Liberals Are Made of Government Cheese

by Kievsky on January 3, 2012

in Politics

I’ve been waiting for a reason to use this as a blog post title, and this Alternet article gave me a priceless quote illustrating exactly this truism.

Newsweek had another cover, “Thinking Man’s Guide to Populism,” and I remember this feeling around the country, that people were just furious. Somehow the right captured the sense of anger. They completely captured it. You could say they had no right to it, but they did. And one of the reasons they were able to do it was because the liberals were not interested in that anger.

I’m speaking here of the liberal culture in Washington, D.C. There was no Occupy Wall Street movement [at that time] and there was only people like me on the fringes talking about it. The liberals had their leader in Barack Obama … they had their various people in Congress. But these people are completely unfamiliar with populist anger. It’s an alien thing to them. They don’t trust it, and they have trouble speaking to it. I like Barack Obama, but at the end of the day he’s a very professorial kind of guy. The liberals totally missed the opportunity, and the right was able to grab it.

Looking back on it, I feel like people like myself were part of the problem. We sort of assumed with the Democrats in power, the system would correct itself.

One of the problems with liberalism in this country is that it’s headquartered in Washington and its leaders are a very comfortable class of people. Washington is one of the richest cities in the country, maybe the richest. It’s not a place that feels the crisis, that feels the economic downturn. By and large, the real estate market stayed OK. The city continued to boom. The contracts continued to flow. What we’re talking about here is the failure of modern liberalism. At one time it was a movement of working-class people. The idea that liberals wouldn’t feel economic pain was ridiculous. That’s who liberals were. No more.

In other words, liberals are made out of government Cheez Whiz, lots of it liberally slathered over them. These are the people who handed over convenience stores to Indians and Pakistanis, the cab driving to Africans and Middle Easterners, the graduate schools to the Chinese, and the racial destinies of many proud white family lines to non-white DNA. Anybody but Whites. They want to diminish us and elect a new people while feathering their filthy rat nests.

And now it’s their end game. This is the year that the Ponzi fails.

Advertisement

Another juicy quote:

So [the right] is constantly talking about this infernal elite that controls government, controls corporations, and controls the academy, and that we have to wrench ourselves free.

So maybe it is true that the Obama technocracy is the infernal elite. Maybe not in the hellish way it is portrayed on the right, but in the sense that these are the defenders of bailouts, the defenders of the system

Exactly. The civil rights lawyers, affirmative action officers, Marxist tenured professors, they are the infernal elite of dogmatically anti-white moralizing busybodies who often employ cheap illegal labor even though they are financially comfortable. And they are terrible tippers.

These parasitic busybody niches will dry up, and then there will be no more multicult enforcers. When these scum have to work for a living, we Whites will be FREE!

Cross-posted at Mindweapons in Ragnarok.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Johnny Milfquest January 3, 2012 at 1:40 pm

Its true that the elite – both LIEberal and CONservative – don’t give a flying fuck about the voters.

Its also true that people in the pay of government tend not to oppose it at all. Or at least, not consistently.

But isn’t race just another bullshit divide-and-conquer tactic used by the elite?

As if the average black American or Brit has things sooooo much better than the average white American or Brit.

How’s Obama working out for most blacks?

2 Explore Nature January 3, 2012 at 9:26 pm

Liberalism is not a philosophy, It is for all of those who have no policies for their lives. They do not like to live with responsibilities. They want more rights and they want to give up social responsibilities. Liberal democracy is for satisfy all of them. That is why governments which are following liberal democracy like to protect people who are selfish and living without responsibilities.

http://spiritofnature99.blogspot.com/

3 Eugenick January 4, 2012 at 6:19 am

“How’s Obama working out for most blacks?”

Irrelevant question. The Blacks in South Africa are so stupid that they keep voting for their own, corrupt politicians. They aren’t smart enough to vote for the most competent person, so they will vote one from their tribe. Unfortunately, their tribe doesn’t have as many smart and competent people.

4 Dave January 5, 2012 at 12:33 am

Whenever I hear of the latest idiocy out of Washington, I picture the city on a cold winter evening in the near future. Lawyers, lobbyists, and bureaucrats, our former masters, now huddle around trash baskets, roasting rats and pigeons over burning piles of hundred-dollar bills. Bon apetit!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: