Race a Social Construct? Pretty Women Weigh in on YouTube

I’m certainly a WN and I appreciate that some women are with it. It’s not that I mind women speaking on demanding topics. This is where I diverge with Delusional Damage. I would rather hear the best speak.

For me and many others, that means William Pierce.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_ryTWJVfwM

Yes, HS, we have all met close minded masses. That’s the test: start talking about race. If someone can’t talk about race, they are not a rebel of any kind. With this in mind, we can see how conventional the PUA really is and how the true rebel, the most forbidden and demanding thing of all is WN. Maybe we should distribute a new meme: Race – the real red pill.

This is a pretty interesting topic. I always love the social constructivism talk… it’s fun. And funny, how groups of humans get together and decide things for everyone without really thinking about the future repercussions. :]
As far as this goes. I believe that Ethnicity is socially constructed. We can look at the definitions below (taken from Dictionary.com). Ethnicity is a set of things that only come about by way of being socialized in a certain group of “types” of humans. It’s probably why certain food is called “ethnic”. Because we don’t come out of the womb just hankering for pigs feet or feta cheese. It’s what we’re grown to be accustomed to.

Race on the other hand, would be how we’re born. The physical traits. Strengths, Immunities, Weaknesses, Intollerations. Things that are hereditary, and cannot be changed by any level of being socialized…that is, unless the socializing includes a mixture of genes, in which case, it’d be change over generations.

eth·nic   [eth-nik]
adjective
1. pertaining to or characteristic of a people, especially a group (ethnic group) sharing a common and distinctive culture, religion, language, or the like.
2. referring to the origin, classification, characteristics, etc., of such groups.
3. being a member of an ethnic group, especially of a group that is a minority within a larger society: ethnic Chinese in San Francisco.
4. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of members of such a group.
5. belonging to or deriving from the cultural, racial, religious, or linguistic traditions of a people or country: ethnic dances

race2    [reys]
noun
1. a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.
2. a population so related.
3. Anthropology .
a. any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being the caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro, characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics: no longer in technical use.
b. an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, especially formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.
c. a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.
4. a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock: the Slavic race.
5. any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.: the Dutch race.

You guys wake me up when you get to the part where you justify mistreating people on the basis of color.

You spoiled ward of the generous white man… Do you know what Arabs did with new African slaves? they’d get the biggest buck negro out in front of all the ithers, and for hours they’d torture him until he died. The rest saw this and stayed in line.

You know what the Chinaman did with his African slaves? castrated every male.

You’re like a little kid who just poked at Daddy to find the limits, aren’t ya? be careful. These anomalous times can’t last. They never do, though their end always comes as a surprise. Normalcy always returns.

You all could have taken these last 200 years to eugenicize yourselves in generous America. You did the exact opposite. Too bad.

All that being said, we should -not- mistreat other human beings based on strengths and weaknesses we all have in spades, but in different arenas.

And as far as being socialized go. Though race is not a social phenomenon, due to race, certain people are socialized in certain manners. See: the aftermath of the slave era. Many black people have not recovered from it. It’s a matter of being socialized and used to poverty and ignorance. It isn’t right, but it is what it is. One doctor (a black woman, no less) refers to it as “Post Traumatic Slave Disorder” (or syndrome).

I was on the bus one day when I lived in Baltimore city and I overheard some girls who lived on the skid mark of a nook of the city where I used to live saying how they “LOVED” living in the ghetto. It made me think…who in their right mind would? You constantly fear for you, your own safety and your belongings, the surroundings are dreary, at best. Why would you like that?

But you see, the same way people can be conditioned to not only accept but love that, so can people grow to tolerate and herald other surroundings as “best” or “better”. And others might wonder why? Though, in rare cases, when we’re at least a bit free (have taken the true red pill and understand the “Forms”, and escaped the allegorical modern social cave Plato spoke of {the true source of the “Matrix” sci-fi mythos}) we know what we actually like.

I think “boring” places that are full of farms and have those weird barn-like bridges over rivers are pretty awesome. But I’d like to be just far enough from the city so I could see the lights at night (and also get there fast enough for events). That’s beautiful.

