You now have the right to get laid

New kid on the game blogger block Kid Strangelove asked me a couple days ago what I thought of this story he posted at his blog on the British government paying for a drooling retard to lose his virginity to a Dutch hooker:

A ‘man of 21 with learning disabilities has been granted taxpayers’ money to fly to Amsterdam and have sex with a prostitute.

His social worker says sex is a ‘human right’ for the unnamed individual – described as a frustrated virgin.

His trip to a brothel in the Dutch capital’s red light district next month is being funded through a £520million scheme introduced by the last government to empower those with disabilities.

They are given a personal budget and can choose what services this is spent on.

The man’s social worker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said his client was an ‘angry, frustrated and anxious young man’ who had a need for sex.

‘He’s planning to do more than just have his end away – he’s having a holiday,’ he said. [emphasis mine - ed.]

Schopenbecq also wrote this story up recently:

This world, created by the feminists and their allies, both conservative and cultural marxist, is full of Orwellian contradictions.  We hold the highest value to be the reduction of human misery and inequality.  Few object to disabled people having financial compensation, privilages, and other support from the state, even the right to ‘compete’ at Olympic Games.  Yet the idea that sex is a human right, rather than something that must be arduously won in the free sexual jungle, is something that strikes most as absurd.  Even the feminists have to pretend that their sexual trade union laws are attempts to save ‘victims’ rather than honestly admitting that they are nothing more than attempts to preserve the sexual ‘rights’ of older, unattractive women in that cruel and ruthless sexual market.

What do I think? I think this is monumental. I wrote back in December that socialists and liberals would never accept a redistribution of pussy to the sexually malnourished because of the gigantic overlap between socialism and feminism in the West:

Now, guaranteeing free nookie for romantically underperforming men is consistent with the socialist program of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” However, much like the robots in I, Robot who had secret brains that allowed them to disobey the Three Laws, progressivism has built within it a secret core of feminism that can and does override the primary socialist programming at any time. Anything that infringes on female sovereignty is to be opposed, even if it is consistent with socialist logic. Hence, the thought of progressives accepting the concept of a “National Bureau of Prostitution” redistributing sex from the most privileged to the least is a ludicrous pipe dream.

I may have been wrong on that score. Declaring sex to be a human right is simply following the socialist program to its absurd, logical conclusion. If we have the right to eat, have a decent standard of living and a roof under our head, why can’t we have the right to get laid? Oh wait, the feminists will have a collective embolism: “YOU DON’T HAVE A RIGHT TO MY BODY I CAN HAVE SEX WITH WHOEVER I WANT YOU MISOGYNIST WOMAN-HATING DOUCHEHAT!!!!”

My solution to this problem, that won’t involve violating the sovereignty that women have over their vaginas, is twofold:

1) Legalize prostitution, Nevada-style, across the country. Treat brothels like other legal red-light businesses like adult video stores and strip clubs, but legalize it. I plan on writing a more detailed argument as to why whoring should be legal – one that LIEbrals and CONservatives can both get behind – when I have the time.

2) Establish a program giving out vouchers to undersexed dudes, redeemable at the whorehouse of their choice. Call it Poonicaid.

Why not? Under my plan, the only women who’ll be required to sex undesirable dudes are the ones who get paid to do it anyway. And they and their pimps will get monetarily compensated for doing so. Everybody wins. If you’re a conservative, libertarian, or feminist who’s upset at the prospect of having to pay losers to get some action, think of it as insurance against the next George Sodini, bread and circuses for the unloved masses. It’s certainly a more sensible way for the government to spend money then half of the crap they do these days.

Not to mention that we could establish an outreach division for divorced men. The news article mentions a guy whose wife ran out on him who also got “serviced” under this program:

Another man who has a brain injury has even had sex work built into his council care package.

This is designed to teach him to become sexually ‘self-reliant’ after his wife left him and took all their money.

It has increased his confidence and restored his faith in women, care workers said.

Want to help husbands whose bitchy wives have cleaned them out in divorce court and taken their kids away? An appointment with Sexy Sally at the Beaver Ranch will do more for them than all the happy pills and counseling in the world.

Of course, Poonicaid is just a stopgap measure. The sickness that has destroyed relations between men and women – feminism and by extension liberalism – needs to be addressed. But until then, give me your tired, your poor, your unfuckable masses yearning to come free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send these, the woman-less, tempest-tost to me – I lift my lamp beside the golden vaj!

Tagged as: Schopenbecq