Will you people please stop paying attention to this assclown?

by Ferdinand Bardamu on October 18, 2010

in Gender War

As I’ve mentioned before, I generally don’t bestow attention on blogger haters who aren’t in the general vicinity of popularity that I am. It’s precisely what they want – a writer with a vastly larger readership to train their guns on them and give their stats an unearned boost. Starve the trolls and they’ll either go away or curl up and die. Which is why I am making this plea to my fellow manosphere denizens: will you please stop writing about David Futrelle?

For those who don’t know who David Futrelle is, he’s the twerp behind Manboobz, a blog that “offers a critique of the Men’s Rights Movement and anti-Feminism generally.” He writes in his opening statement:

I’ve been watching the Men’s Rights movement, such as it is, for some time, with a mixture of amusement, horror and disgust. It’s a movement that’s bad for everyone — for men, for women, for children, and probably even for my cat, though I haven’t yet quite worked out how. The best thing you can say about the Men’s Rights Movement is that it doesn’t, and hopefully never will, have anything near the impact on the world that feminism has had over the years. And this blog, in its own little way, hopes to help keep that way.

Apparently, he never read that Schopenhauer quote about how truth is first ridiculed, then it is violently opposed, then it is accepted as being self-evident.

Manboobz is little more than twelfth-rate feminist boilerplate with the added twist of anti-men’s rights activism, all leavened with snark. Snark is the preferred humor of dweebs like Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and all Beigeist posers who like to imagine themselves as heroic underdogs being pissed on by the evil elites, when in fact they’re the elites doing the pissing. And make no mistake, David Futrelle is carrying water for our cultural overlords, evidenced in part by the fact that he can post his opinions under his real name while the majority of anti-feminist bloggers have to use pseudonyms to avoid impoverishment, censure or even imprisonment in some countries. “Free speech” my ass.

David even has an “enemies list” of anti-feminist sites that gets top billing on his blogroll over actual feminist blogs like Jezebel, Feministing and Shakesville. The “enemies list” includes such diverse contrarians like myself, Roissy, MarkyMark, Dalrock, Laura Grace Robins, Elusive Wapiti, and Robert Lindsay. In fact, I was the recipient of Futrelle’s effete ire recently, when he took umbrage at my discombobulation of “gay pride”:

You know, I didn’t bother reading the whole thing, which has something to do with Carl Paladino, and apartheid, and elephant poking, whatever that means, but this little nugget stood out in the latest post on In Mala Fide, a generally retrograde Men’s Rights-ish blog:

“Gay culture” … has about as much cultural legitimacy as redneck jokes. A bunch of nearly-naked men marching down a major city street beating each other with riding crops and wearing makeup is not a legitimate expression of culture, any more than a group of married dudes finger-fucking their wives on a giant vagina float would be an expression of culture.

Since he’s clearly incapable of following a metaphor, I’ll lay it out for him en anglais – radical gay activists, in their obnoxious way of shoving their lifestyles in the faces of the heterosexual majority and demonizing them, are poking and prodding an elephant. Elephants are big, heavy and have sharp tusks, and can gore or stomp you to death without breaking a sweat. If gays don’t clean up their act and stop treating straight people with contempt (hat tip: grerp), they could inspire a violent homophobic backlash. Capisce?

Under normal circumstances, a nobody like Futrelle wouldn’t be worth the mental energy it takes to read one of his posts. Feminist quislings are a dime-a-dozen, and this guy is just an attention whore who’s looking for his fifteen minutes of fame. And yet for some reason, MRAs continue to waste time on this idiot. It’s bad enough that the majority of his commenters appear to be anti-feminists, but men’s rights bloggers are now devoting blog space to Futrelle’s tiresome dribblings.

I first heard of Futrelle when my fellow Spearhead contributor Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech wrote him up as a hater. That post lead to another one where he made some additions to the Catalog of Anti-Male Shaming Tactics, which inspired me to come up with my own addition, so PM/AFT gets off. Next, Rob Fedders of the NO MA’AM blog lambasted Futrelle as “the Tit Man“:

David is another typical Western Male Fucktard, thinking that even on-line sucking up to fembots will slather his withering pole. A true SNAG (Sensitive New Age Guy) in every dimension.

Reality is not so, Mr. Futrelle, it is not so.

You are anethema to female vaginal lubrication.

Hope you feel proud! You are the reason panties are starting to be modelled without the protective cotten-lined-gussets! Who needs such a thing when the West produces poofs like you?

Hopefully, this blog and your willingness to be a dancing jackass for the matriarchy will help me illustrate this – over time, of course. A suave man of your persuasion will take many moons to out-manoeuvre.

Rob is now accusing Futrelle of libel for calling him a “fag basher.” I’m not up on Canadian hate speech laws, but an MRA suing a feminist toady into next Monday would just make my day. Talk about cosmic justice.

But the last straw came yesterday. Paul Elam, another one of my Spearhead comrades, laid into our very own Menopause Man over at A Voice for Men. And he ended it with this nugget:

Take heart though. I have challenged Futrelle to a debate, he has accepted and chosen domestic violence for the topic.

Should be coming through with the beginning of the debate late this coming week.

You read that right. Paul Elam, former editor of MND and one of the most well-known proponents of men’s rights, is debating a feminist blogger whom no one has ever heard of.

I don’t understand. Why must you people give this nitwit the attention he craves? David Futrelle is nobody important. He’s not a Jessica Valenti, a Melissa McEwan, or a Hugo Schwyzer. He’s not even a Barry Deutsch. He’s a miserable mediocrity who’s trying to get famous, an ant in our blog ecosphere. All you’re doing is feeding his ego. I feel bad about even having to pollute my abode with his name.

To my brethren, I say forget about Manboobz, and forget about David Futrelle. He’s not worth your time or your ire. Paul, good luck in your debate, but after you’re kicked Futrelle’s ass, exorcise him from your brain. Your bullets should be conserved for bigger, more important prey.

And David, this is the last time I’m ever mentioning you here or anywhere else, so relish it. Oh, and you’re welcome.

{ 31 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Samson October 18, 2010 at 7:21 am

Apparently, he never read that Schopenhauer quote about how truth is first ridiculed, then it is violently opposed, then it is accepted as being self-evident.

I like the Salman Rushdie quote I recently came across:

One of the extraordinary things about human events is that the unthinkable becomes thinkable.

2 The Blanque October 18, 2010 at 9:55 am

Never heard of him.

3 Advocatus Diaboli October 18, 2010 at 10:29 am

Why care about the opinions of a spineless guy? Somebody who subscribes to and defends an ideology that fucks him over is a very low form of life.

About “domestic violence”- Why do women seek out guys who beat the shit out of them?

4 RetiredPUA October 18, 2010 at 10:37 am

So wait, let me get this straight: you are telling guys to stop devoting blog space to this fucktard, yet you make your Monday post about him?

Just ignore, ignore, ignore.

5 Cameron October 18, 2010 at 11:05 am

‘Snark is the preferred humor of dweebs like Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and all Beigeist posers who like to imagine themselves as heroic underdogs being pissed on by the evil elites…’

Brilliant, I can’t stand Stewart (real name Leibowitz) either. I remember Tony Blair destroying him once. Blair was spinning the usual neocon babble about ‘a democracy never invading another democracy’ when Leibowitz eyes light up and he starts going on about the Falklands. Blair had to politely remind him Argentina was a military junta back then. Poor old Leibowitz was well and truly out of his depth.

6 Snark October 18, 2010 at 11:32 am

“Snark is the preferred humor of dweebs like Jon Stewart”

I feel subtly insulted.

7 Zammo October 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm

The fellow in question is merely pandering to feminists so he will get some feminine attention. While he hopes that it might be sexual attention, it will be the FriendZone (along with private scorn) for him and nothing more.

I am also disappointed that Elam is willing to debate him.

8 Default User October 18, 2010 at 12:28 pm

I had never heard of him before this post. His tone is full of the self-satisfied, more clever than you, snark, that many Roissy/PUA/MRA detractors have.

Ignoring him should be easy, indeed, natural.

9 Jumping October 18, 2010 at 12:48 pm

Elam is a known mangina and impotent Cialis billboard. With incompetent ‘leaders’ like Elam, who needs feminists? This guy is a publicity whore first, and an incompetent MRA boytoy second.

10 Unfrozen Caveman October 18, 2010 at 1:08 pm

I like snark

…and Snark.

11 Snark October 18, 2010 at 1:35 pm

I like snark when it’s GOOD. The reason I chose this name was because of multiple feminist complaints about anti-feminist ‘snark’. I wanted to embody everything that pisses them off. And for a while I was pretty successful.

But when snark is bad, it is cringeworthy, i.e.

“probably even for my cat, though I haven’t yet quite worked out how.”

Ha Ha! Good Joke, Dude!

12 Snark October 18, 2010 at 1:36 pm

“This guy is a publicity whore first, and an incompetent MRA boytoy second.”

There are few MRAs as competent as Paul Elam.

13 Schopenbecq October 18, 2010 at 2:27 pm

I agree entirely FB.

I don’t think we should even link to his site. If people really want to find it, they can just search ‘manboobz’.

Before you know it, mangina boobz is going to have a google page rank of 5 and be on the first search page for ‘men’s rights’.

To all men’s rights bloggers – if you have to link to this creep, make sure you insert the following html in the link tag : rel=”nofollow”

example :

this prevents you giving his site any of your precious Google ‘authority’.

14 Schopenbecq October 18, 2010 at 2:33 pm

Oops, sorry about the above link example, I didn’t think it would be read as html.

Anway, here’s an interesting extract from a book review mangina boobz wrote for the Chicago Reader :

Throughout the essays Wojnarowicz describes how he turns inward to realize what is unattainable on earth. The book is filled with impossible erotic longings–desires deferred, turned into fantasy. Driving across the country, Wojnarowicz turns his fleeting glimpses of truckers, construction workers, and so on into extended erotic reveries. At times, though, even imagination cannot ease the pressure of unrealized desire; watching a Chicano boy play pool in a waterfront bar, Wojnarowicz feels lust rising like a “humming” from his stomach. “Standing there sipping from a green bottle,” he recalls, “I could see myself taking the nape of his neck in my teeth as he turned and stared out the window at the rolling lines of traffic for a moment. Light curved around his face and the back of his head, the shaved hair produced sensations that I could feel across the palm of my hand, my sweating hand, all the way from where I stood on the other side of the room.” Stung by the boy’s mocking glance, Wojnarowicz flees the bar, seeking escape from an onrush of dizziness.

Throughout the book Wojnarowicz combines tenderly remembered erotic episodes with unflinching descriptions of their sordid surroundings.

Look’s like David Futrelle has some sordid sympathies. Unless I’m reading him too literally.

15 Ancel De Lambert October 18, 2010 at 3:23 pm

Hey HEY! Respect the snark.

16 Denis October 18, 2010 at 4:16 pm

I agree completely, manboobz doesn’t deserve the attention. It is a distraction that gives him unnecessary recognition.

…and yeah, snark is good.

17 EscapistFart October 18, 2010 at 5:49 pm

[Your shtick was never funny, dear, and it's lost what little novelty it had. Comment under your real name, Escapist, or not at all. - ed.]

18 MarkyMark October 18, 2010 at 8:16 pm

I never even heard of this clown until he posted on my blog. I checked him out, and found out you were right, FB; he’s a twelfth rate feminist. I have not mentioned this SNAG, and I have no intention of doing so.

19 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech October 18, 2010 at 11:18 pm

I have wondered if manboobz is really a MRA trolling as a male feminist to make male feminists and feminists in general look bad.

20 John Dias October 19, 2010 at 2:09 am

Robin Steele, Julian Real, David Futrelle… Each one surfaces about a year after the one previous, and they all have names that end with an “L” sound. Coincidence? Who knows.

21 Escapist aka Sexy Pterodactyl October 19, 2010 at 2:18 am

Ferdy, are people really hating on you? And not just Real People, but also females are being mean to the emotionally delicate manosphere? I’ll save you!

[Did you read what I wrote about snark being the province of Beigeist dimwits, little girl? - ed.]

Together we shall defeat dem bitches
Through the power of naughty nasal appendages
(and also Game! And Censorship! Yay, I like this post)

[All that time spent stalking me, and not an iota of talent rubbed off. A pity.]

Aloofly,
Sexy Pterodactyl

[Is this the best you LR groupies can come up with? Weak, weak, weak.]

22 Escapist aka Sexy Pterodactyl October 19, 2010 at 2:23 am

Hey Ferdy, why the censorship of Sexy P, if you’re all free speech and not threatened by him? If da hataz be weak, why not let the haters speak?

[Your facade is crumbling, whinergrrl. Beneath every Strong, Independent Womyn is a brat who throws tantrums when she doesn't get her way. - ed.]

Ferdy and Gameboys say dey be da alpha
But u know dey be da wack clown
Dat Sexy Pterodactyl masculinity crew
Done give dey booty da smackdown

["Far from the vulgar haunts of men
Each sits in her 'successful room',
Housekeeping with her fountain pen
And writing novels with her broom."]

23 Columnist October 19, 2010 at 6:09 am

Geert Wilders is not an Anti-Feminist.

24 EmanTheDesperateHouseboy October 19, 2010 at 9:44 am

DavidFutrelle–this ass-kisser? *aargh*

He’s probably another straight-male beta boobie chump! Not a real ally in my book!

EmanTheDesperateHouseboy

25 Default User October 19, 2010 at 11:13 am

Am I the only one to find theSexy Pterodactyl/Escapist Art blogs unreadable?

I do not mean that they are hard to read because of the point of views expressed; I mean that they are not comprehensible. I have scanned through both blogs, and besides a snarky distaste for MRA/PUAs, I cannot understand what points, if any, the writers want to present. I wonder if Gay Books for Men and Snarky Pterodactyl are related.

["People squirt impenetrable clouds of ink for the same reason squids do." - John Dolan - ed.]

26 Dalrock October 19, 2010 at 4:54 pm

I’d never heard of the guy, and had no idea he was linking to me before I saw this post. I just checked, and he does in fact throw a view or two my way the last few days.

I just took a quick look at his blog, and I think his biggest crime is being boring. Every post is another petty cat-fight with some other blogger. I’m all for mixing things up, but there really aren’t any noteworthy ideas in the mix.

27 Samson October 19, 2010 at 5:29 pm

Am I the only one to find the Sexy Pterodactyl/Escapist Art blogs unreadable?

No. (Whenever you’re inclined to doubt yourself, remember that if you’re an intelligent, reasonable observer, then other people are most likely seeing the same things as you.)

No, I’ve been reading the EA blog on and off with the hope that sooner or later she will knock it off with the idiosyncratic style and say something meaningful – she’s clearly a smart gal. But thus far I’ve been disappointed.

I cannot understand what points, if any, the writers want to present.

Yeah, me neither.

28 Anonymous October 22, 2010 at 4:23 am

I wonder if Gay Books for Men and Snarky Pterodactyl are related.

GBFM at least makes up for his incoherence with charisma and lzozlzlzz.

At this point, I’m not sure if EA is attempting to be a GBFM-type “trollblogger” or if she’s a timecube.com-style lunatic.

29 Smashicus January 26, 2011 at 8:35 pm

John Stewart is about as funny as stepping in dogshit. All you want to do is wipe it off and move on.

30 Frank August 28, 2011 at 4:08 pm
31 Frank August 28, 2011 at 4:09 pm

Jon Stewart is kind of funny but he kills everything by overdoing it. He runs every good joke in the ground and keeps going with unfunny Jew-shtick for another minute after the punch line. He’s entirely dependent on his writers anyway.

Leave a Comment

{ 5 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: