You can’t make this shit up. Legion alerted me to a post at the False Rape Society on the identity of one of Julian Assange’s accusers – a radical femtwat with a revenge fetish:
Anna Ardin, a notorious radical known in Sweden for her feminism views on how men achieve social dominance through sex, has been known to be bent on revenge. On January Ardin posted a blog entry on ‘7 Steps to Legal Revenge by Anna Ardin’, which included a statement, I’ve been thinking about some revenge over the last few days… An article on the blog can be read here - http://progressivealaska.blogspot.com/2010/08/strangest-blog-thread-yet-on-swedish.html .
It is also noted that this is not the first time Ardin has accused someone for molestation of a sexual nature in Sweden.
Ardin invited Assange to Stockholm, and was briefly appointed his press secretary during his visit.
The story begins the weekend of August 15. Assange wanted to attend a Swedish crayfish party, Ardin made the arrangements.
According to the Swedish newspaper Expressen, Assange sexually harassed a woman (Ardin) in Stockholm then two or three days later traveled 20km to Enköping where he supposedly raped another woman (Ardin’s friend). The Expressen concludes by an astonishing coincidence, the two women were friends. They decided a week later to go to a police station together saying that “Assange raped and harassed usâ€.
I’m guessing Anna Ardin is the “Woman A” mentioned here.
Do you understand this? Assange’s “victim” is a twisted, man-hating cunt who was bent on getting revenge for being played. She fabricated a rape charge because she was mad at him for porking her younger hotter tighter girlfriend within two days of putting it in her. Ardin is a sick puppy whose petty act of vengeance will damn an innocent man.
This is the little darling:
If ever there was a time for us to spring into action, this is it. We must sound the bell – Julian Assange’s rape accusers are nothing more than lying feminist slags. The name “Anna Ardin” must go down with Crystal Gail Mangum and Katelyn Faber in the Hall of Girls Who Cried Rape. We must make the definitive case as to how feminists have destroyed modern society by making it easy for mentally disturbed groupies to make false rape accusations because their feeeeeeelings were hurt. We must hang this albatross around the feminists’ necks and give them a blow that they will never recover from.
If there is a men’s rights movement, this is your call to action. This is where you must prove you are more than talk. The ball is in your court.
{ 37 comments… read them below or add one }
Feminism has become so politically accepted and integrated into the minds of the swedish people that just by questioning it you are considered a woman-hater, lunatic or a moron. No one dares speak up against it and the few who do are quickly ridiculed and marginalized into silence. I’ve experience this first-hand. I even had my employer warn me that I my view of feminism as something dangerous and negative didn’t “fit in my occupation” (I work in health-care).
When girls feel dissed like that they should simply give me a call. I will fuck them so well they forget their past lovers, cleanse their systems of it, and move on. Eventually I would have to start a company, hire extra studs to help with the volume of women using my services and probably make a fortune. This would be my contribution to rebuilding our society from the evils of spurned women like this.
She is moderately fuckable. I would have to charge her a slightly higher fee because of that. The better looking the babe, the lower the fee.
On a more serious note, this is a good post, and your calling attention to the problem of women crying false rape charges is important. Men get ruined by these sorts of charges. The mere accusation can damage a man’s life forever. This story is all too common. It is also fascinating how feminine behavior, no matter how steeped in feminist indoctrination, is fundamentally immutable through time and place. A spurned women, or one who perceives she has been spurned, is always a dangerous creature.
And I wonder if she has a nice blond bush. I love a blond bush on a girl.
Assange is a victim of feminist witch hunt, but he could have avoided becoming a target of persecution had he followed either a) or b) :
a) if you’re applying for residency in a country, don’t risk causing trouble in that country by fucking a woman
OR
b) if you insist on fucking a woman, don’t fuck the women who specifically seek you out by arrival at your press conferences.
Looks like feminists and conservatives are, once again, on the same side
White Knighting for a sleazy little rat like Assange is at least as contemptible as White Knighting for a girl you’re never going to bang.
Julian is a grown man. Let him fight his own battles.
[Yeah, fuck that fighting feminism bullshit, it's not like feminism is causing ANY problems! No sirree, move along, nothing to see here! - ed.]
Ferd, you should cross-post this over at The Spearhead.
[Done. Look for it tomorrow. - ed.]
(And not merely as contemptible, but as pointless.)
Tarl sounds upset!
Like the rest of the neocons, he lives his “life” in daily terror of cave-dwelling mongrels.
Look, Tarl, I don’t need some Big Government to protect me from the savages. Let one pull a box cutter on me during my next flight. We’ll see how far that gets him.
You and the rest of the cowards should get out of the way. There are a few big boys left who will save your feces-filled, scared asses.
“Julian is a grown man. Let him fight his own battles.”
And this attitude is exactly why feminism will come out triumphant.
A woman can kill her own children and other women will defend her.
A man can be falsely accused of a crime and other men will piss on him (to get laid).
Standing by your principles is not contemptible, but noble. It is arguably even more noble to protect or defend those who you don’t particularly like. After all, it is easy to defend your friends, harder to defend your enemies.
Of course he is a sleazy rat bag. That is immaterial to the point.
Yeah, fuck that fighting feminism bullshit, it’s not like feminism is causing ANY problems!
You gotta pick your battles. If Julian were a conservative, I’d be all for standing behind him. But he’s a Leftist douchebag, and if some femcunt takes him down, that’s the kind of intra-Left cannibalism I like to see.
[Where do you get the idea that he's a leftist? I posted a link to an interview in the previous post in which he revealed his politics as being more libertarian. Granted, he's probably aligned somewhat with the anti-American Lew Rockwell/Ron Paul crowd, but so what? When a man's right, he's right. Assange is a douchebag, but he's in the right. - ed.]
Tarl sounds upset!
Like the rest of the neocons, he lives his “life†in daily terror of cave-dwelling mongrels.
I’m not upset, and I’m not a neocon, dickhead.
I don’t white knight for men. And I especially don’t white knight for men I despise.
Look, Tarl, I don’t need some Big Government to protect me from the savages. Let one pull a box cutter on me during my next flight. We’ll see how far that gets him.
You and the rest of the cowards should get out of the way. There are a few big boys left who will save your feces-filled, scared asses.
What the fuck are you talking about? Where do you get all this horseshit from anything I said?
My own view is, in fact, exactly that the TSA should quit hassling people, and let the passengers take care of any bad guys who get on the plane with them.
Standing by your principles is not contemptible, but noble.
If your principles are contemptible, then standing by them is also contemptible.
It is arguably even more noble to protect or defend those who you don’t particularly like.
Noble, eh, maybe. But definitely stupid.
Of course he is a sleazy rat bag. That is immaterial to the point.
No, it is precisely the point.
The enemy of your enemy is not necessarily your friend. If one of your enemies takes down another one, that should be encouraged, not prevented.
A man under attack by a femcunt is not automatically a good man. If Assange is busy fighting off her attack, maybe he’ll be too busy to continue carrying out his evil agenda.
“Hell hath no fury like a woman pwned.”
If your principles are contemptible, then standing by them is also contemptible.
Freedom of speech is contemptible? Justice is contemptible? Truth is contemptible?
Noble, eh, maybe. But definitely stupid.
Not stupid. Perhaps not expedient or pleasurable, but certainly not stupid.
If one of your enemies takes down another one, that should be encouraged, not prevented.
I am not for winning at all costs. If you sacrifice everything to win, then you lose. What is the point in being victor in a battle, if you then go on to lose the war?
A man under attack by a femcunt is not automatically a good man.
I am not claiming that Assange — or, for that matter, FB — is a good man. I do not particularly care, and I make no claims to be a good woman either. It is possible even for a wicked man to do something noble, or to be deserving of my defence because he has been unjustly wronged.
Tarl says:
*************
This is not about Assange and it’s not about ‘white knighting’ for other men. Grow a pair and fight back against the widespread trampling of mens’ civil rights under feminism. This could happen to any of us. Let’s see how you deal with being labeled a rapist by international media because your condom broke during sex. Fuck you pussy white knight.
Updated: The Swedish prosecution office has now issued a notice saying that they are charging Assange with rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion. He has been “detained in his absence”.
—
http://gizmodo.com/5705430/wikileaks-julian-assange-is-now-not-accused-of-rape-updated
This is interesting. From “counterpunch” website:
http://www.counterpunch.org/
QUOTE:
Interpol, the investigative arm of the International Criminal Court at The Hague, has issued a fugitive notice for Assange. He’s wanted in Sweden for questioning in two alleged sexual assaults, one of which seems to boil down to a charge of unsafe sex and failure to phone his date the following day.
This prime accuser, Anna Ardin has, according to Israel Shamir, writing on this CounterPunch site,
“ties to the US-financed anti-Castro and anti-communist groups. She published her anti-Castro diatribes in the Swedish-language publication Revista de Asignaturas Cubanas put out by Misceláneas de Cuba…Note that Ardin was deported from Cuba for subversive activities.”
It’s certainly not conspiracism to suspect that the CIA has been at work in fomenting these Swedish accusations. As Shamir reports, “The moment Julian sought the protection of Swedish media law, the CIA immediately threatened to discontinue intelligence sharing with SEPO, the Swedish Secret Service.”
END QUOTE
She seems to be an unusual kind of CIA “honey trap”.
You’re totally right on this one, Ferd. I probably wouldn’t care one way or the other if they were launching this witch hunt on a trumped-up jaywalking charge, but using man-hating anti-sex laws to drum up moral support for their witch hunt is disgusting. This really exposes the pernicious nature of legal systems that have succumbed to identity politics.
This woman is off-putting both on the inside and the outside. Her right eye is sliding off her face.
She is quite a pretty girl, and in a sane society she would have had a happy life; but she has been driven mad by feminist penis envy. Swedish feminists have been crazy for decades.
The problem with feminism is that it has no natural end. There are always crazier and crazier “demands” that can be made.
The reason it has no natural end is that it is fueled by an unnatural and impossible desire – of women to be men. Anna Ardin will never be happy because she is a woman, who hates what it is to be a woman. She has driven herself mad by believing things like “men achieve social dominance through sex”.
Like Lady Macbeth she would say:
“Come, you spirits
That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here,
And fill me from the crown to the toe topful
Of direst cruelty!”
http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2010/12/no-awards-shall-be-named-in-honor-of.html
“You gotta pick your battles. If Julian were a conservative, I’d be all for standing behind him. But he’s a Leftist douchebag, and if some femcunt takes him down, that’s the kind of intra-Left cannibalism I like to see.”
To me, this only goes to show that certain men in the Men’s Rights Movement are not really interested in the rights of men (as men), only in the rights of men who are similar to themselves.
Ferd, hate to tell you, but we already knew that since the first article at The Spearhead about Assange.
Fuck yeah that is bullshit done for a crazy bitch.
And I still fail to see why these “leaks” are SO damaging. I mean, c’mon. Those aren’t weapons, military operations, just diplomatic gossip. Most of it done to paint Goverments as the incompetent sychopants that we already knew that they are.
Tarl is soooooo in love with labels… he so desperately needs to know who is in his tribe and who is not that, had he lived in the U.S. in the late 18th century, and had George III’s goons told him that George Washington & Co were “leftist douchebags” (or some other vacuous label), then he would have fought for the oppressors. What a true patriot!!
Assange is beyond the simple-minded left-vs-right dichotomy. That’s one of the reasons I respect him. He upsets and embarasses people across the entire political spectrum. When his targets stop engaging in wrongdoing, WL will be made obsolete.
The persecution of Assange is nothing but a prelude to the fall of the system: the fiat butthex matrix.
Things are getting more interesting.
Ferds,
On January 1, 2010, I wrote the Misandry Bubble, which is up to ~200,000 visits and still has legs.
On January 1, 2011, I will unveil a strategy that can cause asymmetrical damage to misandry with very little time investment from anti-misandrists like us, within the professional/culture/media/judical constraints that currently prevent market forces from correcting the disease of feminism.
Wait for New Years Day.
On that day, we fight.
Funny, I bet Tarl would not be so nonchalant if it were a friend of his who was falsely accused by a miserable slag like this.
She should be sued for slander. The lot of them should.
And then prosecuted for making false rape accusations.
How can a feminist say hey i found cool guys and do this. How can it be non-consensual. And it is a premedited act from a tier person. How can you adjust in real time policies for your own purpose. It need approbation of a council and time etc…. So all war journalism in the world will have to keep quiet now? No scoop and redundant and boring content, nobody want to pay for such content. I’ll stay on free RSS source.
The government needs to initiate a FALSE Rape registry to protect men. Girls who make FALSE claims of rape/sexual assault will be put on that list.
Here is Julians little darling
Personuppgifter
Personnummer: 1979-03-19-3204
Namn: Svea Anna Karolina Ardin
Gatuadress: Tjurbergsgatan 36 4tr
Postnr och ort: 118 56 Stockholm
Kommun: Stockholm
Län: Stockholms län
Give me a break, there is no way that this skinny little weakling of a guy could rape anyone. Any girl could beat the crap out of him. Sounds like they set him up and now have a lynch party ready.
It might actually help your cause if you showed a less glammed up picture of what this hairy armpitted sloth really looks like.
Bad teeth, and she looks like a dude.
http://sports.rightpundits.com/wp-content/photos/Anna_Ardin.jpg.png
what a dog however her friend looks doable….
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_hikjq4SSRx4/TP2wwaqHzxI/AAAAAAAACJM/lBrdXY9FGP4/s1600/annaochpetra%255B1%255D.png
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hikjq4SSRx4/TP2bXvcAYEI/AAAAAAAACJE/G1jHzq0NieQ/s320/Anna+and+Petra.+Jan+1+2005.jpg
a picture of Ardin at the meeting….. again looks nothing like your picture in real life..
http://sports.rightpundits.com/wp-content/photos/Anna_Ardin.jpg.png
some more doggy pics…
http://www.flickr.com/photos/martaaxner/63520436/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/martaaxner/102994061/
I think I prefer to pass than wet my wick with this one.
Finally, a website that calls the shite behaviour- SHITE- of those swedish trolls.
The Guardian however, finds it reprehensible,hits the remove button, disqualifying anyone in their “public forum” they provide- who may disagree!!! with their “pro-swedish state in britain journos” .
You cannot disagree with their pro-JA-criminal slander !!!! wtf?
You will find, bar naomi wolf,(she defends JA at her peril), some shocking assumptions along the lines of such as ‘women do not lie about rape’!!!!????” women(journos) must band together “.It’s vindictive and wrong. Well, i wont band together on the bed of bullshit, accusing women’s convention.
Are journos,forgetting well, women will, if they want to lie about it, to gain revenge-ie: find a person, method and context of personal inconsequentiality- deliver it on a man who is innocent,leading to:-
any revenge will do = revenge matters. But hurting an innocent person does not ever enter the argument-where is any empathy?proof?
why, if not wearing a condom is ‘rape’ why could neither women wear a female condom? is that argument not fair?
Bianca Jagger was right to defend Julian Assange in the huffington post.read here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bianca-jagger/the-julian-assange-trial_b_805299.html
read this other case in Australia:
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/innocent-boys-jail-nightmare/story-e6frg12c-1111113259916
This is so bizarre who can predict where it will end. If these rape laws are passed you might get a situation where Swedish men refuse to have sex with Swedish women because of the fear of reprisals. I am sure this will suit the lesbian and feminist fraternity down to the ground until till they realise the plummeting birth rate will mean the end of the nation and future taxable income to pay the enormous wages of future feminists in government. This then could lead to everything coming full circle and feminists demanding that Swedish men shag them, bringing in new intercourse laws for the good of the country. Fantastic!
Considering that even many feminists such as Wendy McElroy are saying that false rape accusations are more common than believed, then I think that the statement should be individual feminists. Feminism in 2011 isn’t always the feminism of 1971 because there are feminists & not just women defense lawyers who side with suspected rapists.
{ 10 trackbacks }