Bardamu’s Bookbag: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Journey to the End of the Night and OVO 20: Juven(a/i)lia

by Ferdinand Bardamu on November 16, 2011

in Books

Like I promised last week, here are more book reviews.

Remember folks, all of my reviews are archived here. Also remember that if you buy any books through the links in my reviews, I get a commission at no cost to you. In the case of Amazon links, I get a commission even if you buy something other then what I linked to.

On with the show!

***

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream by Hunter S. Thompson

Hopefully, I don’t have to explain why this is a great book, possibly the greatest book in the American canon. It’s funny, honest, riveting and it popularized an entire genre of journalism that everyone tries to emulate. The Doctor is so good, in fact, that he’s the closest I’ve come to a foolproof Idiot Test. This is how it works – anyone who hates Hunter Thompson or is otherwise unable to concede that he was a great writer is usually a moron with nothing worthwhile to say. Over the years, I’ve noticed that people who hate Thompson fall into two categories; prigs who are offended by his “immoral” drug use and un-PC sensibilities (this includes both religious conservatives and prissy SWPL liberals), and middle-aged mediocrities with delusions of grandeur. The latter group typically dismiss the Doctor with faux nonchalance (“Oooh, I’m supposed to be impressed that he snorted coke and nearly got killed driving a convertible into Lake Mead?”) despite the fact that they’ve spent the past decade slaving away in a cubicle, their wives are obese, pill-popping headcases, and the highlight of their lives is fapping to porn on the family computer late at night after the kids are asleep. Swine, the lot of ‘em.

If you’re going to adopt the Hunter Thompson Idiot Test, don’t forget the Tom Wolfe Corollary; anyone who prefers Wolfe to Thompson for any reason whatsoever is as much a moron as the ones who despise him outright. Wolfe is a ripoff artist who did to gonzo journalism what R.E.M. did to indie rock – sanitized it for the benefit of bourgeois cowards who want to appear rebellious without upsetting Mommy and Daddy. It’s fitting that he’s ending his life writing trite Victorian morality smut like I Am Charlotte Simmons. I dream of living in an America where copies of The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test and The Right Stuff are torched in bonfires from coast to coast.

Click here to buy Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream.

***

Journey to the End of the Night by Louis-Ferdinand Céline

Four years of college taught me that not only does the ivory tower have no idea what makes good literature, they couldn’t care less – they’ll erase truly talented writers from the history books if they wander off the plantation. Case in point: the 20th century’s most reviled and imitated novelist, Louis-Ferdinand Céline. Ask an English professor about Céline and half of them will have no idea who you’re talking about, and the other half will react like you just snapped off a Hitler salute. I still remember how my junior year Early American Lit professor reacted when I told her I was reading Rigadoon - ”Wasn’t Céline a Nazi?”

I may be biased on this front, but Céline is arguably the finest Western novelist of the past hundred years. With the publication of this, his debut novel, in 1931, Leon Trotsky wrote that Céline ”had walked into the pantheon of great literature like a man walks into his living room.” But with the rise of Nazi Germany, Céline made the fatal error of becoming a fascist, and like magic, he was suddenly a non-person in the world of books. Of course, he wasn’t alone in joining the losing team – Ezra Pound gave anti-Semitic propaganda speeches on Italian radio and was arrested for treason when the war ended. But Pound is still taught in the universities while Céline is a leper.

Advertisement

Don’t give me the argument that it’s because of Pound’s influence on literature, because Céline was just as influential if not more. Numerous writers up to the present day have mimicked or outright ripped off the bad doctor, from the good (Bukowski, Miller, Burroughs, Houellebecq) to the awful (Kesey, Heller, Vonnegut). It’s not hard to see why when you pick up Journey to the End of the Night. Like Mark Twain, the first great American novelist, Céline is less of a formal writer than a storyteller - he pulls you into his world as assuredly as your best friend bragging about the crazy adventures he had last night. His prose explodes with energy and life, never shying away from the dirty details, holding you captive in its grotesque grip. So the quality of Céline’s writing has nothing to do with his being blacklisted from the curriculum.