@PA

Black people who internalize Jewish Supremacism will never believe whites. Black people who internalize Muslim Supremacism will never believe whites.
Black people who internalize Chinese Supremacism will never believe whites.

The problem with WN proper is easy to see.
As long as white men don’t have power, white women don’t want to breed with them.
As soon as white men do get power, non-white women do want to breed with them.

You all sound like a bunch of confused nerd losers.

Columnist—

WN overlooks the hard fact that some other races are more intelligent than whites; it also severely limits the sexual-reproductive options of the demographic it pretends to help; white males.

I’m not a WN but a race realist=HBDer.

Race realists do not. NE Asian (Japanese, Koreans and Chinese) test a little higher, 105 vs 100 IQ for Euro ancestry people=whites. However that’s all on the math and visiospatial side, they’re a little worse on the verbal reasoning and logic side. They also seem to be less creative and inventive. See this long comment about how white men created the modern world, soup to nuts:

http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2011/12/accomplishments-of-white-society-and.html

Whites skew into upper and lower classes, it’s the difference between the whites who go to wine tastings and ones who watch NASCAR. The gap between them is quite large.

A white person has straightish hair and usually a shade lighter than black. Has a thin nose and lips, and eyes a color other than black. His genetic ancestry is 100% European. His skin tone is light beige. Or, as RobertB once aptly said, a white man is a reflection of God. Howzzzis?

Race is a social construction, but social constructions must be consistent with the nature finally. How ever social constructions like feminism will not be existed in future. They will refuse by the nature. Races which are not following ideologies like feminism, liberalism, post modernism…..etc will be existed for a long time.

http://spiritofnature99.blogspot.com/

Ryu, Thwack is a goofball so my response to him was a fun version of white being “you know it when you see it.”

Ryu December 16, 2011 at 10:21 pm
No good PA. That’s a deflection tactic, I’ve encountered it many times.
*snip*
WN is for whites. The only people you need to convince is white men and women who are open to it.

************************ Use your own definition of white.**********************************
______________________________________________________________________

Boom! there it is;

USE YOUR OWN DEFINITION OF WHITE.

In other words, just DECIDE for yourself.

This is why racism=white supremacy; its just the collective result of individual people who classify themselves as white deciding for themselves who is and who is not white in a way which benefits them.

Its both a conspiracy and a fraud at the same time because as RYU points out, its a “homemade”, “makeshift” improvised system of exclusivity with no clear or firm definition other than the one a racist gives it at the time they give it.

Race is not a morphology, its a BEHAVIOR.

PA and RYU have never met, but they agree they are both white and agree that Im not based entirely on BEHAVIOR, saying and doing.

Think about this non existent phenomenon: you never see two white people arguing about whether each one of THEM is a white person:

Im white

no you’re not

yes I am

no you’re not

You don’t see that.

What you see is two people who already agree they are both white arguing over whether a 3rd person is white.

Columnist December 17, 2011 at 8:10 am
@thwack

Right on track. But other groups have the same tricks. Think of Jews.
—————————————————————————————————-

Yes, thats its.

The Jews are the best example of a group of people taking the dynamics and mechanics of white supremacy and using them to build another layer of exclusivity within the system of white supremacy.

Other than white people, they are the only group willing to consistently retard their behaviors in other areas in order to PRACTICE THEIR RACE.

This is what confuses nonwhite people about white people. White people will deny themselves benefits in other areas in order to practice their race. It confuses nonwhite people because we don’t have a race to practice.
For example:
White people will often choose race over making more money,

over having more sex…

In other words, they will give up some material benefit/advantage in order to practice their race.

Nonwhite people don’t do that.

If white people wanna hire me for a million to criticize black people as lazy, shiftless, don’t wanna work…

Well,

I love my peeps and all that…

But you get the picture.

This is why the final “battle” will, as predicted, come down to “Aryan VS Jew”.

You can’t have 2 systems of supremacy in the same universe at the same time.

Nonwhite people should not dismiss the comments of a racist white supremacist just because the person is one. Racists often make true statements.

Focus on what is said, instead of who is saying it.

@Kievsky

That is why I asked thwack whether Herman Cain should get affirmative action. Under the one drop rule, most North Africans, and many South Europeans could apply as black.

I think you’re square Brett. No doubt when you express some of your more radical ideas you are categorized as a racist yourself.

I agree with your points but my simple focus is race whereas yours appears to be conservatism. We will slaughter the beast of equality; then after the white race is in a better condition, you may do as you like with the carcass and the rest of the farm.

I am part North African. North Africans are part West African. I have dark hair, and piercing dark eyes.

Twack–

Im sure if you shake your family tree hard enough a nigger will fall out?

That is not true for most whites. It is true for a small percentage. It’s more often the case than if a white person shakes his family tree hard enough an Amerindian (woman) will fall out.

Columnist–

North Africans average about 1/3 black ssAfrican and about 2/3 Caucasian, according to geneticist Luigi Cavalli-Sforza of Stanford. Of course it’s a bit lumpy, with those further up the social scale have more Caucasian blood in them, generally speaking.

37 Ferdinand Bardamu December 17, 2011 at 5:41 pm
To all:

Thwack’s comments on Kievsky’s post last week showed him to be a troll. I keep him around because he’s amusing, but don’t take him too seriously.
______________________________________________________________________

Mr. Bardamu,

You have a pretty good website ONLY because it is open to all the smart but politically incorrect presenters such a Kievsky…
Why do you not allow me the same consideration?

Is it because I admit Im a nonwhite person?

Are you a white person?

Are you a white supremacist?

Why don’t you challenge my logic instead of dismissing me as a troll?

Is it because my LOGIC is flawless?

Maybe YOU need to Step up to the plate and show them how to do it?

Your website is all about revealing truth right?

Or is “driving traffic” your goal?

You only weaken white people like Kievsky when you prevent them from challenging me.

Is that your purpose?

Wayne Newton said…
“You all sound like a bunch of confused nerd losers.”

I remember Wayne Newton. Very castrato vocalist from the sixties. Maybe they grew back.

Kievsky December 17, 2011 at 7:38 pm
Thwack wrote:

But your luck is gonna run out if I have anything to do with it.

*be advised*

Bring it on, my colored cousin!
————————————————————————————————–

OK, but you need to pick a “safe word” so I know when you are about to pass out from lack of oxygen.

It would be ironic if I accidentally killed the only white man who knew how to get around the Monsanto super white man, no nigger you don’t get no seeds…” genetically modified, Frankenstein seeds…

I might hafta get in tough with my inner Congo child and eat a turtle shell samich.

MMMMMMMMM…good!

I like my crackers salty.

The blonde chick has a point about nutrition and environmental factors, can’t deny that.

Columnist December 16, 2011 at 4:34 pm

thwack is somewhat right. Regurgitating factoids isn’t helping a lot. By the way, intelligence lies on the X-chromosome, so it isn’t surprising men try to seduce women of races more intelligent than their own

That’s news to me and to every scientist on earth. Where’d you read that? In some comic book or feminist magazine?

And let’s put to rest this nonsense that Asians are smarter than Caucasians. Even the term Asian is stupid because western Asia is Caucasian and there are even many people in the subcontinent of India who would be classified as Caucasian. By Asian you likely mean the Far East where 80% of the people are poor peasants and I doubt very much they ever bothered to even test their IQ. The other 20% that they test are the top people and if you just tested the top 20% of Europeans you’d get an IQ of perhaps 120. And btw, southeat Asia scores in the 85-90 range.
Average IQ’s are misleading anyway. If NYC had an average IQ of 100 where the typical non Caucasian schoolkid has an IQ of 85 you can be sure that the other people have IQ’s of 120+ because you wuld need that to even survive and prosper in an environment where your competitors are equally smart. The low IQ types never do anything in life anyway and are superfluous. The only reason they can even survive in a city is because they are subsidised by the high IQ types taxes. Either in full or partially to suplement the income from their menial jobs which is probably the only reason they bother to keep them around.