New York Times Wants Pro-White Volunteers “Chased Out” of Ron Paul Campaign

by Kievsky on December 29, 2011

in Politics

Here’s a New York Times editorial entitled “Mr. Paul’s Discredited Campaign.”

So I guess they are unambiguous — putting it right in the title. That’s how you know they are freaking out bad. Here’s the money quote:

Mr. Paul, saying he still hopes to “convert” these supporters to his views, has refused to disavow them or to chase them out of his campaign. If he does not do so, he will leave a lasting stain on his candidacy, on the libertarian movement and, very possibly, on the Iowa caucuses.

So the New York Times calls for a group of American citizens to be “chased out” of something. Oh, the great tolerant liberals of the New York Times wants a group of people “chased out,” perhaps even forcefully. What do they want us chased with? German shepherd dogs? Firehoses? Drone mounted missiles?

Advertisement

Cross-posted at Mindweapons in Ragnarok.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Lovekraft December 29, 2011 at 1:41 pm

A worthless rag, the New York TImes, trying to remain relevant in the face of inevitable irrelevancy.

2 Natassia December 29, 2011 at 2:48 pm

I suppose the Obama campaign will chase out their pro-black supporters like the NBPP and the pro-brown supporters of La Raza.

Oh wait…

3 CH December 29, 2011 at 2:51 pm

the stuck pig will always lash out most violently when it is cornered.
what you are seeing is the face of fear.
keep going for their throat.

4 Kievsky December 29, 2011 at 4:44 pm

Yes, putting “discredited” in the title really smacked of desperation. And what I forgot to mention — the comments skew way to the side of the Ron Paul camp.

5 Ouroboros December 29, 2011 at 4:45 pm

It is funny because Paul didn’t say anything untrue.

6 Michael Maier December 29, 2011 at 5:24 pm

Natassia whacked it right out of the idiot liberal park.

7 Laguna Beach Fogey December 29, 2011 at 11:47 pm

Anyone interested in organising an Occupy (and Burn) the Offices of the New York Times (OBONYT) movement?

8 Ryu December 30, 2011 at 6:58 am

Admiral Cod,

Leave that for the OWS crowd. The NYT already becoming obsolete. In 10 years they won’t matter.

9 Kievsky December 30, 2011 at 7:23 am

@LB Fogey,

Violence makes martyrs of them. Going bankrupt and out of business makes jokes out of them. I would much prefer to see the latter.

Imagine of MLK had not been martyred, but went on to organize blacks into an explicitly Communist bloc,taking the side of the cold war enemy. THis might have turned out very well for American Whites. It would have been a damned good reason to seprate into differnet countries. We all agreed back then that Communism was a threat.

It’s great to see the bloodsucker tax farmer Left implode!

The Left is made of government cheese, literally. It shall wither away as the governmnet goes bankrupt.

10 Attila December 30, 2011 at 10:52 pm

Ron Paul’s positions must be making a few cliques very nervous — classic hatchet job.

11 Kievsky December 31, 2011 at 8:15 am

Yes, what’s become of the Old Gray Lady? At this advanced age of senescence, half a century past menopause, she is hysterial like a teenaged girl over:

1. Ron Paul

2. Iran

12 Stephen December 31, 2011 at 2:07 pm

I think it was Alex Linder who said that the correct name of this newspaper should be The Daily Duranty (after Walter Duranty). I can’t agree more!

13 Columnist January 1, 2012 at 12:54 pm

Ron Paul will be called a racist anyway.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: