At The Occidental Observer, Edmund Connelly writes on the emerging trend of young Jews making light of Jewish stereotypes:
One hardly knows what to make, then, of recent examples where young Jews really push the envelope on exposing their own power or even crimes, all done with cutting humor. For instance, the whole question of Jewish power in Hollywood and in TV is a touchy one. In his excellent study The Jews of Prime Time, David Zurawik asks, “What is ‘too Jewish’ yet not Jewish enough?â€Â  Answer: “the strange history of Jewish characters on prime-time network television.†The incongruence to which he refers comes from the fact that nearly all the top TV executives and producers were Jewish, yet they were ambivalent about portraying their own high status or that of Jews in other important areas of American life. To illustrate, he begins with an interview with Jewish comedian Al Franken (now a Senator from Minnesota). Zurawik’s direct access to Franken and TV mogul Brandon Tartikoff provides an inside view of Jewish thinking on the “too Jewish†issue.
Why, then, did the heavily Jewish Saturday Night Live crew ever create — let alone run — a skit that makes fun of the prominent role Jews played in the financial meltdown? The skit spoofs Jews such as Herbert and Marion Sandler, Congressman Barney Frank, and even George Soros. Here’s the unadulterated original version.
More pointedly, however, I think the Jews behind the skit [a recent Onion video - ed.] (again, I have to assume this because I can’t imagine non-Jews ever daring to create images such as these) are getting a thrill out of scaring and offending older Jews. It’s a very adolescent thing — to scandalize your parents. For a young Jew in America today, where physical safety has also been guaranteed and financial or job prospects never a true worry, what can beat the frisson of excitement associated with tweaking the noses of the goyim with some secrets about the tribe and in the process really upsetting mom, dad and uncle Bernie down at the country club in Miami?
In response to Observer editor Kevin MacDonald’s request for suggestions as to why the Jewish Borg Hive Mind would allow this to occur, my dear frenemy Matt Parrott gave his take:
I agree with Connelly that it’s generational, but I think it has less to do with teasing the parents than it does with failing to take antisemitism as seriously as their forebears. I believe Joel Stein’s notorious article naming Who runs Hollywood illustrates the “generation gap†that Connelly was getting at. The comfortable and sarcastic younger Jew doing a piece on how Jews really do run Hollywood contrasted against Foxman acknowledging the obvious and telling him to shut up about it.
These integrated cosmopolitan atheist Jews don’t realize the magnitude of the forces at play. They think that the goyim (perceived by them through only the thin slice of philo-semitic White elites they’re exposed to) are completely harmless, that the tiger is completely housebroken and safe to poke, prod, and tease.
This is right and wrong. Parrott is correct that young Jews don’t perceive anti-Semitism to be a threat, but his implication that they’re joking about Jewish power to rub it in the faces of the “completely housebroken” goyim is typical white nationalist paranoia. It’s not all about YOU, sweetheart.
The reason young American Jews are so cavalier about anti-Semitic stereotypes is because they are almost completely disconnected from their Judaism. As far as they’re concerned, their Jewishness is nothing more than a prop to be used in asserting their individuality. Only someone who has zero respect for their heritage and culture would dare make jokes about the worst aspects of their tribe. I covered this back in June when I wrote that young American Jews are increasingly indifferent to Israel, a major break with their parents’ generation.
The fact is that all white Americans of my generation are like this – little knowledge and no respect for their tribal cultures, beyond what they can use to brag to their friends. When I was in college and high school, one of the standard topics for making small talk when you met someone else was your ethnic heritages. The more heritages you had and the more exotic, the better. “So Ferd, what’s your heritage?” “French-Canadian, Anglo-Canadian, Italian, Polish and a bit of Algonquin Indian.” You get the idea. Me and my friends typically fling ethnic insults at each other – the Irish are micks, the Italians are greaseballs, and I’m a frog – and it’s all in good fun. None of us would dare do it to our parents or grandparents, because they’d understandably take offense – if I ever cracked a joke about “wops” to my Italian grandfather, he wouldn’t hesitate to haul off and punch me in the face.