Nope, the reason why Pound is still loved and Céline is hated is because the latter was honest. Like all popular hacks, Pound was a better entrepreneur than a writer, a charmer who knew how to say all the right things at all the right times. Like the trendy lefties who lined up to root for the Republicans in the Spanish Civil War while they were disemboweling Catholic priests, Pound converted to fascism because he thought they were the winning side, then staged a public repentance to avoid having to face a firing squad. Céline, the poor sincere bastard, never surrendered to the jeering hordes. An open supporter of the Vichy regime and author of anti-Semitic pamphlets, Céline wore his convictions on his sleeve even when public opinion shifted against them. He went to the grave without apologizing for or recanting anything he’d ever written.

But more than that, Céline is persona non grata in the literary world because he alone confronted the nihilism and emptiness of the post-WWI West. Oh sure, Fitzgerald and Hemingway wrote about the aimlessness of the Lost Generation, but they were strictly amateur hour, bedtime stories for the kids. Céline was dead serious. His books were glorified accounts of his own life, with the boring bits taken out and new details added in. In Journey to the End of the Night, he grabs you by the back of the neck, shoves your face in it and doesn’t let go.

Journey begins with Céline’s protagonist, Ferdinand Bardamu, shooting the breeze with his buddy in 1910′s Paris. Bardamu joins in a passing military parade to mock his patriotic countrymen, and ends up being drafted into the war. Deserting the front lines, he flees into the jungles of French colonial Africa to escape punishment. Bardamu’s bizarre odyssey takes him all the way to New York City, Detroit to work for Ford and fall in love with a prostitute, and finally back to France where he establishes a medical practice caring for poor Parisians who are always looking for ways to cheat him. Along the way, he is continuously dogged by Robinson, an off-and-on-again friend whose own escapades never end happily.

By Célinean standards, Journey is mild stuff, a gateway drug for his later nihilism. As is the nature of geniuses, however, even his less-exemplary works are miles ahead of everyone else. The translation by Ralph Manheim does a fantastic job of preserving the unpretentiousness and humor of the original French, as shown by the excerpt where Bardamu runs into a communal toilet in New York:

Men among men, all free and easy, they laughed and joked and cheered one another on, it made me think of a football game. The first thing you did when you got there was take off your jacket, as if in preparation for strenuous exercise. This was a rite and shirtsleeves were the uniform.

In that state of undress, belching and worse, gesticulating like lunatics, they settled down in the fecal grotto. The new arrivals were assailed with a thousand revolting jokes while descending the stairs from the street, but they all seemed delighted.

The morose aloofness of the men on the street above was equaled only by the air of liberation and rejoicing that came over them at the prospect of emptying their bowels in tumultuous company.

The splotched and spotted doors to the cabins hung loose, wrenched from their hinges. Some customers went from one cell to another for a little chat, those waiting for an empty seat smoked heavy cigars and slapped the backs of the obstinately toiling occupants, who sat there straining with their heads between their hands. Some groaned like wounded men or women in labor. The constipated were threatened with ingenious tortures.

Of course, a true artist like Ezra Pound would never have written about something as plebeian and low-class as the sight of Americans straining to shit in a public restroom. But that was the reality of post-WWI West – it was Shit World, everywhere, and Céline chronicled it like no writer before or after. In a way, I’m thankful that “respectable” people don’t dare touch Céline – it makes it easier for me to separate the wheat from the chaff. It’s the reverse of the Hunter Thompson Idiot Test – anyone who likes Céline is usually intelligent and worth paying attention to, even if I disagree with them.

One thing that annoys me about this edition of Journey is the glossary. Céline’s writing was steeped in the vernacular of interwar France, and he frequently employed wordplay that doesn’t accurately translate into English. For example, in an early part of the book where Bardamu is recovering in an army hospital, he shares a room with a Sergeant Branledore, whose name is derived from branler, the French verb “to masturbate.” Instead of using footnotes, this edition forces you to flip to the back of the book whenever you come across an asterisked term. But this is a minor ding and won’t stop you from enjoying yourself.

Click here to buy Journey to the End of the Night.

***

OVO 20: Juven(a/i)lia by Trevor Blake

This is a best-of collection of articles and artwork from OVO, a zine founded and edited by friend of the blog Trevor Blake, “a public record of [his] interests and inquiries.” It’s interesting, it’s weird, and I don’t entirely know what to make of it. I guess it’s because I’m too young to appreciate it – I was barely out of diapers when Trevor was printing up the early editions of OVO on his pal’s company’s copiers in the eighties. To someone of the Internet Era, where narcissistic self-expression is just a couple of mouse clicks away, the effort and dedication involved in compiling an entire magazine, from writing and gathering the material to binding the physical copies and mailing them out, is difficult to relate to.

