We have major loopholes in our sex offender laws. Obviously, Hugh Hefner preying on a woman 60 years younger than him is a perversion. Absolutely disgusting! We need laws against that. Sex or marriage with anyone more then 3 years older or younger should be a felony. That is, if the older party is male, of course – the sexual liberation of cougars, of the protected class known as “women,” must not have their freedom infringed upon. Maybe in this case, a 21 year old young man is taking advantage of a 51 year old woman who is unable to consent due to her irrational attraction?
Or maybe only violation of the “half your age plus 6 years” rule should be made a felony. So 84 year old Hugh Hefner could not abuse any woman younger then 84/2 + 6 = 42 + 6 = 48 years, or would be punished for statutory rape of a 47 year old, incapable of consenting to sex with an old geezer like Hugh Hefner. He should be in jail for objectifying women in Playboy Magazine, anyway.
Our sex offender laws are not being enforced. Anyone that has illicit sex with rapes an under 18 year old minor in California needs to get tried and arrested. Yes, that includes minors too – in California, two 17 year olds are not allowed to have sex with each other. That, finally, would allow us to imprison a few million men in California, and only a few women (because in couples, men tend to be the older one of the two).
He is 84 Years Old, She is 24 Years Old: A 60 Year Difference
Love really must be blind — at least, for 84-year-old Hugh Hefner’s new twenty-something fiancé. Playboy Playmate Crystal Harris, 24, told ‘Entertainment Tonight’ she hardly recognizes the 60-year age gap between herself and her husband-to-be.
‘I don’t notice the age difference with Hef at all,’ Harris said. ‘If anything, I have to keep up with him!’ Harris said Hef’s energy level often surpasses the blond bombshell, who was Playboy Playmate of the Month in December 2009.
NY Daily News

But the 83-year-old Playboy publisher took his tried-and-true May-December romance to a whole new level when he started dating then-19-year-old twins Kristina and Karissa Shannon, in 2008 [83-19= 64 years difference] The girls went on to star in ‘The Girls Next Door,’ but the media mogul and the Shannon twins parted ways in early 2010, so Hef could focus on his other blond girlfriend, 23-year-old Crystal Harris.
Don’t miss our articles on:
Actor Dough Hutchinson (51) married Courtney Alexis Stodden, 16 year old child. We suspect he is a child rapist.
Michel Temer (70), new Vice-President of Brazil was 63 when he married Marcela Temer at age 20. Borderline Pedophilia or healthy human sexuality?
Cougars Marrying Young Men is Progress!
When a repressed class violates old norms and robs the cradle, then this is sexual liberation, very different from horny perverted men marrying young women. You go girl! Free yourself from the tyranny of age restrictions!
When Madonna and her ten-years-younger husband, Guy Ritchie, called it quits in 2008, the eternally youthful material girl wasted no time rebounding with an even younger boy-toy. Madge started dating 23- year-old Brazilian model Jesus Luz in 2009, and the pair has been spotted all over the globe since.
Ick Factor: Jesus’ mother is 14 years younger than Madonna.
NY Daily News
The Cougar Queen
Hulk Hogan’s ex-wife, Linda Bollea, takes the cake as the cougar queen. Linda, 51, and her 21-year-old boyfriend Charley Hill, started dating when he was only 19! But the duo’s matching platinum ‘dos aren’t the freakiest thing about this relationship …
Ick Factor: The Hogan kids, Brooke and Nick, are 21 and 19, respectively. In fact, Charley is a former classmate of Brooke’s.
NY Daily News
Gay May-December is Chic!
Equally, the repressed class “gay men” can do what creepy heterosexual men should never do.
So what’s Calvin Klein’s hottest accessory? It’s got to be his 20-year-old partner, Nick Gruber. The designer and the model/actor make quite the pair, despite the fact that Klein is 67-years-young.
NY Daily News
35 Year Age Difference, with an Adopted Stepdaughter
They only started their affair when she was 22. The old pervert must have groomed her when she was younger. Maybe he already adopted her with such ill intent. All men are rapists and perverts. She got brain-washed to accept such an age difference. We can not understand why she would pick such an old man, so it must be rape. [We are kidding, in case you don't get the joke.]
![]()
In 2005, the notoriously private Woody Allen finally discussed his scandalous marriage to Soon-Yi Previn. Despite never getting married, the now 74-year-old filmmaker and actress Mia Farrow were together for twelve years, had one biological child and adopted two children together, one of whom was Soon-Yi. The pair split in 1992 after Farrow discovered Allen, then 56, and Previn, then 22, were having an affair.
Despite a 35-year age difference, the couple have been together ever since, tying the knot in 1997.
NY Daily News
Originally published at Human Stupidity on July 15, 2011.




{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
wow. our society is beyond worthless.
2nd
=D
This is interesting. Do I see strong condemnation?
I come from a libertarian and sex positive stand point.
My point is that people should be able to do what they want, as responsible adults.
So if an 18 year old willingly decides to have an affair or to marry a 97 year old, we might wonder, but it is nobody’s business to prohibit or punish such acts.
Of course, then we also would wonder why a 15 year old with a 25 year old is worth a decade in prison, when 18 y with 97 y is legal. (But I will leave aside the discussion that I believe that adolescents don’t need government protection either, to “protect” them against their own will from their own sexual choices with draconian prison sentences for their consensual lovers)
You can notice that the men above are generally highly desirable, powerful and rich. You will not see a sick, fat, poor, unintelligent 83 year old landing a beautiful 18 year old.
And do you really doubt that many 18 year old girls would instantly choose Brad Pitt or Richard Gere with no concern whatsoever for age differences? The only question is if it is 50% or 0.1% of the girls (which would still leave Millions of under-20y candidates for Brad Pitt)
So I hope we don’t have too many people here who argue that government should prevent adult people from doing what they want.
I personally think this also is inoffensive and causes no harm. But, probably, some people here think otherwise, might think this is bad for society. Most of these men already had prior wives who might have been left alone.
May be I play devil’s advocate in favor of the Muslim system. Don’t divorce your old wife, just add a younger one every 10 years or so. So your middle age wife still has a useful role in your household, doing responsible chores that the young one is not quite able to do.
How can any rational minded person not call the Hugh Hefner / Crystal Harris marriage anything other the prostitution? Are we 5 yo kids on a playground? Marry me, Crystal; I’m only 20 years older. Oh, I don’t have millions of dollars, that’s why. You are not “exposing” any hypocracy here, merely putting it in people’s faces.
@Eric J Schlegel:
maybe here we differ. I see nothing wrong with prostitution.
Furthermore, I think most marriage is prostitution. Divorces are worse then prostitution, because in that case the man is robbed: he is violently forced to pay with absolutely no service in return (if there are no children)
Or maybe prostitution comes natural to men and women? Ever since the first man shared the meat of his prey with a pretty woman, and guys here invite girls for luxurious dinners and movies?
Or maybe prostitution is normally defined as girls being totally nondiscriminatory in the choice of partners, purely for money. Most girls here chose pretty attractive men, they were just a little old but rich, powerful and not that bad looking.
I forgot that here are lots of sexually very conservative men. Still, as long as we can agree that the government should not meddle in these affairs, we can perfectly agree to disagree, with no further conflict.
@ Human-Stupidity:
“maybe here we differ. I see nothing wrong with prostitution.”
Not in the least; prostitution is no crime at all, and is in fact the basis of all male-female interaction. Resourses for access. Not one marriage has been contracted in history that was not on that basis.
The point of my comment is the convoluted thinking that makes me a criminal for paying a female to use HER BODY to do something for my benefit. Then when we see a 24 yo “alpha female” sell herself to a wealthy 85 yo (in his way)alpha male, we call that “holy matrimony”.
Pontius Pilate once asked Jesus Ben Joseph “What is truth?” and did not get an answer. I don’t expect one either.
Love it man, fantastic.
The laws we have in place are ther for no reason other than to allow the people at the top an additional measure of control over the rest of the population.
As for prostitution, if it’s a straight trade that a chick is enntering ino freely, I don’t see a thing wrong with it; I have what she wants and she has what I want.
The rub with protitution though, and I’ve seen this all over the world, is chicks get snatched up or trick-fucked by ka-niving sheisty hustlers (usually of a fairly narrow ethnic background) and the chick winds up with the option of either being on the stroll or taking a beating.
I do like your take on the muslim approach to hanling women; can’t let these annimals run wild or they fuck up everything they touch.
The dumber a law is, the easier it is to get around it.
No one can arrest you for using an escort as long as you don’t talk about money. The usual protocol is to talk to her for 10 minutes about whatever and then she’ll start stripping and touching you. When you’re done, just leave the envelopment with cash on the night stand.
In Lawrence v. Texas in 2003, the US Supreme Court said that states can’t prohibit gays from having sex because it violates their right to privacy. The state can’t interfere with what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their home. Thus, the Supreme Court’s rationale has made prostitution legal whether they like it or not.
It’s absurd that adults can have sex with each other as long as the reason is because of “love”/boredom/as a dare/to piss off an ex/it’s raining outside/the guy bought lunch/the guy bought jewelry/for no reason at all. But if it’s for MONEY? No no no no no, we can’t have that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKI4dwSVKxU
EVERYONE needs to watch this video.
The video is of a little girl telling a little boy she WILL marry him. The boy denies that this will ever happen. It was amusing for about 5 seconds, then the boy gets very upset when his mother starts to encourage the little girl to keep saying that she will marry him. Notice how the boy takes it as the ultimate betrayal that his own mother is supporting the little girl.
This mother clearly finds it funny that her son is crying and is being bossed around by the neighbor’s daughter. Feminists shouldn’t be allowed to raise boys.
only liberals care about double standards.
There’s no fool like an old fool. How true it is. The old fart probably can’t even get it up.
Mr. S., as usual your insight is flawless except in one small detail. inter-generational relationships are as penalized for homosexual men as they are for heterosexual men. The text of the Calvin Klein blurb says: “The designer and the model/actor make quite the pair, DESPITE the fact that Klein is 67-years-young.” Such relationships are usually unacceptable, but perhaps not in this case, due possibly to Klein’s extraordinary wealth.
For example: One aging gay, after discussing falling in love with a 25-year-old man:
“You’re too bloody old,” one [friend] tells me.
“A kid that age doesn’t know what colour socks to wear in the morning let alone what he wants out of life,” says another. “It wouldn’t be fair to him to tie him down in a relationship with someone as old as you and it wouldn’t last if you tried.”
Now you might be thinking at this point that I must be like a hundred years old for these people to be so shocked. Close. I’m a horrific 38.
And who is showing disgust? Women, demoting a 25-year-old man to the status of a child.
http://www.xtra.ca/public/Vancouver/In_praise_of_older_men-6357.aspx
From an ultimately hedonist view, there’s no problem with establishing poligamy, but first it is necessary to work on the aesthetically disgusting 105 / 100 ratio. Hell, I would even support something that encourages the opposite of truce: massive abortion of male fetuses.
From a monogamy view, which is where we are currently stuck, big age gaps are disguised poligamy and therefore, can’t be tolerated. Restricting older women relationships is overkill, since men naturally avoid them; they only part that requires positive action is the punishment of the way too older men relationships for both sides.
{ 1 trackback }