And none of us know jack about our tribal cultures. We don’t speak the languages, we’ve never visited the homeland, and half of us probably would have trouble pointing it out on a map. If you’re Italian, you know that Italy is somewhere in the Mediterranean and that they eat pasta. If you’re Irish, you know that you get to eat corned beef and cabbage and drink green beer until you puke on March 17th each year. That’s it. The only thing I ever learned from any of my cultural backgrounds is my mom’s recipe for tasty, gristle-free Italian meatballs. My generation is a tribeless generation, with no culture beyond mindless consumerism. And why should we care? Our ancestors crossed the Atlantic eons ago, and time and distance have severed our bonds.
Our Jewish brethren are part and parcel of the same generation. Liberalism may have gotten to them a bit late, but it’s destroying them all the same. Their lack of loyalty to the tribe is even more shocking considering their parents’ fruitless attempts to get them to give a crap about their culture. All the Hebrew schooling, Taglit-Birthright trips and Hillel sleepovers aren’t doing a damn thing. Most of the Jews my age might as well be gentiles for all the respect they give to their forerunners’ traditions. They don’t go to synagogue, they eat pork, and they casually point out the influence Jews have in American society because they think it’s all a big joke. The Jews of today feel free to profane what is sacred because they don’t consider it sacred and never have.
But of course, you may not be interested in tribalism, but tribalism is sure interested in you. Just because young Jews don’t care for Judaism doesn’t mean that non-Jews will see it the same way. I’ll quote Matt again:
They might be right. They might not. I’m with Foxman on this, and believe they’re pulling a Siegfried and Roy stunt with their failure to maintain the taboo against drawing attention to Jewish power. These anti-Semitic patterns of thought are serious business. The Saxon may yet begin to hate. Jews might be, as mindweapon put it: â€sharpening the knives and cackling triumphantly all too soon.â€
I echo his concern, but for different reasons. The Jews of yesteryear should be scared shitless at how their children are behaving, not because they’re drawing attention to the mythical man behind the curtain, but because they’re burning everything that they should be holding dear in the liberal bonfire. If this isn’t cultural suicide, I don’t know what is.


{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }
So how does one get a young man to care? By being worth caring about.
I know that in my personal experience it’s really hard to respect “the tribe” because “the tribe” is a bunch of aging hippies who have already thrown away all self discipline, self respect and any beliefs in anything bigger than themselves. I have these three qualities, but “the tribe” isn’t worthy of my respect or loyalty.
Among the gentiles it’s not the young who have committed cultural suicide, it’s the Boomers. We’re just hanging out by the corpe, trying to do the best we can.
Most Jews in America (unless they are religious in some way) tend to relate to being Jewish as largely having drawn the straw of having had Jewish parents. This phenomenon of making like of the stereotype of Jewish power isn’t seen as much different that the idea of playing around with the stereotype that most Italians are connected to the mafia ala The Sopranos.
Jews like Irish and Italians before them passed into the general White group a long time ago. When the intermarriage for your group is over 50 percent, it should seem pretty clear that its not a particularly important part of your identity.
As for the worries of the “Jews of yesteryear”, they’re helpless and have been for a while because you can’t keep kids in the fold by appealing to feelings over ethnic food and Philip Roth books. You need something solid to back you up against the natural allure of quietly being like everyone else in your class, including marrying whoever you want.
A young Jew who is Jewish just because his parents happen to be isn’t going to be that upset about marrying someone who isn’t Jewish but also relates to their background the same way he does, i.e. its just the luck of the draw that I’m Italian/Irish/etc cause thats where my family came from. Whats happening is that most Jews are slowly turning into that lone curiosity that’ll appear in a genealogy chart of their gentile descendants (ala lets say John Kerry’s Jewish relative from 150 years ago) while the religious will either have to recoup the loss or essentially turn into an urban version of the Amish.
Ferd,
I believe it’s pretty common for groups to make derogatory in-group jokes, and it’s not necessarily a sign of disloyalty or disrespect. When the joke’s that your people dominate the West’s information and economic chokepoints, then there’s a risk of blow-back from…the West.
People make too much of Jewish exogamy. While their demographic balance sheet is indeed in the red, their fountainhead, high Orthodox Jewish birth rates, is in good shape.
I appreciate the linkage.
The melting pot at work. It’s a good thing. American first, whatever else next……
A succint demonstration:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5h5bhf-nRT4
WNs are gonna criticize Jews either way. If Jews were more traditional, the complaint would be “See, these Jews refuse to assimilate into American society!” Now it’s “How dare these Jews not respect their culture and heritage!”
Only someone who has zero respect for their heritage and culture would dare make jokes about the worst aspects of their tribe.
Would that apply to Chris Rock or Dave Chappelle?
[Rock, possibly. Chappelle, definitely. A big reason why he pulled the plug on his show was because he realized he was essentially shitting on black people:
"It’s been nearly a decade since Spike Lee’s film, Bamboozled, prophesied the rise and fall of Chappelle’s Show. The film follows two Black entertainers who end up hosting a modern “minstrel show†that becomes a hit sensation, especially among Whites. In it, they rationalize their degradation of their own people on the ground that it’s art, on the ground that it’s comedy, on the ground that it’s fake, and on the ground that it’s real.
The real reason they overlook the impact of what they’re doing is because doing so increased their status: there’s money and fame in getting away with perpetuating dehumanizing stereotypes about Blacks. Chappelle, to his credit, eventually realized this, snapping on the set in the middle of the third season, abandoning the show, and fleeing to Africa. While he had been growing uneasy with his show for months, it was a White crew member laughing a bit too hard during the taping of one of his sketches that triggered his paradigm shift."
http://delightsome.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/fag-ugly-stupid-pigs/
- ed.]
You’re so right, FB. For the disaffected and alienated Jew, why not capitalize on Jewish culture for fun and profit. Who cares if you’re endangering people in the process?
Up in Canada people like Naomi Klein and Judy Rebick use their accidental Jewish birth cred as license to boldly go where no anti-Semite has gone before. They’re just as dangerous than the worst closet anti-Semite. And those of us Jews committed to Israel, democracy, and liberal Western values watch helplessly as these types cannibalize us.
We are doomed.
Predating Harry Reid by seven years, my cousin’s stupid cunt girlfriend in 2003 said “I don’t see how any Jew could not be a liberal.”
If I hadn’t been groggy from driving 12 hours that day, I would have responded “I don’t see how any Jew could not have children.” (she was 44 at the time).
Matt Parrott is right: the future of a shrunken Judaism is Orthodox. And sadly, so is JustDespair. The people to whom he refers would vote for Hitler if he were non-white.
HA. Why anyone of my generation should believe that anything is sacred when we were raised for those that sold said things to the cultural Marxist cancer?
We are a generation that has only known a rotten carcass of actual patriotism and pride for their heritage. Why a shadow, a poor imitation, a pathetic copy of actual pride should be sacred?
Answer me.
Forgot to add:
Why should be proud of a culture that hasn’t given ANYTHING to be proud in our lifetimes?
dude, take me off your fucking blog list. i don’t want to be associated with this racist echo-chamber.
i listened to the pod-cast you recommended this morning and it was one of one of the most idiotic things i ever heard. “Americans selling out America” etc, etc,
The economy ain’t so fucking simple, Ferd. it ain’t a bunch of fucking jews selling out the economy. the economy is complicated. nobody really gets it, not even brilliant minds who have spent a lifetime studying the matter. Yet ignorant fucks are the most likely to act like experts on the matter. Why is that? Surely you have read about this phenomenon. It might as well be called the American Idol phenomenon. As John Cleese points out in a recent lecture you have perhaps seen online: “It takes the exact same skills to recognize you are good at something as it does to be good at something. This has many implications. It explains Hollywood, for example.”
It also explains all the HBD movement and all you other reactionary twats. You don’t know what you don’t know. Morons like Steve Sailer think they are experts on economic matters — for the exact same reason they are not. They are clueless. They are tone deaf idiot fucks who have no clue they are tone deaf idiot fucks.
Those who aren’t interested in tribalism may not be because they recognize that a large part of the population has surpassed it. The better part of the population, btw.
The rest of you are retarded.
David Gordon reviewing Paul Gottfried’s analysis of the managerial-therapeutic state:
http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=124
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_man
The last man (German: der letzte Mensch) is a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra to describe the antithesis of the imagined superior being, the “Übermensch”, whose imminent appearance is heralded by Zarathustra. This ‘Over Man’ may be contrasted to a weak-willed individual, one who is tired of life, takes no risks, seeks only comfort and security: the last man.
Nietzsche saw that nothing great is possible for the Last Man, and it is Nietzsche’s contention that Western civilization (Europe) is moving in the direction of the last man, an apathetic creature, who has no great passion or commitment, who is unable to dream, who merely earns his living and keeps warm.
One of Nietzsche’s greatest fears was the creeping mediocrity brought about by democratic “freedom” and universal equality. If the “Übermensch” represented his ideal – the ideal of a being strong enough to create a new master morality, strong enough to live without the consolation of an egalitarian ethics, and strong enough to recognize and embrace the “eternal return” as the ultimate reality – then Nietzsche’s so called “last man” is the exact opposite.
The last man, Nietzsche predicted, would be one response to nihilism. But the full implications of the death of God had yet to unfold. As he said, “the event itself is far too great, too distant, too remote from the multitude’s capacity for comprehension even for the tidings of it to be thought of having arrived as yet.”[1]
The late Marxist Paul Piccone helps us to think coherently about the current experiment we are living through:
http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/piccone_ulmen.htm
(…)
Forced by WWII into playing the major world power role it had rejected after refusing to join the League of Nations, and subsequently confronted with the communist threat, the US in the second half of the 20th century abruptly rejected isolationist sentiments that had resurfaced in the interwar period. Instead, it sought to mainline its own self-understanding within the kind of universalist political framework it had traditionally rejected since George Washington’s Farewell Address–at least until Sept. 11, when the Islamic fundamentalist attack made the irreducibility of radical otherness unmistakably obvious. (9) Suddenly, the inherent universalist pretenses of liberalism again were demonstrated to be what they had always been, i. e., the expression of a particular version of secularized Christianity. This cataclysmic development encouraged a turn toward unilateralism in foreign affairs–something that had been developing slowly since the end of the Cold War.
Although defined by the Cold War, the postwar years were also characterized by an American administration attempting to fine-tune the New Deal–a collectivist project of socio-economic reconstruction that had been strengthened considerably by war mobilization, but remained unable to legitimate itself fully on the basis of those deep-rooted Protestant values of decentralized governance and local self-determination embedded in the US Constitution. Consequently, with the gradual shift from isolationism to imperialism and from classical to managerial liberalism, which had begun toward the end of the 19th century, but had stalled temporarily in the 1920s (in reaction to WWI), American historiography broke with its traditional exceptionalism. What took its place was a slight variation of the unilinear theory of history espoused by its managerial-liberal and, even more, its former communist opponents. The “pursuit of happiness,” previously left to the discretion of particular communities, was redefined in terms of full and equal participation in a well-administered, professionalized society (a euphemism for socialism and social homogenization), projected as the inevitable outcome of all historical developments. As with all secularized versions of the Christian theory of history, deviations from such a path came to be seen as pathologies or breaks, rather than as legitimate alternatives.
(….)
Just Despair:
How are Jews “doomed?” Your ultra-orthodox population breeds like rabbits and is already bringing Jewish population growth back to the UK. (I don’t mean “breed like rabbits” in a bad way. I have nothing against big families.) Israel is the only developed country with a fertility rate consistently over 2.0.
Or do you mean that Israelis and the ultra-Orthodox are not a part of that group of Jews that stands for western values…?
@Mark,
Jews are the canary in the coal mine. First it’s Israel, than it’s the West in general.
World wide Jewish population is shrinking and is tiny compared to the global Muslim population. Right now governments like France pander to their huge Muslim populations and Jews are emigrating because of unchecked Muslim anti-Semitism. Those rabbits that you so fondly refer to, constitute a miniscule proportion of the overall Jewish population and will not stave off the tsunami that’s coming.
Yep. Same dynamic in my own family. The emblem of this phenomenon is the chai tattoo, a perfect example of missing the point. Yet its the elders fault for emphasizing the most boring aspects of Judaism: milquetoast bourgeoisie community and second-hand nationalism. A religious revolution is what’s needed, a new Sabbatai Zevi.
I thought Jews were supposed to be self-deprecating.
I think it’s more a slap in the face of the non Jew than it is to their Jewish ancestors. Because all they really are doing is saying what everyone has known for decades that Jews run our financial and media outlets not just here but essentially world wide. I think it’s more indicative of the lack of a backbone of non Jews the world over that they throw it in our faces and we do nothing but mumble under our breath. Then when they say “What? What did you say?”, we answer “Nothing” because we are so afraid of being called a racist or anti semite that we cow before them. All the new generation of Jews are doing is accelerating the plan that their ancestors put into motion a century ago. The only difference is now they don’t have take the behind the scenes role they have in the past.