Still, this is a great little collection of oddities, ranging from poetry to short stories to investigative journalism on offbeat subjects. They include “Holding Games for Ransom,” about how one tabletop game creator found a way to keep online piracy from cutting into his profits; “A Pit Stop Along the Inward Journey,” a stream-of-consciousness tale beginning with white guilt and ending with madness; and “23 Sperm Stories 23,” the longest article in the book, on just about every aspect of sperm, from its discovery, its function, and its future. Of particular interest to us in the manosphere are “Warbucks Intra-Family Communique” and “Becoming More Free” by Ernest Mann. The former is a satirical article on the emptiness and mindlessness of American consumerism; the latter is on how Mann unplugged himself from the Matrix of American culture:

I am wasting less of my time (LIFE) watching, listening to and reading THOUGHT LEADERS, ie, TV, movies, radio, music, newspapers, magazines and novels. These are like spectator sports. They cause me to live life vicariously, ie, second-hand, not real, only in fantasy. These mind conditioners are subtly designed to create not only fear and anger emotions but also create feelings of guilt and inadequacy. These feeling stifle growth and keep one securely in one’s rut. And of course the more visible purpose of the media is to create the desire to acquire (BUY! BUY! BUY!) and keep up with the Joneses. ‘Buying’ uses up my savings. I spent 22 years of my TIME (life) working as a Wage Slave. I helped perpetuate the status quo, ie a world of 98.6% Slaves and less than 1% Elite (Billionaires). I don’t wish to do that any more.

But the real prize is Trevor’s own writings, comprising the second half of the book. They include book reviews (including an exhaustive review of one of my favorites, L.A. Rollins’ Myth of Natural Rights), interviews with such diverse individuals as a bulimia sufferer and an expert on out-of-body experiences/bilocation, and my favorite, “Trajectory Through Anarchism,” in which Trevor tracks the evolution of his political beliefs:

1996: Feeling free of anarchism and a little burned by what I now see was my own hooded thinking, I call up the imp of the perverse to see what other forbidden ideas might be out there. Ayn Rand is suggested, and I read her works. Having already shed one hood I’m less inclined to put another one on, and I do not become an Objectivist.  But moving through Objectivism brings libertarian thinking to my attention. It’s something about the sovereignty of the individual… but I’ve walked down that path already and don’t sign on as a libertarian either.

Like The eXile, OVO 20 comes in a 8 1/2 by 11 inch size, to fit artwork and cartoons on the pages – I was particularly amused by “Attack of the Giant Killer Sperm.” One minor issue I have with the design is that all paragraphs in OVO 20 are punctuated with bullet points. I suppose they’re there to make the book look distinctive, but I found them mildly distracting, fooling my eyes into thinking I was reading a series of lists instead of articles.

Still, if you want to take an excursion into the bizarre and come back a little more enlightened, OV0 20 is a fun and informative read. If you’re still not convinced, Trevor maintains a free online archive of all OVO articles here. He also has some words of wisdom for aspiring writers and publishers:

…First and most important, get busy. Your time is already diminished by work and mortality, and neither of those situations is going to improve. Keep a printed copy of what you make and write down the date of when you made it. Large bodies of work and the pleasure they bring are made a few small pieces at a time. Learn about the history of what interests you. Novelty is rare and not always of value for being novel. Your friends are not being documented right now and you are the one who can do a good job with that. Read with regularity outside your area of interests. Nothing will point out your own ignorance and error better than attentiveness to those who disagree with you, nothing makes what you know make sense like learning something unrelated to what you know. Take as many chances as you are willing to take the lumps for.

But most of all, get busy.

Click here, then type “ovo 20″ (without quotes) in the search bar to buy OVO 20: Juven(a/i)lia.

{ 30 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Trevor blake November 16, 2011 at 8:16 am

Many thanks for this, the first review of OVO 20 JUVEN(a/i)LIA.

