What we really need is for the families of crime victims to use that camera stuck in their face or phone call from the TV station to do a Derek Vinyard-type speech from American History X when he is interviewed after his father the firefighter was shot by the blacks whom he rescued on a daily basis. I could only find a version dubbed in Spanish.
The fact that women in England are having these public meltdowns tells you that it’s got to be real bad there. From what I gather it is an unbearable nanny state, with the Queen and the City of London and the white hating, traitorous lib-lab-con parties, and all the bankster funded “anti-racism trusts.”
As for us, the groundswell of support for Ron Paul should provide some hope, as well as an interest in local (hence sovereign) economies:
At a time when we have serious concerns over unemployed and underemployed, about regulation that strangles or stifles business, and taxation and tariff rates that drive prices through the roof, this fascinating little gem grabs you from the start with stories and data about the ‘real’ economy around the world, where currently fifty percent (and moving towards sixty percent) of the billions of working people in the world are doing so in the ‘informal’ economy, below the radar, off the official record, not part of world GDP. Neuwirth cites an estimate that this ‘informal’ economy amounts to about $10 trillion dollars annually, or about one-eighth of the world economy. Why so many people and so little economic impact? Because the margins in this business are razor-thin, where unfettered and, yes, in some cases, illegal, immoral and unscrupulous business better expresses capitalism than does the image of the multi-billion dollar global corporation.
Working his way through South America, China and Africa, Neuwirth meets and understands the people, their motives, and their practices. He is not writing about the darkest side of the economy, i.e., sex, drug and nuclear weapons trade, but rather the basic human element of survival, where entrepreneurs with a real flair for business work deals between Nigeria and China, dealing only in cash, bribing and smuggling, and providing a living for tens of millions of people. One can’t decide if this is the solution to world economic problems, the ‘real’ economic problem itself, or just a grey underground world of questionable practices. Yet as scholars and over the years have noted over the years, the practice of these entrepreneurs are not that morally different from that of the established corporations. While I am not ready to go that far, read it and decide for yourself.
Since the Queen and the City of London use money to control people, both in England and to a lesser extent here, local economies can return some sovereignty to us.
They really aren’t anything but a degenerate “global” aristocracy/oligarchy with some high tech and well funded militaries that they have taken to abusing in wars of conquest.
They want us to be like children; like “chavs” and Idiocracy-type rednecks, and whiggers and gangstas. That’s their ideal NWO slave. That, or if they are “smart” and offiially educated, they are supporters and enforcers of the anti-white nanny state, and drawing a paycheck from it.
But some of us refuse this. Some of us are educated proles, who refuse to toe the Inner Party line. And we notice that some of our fellow proles, who many not be as educated, but are certainly of us, such as Emma West, are ready to rebel.
You can meet millions of implicitly pro-white proles in the world. The question is how do you organize them to do something productive, that will advance our goals? All such things involve more work than they want to do. They weren’t raised right. Maybe things will get bad enough to force them to reform.
What we had was a revolution in bad child raising. I know one of my commenters disagrees with any intergenerational blaming, but I think that the Boomers were victims of a very strong and effective campaign in the post-WWII era, that made them go slack in their concern for the younger generation. They were implicitly if not explicitly influenced by Psy-Ops tomes like The Authoritarian Personality and Freudian psychology which broke down our moral certainties, at least for a while.
Now the moral certainties are being re-assembled, and we are the re-assemblers, not the anti-racists. The anti-white anti-racists are not fanatic; they are drawers of paychecks. We are the fanatics. The new moral certainties are being forged on WN blogs, and by the time we are done, a fanatical religion will have been forged from the hell fires of Multikult.
Cross-posted at Mindweapons in Ragnarok.
{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
We should kill all niggers[Watch it. --- Ferdinand]
Good prose. Surprisingly, i saw no mention of that Nrwegian fellow’s recent appearance in court, where he demanded to be given a military medal for his actions.
The Queen?
Been readin’ too much Lyndon LaRouche and his wacko conspiracy-mongering.
Lyndon Larouche is quite correct, actually. He is not wacko. But the scientific
research of his research group, the so-called Basement Team, is especially important.
Beware of falling into mere reactionary patterns.
The “fairer” sex indeed…
But it’s not surprising. People can only handle so much tension, and nanny-states are damn near defined for the tension they inflict on their citizenry. And what with women being the naturally unstable creatures they are, well… The proof is in the pudding, or youtube videos in this case.
oh, kievsky poops, since you mentioned American History X, I know you are thinking of re-enacting that shower scene-the coinci-dink is just too much to bear… hehe, are you a bear?
anywho’s we should just be like India or wherever where there are womyn only cars and if a dirty man tries to enter, we should throw him on the tracks….
Obviously the women of London need more jews and faggots.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQI_bHd3KBo
What did I tell you about talking to strange men?
oh, but kievsky is sooooooooo seXXXXy….
I thought this was an open relationship…
and that’s David H. Fucktrelle-Male Feminist Extraordinaire™ to you studmuffin…
Okay “Fucktrelle” (aka Stoner with a Boner), you made me laugh at first but you’ve seriously worn out your welcome. I’m deleting your troll comments from here on out; keep it up and I’ll ban you.
When we compare the outbursts by the female passengers versus the outbursts of the “black flash mob” or the deadly-minded black male threatening white genocide, we see the stark difference between the continuing supression of righteous indignation and the rapidly increasing embrace of “radical autonomy.” Whereas the females are reacting to the degeneracy around them with perhaps some far lesser degenerate behavior of their own, the “black flash mob” or the deadly-minded black male SEEM TO BE attempting to test how much and how far they can go with their transgressions. Most blacks understand that they can continue to push the envelope without consequence BECAUSE that is exactly what our “default elite” allow them to do. Both sides have made an informal pact with the other side in order to maximize their respective autonomy at the expense of the everyday white person.
The Queen and the City of London?
Really?
The City of London have no power outside London. The Queen has a load of theoretical power but never uses it, and would be usurped if she tried to. She is a tourist attraction. This woman and the previous tram woman are both clearly off their faces on something, I’d guess alcohol or our cheap shitty drugs.
Our nanny state is a pain in the ass, but they are better at directing help where it is actually needed than to ghettoes and to people with no intention of working.
And no I’m not just trying to stand up for “good old England”, our country has numerous problems. But IMO the author of this article has not highlighted them at all.
The Queen has a load of theoretical power but never uses it, and would be usurped if she tried to
Today, she would be usurped, but tomorrow?
The Monarch is still commander in chief of the armed forces and if there is a break down in public order and government, there might be no one to turn to except the Monarch to rally public support and restore order to the streets.
It interesting to read Moldbug (who writes from a US perspective), but interpreting it from the British point of view. Arguably, the 1688 coup, known as the Glorious Revolution, was a disaster that elevated a fractious and quarreling parliament above the natural constitutional order of the country. It elevated the Whigs and Whiggish thought, which in turn caused the Irish question, the IRA and the disaster that is modern Britain.
BTW, the emotions expressed by the woman in the videos are very, very real and are an ever-present undercurrent, whispered among the population, but ignored and repressed by the MSM.
{ 5 trackbacks }