One of the most destructive things that feminism has done to the West is to lower our birthrate. It is extremely troubling to observe that most of the population growth in the next fifty years will be coming from the third world; an area which is, not coincidentally, lacking in feminist ideology.
Demographics is a weapon, a tool. We should not delude ourselves that our advanced age is beyond the conquering of a nation by flooding it with immigrants. The use of demographics enables one to overtake a nation without firing a shot.
The Aztlan Movement postulates that the United States stole much of the Southwest from Mexico. As the idea goes, to get it back, one simply needs to flood the area with people from Mexico. Feminism has reduced the Anglo birthrate, and arithmetic will do the rest of the work. Movements similar in spirit are also occurring in Europe and Australia.
So, how are we doing? A substitute teacher in Arizona recently had an classroom experience and wrote the following letter to Senator Pearce:
March 15, 2011
Dear Senator Russell Pearce,
I am compelled to write to you about a recent event that occurred to me. I currently work as a substitute teacher in the west valley areas of Phoenix, Glendale, and Peoria. I was called upon to teach history and language arts for 8th grade at a Glendale public school. The number of students I had in each class ranged from 28 to 38 children, which were almost all Hispanic and a couple of Black children. The day started out as usual turning on the television listening and watching the announcements and saying the Pledge of Allegiance. During the Pledge of Allegiance I notice the vast majority of students refusing to stand and say the pledge. I asked the students why they refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance and they responded by saying, “we are Mexicans and Americans stole our land.”
The teacher’s instructions were for the students to read a few pages and answer the questions regarding Mark Twain in their history textbook and to finish their final drafts to Senator Steve Gallardo thanking him for his position on Illegal Immigration rights. Their teacher apparently had showed them a video with Senator Steve Gallardo and Lou Dobbs. Most of the students came unprepared for class not possessing paper and pencil. I provided the students with paper and pencils only to have them wade-up the paper and throw it at each other along with their pencils.
The students’ final drafts that I read were basically the same. Most of them stated they were in the country illegally, White Americans are racist, and that they came here for a better life. I asked the class if America adopted Mexico immigration laws would Americans still be consider racist?
That question they could not answer and called me a racist for asking it. I mentioned that my wife and children are Hispanic so how could I be racist? I asked the students to stop speaking Spanish in class because it was impolite to speak a language in front of people who may not speak that language. Their response was that Americans better learn Spanish and their customs because they are taking their land back from us.
When it came to completing the Mark Twain assignment only 10 students completed it out of all my classes. Most of the students refused to open the book, tore the pages out of the book, or threw the textbooks at each other. I thought are these the students we are trying to educate with taxpayers money. I have found that substitute teaching in these areas most of the Hispanic students do not want to be educated but rather be gang members and gangsters. They hate America and are determined to reclaim this area for Mexico. If we are able to remove the illegals out of our schools, the class sizes would be reduced and the students who wanted to learn would have a better chance to do so and become productive citizens.
I applaud and support your efforts to stop this invasion into our state and country. When the citizens of a country are forced to speak the invaders language, adopt their customs, and forced to support them, are we not a conquer nation? I do not want to see our state and nation turned into a third world country. Thank you for standing up to this invasion. You may contact me by phone, e-mail, or mail. Thank you, again.
Sincerely,
Tony Hill
{ 46 comments… read them below or add one }
Pffft. “Reconquista” is Mexicans cashing in the nation-wide inferiority complex and their envy of the US.
“Stole their land” is one of the most bullshit excuses that I’ve ever heard.
Why would people seen and treated as less than human by whites give a shit about what whites want or think?
What is in it for them?
—-
http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/04/26/demography-is-a-bitch-3/
A letter like that would force any person to call for increased barriers. Only the staunchest of liberals can advocate immigration in face of such a letter, and they will have to hesitate.
However, it seems that are considering the letter to be a hoax, citing that Mark Twain is not on the curriculum and other substitute doesn’t experience the same thing. The thing is, they have a point that it could be a hoax and invalidating the logic conclusion of the letter.
Still, if students are being that open in their hostility including not taking the Pledge of Allegiance and Saying the US stole Mexico land, a simple visit a few schools could verify the story. If it is videotaped and put on Youtube, it would make it impossible to view it as a hoax.
Weak argument. Correlation does not imply causation.
Feminism, environmentalism, socialism, etc are all the result of over-civilization and high standards of living. 3rd world countries have high birthrates because people are ignorant or due to the fact that, lacking any sort of state welfare, having kids is a retirement plan. When life is good, there’s not such a great incentive for people to have kids.
By the way, some facts worth noting:
1) There’s no such thing as an hispanic race. That’s a U.S. invention. Hispania was the name the Romans gave to the Iberian Peninsula over 2000 years ago, so only Andorran, Portuguese, and Spanish people can claim to be hispanic. Language is not ethnicity. If it were, black South-Africans should all be considered part of a “Dutch” ethnicity.
2) It’s stupid to refer to Latin-Americans as “hispanic” as you group Amerindian peoples, African slaves, and White colonialists together.
3) Mexicans descend from the Maya and Aztec peoples, and also from Spanish colonizers. Most Mexicans that emigrate to the U.S. are almost pure Amerindian and have no Spanish blood in them. Hence, by definition, they can’t be “hispanic”. Amerindian people came from Asia originally, so they are “asiatic”.
4) As far as I know, Mayas and Aztecs never settled in California or Arizona, so I don’t see how Mexicans can take back what was never theirs.
5) the “Reconquista” was the period from the 8th century to the 15th century when the nations that would later become Portugal and Spain took the Iberian peninsula from the Muslim invaders. Those were the first unofficial crusades, when Northern European knights came to Portugal and Spain to kill infidels. Calling a worthless movement such as the Aztlan Movement “reconquista” is profoundly distasteful.
“Why would people seen and treated as less than human by whites give a shit about what whites want or think?”
When you’re in a host country, you fall into line with their customs. The world does not bend to you.
Italians, Jews and Irish all came over to the US in the early 20th century and each was treated worse than the next. Yet by doing things like learning the language, getting an education and working hard, these three ethnic groups are amongst the most successful today. If I were to go over to France today, I’m sure I’d encounter hostility. I’m also sure I’d learn their language and customs, not expect them to change for me. New immigrants to America should do the same.
Who knew lazy 8th grade Mexicans were so interested in politics?
This article was mostly on the US. There is another movement in France by the Muslims. France now has 751 ZUCs or “Sensitive Urban Zones.” Read that as areas that the French government does not control, where the police and fire departments do not go, and the people live under Sharia law.
I have watched what happened to whites in the Congo, Zimbabwe and South Africa when they lost control of their governments. I don’t want my kids to be the one white kid in an all Hispanic or all black school. To me, the reasons are obvious. Others have to be convinced.
Here in the US, I have heard several arguements regarding the Reconquista. One group of people say that the mexicans will not secede the union once they have control over California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas. The money and benefits they recieve from the government is too much to give up.
Another group notes that extremists tend to be more popular than moderates. Most Hispanics are “moderately” proud of being Hispanic. The La Raza and MECHA organizations are rabit and fervent believers. They seem to absolutely hate “anglos”. Some quote the plan of san diego : “Every Norteamericano over sixteen years of age shall be put to death; and only the aged men, the women, and the children shall be respected…”
@Days of Broken Arrows
Only if you are in the ‘real’ minority zone. Otherwise the host and kids get their heads blown off for being assholes.
Whites are NOT on the ascendant nor do they have any worthwhile edge over others. Better get used to this new reality.
@Days of Broken Arrows
AD is right. A true “minority” is socially and politically submissive. In the American context, the “minorities” are free to blow our heads off for “being assholes” and can trust their major newspapers to look the other way, their peers to nullify the punishment, and their media and entertainment outlets to glorify their aggressive behavior.
White Americans don’t realize how they’re going to be treated when their power and influence is even further eroded. We’re not merely going to be treated as disempowered minorities, but despised and disempowered minorities that they have historical grudges against.
I have had extensive interactions and acquaintances with Mexicans, and it doesn’t matter whether they are here legally or not, they have no love for America. I’m not even from a border state and I get to hear that shit from them. Usually when one of them spouts off I tell them to shut the fuck up, stuff a dildo up their ass, and go back to Mexico because I have zero tolerance for anti-Americanism from immigrants, legal or not. The high school I went to had a bunch of them and I tried, I really did, to be friends with them out of niceness but fuck them and fuck their Mexico-first attitude. They would rather listen to La Mecha and La Raza. God damnit our country is fucked.
@ Spaniard,
You have some good questions. I feel like we have gone over some of these points many times. I think as white nationalists we have gone over the theoretical aspects and the minutea of our positions to death.
@ A. Diaboli
You seem to have a great deal of anger toward whites. I will look at your blog later to see if I can figure out your race and your position. I credit you that you are at least open in your hate.
I’m not asking or begging your permission here. I am stating a fact, and the fact is that I want my race to understand what is going to happen. I know that most whites already prefer the company of other whites. It is only the why that they lack.
AD:
“Only if you are in the ‘real’ minority zone. Otherwise the host and kids get their heads blown off for being assholes.
Whites are NOT on the ascendant nor do they have any worthwhile edge over others. Better get used to this new reality.”
What are we being ascended by? a pack of wild animals? these people have an edge? lol. if the whites ever decide to get violent it will be over for the spics
Rome and the barbarians … all over again. But this time it’s NOW and it’s US.
¿Hablan español, compadres? Me parece que debemos aprenderle.
(Do you speak Spanish, compatriots? It looks to me as if we’d better learn.)
What is in it for them?
Clean running water, road repair, functioning hospitals with stocked pharmacies, literate teachers.
Whites are NOT on the ascendant
Whites will always run things. The question is, which whites. Ones that promote civilization and beauty, or ones who ought to be swinging from lamp posts?
demography-is-a-bitch-3
Not really. Chad and New Guinea can have TFRs of 1,000 per woman, for all I care; as long as they stay in Chad and New Guinea. Besides, third world population is a bubble. Pull the Western aid lifeline, and …
A. Diaboli / You seem to have a great deal of anger toward whites. I will look at your blog later to see if I can figure out your race and your position.
He is a south Asian, Sri Lankan according to TFH. He used to post fantasies of white extermination at Roissy’s under a different nick. He also sympathized with any non-whites as agents of anti-white violence. He does not realize that there is no rainbow coalition; the blacks (or whoever) that he loves, don’t necessariloy love his brown ass.
One guess is that his hatred is sexual in nature.
@ PA
Thank you. I figured that A. Diablo was from India, but Sri Lanka is pretty close. There was too much talk of brahmins, Eastern mysticism and such for him to be white in my estimation.
I want to be clear that A. Diablo and another famous anti-white poster “Volcanic Glass” should be free to vent and rage here. There should be no censureship of anti-white hatred. Insults, degradation and genocide ought to be freely published. Alot of whites do not accept how much hate and resentment that minorities feel. The best teacher is their own words.
Whether we like it or not, AD’s description of present circumstances is spot on. His view of the future is correct as well, if we assume that white people will continue to beat ourselves up about Nazis and slavery, until there’s nothing left of us. That’s where I think he’s wrong. At some point, white people will collectively get over our misplaced guilt, and start kicking ass wholesale. Frankly, I see that happening sometime in the next 30-50 years.
We don’t all have the same talents, or abilities. We don’t all have the same propensity for violence, nor the same ability to organize effectively. History shows that when white people decide, en mass, to make a bunch of people dead, no one does it more efficiently. There’s no reason other than emotion keeping whites (mostly) docile. But emotion is fickle. It can swing in less than a decade from “cum by yah” to “sieg heil.” I don’t look forward to it, but that’s the future I see.
Whites do NOT have the technological edge they once had (1800-1920). If you don’t believe me, look at the ‘made in’ stamp on things you use. Then there is the issue of demography..
Don’t forget the issue of fragility- as overtly complex systems with low error tolerances can be fucked over far more easily than simpler systems with higher error tolerances. Furthermore, there is no need for any non-white coalition to screw you over.
Individual and disconnected acts of bad faith from a significant percentage of the population can screw up the system far more effectively, and thoroughly, than any concerted action. It is easier to fight an army than an insurgency..
Take away all the anti-white propaganda, affirmative action, forcible redistribution of trillions in White money to nonwhites, technology subsidies, etc, and you’ll see that Whites are still, by far, the most powerful people on Earth – it’s just that their countries are heavy with parasites they are too misguided or compassionate to kill outright. That will change in time. Hope you realize this before the blowback.
Speaking of this, did you see that Congressman who said 70,000 children around the world will die if the Republicans make minor budget cuts?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/usaid-administrator-rajiv-shah-republican-cuts-lead-child/story?id=13275542
I guess White American males are expected to adopt parasites worldwide, not just in the homeland.
“Why would people seen and treated as less than human by whites give a shit about what whites want or think?”
Hmmm.. because (mostly) white taxpayers are buying pampers, food, healthcare and shoes for their kids, and at some point they may get tired of doing it???
@ retrenched
taxpayers are meaningless.. most people’s jobs are not essential. It is about keeping money in circulation, aka spending.
Anybody can spend..
Most of the Chinese and Indians live in relative poverty, and much of what is produced in China is cheap knockoff garbage. They also regularly infringe US copyrights and patents, or steal American software to run their computer systems. Sure, they’re catching up, but they’re not going to surpass America as a superpower for decades, if at all. Let Whites keep what they produce, let them return to high education standards that will leave low-IQ minorities behind, let them compete on their own merit for their own jobs and schools, and repel the illegal invasion of America – we’ll be fine. What you seem to forget is that all the advantages minorities have are handed to them by willing White liberals. Keep up with your rabid anti-white politics and maybe you’ll get to see that even self-loathing White commies have a breaking point.
No it isn’t. Really. It’s only more difficult when you are playing nice for political reasons. When you’re not, you just kill the host populations, no big deal. If the political will existed in the White population, genocidal nonwhites could be wiped out of America in 5 years or less, no problem.
@goldenfetus
Have you even looked at where your computers, smartphones, chemicals, machines, ships etc are made? look again- moron, or maybe you cannot read.
IP is worthless as every nation steals it when they are building up their industry- read some history. You are on the path of exponential decline..
PS: Keep up that attitude and your kids (if you end up with any) will be the last generation of your kind.
Made overseas using…what? Chinese tech and processes? No. Chinese LABOR. Made by White companies with White technology and White processes.
Yes, strategically worthless. The point is they are stealing it and not making it themselves. I’m using it as evidence that Whites are still technologically more advanced and innovative. You’re right – we are exponentially declining. But when we’re gone you and all your parasite brothers die too. You think the minorities you worship are going to take up the torch of the West and continue producing enough to to feed their worthless, entitled, inflated populations? No. There will be massive die offs all around.
That’s either going to happen or it won’t. It does NOT depend on my attitude, obviously. I’m dead anyway, and so are you. It would be nice to die knowing the legacy of the West is intact and will carry on into the future, but a close second would getting to watch the minority gravy train wreck itself, and to see them turning on each other.
But no matter if I die or have children or what, the simple fact is that you are yours are so angry and resentful because what Whites produce with minimal effort invalidates your highest yearnings. You know you will never measure up.
AD is just angry because he has to buy sex from white chicks because all of his girlfriends dumped his Indian ass for a white guy, or did not want to be seen with an Indian.
Ignore him.
“taxpayers are meaningless..”
Sadly, you may have a point, though probably not for the reason you think you do. Thing is, it doesn’t seem to matter what taxpayers want, or who wins elections… the OWNERS OF THIS COUNTRY (as George Carlin once called them) always seem to get their way. And apparently they just want to keep spending money we don’t have on services we can’t afford until the whole system collapses under its own weight. If that happens, things will get interesting… VERY interesting, to say the least.
This is nothing new though. As others have said, no nation or civilization really survives. Some just last a little longer than others, but all ultimately meet the same fate. Hell, even human beings will one day be replaced.
Made by White companies with White technology and White processes.
lolzzllzlolzzllzlolzzllzlolzzllz!!!!!
Well hey I could be wrong. Were computers, smartphones, chemical engineering, industry, and modern navies originally developed by nonwhites? Are Apple, Google, Microsoft, IBM, Intel, Exxon, Walmart, GE, GM, ad infinitum nonwhite companies?
White guy here. First off, I’m not going to respond to an absurd brand of pseudo-Aztec nationalism by advocating an equally absurd brand of my own.
Secondly, even if Reconquista mythology is as common as claimed here, I’m not sure how much it matters much in terms of peoples’ actual behavior. People who are ideologically motivated — i.e., people who spend a lot of time commenting on blogs — easily fall into the trap of thinking that other people are equally driven by ideology while taking their words at face value. In spite of multiculturalism attempting to accentuate people’s differences, most people have the same motivations — they care about status, security, eating, drinking, fucking and being entertained. And apparently, ideologies and old tribal loyalties have not been any barrier to large numbers of Hispanics and Asians from getting what they want out of life by marrying out:
“Among all newlyweds in 2008, 9% of whites, 16% of blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 31% of Asians married someone whose race or ethnicity was different from their own.”
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1616/american-marriage-interracial-interethnic
In the previous race-related article I commented on, the concern was that the various racial groups would wipe each other out through miscegenation. In this article, people think that it will come by means of tribal war. It has to be one or the other, folks, not both.
I think it’s going to be the former. Why? Because maybe about five percent of the population are actually ideologically driven. The remaining population simply pays lip service to the prevailing ideology of their resident community because it makes it easier to achieve those basic animalistic goals that I described above. La Raza doesn’t matter. The Greco-Roman/Judeo-Christian “defense of the west” thing (whatever that refers to exactly) doesn’t matter either. What matters is that people are going to fuck who they’re attracted to — or maybe not even necessarily who they’re attracted to, but who they have the mere opportunity to get with or who they find it easiest to get along with.
It’s probably true that a culturally homogeneous society has greater social cohesiveness, but at this point, you can’t get there from here. AD is right that demographic trends make your opinions irrelevant, even if you’re right. Even if immigration were halted entirely, you’ve already lost, as the number of white children born in the U.S. last year was less than 50 percent of total newborns. Also, too many people with friends, lovers, spouses, family members, business associates, etc. from other ethnic groups, and ultimately, people derive a lot more utility from their social network than they do from a sense of ethnic nationalism that’s no longer pertinent to today’s world.
Gx1080 that honestly makes no sense
Indian men tend to marry outside their race more than Indian women (contrast to Asian men and women). Also if you have a decent job, you can pretty much get married without any trouble to an Indian woman.
Anon666 has some very good points.
As I’ve mentioned before, this “reconquest” is not only happening in the US by the Mexicans. I think it’s reasonable to assume that the people who founded those 751 ZUCs in France are similar to the sort of men responsible for the troubles in the Middle East today.
The Coalition has been fighting for 10 years in Afghanistan and around 7 years in Iraq. These men, call them what you will, are driven by ideology. So much so, that they will strap a bomb to themselves, and blow themselves up, without any hesitation. It’s not just ideas, it’s that they have a religious conviction.
I have read about life in these “sensitive urban zones.” There is no integration with ordinary French citizen. Each ZUC has it’s own Iman and the whole area is under Sharia law.
Ideology is important. The extremist drives and directs the moderates, who are relatively indifferent. Moderates in North Korea must live in ways shaped by the extremists like Kim Jong. It is the extreme feminist who pushes the agenda the hardest and gets the most results, good or bad. The moderate feminists, and the ordinary women who collect the benefits earned by extreme feminists, don’t complain or challenge the extremists. They do nothing to combat feminism. So it is with the Muslims, so it is with La Raza.
It doesn’t really matter who originally developed what. Even if Anglo-Germanic civilization originally spearheaded industrial civilization, the process has outgrown its founders. Today, the most innovative areas today are not always the most Anglo-Germanic today. Coeur D’Alene, Idaho and St. Johns, Newfoundland are not capitals of innovation today, nor is the entirety of the United Kingdom. Germany has a lot of innovative cities, although they are dependent upon large populations of foreign professionals.
Also, technological innovation doesn’t really require the labor of the majority of the human population. Most people who use cellphones didn’t participate in their innovation and have little idea how they work. A handful of companies in the United States, Finland and South Korea innovate them, but they are used even in the poorest of African countries today. Cellphones are not going to disappear as a result of having a multiracial population in the U.S. If a demand for cellphones exists and if the industry can hire a sufficient number of people who can meaningfully contribute to their innovation, they’ll continue to be produced. Whether the original innovators of cellphones were white or not matters far less than the question of who companies such as Nokia, Samsung, Apple, LG. etc. currently find fit to hire to their teams of engineers and designers. They aren’t all white.
Many industries that make up the economy don’t innovate anything that improves the human condition. The construction boom, for example, did not improve the experience of living in a house by enhancing comfort and convenience. Nothing new was innovated at all. It merely made it possible for a greater number of people to signal their social status by way of home ownership when they would have been just as materially comfortable in an apartment or rented house. Much of the economy exists entirely for the purpose of validating peoples egos, not for alleviating physical discomfort or reducing the inconvenience of everyday tasks.
@anon666
Personally, I do advocate this either. I advocate letting White people keep their own lands. Is there really anything unreasonable about that? They don’t need to hate nonwhites or exclude them totally, but self-defense is a natural right.
I agree with you, but the issues I see are ability and loyalty. Regardless of whether people desire the same things, the ability to produce/acquire those things varies between races. It’s not fair or reasonable to allow races that cannot produce advanced things to demand those things for free, at gunpoint, from those who can, or to demonize people that advocate being allowed to keep the fruits of their own labor. By this I also mean allowing one’s race to keep its lands and institutions intact. In this case nonwhites are clearly the aggressors. It wouldn’t be an issue, except that Whites are disallowed self-defense.
The other issue is loyalty. We can all enjoy or have the same things, but loyalty to one’s own race is innate. There will always be conflict between races occupying the same territory, so I’m advocating letting the race that created America keep her.
There are highly intelligent and capable people of all races. Calling on my previous point, the problem is that very intelligent Black people, for example, maintain loyalty to other Blacks who have very low average intelligence. They may produce as much as Whites, but the genes, culture, and wealth they pass on will be passed on to nonwhites, while the origin of their wealth is essentially White in nature, as it could not have arisen in a Black culture. Also, the intelligence of those Blacks will be diluted in their children through regression to the mean, and there is no shortage of intelligent Whites. For every highly intelligent Black man there are several (conservatively) highly intelligent Whites who are underemployed because of affirmative action.
I also feel their is a significant ethical issue in giving people access to what they cannot or will not create. No justice for the unjust, no food for the lazy, no nuclear weapons for South Africans, etc.
I ought to have read that over again before posting. My first sentence should have been “Personally, I do NOT advocate this either.” Please forgive the other grammar mistakes.
PA: “He is a south Asian, Sri Lankan according to TFH. He used to post fantasies of white extermination at Roissy’s under a different nick. He also sympathized with any non-whites as agents of anti-white violence. He does not realize that there is no rainbow coalition; the blacks (or whoever) that he loves, don’t necessariloy love his brown ass.”
Is he an actual Sri Lankan or a Tamil? From his constant frothing-at-the-mouth style and genocidal fantasies, I’m leaning more towards Tamil (i.e. the scum who invented suicide bombings).