2 Jack Donovan November 16, 2011 at 8:27 am

What an awesome surprise to see you review Trevor’s work. Mr. Blake is the man I go to for advice about smarty-pants-book-talk-stuff and my cigar smoking buddy. He was stirring up trouble with zines when we was just whipper snappers.

3 Cicero November 16, 2011 at 11:29 am

What happened to Celine is similar to Martin Heidegger in philosophy. However, despite his unapologetic support of the Nazi regime, Heidegger’s infamy still holds a fascination in certain quarters of academia today. Case in point: my college is offering a Major Philosophers course dedicated to him next semester. I can be assured that much talk will arise about how evil this NAZI philosopher was.

4 Benjamin November 16, 2011 at 11:52 am

FYI, I read “Death on the Installment Plan” by Celine in a university Comparative Literature class – the better of his books, in my opinion. And though he’s a great writer, he is an asshole. Writing in 1939 to a former lover (Jewish, he didn’t mind fucking Jews), whose husband was sent to Dachau: “Because of my anti-Semitic stance I’ve lost all my jobs (Clichy, etc.) and I’m going to court on March 8. You see, Jews can persecute too.” (See http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/jan/14/uncovering-celine/?pagination=false ) More proof that anti-Semites, even the talented ones, are solipsistic whiners who are the true perennial victims-in-their-own-minds.

5 Spike Gomes November 16, 2011 at 3:25 pm

Ferd:

You gotta admit that after “The Curse of Lono” Thompson’s mojo had more or less left him, sans a few sparks of light every now and then before he finally realized he had outlived himself.

Also, while Wolfe is a pretentious rosewater-scented git in a worsted suit, you gotta admit that “Bonfire of the Vanities” was way ahead of it’s time.

Also, Bukowski better than Vonnegut? Granted Vonnegut wrote shit after the 60s, but Bukowski? Seriously? Read “Moscow to the End of the Line” to see how dead-end alcoholism should be written.

Also, for all the shit Pound gets, he at least held off poetry from becoming a literary dutch-oven for a decade or so before succumbing bipolar induced brain rot.

6 G.L. Piggy November 16, 2011 at 3:49 pm

“Fear and Loathing”, both Las Vegas and Campaign Trail ’72 are great books. But you sell Wolfe short. I don’t think he “ripped off” gonzo journalism – as in, I don’t think he tried to convince anyone that he was gonzo in the same way that Thompson was gonzo. Wolfe was an embedded reporter; Thompson was a *deeply* embedded reporter. So embedded that the skin of his host grew around him. They had two different styles that are a joy to read.

7 AA November 16, 2011 at 4:38 pm

Good reviews Ferd. After reading alot of your material, I’m pretty sure you also could write a good novel.

And how did you learn how to write the way you do? Any tips?

8 Ferdinand Bardamu November 16, 2011 at 8:00 pm

Spike:

You gotta admit that after “The Curse of Lono” Thompson’s mojo had more or less left him, sans a few sparks of light every now and then before he finally realized he had outlived himself.

Yeah, Thompson was pretty much burned out by the mid-80′s, but he still wrote really well for a hell of a long time.

Also, while Wolfe is a pretentious rosewater-scented git in a worsted suit, you gotta admit that “Bonfire of the Vanities” was way ahead of it’s time.

Damn, I almost forgot about that bathetic shitheap. “Ahead of its time”? Really? “Bonfire” is another example of trite Victorian morality smut, the Calvinist Addiction Novel, in which money/drugs/sex are always bad, sin always leads to the worst fate imaginable, and God/AA/sobriety/Oprah is the only salvation. Grimm’s Fairy Tales for the yuppie set. Just because he riffed on current events doesn’t make recycling ancient Christian tropes edgy or innovative.

Also, Bukowski better than Vonnegut? Granted Vonnegut wrote shit after the 60s, but Bukowski? Seriously? Read “Moscow to the End of the Line” to see how dead-end alcoholism should be written.

Maybe I over-criticized Vonnegut, but the mainstream literary world gives him entirely too much praise. Post Office and Women had me laughing my ass off. Haven’t read Moscow to the End of the Line, putting it on the list.

Also, for all the shit Pound gets, he at least held off poetry from becoming a literary dutch-oven for a decade or so before succumbing bipolar induced brain rot.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL…wait, what?

Dude, Pound STARTED that trend. Him and his buddy Eliot ruined poetry forever. The further poetry gets from music (poetry basically is music, or at least it used to be), the worse it gets, and the Modernists completely divorced the two with the shit they pulled. I challenge anyone to read the Waste Land or the Cantos without contemplating suicide.

GLP:

I don’t think he “ripped off” gonzo journalism – as in, I don’t think he tried to convince anyone that he was gonzo in the same way that Thompson was gonzo.

No, he only wears that stupid white suit because he took the ZZ Top song “Well Dressed Man” to heart. C’mon dude, Wolfe’s entire career was about passing off age-old morality plays off as avant-garde literature. Why do you think mainstream CONservatives love him? He’s not alone in this – phony memoirists like James Frey do the same – but Wolfe is the guy who’s done it the longest. The only way to write gonzo is to live gonzo, and Wolfe was always too much of a coward, too fearful of pissing off the Manhattan crowd to take the plunge.

AA:

And how did you learn how to write the way you do? Any tips?

Write a lot. Read a lot. Drink a lot. Have a childhood full of regrets and sexual frustration. Take up playing guitar or bass. Be an introvert. Hang out with self-destructive degenerates. Go to college. Find a writing mentor who knows what he’s doing. Join a rock band. Be constantly dissatisfied with your life, knowing that 99% of the people around you are barely two steps up from being vegetables.

9 Cicero November 16, 2011 at 9:29 pm

“Just because he riffed on current events doesn’t make recycling ancient Christian tropes edgy or innovative.”

that, and you don’t like T.S. Eliot, Ferd. I suppose you have it in for Dostoevesky as well.

10 G.L. Piggy November 16, 2011 at 9:58 pm

Ferd,

Wolfe published ‘Electric Kool Aid’ in ’68. Thompson published ‘Fear and Loathing’ in 1970 and first used the term “gonzo journalism” then. Wolfe wasn’t actually even Gonzo; he wasn’t trying to be Gonzo. I should have cleared that up from the jump. He was of the New Journalism school of which I’d say that gonzo is a peculiar brand. Wolfe was a reporter who embedded himself in social and cultural movements.

So, yeah, Thompson was more of a hardcore New Journalist than Wolfe and other writers like Gay Talese and Norman Mailer, but that doesn’t discredit Wolfe and those other guys.

Wolfe is a good writer and probably a better writer than Thompson. But Thompson is dynamic and hilarious. These are two different types of genius.

And if you are going to argue that Wolfe kowtowed to conservatives, well I think you’d be making a very interesting argument in that most journalism and most publications were very liberal. So if Wolfe was conservative then he was bucking the prevailing ideology of the people in his literary circles.

11 Spike Gomes November 16, 2011 at 10:24 pm

Ferd:

Guess I’m just of a different bent than you in regards to Wolfe. Trust me, while you don’t need to dive into a baptismal font (God knows I still hew to denying his existence), if you completely give yourself over to the Dionysian without making any space for the Apollonian (please forgive this old saw, but I’ve yet to see anyone reword it better for our times), you may burn out before you even have a chance to truly formulate your ideas (though of course, if it’s all for shits and giggles, you may disregard that one), or worse, end up like Huysmans.

As for your argument that Modernism represents the bus leaving music behind in written poetry, I’d say that bus left well over 200 years before, particularly in the English language. But that’s a long dry technical discussion on the differences between spoken cadences and sung ones, as well as a bunch of other stuff that exceeds the topic at hand here, as fascinating as I may find it to blather on about.

12 Ferdinand Bardamu November 16, 2011 at 11:39 pm

Cicero:

I suppose you have it in for Dostoevesky as well.

Dostoevsky’s okay. I enjoyed Notes from Underground and the Idiot, Crime and Punishment not so much. Tolstoy, on the other hand…

GLP:

Wolfe is a good writer and probably a better writer than Thompson. But Thompson is dynamic and hilarious. These are two different types of genius.

Ginga, please. Wolfe’s public persona is constructed to be outlandish and attention-grabbing. His oeuvre is classic subversion – dress up an pro-establishment message in anti-establishment garb. I’d have less of a problem with him if he ditched the suit and was honest about his motives. I don’t have any Wolfe on hand right this second, but I’ll have to grab “Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test” from the library later and write a post fully explaining why he’s a terrible writer.

So if Wolfe was conservative then he was bucking the prevailing ideology of the people in his literary circles.

That would mean something if conservatives had any taste. They don’t. The only criteria conservatives (specifically, neocons/mainstream cons – paleocons, the alt-right and WNs have much better taste) have for art is “Does it reaffirm my political beliefs?” That’s it. Liberals do it too – hell, I just wrote a spiel about it vis-a-vis Celine – but conservatives are far worse; they can’t enjoy anything unless it repeatedly reassures them that They. Are. Always. Right. See: Bill Buckley slobbering about how The Lives of Others was the greatest movie he’d ever seen, mainly because it attacked communism. I like The Lives of Others, but best movie ever? Not by a long shot. Philip K. Dick was lampooning these types way back in the 60′s. If Wolfe was a liberal, the cons’d dump him like a sack of bricks.

Spike:

Trust me, while you don’t need to dive into a baptismal font (God knows I still hew to denying his existence), if you completely give yourself over to the Dionysian without making any space for the Apollonian (please forgive this old saw, but I’ve yet to see anyone reword it better for our times), you may burn out before you even have a chance to truly formulate your ideas (though of course, if it’s all for shits and giggles, you may disregard that one), or worse, end up like Huysmans.

It’s not the Apollonian I necessarily have a problem with, it’s presenting the Apollonian as the Dionysian, which is what Wolfe and these other hacks try to do. I cite this eXiled article a lot, mainly because it makes this point better than I can:

The current generation of “avant garde” drug-horror writers started popping up in the 80s and 90s. The prototypical example is Bret Easton Ellis, lamenting how hard it is for rich people to communicate because of their sheer self-absorbtion. Like most young 90s Puritans, Ellis is just rehashing a very old Christian theme – Augustine’s idea that fallen man is incurvatus in se or “turned in on oneself” – with secular postmodernish jargon. And while Augustine should probably be credited for inventing the basic structure of half the titles in your local bookshop’s biography section, there’s a crucial difference between his Confessions and books like Less than Zero. To Augustine, character flaws aren’t just a cause for moping and generational angst, but sins that could affect whether or not he goes to Hell, which, unlike Ellis, he strongly believes in. It’s not pear tree theft or whether his motives are impure that Augustine’s worried about, but the fact that those things put him in danger of burning forever in a lake of fire.

The Augustinian structure flops immediately without eternal torment as a conceit. Sure these jaded Los Angeles kids are a “lost” generation, but why’s it so bad that they’re “lost”? They have plenty of sex, drugs, threads, cars and cash. Lacking a Christian Hell, the writer needs an equally powerful lie to prop up the narrative – either they pretend that insincerity is an emotional hell no amount of money can make up for, OR, they pretend that members of the Hollywood brat pack have the same life expectancy as Ethiopians, dropping like flies from an endless parade of overdoses and Lamborghini accidents, rarely hitting 30. The second option usually requires the writer to massively exaggerate the dangers of drugs, since they’re the easiest way to kill off rich characters without using your imagination too much. Naturally, this has lead to lots of books portraying your Ellis-Frey type as the sole survivor emerging from the wreckage. In the end, this is worse than if these brat pack authors were openly Christian – Augustine’s Catholic Hell would be just as scary if sex and drugs had no material consequences at all. It’s the terror of the hereafter that counts, not the pain of the present. Ellis can’t grasp this. He begins American Psycho with the words “ABANDON ALL HOPE YE WHO ENTER HERE,” but can’t find anything fearful enough to keep that promise. All his supposedly damned narrator can do is assure us that “there are no drugs, no food, no liquor that can appease the forcefulness of this greedy pain.” Pain which Ellis pulls out of nowhere.

http://exiledonline.com/david-foster-wallace-portrait-of-an-infinitely-limited-mind/

13 wingwoman November 17, 2011 at 6:15 am

@ Ferd
I have to ask what your problem seems to be with Fitzgerald.

I disagree with Mann about the media consumption of others ideas effect. Media is actively consumed and must be interfaced with. I can see where people could get stuck in a rut of listening and following others but they could also get in a rut of not challenging their own thoughts by avoiding such mediums .

Music and poetry have not gotten worse it’s just that anyone can and does publish/perform anything. It’s harder to find the quality pieces because of the volume of other crap.

14 neobasher November 17, 2011 at 10:09 am

About my version of Journey, the afterword by William T Vollman is an absolute embarrassment. Some jew goon hipster nerding about how Celine was so rad. Leaves a sour note on the whole book.

15 Ferdinand Bardamu November 17, 2011 at 5:17 pm

wingwoman:

I have to ask what your problem seems to be with Fitzgerald.

He, like Vonnegut, is overpraised. Like Wolfe, he too wrote simplistic Victorian morality smut (specifically The Great Gatsby and The Beautiful and Damned).

neobasher:

LMAO, that afterword’s in my edition too, I completely forgot about it. Vollmann is the hack of all hacks – just read Whores for Gloria if you don’t believe me.

16 G.L. Piggy November 17, 2011 at 5:24 pm

Ferdinand:

I admittedly have not read a whole lot of Wolfe’s work – mostly EKAAT and some essays – but I wonder why you consider it Victorian morality smut. Can you give examples of what you mean here?

17 Pat Hannagan November 17, 2011 at 6:56 pm

Great stuff, thanks very much for these recommendations. My Christmas book list has just grown by two more (already have Fear and Loathing).

Celine sounds like an author I’ll enjoy very much for obvious reasons (not just the anti-semitism), but the comparison with Pound rings a little hollow given that he wasn’t popular or populist and did suffer for his thought crimes in a mental institution courtesy of the US government. Is Pound still taught? I never read much of his stuff and only became aware of him through reading T. S. Eliot. Been reading his war speeches lately and loved/repulsed by this line:

“And as for the Australians, they deserve a Nippo-Chinese invasion. Criminals were their granddads, and their contribution to civilization is not such as to merit even a Jewish medal. Why the heck the Chinese and laps don’t combine and drive that dirt out of Australia, and set up a bit of civilization in those parts, is for me part of the mystery of the orient.”

The speeches are a series of invective that overwhelms after a while and should be taken in small doses. My understanding is that Pound and his early followers were a reaction to Yank “Fireside Poets”, and created modernist poetry by doing so. Perhaps a reaction against the reaction is required.

I call up the imp of the perverse to see what other forbidden ideas might be out there.

From Poes The Imp of the Perverse. Poe is my favourite author, did Celine read Poe at all? Creator of the modern detective before Doyle, the magnificent C. Auguste Dupin. I hope Yanks appreciate Poe, and also Runyon.

Re. Hunter Thompson, his tragic legacy is the GOP/neocon opinionistas who think they are Thompsonesque reactionaries but are in fact servile pig gulag informers of the most rank kind.

18 Ferdinand Bardamu November 17, 2011 at 7:15 pm

GLP:

Can you give examples of what you mean here?

I could write a whole book about this subject (in fact, I just might), but I’ll keep it brief.

The best examples in Wolfe’s bibliography are Bonfire of the Vanities and I Am Charlotte Simmons. I touched on it in my reply to Spike above – books like those are simplistic morality plays in which earthly pleasures are always evil and always lead to damnation, and God is the only hope for mankind. In our secular world, God is usually substituted for something else – rehab, AA, friendship, daddy, college sports – but the basic structure is the same. In the eXiled article I quoted above, Ramon Glazov traces it back to Augustine – I’d trace it back to the mystery plays of the late Middle Ages, literal morality plays specifically designed to scare the peasants into doing their Hail Marys. Example: the medieval play Everyman, in which the moral is that only good deeds guarantee your entrance into heaven. Hell, writers were even rebelling against this simplistic preaching in the Middle Ages – Dante gave a big “fuck you” to it in the Divine Comedy, and Chaucer did the same in the Canterbury Tales and Parliament of Fowls.

What’s the moral of Bonfire? Greed is bad. What’s the moral of Charlotte Simmons? Lust is bad. That’s it. Repeating the Ten Commandments is not original, it’s not edgy, it’s not avant-garde. That’s why Wolfe is so loathsome – he plays at being a daring, courageous reporter when all he’s doing is recycling cliches that were old and tired before Marlowe got murdered.

19 Ferdinand Bardamu November 17, 2011 at 7:32 pm

Pat:

Is Pound still taught?

Oh God yes. I was forced to read those sobby, sentimental Cathay poems in undergrad. My swipe at him is due to the fact that the American literary establishment has crucified Celine for his anti-Semitism while Pound gets a pass on the same. And the “Fireside Poets?” Horrible. Mark Twain gave a hilarious speech basically ripping them to shreds – I’ll have to dig that one up.

RE Eliot’s anti-Australianism, I’ll explain it for you – he hated Australians because of your Irish heritage. One of the requirements for being a patriotic Limey is hating the Irish for some reason, and Catholics too. Orwell, Auden, Woolf, Wordsworth, even up to the present day with Hitchens – hatred of Catholicism and Ireland runs in the blood of any “good” Englishman.

Poe is my favourite author, did Celine read Poe at all?

Probably, though I don’t recall him being a significant influence. And Poe is still taught in the colleges, fortunately.

20 Pat Hannagan November 17, 2011 at 8:05 pm

That quote re Ozzies was from Pound’s wartime speeches, though point taken :-)

You don’t like Vonnegut? Surely Slaughterhouse-Five is worthy?

21 PA November 17, 2011 at 9:25 pm

A GBFM’esque question: do you like any books that are about god honor fathers and not about butthex taping a girth without her consenth?

22 PA November 17, 2011 at 9:28 pm

Ok, the butthex taping part was self indulgence. But your taste runs toward books that demolish pretty lies. Do you like any books that build noble truths?

23 PA November 17, 2011 at 10:16 pm

“….books that *illuminate* noble truths” is a better way of putting it.

24 Ferdinand Bardamu November 17, 2011 at 10:28 pm

PA:

But your taste runs toward books that demolish pretty lies. Do you like any books that build noble truths?

Off the top of my head – Iliad, Odyssey, the Theban Plays (all translations by Fagles), the Poem of the Cid (Merwin translation), Le Morte D’Arthur (versions based on the Caxton text, as the Winchester text is too wordy and nigh unreadable), the Lais of Marie de France, Beowulf, the romances of Chretien de Troyes, the poetry of John Donne, and Shakespeare (specifically Hamlet and Macbeth).

25 PA November 18, 2011 at 6:50 am

Anything from the past 50-60 years?

26 Ferdinand Bardamu November 18, 2011 at 3:39 pm

PA:

Anything from the past 50-60 years?

Do Hemingway, Yeats and John O’Hara count?

27 PA November 18, 2011 at 6:26 pm

Thanks. that was a serious question BTW. I can relate to angry, hedonist iconoclastic (if they smash icons I hate) literature. But it doesn’t satisfy me. I get real satisfation from affirmative art, especially where aesthetics and spirituality meet.

In film, you can get glimpses of it in Kieslowski’s “Decalogue” and “Three Color Trilogy.”

On another twentieth century note, I recommend Arthur Koestler. “Darkness at Noon” and his two-volume autobiography.

28 Spike Gomes November 18, 2011 at 10:39 pm

Pat:

Poe is probably more popular in France than in the states. There, thanks to Baudelaire’s translations he’s taken as a serious author by most literary types, and not some sort of gothic curiosity he is in the states. It’s pretty much certain that Celine read him. He’s the American author to the French world that Victor Hugo is to the English speaking world.

It’s rather interesting how those sort of things work. Dostoevsky is immensely popular and influential in Japan, and he openly hated Asians with a passion. Jack London was a WN like you, but he wrote some of the most sympathetic portrayals of Asian and Polynesian characters in his short fiction.

29 Cameron November 20, 2011 at 8:31 pm

Those reviews are great Ferdinand and some real gold in the comments section as well.

30 Eddie Willers April 26, 2012 at 6:26 pm

Just came across this and have to add…
Hell, yeah! +100 on Celine on “Journey” – good stuff, but here’s some others..

John Fante (Bukowski’s hero), “The Road To Los Angeles”
Anthony Burgess, the “Enderby” trilogy
Henry Miller, “Black Spring”
Jan Kerouac, “Baby Driver”
Howard Jacobson (the Limey Phillip Roth), “Coming From Behind”

And don’t forget to get stuck into some of the great nonfiction classics – de Toqueville, Spengler, Locke (hell – even Ayn Rand!)

Leave a Comment

{ 4 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: