The statement above is a complete fabrication – I actually don’t know what Miss Valenti’s vagina smells like. It could smell like a fish market drowned in hurricane flood waters, or she could be sandblasting the salmon fumes out daily. That’s not the point.
Intrepid readers might remember that a little over two months ago, Paul Elam launched Register-Her.com - a registry for false rape accusers, lady pedophiles, and other sterling examples of the female species. You may also recall that within days of its launching, the aforementioned feminist loudmouth Valenti went into a tizzy, frantically begging her Twitter followers for ways to scrub her personal info from the Intertubes. Now Paul is reporting that Register-Her.com has been a massive success so far, ensuring that false rape accusers will no longer have anywhere to hide:
…Not that she is what really matters here. The important thing is that now, any woman making a false allegation is subject to have her misdeed follow her for the rest of her life. Any prospective employer, or anyone else that invests in Googling her name, will find her listing and undeniable proof of the kind of person she really is. And in an increasingly web savvy world, this will be the rule much more than the exception.
My prediction is that within 6 months to a year we will have our first litigation, maybe sooner, which is why I have secured an agreement for services with the Randazza Legal Group, a firm that specializes in First Amendment issues and internet law. The attorney I made contact with there is very supportive of the MRM.
We are going to go ahead with this full steam, damn the torpedos, and bring to bear the considerable expertise in making these things happen that AVfM is beginning to amass in earnest. It is one of many FTSU efforts we are going to undertake, but I am particularly proud of this one.
I’m tired, I’m weary, and I could sleep for a thousand years, so I’ll cut to the chase.
A Voice for Men commenter Adi suggested having MRA/manosphere blogs link to Jessica Valenti’s Register-Her.com profile and push it to page one of Google’s search results (it’s already on page three). Another commenter there named Jeremiah suggested getting me to do a Google bomb ala our vajazzling escapades a year and a half ago:
You could see if Ferdinand Bardamu would be interested in doing something similar to the Vajazzle Google bomb except it would be a Valenti bomb: http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2010/03/05/your-mission-should-you-choose-to-accept-it-vajazzle-the-internet/
Neither Paul nor anyone at A Voice for Men has contacted me on this, but since I’m a nihilist (i.e. I like destruction), I’m doing it anyway:
If you want to help Fuck Their Shit Up, just copy that link and post it to your blog/website. Also be sure to let me know you’ve done it with a comment on this post, pingback, email, Facebook or Twitter private message. Now if you excuse me, I’m gonna go take a nap.
{ 50 comments… read them below or add one }
I did my part.
Of course her cooch smells like a garbage dump in August. Do you think her mangina kitchen-bitch nerdling “husband” will ever complain? JV probably gets off on watching him choke on the fumes.
Thank’s Ferd. And thanks to other bloggers that help with the Google bomb.
Oh, and in couple of days I will gather all the links I can find to Register-her.com and do a Bardamu style Linkage is good for you posting at AVfM.
“Bout time I started doing that sort of thing anyway.
For a member of the “alt-right” you sure like some pretty fey indie and alternative rock.
Notice the hairy forearms on this chick. Now we all know what Roissy told us about chicks with hairy forearms.
Just look at the fucking jaw.
done
http://booooooooom.blogspot.com/2011/09/hateful-bigot-jessica-valenti.html
done
Done
http://badgersbastion.blogspot.com/2011/09/jessica-valenti.html
That photo…are you sure it’s a woman? Seriously, if an skinny 30-year-old Italian or Spanish dude put on a wig and a dress, he could pass for Jessica Valenti. And his vagina wouldn’t smell nearly as bad as hers.
Done
I hit it.
…with a mallet.
I was almost in favor of Register-Her, until the talk about lynching. Shallow emotional symbols are not the basis of a professional movement.
This Valenti woman is clearly out of control. False rape accusations lessen the chances of getting convictions when possible (and hint, ladies: if you go home with some guy and then claim he “raped” you, no court in the world is going to take your case).
http://www.groin.com/jessica-valenti/
http://www.anus.com/zine/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=343
I just looked at the “register-her” page on Valenti. What an idiotic piece of writing. “Bigot”? “lynching of African Americans”? And… what – no mention of Nazi or Hitler to round things out?
Brett, PA:
You gotta start somewhere. Consider that this profile already got under Valenti’s skin. You go to war with the army you have, not the one you wish you had.
The “lynching” thing annoyed me because it validates an unrelated leftist talking-point.
@ PA
Leftist talking point? Really? The paragraph said that institutional racism led to the lynchings of black men in the South—this is a verifiable, historical fact. And that the biogtry Valenti propagates creates a climate in which it may soon become acceptable to do that to men generally, if it hasn’t happened already.
I fail to see the problem here.
Ferd, her marriage is also worth picking apart
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/apr/24/feminist-wedding-jessica-valenti
you guys make amazingly well thought-out points. so valid. especially the parts where you talk about her looks. i mean, could you get more concrete than that? impossible.
“institutional racism led to the lynchings of black men in the South”
You manosphere guys like to talk about blue and red pills. Well, your line about the South is the granddaddy of blue pills.
In reality, those lynchings were retaliatory in nature. Civilized white men protecting their communities via a rough citizens’ justice.
And today? Black males, a federally protected group, have murdered, raped, and assaulted whites far in excess of what whites did to them. That, on top of the staggering destruction they inflict on any community they settle in appreciable numbers, with their mere presence. And black crime targets random whites, unlike old school lynching, which, again, were mostly retaliatory in nature.
Did you go and lay flowers on the graves of Channon Christian and Christopher News yet?
Christopher Newsom
@ PA
Except that this has been researched and written about and thoroughly debunked by many historians and researchers across the political and academic spectrum. I won’t even take the time to point you to the research—it’s all there out in the open. Yes, there are times in history where white people mistreated blacks for no reason. Yes, there are times in history where white people acted like, well, flawed and imperfect human beings. You don’t know because you don’t want to. This is almost right up there will holocaust denialism.
You don’t have to be ignorant of history to support men’s rights.
It’s amusing to note that Google search results brought me to this page whilst attempting to “+1″ Valenti’s register-her entry.
It’s working guys! :-)
I did my part.
Let’s not forget the lynchings of black men in the South were very feminist. Often times white women would lie about a black man raping them to get that black man lynched. This was the forerunner of the modern false rape industry. Thus the comparison between black men in the South and men now is very apt.
Watch PA call these facts “leftist talking points”.
@ Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech
Exactly. The lynchings were really just good old fashioned conservative misandry and murderous white knighting for capricious, dishonest, and unscrupulous females. The whole “leftist” talking points complaint is bullshit because throughout history the American right has, in it’s own way, been just as supportive of feminism as the left. As TFH says, right-wingers will support ANY feminist idea as long as it’s couched in chivalry or protecting women from “other” men.
What’s happening here is just the usual HBD/beta bullshit: when bad shit happens to white men misandry is to blame, but when bad shit happens to black men it’s because they’re lying, thieving, low-IQ, murderous scum of the earth.
May I interrupt this man-hug in order to ask if you fellows would at least address the second half of my original comment — black violence against whites over the last five decades greatly exceeding anything whites did to blacks?
Go ahead and whitewash any possibility that southern blacks posed a grave threat to neighboring white communities, whose vigilance was the only way to avoid mass suicide. But how will you square that whitewashing with black violence worldwide today?
I might add that it looks like the only real place for men’s activism–real action on behalf of men without regard to race or socioeconomic status–is Paul Elam’s site, A Voice for Men.
All the rest are imposters.
Ferdie,
I just did my part too. JV needs to be EXPOSED; she needs the blowtorch of our righteous indignation turned her way now!
MarkyMark
@ PA
What in the fuck are you talking about?
We have the history and crime rates from that time period, as well as the larger historical context. I’ve yet to see ANY evidence whatsoever that southern black enclaves were the hotbeds of criminality they are today. You do realize that we can go look this up, we don’t have to speculate.
And this was after these communities endured over 200 years of horrendous slavery coupled with the mass rape of black women, an absolutely savage civil war and then decades of state-sponsored violence against black communities by various terrorist organizations including the well-known KKK. In the face of all this, rates violent black criminality didn’t depart significantly from the mean…until feminist/matriarchal reforms and extreme economic liberalisation all but ensured that black communities would become matriarchal enclaves. The poor and lower SES are always hit hardest and earliest by social upheaval–no shock there.
Race is largely red herring—and it’s been so for a long time in this country. It’s been a time honored strategy of wealthy and powerful to incite and enforce divisions among people who should, left to the inevitable, combine against them. As an example, by 1860 only 12 percent of whites could even afford to own a single slave…yet poor whites were among the fiercest defenders of the insitution because they were duped by white elites into thinking that their skin color made them better than the very same blacks they toiled next to and, often, were beaten with.
Fmr Senator Jim Webb has spoken very eloquently of the artifical divide between blacks and lower- and working-class whites prompted by white elites post-Reconstruction when it was feared that the new class of freed blacks and poor, war weary whites would join together to bring change.
We don’t have to speculate—we KNOW what happened then. The scholarship has been done, discussed and published. Get off your ass, get a library card, and educate yourself.
You can start here: http://www.temple.edu/tempress/titles/1338_reg.html
The next 50 years are going to be very, very interesting for white people. I read white nationalist posts on this site and just shake my head—you people don’t get it. The battle lines are not drawn by race—they are drawn by class/wealth and in that battle it is absolutely crucial to keep MEN weak and ineffectual, no matter their race. The SWPLs you deride don’t see you as like them even though you’re both white. In fact, they see me—a black guy Ivy graduate–as being like them much more than people like Chuck Ross, PA, or a working class stiff from rural Pennsylvania.
Point blank: you are not on their team. The Susan Walshs, Jamie Dimons and hedge fund managers do not see you as like them. In their eyes, you are just like the low-SES NAMs you despise. Period.
How anyone can look at a fractured and suicidal EU, the extremely contentious and bilious red state/blue state divide in this country, two ridiculously savage world wars, and countless other phenomena and still talk about “white nationalism” with a straight face is absolutely gobsmacking.
The gap between rich/poor in this country will continue to expand and eventually the middle class will be eliminated–bled dry by the elites of this country. And, formerly comprising most of the middle class, white people who will suffer beyond what they are accustomed to. But their attempts at social unrest will be put down by a domestic “national security” apparatus built up in the country over the last 10 years—ostensibly to respond to terrorist threats. As it turns out, the militarization of our police forces, the rollback of constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms, the privatization of prisons and the normalisation of torture, due-process free assassination, two-tiered justice and other loathsome initiatives never really about Muslim terrorists or oppressing blacks—it was about suppressing the coming domestic social unrest. The elites of this country don’t care about race—they care about class, privilege, and self-preservation. You ignore this at your own peril.
Wake the fuck up.
Done:
http://naturalone.tumblr.com/post/10110202135/jessica-valenti
Drained,
You are blind to how inextricably “anti-racism” is tied to the elites’ destruction of the middle class. It’s its cornerstone. Beginning with court decisions to desegregate schools sixty years who, whites, from the functional-poor on up have been dispossessed if their neighborhoods, communities, cities. White flight, Detroit, did not happen because Goldman Sachs started moving in.
You are too sanguine about any kinship shared between poor whites and poor blacks. There is none. And you know what a reconciliation between poor whites and poor blacks looks like? It looks white trash whiggers and fat blondes with dark-skinned, woolyheaded babies. Poor southern who, despite their poverty, created and maintained healthy communities, knew this existential nightmare being a hair-breadth’s away. So they kept blacks on notice, maybe sometimes with excess harshness. And they fought desegregation. But they lost. The elites and their federal government won. Goodbye Tom Joad, hello People of Walmart.
You may he an ivy-educated black guy (do not assume I’m a low SES guy – I’m not) but you’re too sanguine about the elites’ indifference to race. They may he ok with you moving in next door. But not you and four of your cousins. And no, they will never accept your sin dating one of their daughters.
Trust me on this. I know those people. I go to cookouts attended by people one degree removed from people at … very high levels.
Dragnet, not “Drained” in earlier comment
@ PA
Once you again, you’re totally off-base on this. I know more than a few of these elites. I have sat in classes with their children. I’ve networked with them. I have fucked their women. The truth is that high-SES black men don’t have too much trouble integrating/dating/marrying into this tranche if they really want it badly enough. The reason you don’t see it more is because, 1) there are comparatively few high-SES black men, 2) most (high-SES) people still prefer to marry inside their own race.
If you want an example that hits close to home, take the commenter Gorbachev. He comes from a high SES family and one of his sisters is married to a black guy…who is very well educated, works hard, high SES, etc. I’m telling you the issue with the vast majority of high SES whites is really one of status, wealth, education, class, privilege…which also has it’s roots in the American experience. Before the civil war, there was famous court case where a black man was declared legally “white” and allowed to marry a white woman because he demonstrated values and abilities that were viewed as consistent with the white majority. There were a few instances of this happening. I remember reading about it in college—if I can track it down I will post.
You’re right about one thing though—there never was and never will be any shared kinship or class consciousness between poor whites and blacks. In my opinion, both groups have been totally brainwashed by elites into viewing each other as the enemy—a process that started hundreds of years and has been very carefully documented—while they are both ruthlessly drained and exploited by those same elites. That you are ignorant of this is a willful decision on your part.
Once again, post-Reconstruction blacks formed patriarchal, peaceful and economically advancing communities—this is well documented. After terrorist groups made a point of systemically terrorizing and destroying these communities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot , Black Wall Street, etc) these communities fell under increasingly harsh race-motivated legislation designed to enforce economic privation. They descended into poverty and then finally into familial disintegration and violence as feminist reforms, technological advances, an oversupply of labor, and extreme economic liberalisation precipitated the establishment of an almost totally matriarchal society.
And for the record, I wouldn’t want four of my cousins living next door either, lol.
The bottom line is that you haven’t educated yourself enough to actually know what you’re talking about here. The research is out there. Wake up.
why am i stuck in moderation?
I think I got moderated out…
Here’s my link
http://naturalone.tumblr.com/post/10110202135/jessica-valenti
Curboing the appetites of women:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/curbing_the_appetites_of_women_a_summary_of_the_garbage_generationby_daniel/
I’m late to the party, but I showed up anyways.
Registered!
dragnet, you should start a blog. it’d be refreshing to hear the POV of a black, ivy-league man within or related to the manosphere.
Seconded.
Done and done.
dragnet, you should start a blog. it’d be refreshing to hear the POV of a black, ivy-league man within or related to the manosphere.
Second.
Dragnet:
Nothing to add except thumbs up. I’m not as pessimistic as you: When people start starving they have a marvelous tendency to (not always, but often) come together to put the screws to the people who have ripped them off. Working Class Blacks and Whites did this in small town Louisiana after a visit by Big Bill Haywood 100 years ago. They basically took over the entire town and redistributed the wealth among themselves. Happened among Whites and Asians in Idaho/Montana a few years later (the mining wars).
Maybe I’m too optimistic, and I’m sure Whites and Blacks will kill each other in some places, but I see a very interesting era ahead, as popular consciousness wrests itself from the usual bread and circuses and becomes much more pragmatic. We don’t have to love each other, or even live in the same neighborhoods, but we ought to fight our common enemy if he’s starving us (and he is).
I’ve seen articles in the manosphere mention how feminism and leftism were driving factors in the destruction of black families and communities, but not in great detail. Does anyone know of an online source that goes into detail on these issues?
For example this article from the Spearhead touches on it but it isn’t very detailed: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/06/24/latest-feminist-triumph-black-family-finally-destroyed/
Done – bombs away!!
Dragnet:
No, it’s not — it’s political propaganda. Lynchings were not organized by any institution, nor was there “institutional racism” — racial segregation reflected the organic will of the population (and still does). Incidentally, I think it’s offensive to southerners to call it racism. More likely, a recognition of differences, the values of cultural separation, and finding an honest way to live together.
When did you become a leftist?
Ferd:
Generally I agree. However, this one is on the line for me, since he’s marshalling his army using the rhetoric of the enemy, which means that ultimate he will be swallowed up by it (as they all are).
OH … it’s OK whenever they publish a list of “johns”;
plaster your name all over the news media, if you get accused of rape; or …
set up websites that slander the daylights out of you for dumping them.
For once we turned the tables on them, big time!
{ 3 trackbacks }