Listen, I’m just going to quote the man:
http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/06/07/on-bad-faith-5/
Ryu,
“I’m not asking or begging your permission here. I am stating a fact, and the fact is that I want my race to understand what is going to happen.”
What if your race mixes with the other races, which leads to one mixed race?
Isn’t that a better solution? In fact, in this case, the other races are also dissolved, so they don’t pose a threat anymore
You see, any white guy with my qualities/abilities and other attributes would have no problem getting LTRs.
I don’t want to comment specifically on AD’s particular case, but rather in general on the phenomenon, per my somewhat limited observation. His point of view rests on the fallacy of interchangeability of races on the sexual market. In a normal case, for every young South Indian male there is a South Indian female, and so his envy of white mens’ access to white females is a non-issue.
However, ther is a tragic angle to many upper-class immigrant families, particularly form the Subcontinent. Unlike blacks, central americans, and east Asians, they generally do not live in coethnic communities her in the US, where they have girls to date. They are atomized and tossed into a wholly different society. Even if their parents have other Indian friends, the younger Indians’ social circle is white Americans. So they feel, understandably, different. And in many cases, white girls (the only girls they know to begin with) aren’t, understandably, interested in them, on the female anti-miscegenation prerogative.
(The female anti-miscegenation prerogative is a woman’s instinct to creating a child that looks like they do, not darker skinned, or with different kind of hair. WHne white women mix with non-white men, there is usually a secondary factor involved: the male’s Game, wealth, etc, that isn’t necessary for her to date an otehrwise unexceptional guy of her own race.)
Anyhow, the tragedy of someone like AD (I don’t know him personally; just speculating the circumstances I think he represents) is that he is in a postion where he has to square the circle: there are very few women of his ethic background he knows, and many out-date to begin with; and the white women he’s around instead are not his natural match.
What if your race mixes with the other races, which leads to one mixed race? Isn’t that a better solution?
It is not. One, because this proposition is a purely academic exercise; it will never happen. Two, “brownded up” races, like what you can probably see in Sudan or with Afro-Arab mixes, don’t exactly add up to harmonious coexistence. Three, there is value in preserving any race; female (and male in a different sense) beauty is an argument tha trumps all others.
@Gx1080
Welp, I didn’t follow the guy at all, but I didn’t know he said it himself, can’t fight that.
Anyways the comments here have degenerated into the usual racial shit slinging. About white people wanting to remain in their own lands since they are the ones who made it great, etc.. Alright that’s fine, but you just want to have all the benefit of globalization (cheap standard of living, resources from outside nations) without all the drawbacks (having slighting brown to brown people in ‘your’ land). I think it’s fine if you defend yourself, etc, but if you’re upset about general policy go to your politicians.
Now, I don’t really care about the rest of what you’re saying, because as usual, it’s not the non-whites at the helm, deciding immigration policy.
Intel is heavily powered by nonwhite brains, although the science originated by whites is obviously pivotal. Its Israeli connections are notable.
Apple is heavily nonwhite; it is a marketing company led by a half-Arab (Steve Jobs). Its original technologist, Woz, has no evident signs of nonwhiteness.
GM is a failure.
GE is a designer of substandard nuke plants.
Walmart is a classic example of Yankee ingenuity and gumption that got subverted. It is no longer a white-friendly company.
Google is *not* a white company, and never has been guided by white interests. Of course, there are white people who work for it.
@goldenfetus
It’s unreasonable in the U.S. and Canada at least, as both countries have long ceased being white lands. Having grown up in a metropolitan area with many Asians, blacks and hispanics — at at a high enough number that whites no longer have a clear majority in most cities in said area — the notion of the U.S. being a “white nation” was never a part of my meta-narrative when growing up. Diversity is now the norm for kids growing up in most metropolitan areas around the country.
I see the U.S. and Canada as being similar to Latin American countries in the sense of having been international migration destination for centuries, difference being that we speak English and have a more innovation-friendly business culture. That might not be ideal for white nationalists, but you had better learn to live with it, or else you’re going to face a very alienated existence. I don’t think your views are going to receive much sympathy even with whites who consider themselves “conservative” these days. Might as well learn to enjoy the benefits of this new reality, like oogling that hot Latina chick who just passed you on the street.
Europe is another matter. and perhaps I’ll express my opinions on that another time.
Mass immigration of non-Europeans to the U.S. and Canada only happened because Americans and Canadians of European descent allowed it to happen. You might object that the government, not the people, allowed it to happen, but that still means that the people allowed the government to allow it to happen. I’m not convinced that the objections of whites nationalists are shared by the majority of the white population. This invasion metaphor falls flat because there’s no real resistance to it. What percentage of the white population do Stormfronters represent? 0.5?
I’d also say that mass immigration of hispanics and Asians is not an invasion because the very process was spearheaded by white-owned businesses offering them jobs. That quite literally means that they were invited in.
No, racial loyalty is not innate. Tribalism is innate, but there are a multitude of factors that determine the nature of one’s in-group. Prior to the 19th century, “race” only meant “ethnicity” — when a person referred to their “race”, they referred to fellow Welshmen, Basques, etc. Metaracial categories like “white” or “caucasian” didn’t exist. The invention of said categories didn’t generate any loyalty between the French, the English, the Germans, etc.
Today, tribalism takes many non-ethnic forms. People have in-groups based upon social class, religion (or lack thereof — atheists are a tribe of sorts these days), shared interests and hobbies, etc. I think most people’s “tribe” is just the company they happen to keep — their friends and family. I see that as a far more rational form of tribalism. People have been screwed over my members of their own ethnicity throughout their lives, but those they’ve selected as friends have generally proven themselves trustworthy.
Better learn Nahuatl.
Advocatus Diaboli considers demography all-important, yet he hires escorts instead of fathering a large family?!
No, of course not. That would result in a people with lower average ability than Whites have. Why would Whites want that?
I oppose globalization. It’s part of the same Hebrew utopian bullshit as miscegenation/integration, feminism, communism, etc. If that means I have to bust my ass in a factory, so be it!
So what game are we playing, then? You bring enoug nonwhites into America illegally and then, whoops, too late for you to defend yourself Whitey – just die quietly?
Significant nonwhite immigration is relatively recent, and can still be reversed.
You’re probably correct on this one. As Whites plummet towards minority status in America things may begin changing course, but I doubt it. That doesn’t mean I’m going to like it. It’s going to be disastrous for everyone involved, and I don’t want that for anyone.
I believe it was rich globalist Jews and anti-white liberal traitors who changed the laws to encourage nonwhite immigration, and who today refuse to enforce even the laws we have.
I concede this to you, but I do not think, as examples, that Whites and Chinese or Blacks and Turks will ever find themselves with any significant degree of overlap in who they consider to be part of their tribe. Different races occupying the same territory will result in conflict until one or the other is destroyed or absorbed.
Stole their land? The land was largely empty, wild and populated by a few thousand Castilian Criollos.
Later, we went to war with them, after which Mexico signed the treaty and we bought the land, though we did not have to. In fact, had we wanted to, we could have sacked the whole republic, except that it would have been more work than it was worth.
Of course, now that the land has been put to good use (and well-kept, I might add, given the white man’s unparalleled appreciation of nature) the backwater Mestizos come, calling it theirs, expecting us to give them jobs, clothing, shelter, free money, etc.
Mexican immigration is turning into the great American tragedy.
There they have 2.3 children (not much more than our own white women) but for some reason the illegals who come to America have about 3.5 children. Personally, I’m disgusted.
I think that all the viewpoints mentioned have merit. But, I think one thing we are overlooking, is that if you look at history, the white tribes are one of the few peoples who were able to subjugate and systematically eradicate other nations. Why were they able to do it? Even when they had smaller numbers, and shittier lands? Organization, and discipline.
How else could a tiny, rainy island nation found an empire where the sun never set? How could a small country prone to flooding and filled with tulips become a maritime superpower? I do not look forward to the day when white people get organized and start readying the cattle cars.