I promised myself a while back that I would stop responding to the goading of bloggers who are much less popular than I am. Giving exposure to random losers with neither readerships nor writing skills only inflates their egos and hit counts. Once you pass a certain threshold, Rule 4 should only be applied to those who are in the same neighborhood of notoriety that you are.
But a few days ago, this bit of hateration popped up in my referrer list.* According to “staunch, Constitution believing, Reagan Conservative” blogger Ronald Williams, I suffer from a disease known as douchebaggery, or DB:
I was recently made aware of a website owned by a writer who obviously suffers from advanced stages of the disease (Inmalafide.com) Thanks to Sharon from www.theliberalheretic.com for providing this information and I am hoping maybe we could set up an intervention to try to get this website author to accept the help he so desperately needs to combat the DB which causes him to spew idiotic, mindless thoughts.
How does our very patriotic (he’s “been serving on active duty in the United States Marine Corps for 16 years“, so you know he’s both a manly man and he loves America) broski know I am a victim of DB? He has a list of eighteen symptoms:
Those that suffer from DB and/or MDTD may experience loss of respect, loss of possessions, loss of friends and family. Symptoms include exaggerated feelings of confidence, overinflated ego, loose lips, problems with law enforcement and/or any authority figures, inability to speak at a low volume, laughing hysterically at own jokes, association with liberals and progressives, inability to hold down a career, urges to install mufflers on cars that sound like weed-whackers, wearing of sunglasses indoors, wearing of Che Guevara shirts, flexing of muscles in public places, belittling of the opposite sex, desire to wear pants at knee level, desire to tell everyone exactly how much you’ve had to drink, purchasing of wheels that cost more than their car, urge to wear fake tanning products, bleaching the tips of your hair, and countless others.
He then lists off a group of liberal celebrities such as Kanye West and Matt Damon who apparently suffer as I do from this tragic illness.
Well, let’s see – I’m confident and I have an ego (because I am awesome in every way), I have “liberal race realist” Robert Lindsay on my blogroll (because he rocks), and I delight in smashing LIEbral and CONservative myths about women (because I want to make the world a better place). Those are the only aspects of DB I seem to have. One would think poor Ronnie would know that four isn’t anywhere close to eighteen, but I guess he was too busy jerking off to pictures of Sarah Palin and David Frum columns to check his calculations.
More to the point, Ronnie’s feeble attempt at insulting me is emblematic of the slow, steady decline in the quality of my haters. There was a time in which I couldn’t go a week without getting great invective from a talented hater. Whether it was my legendary blog wars with Lawrence Auster, a feminist troll who claimed I was sexually abused by a family member (among other things), or the guy who called me a “key board jock faggot” for daring to suggest that Audrey Hepburn wasn’t the apex of female beauty, I was never at a loss for well-written, entertaining hate. In fact, I had so many awesome haters that I was the envy of other bloggers.
Fast-forward to today. Despite being exponentially more popular and well-known now than I was back then, the only entertaining bit of hate I’ve gotten recently is World’s Biggest Mangina contender Cord Ivanyi’s pitiful attempt at an anonymous drive-by. Oh, and there was the Randroid I almost made throw up. But aside from that, all of my haters these days are piss-weak, like Ronnie boy up there. When you can’t even rise to the pitiful level of an autistic, humorless Nordicism-obsessed retard like MGLS, you’ve got a biiiigggg problem, holmes. Forget about being exposed as a well-endowed reptile alien Illuminati charter member with a “stream of cum dumpster servant girls” like Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech – I’ll be lucky if I can get a feminist to claim I’m a small-dicked loser who’s never gotten laid. (Speaking of which PM/AFT, the check better be in the mail. I don’t spread anti-liberal, anti-feminist misinformation to aid you Illuminati reptile aliens out of the goodness of my heart.)
I just don’t get it. Am I not hate-worthy? I acknowledge the science of human biological diversity, saying that there are intrinsic genetic differences between races. I’m a Gamesman who gets into girls’ pants by being all aloof and jerkish. I think feminism was a disaster for the West, and I believe that different peoples would be better off in their own states, running counter to the liberal multiculti madness that rules the world today. I also live in upstate New York, work for the government, and listen to faggy indie bands like Animal Collective. Basically, I’m a racist sexist misogynist knuckle-dragging pseudo-hipster who sucks off the public teat. Is that not enough to attract some quality haters? What more do you want from me?
This is a mystery I have yet to solve. Until then, why not drop by Ronnie’s blog and give him some tips on how to properly hate on his betters? He could use the attention – according to Alexa, his blog is read by so few people he doesn’t even rank. Also tell him that he’s just a liberal masquerading as a conservative, like most of the “Reagan right.” The Alternative Right is where it’s at these days, fools.
This is where the tale might have ended, but there’s more to say. I thought that “Sharon” and The Liberal Heretic sounded familiar, so I went through my old Facebook private messages. A couple months back, as part of my never-ending campaign to spread the Gospel of Bardamu, I friended a wave of people who showed up on the Suggestions box, Sharon being one of them. (She’s the cute blonde second from the top here.) Shortly thereafter, I got a PM from her asking to clarify a couple of things on my About page. I PMed her back and she sent an essay-length reply talking about how she read through “a quarter” of my blog, describing it as a “mindfuck” and more. She ended up de-friending me anyway because she didn’t think I’d be interested in her posts, so I forgot about it and moved on. I assumed she did too.
If you’re reading this Sharon, this is the part where you start violently throwing up in your chair and screaming for help. Nobody ever said taking the red pill would be pleasant. But once the convulsions pass, you’ll thank me.
…
* – The referrals I got didn’t come from the version of Ronnie’s post that I linked, but a re-post at some aggregator blog that looks suspiciously like a spam site. I linked to Ronnie’s blog because it’s more aesthetically appealing.
{ 24 comments… read them below or add one }
manjaw alert
A couple months back, as part of my never-ending campaign to spread the Gospel of Bardamu, I friended a wave of people who showed up on the Suggestions box,
Ahh – That’s why you befriended me. Can’t say it was a stupid move either. I did know about both inmalafide and The Spearhead before, but was never a regular reader back then.
Yea I’m not seeing why Mr. Williams hates you so much.
Forget to mention that on an online forum awhile back, someone told me that I believed in HBD because I had been sexually abused as a child.
I hate you Bardamu!!!! You killed my father, prepare to DIE!!!!!!!!!
Hmmm. Tell women that they shouldn’t put themselves on situations where they could get raped. Explain why “marital rape” is rubbish. Talk shit about a dork hobby.
All of the above are tried and true quick ways to get haters.
If you want more haters, I recommend going after conspiracy theorists. Plus you can make jokes about how they are obsessed with Dick Cheney’s dick.
We’re sending you your very own cum dumpster servant girl this month.
[Yes! I knew selling out Earth was the smart move! - ed.]
There’s a natural and completely rational hate from military types for PUA douchebags like this blog and the two Rs.
[I'm not a PUA. Fail. - ed.]
Military life is about actual competence and having one’s status tied to actual useful ability. PUAism is about aping status behaviors through a facade without even concerning oneself with offering actual merit. Of course manly men don’t like PUAs.
[Thanks for the laffs, queerboy. Did Roissy finally ban your sorry butt?]
Military life is also serving countries that don’t give a shit about you.
In wars that are directed by idiots.
Ferdinan, You’re my heeerrrrooo!
Seriously. Even your lame haters provide fodder for our entertainment.
Damnit, Must remember to not drink and comment.
I’ve been critical of a lot of your recent posts, but I’m too much of a fan of your writing and your sense of humor to consider myself a hater.
Also tell him that he’s just a liberal masquerading as a conservative, like most of the “Reagan right.â€
I agree in part, but for different reasons. While my overall ideology hasn’t changed that much over the last two years, I now consider myself a “liberal” as opposed to a “conservative” because I value liberty more than tradition. With the hard-left moving toward the term “progressive,” I think the libertarian-right should reclaim liberalism for what it meant in the 19th century. (Although it’s extremely unlikely)
I believe that different peoples would be better off in their own states, running counter to the liberal multiculti madness that rules the world today.
You have fans amidst rabid liberal immigration and open-borders types, some of whom comment on your blog. What’s your secret?
[I offer something for everyone. Game advice, social commentary, racialism, or lulz. This is basically the Chinese restaurant of alt-right blogs. - ed.]
I think your problem Ferd is that you deliver smackdowns to haters that are too good and nobody but fools throw haterade at you. The only way for you to fix this problem is to start to garner Roissy sized traffic. Haters can’t resist a crowd.
Even Susan Walsh has gotten boring. She used to say that I was incapable of relating to women as anything other than cum dumpsters. Now all she can say is that I’m a “coward” and that I need to “man up”.
Ferdinand wished he had haters,
but he’s left with just fellators.
[LMAO. - ed.]
“[Thanks for the laffs, queerboy. Did Roissy finally ban your sorry butt?]”
Hater. And you’re not even good at it.
[You're not worth the effort. - ed.]
“[You're not worth the effort. - ed.]”
In other words, I schooled you, and now you’re pretending that your incompetence is really superiority.
[Still as delusional as ever, I see. - ed.]
And that just supports my original point about why military men don’t like you. They believe in real merit, and you’re all about being a poser.
Game, set, match.
[All this time and you're still pulling the same old shtick. God, you are so lame.]
Hard to hate someone who’s writing is meant to intentionally incite hatred. You associate being popular with being right (Argumentum ad populum). Your screeds are based on generalization fallacies. You treat aspects associated with being the least common denominator of humanity (e.g. sex) as being the zenith of human achievement and your raison d’être. Any rutting animal can have sex. I can’t say whether or not you’re a Christian man, for I haven’t read anything to indicate it, but if you have any readers that are, they should really consider what your writing implies about a person such as Jesus. Just because you obsess with the count on your chalkboard doesn’t mean you’re a better man. Just what are you trying to prove by it? Seemingly, by your standards, Genghis Khan was the greatest man to walk the planet simply by virtue of how much sex he had.
You’re own attempts at countering your critics, in which you use ad hominems yourself and criticize their writing ability is itself arguing by the bombastic (proof by verbosity).
What’s ironic for a person such as myself, I came to this website at first agreeing with some of the basic premises of the site (i.e. antimisandry), but further reading revealed that your content is clearly meant to be sensational, and corrosive for the purpose of increased popularity, rather than rational and logical discourse.
Yes I did read this, and yes I did warn Ron when he showed me his blog post that you would attack him. I have been reading your blog every once and a while ever since you added me on facebook. Sometimes you are spot on (the post on the dumb bitch who got raped in Haiti was brilliant, and I even quoted an excerpt while arguing with a liberal on digg). What keeps me coming back though are your seemingly misogynistic rants that paint women as useless whores, who should be broken down and judged purely on a physical level (as you so often do in your “gaming”). Your sentiment is quite popular, as I see many similar blogs out there all championing the same thing- evil emasculating women have plotted to take over the world, let us combat this by putting them back in their rightful place- in the bedroom, preferably between the ages of 18-23, let us all act like “alphas” because after all that’s what got all the Neanderthals laid back in the day. I get it; I understand what’s going on. Feminism fucked things up, but what you can’t see is that this counter movement you seem to be part of is not really the answer either. You don’t fight subjugation with subjugation, which is exactly what is happening right now with regards to race and gender.
We aren’t animals, at least I don’t think we are, and sadly that is exactly what society, abetted by technology, has done to the human race- created twittering drones, who would rather sit on the internet and anonymously bash people than partake in the oh so scary experience of real life. I am not saying you are a shut in, I have no idea who you are, and I wouldn’t dare postulate that you were an abused child or some pseudo-psychoanalytical bullshit like that– But I would say that you are a highly intelligent person who has channeled his intelligence into a very nefarious endeavor— Ego, when left unchecked is a very dangerous and intoxicating drug, not only to one’s self, but to society in general. Again I understand what you are doing, you are opining on the things that you see are destroying civilization, but as I said to you in that “essay”, you are contradictory in that the things you bemoan (i.e. slutty, unchaste women) are the very things you are trying to acquire and encourage others to acquire through “gaming”. It makes no sense to me; you are actively partaking in the very things that have helped to destroy any semblance of decent civilization. I still believe in basic human goodness, and although rare, I do think there are men out there who are able to see past all this natural selection BS—that we are in fact more than commodities who have much more to offer than what kind of jaw-line we have.
I am going to quote an older gentlemen from our page who really seemed to hit the nail on the head in terms of what feminism has done to our culture: “Sexism still exists, in both sexes (way of the world: both sexes seem to at least tacitly regard their own as superior and, in some senses, they’re both right) and, like racism, always will, but male-to-female sexism has, as you say, morphed (IMO) into a more virulent strain than the Empty-Headed Little Woman model we imagine existed prior to our own era. As no less an authority than Germaine Greer said: “We had a sexual revolution–and women lost.” In return for the right to behave as casually and boorishly as men in matters of the sack, women surrendered a measure of safety, courtesy and the remnants of chivalry, some legal protections, economic security for their children (and in some cases themselves), their invaluable position as sexual gatekeepers and a lot of dignity and self-respect. Men gained greater responsibility-free sexual access and surrendered little or nothing except blows to their self-images as inherent lords of the manor. Male expectations have inflated to match the era of expanded female opportunity. To paraphrase Helen Reddy, many now EXPECT women to bring home the bacon AND fry it up in the pan–and the freakish contortions (completely unnecessary, if men are properly understood) that some women go through to make themselves attractive are far more rigorous today than 30 years ago–and (seems to me) there are a lot more empty-headed little tweeters whose primary skill is tittilation (so to speak) getting patted on the head by patronizing males. It scares me. I wish that feminism–like all isms–had never reared its ugly head, that women had demanded the simple human justice that was their due (the original American feminists/suffragettes had it right, even with regard to abortion), because, on balance, we all lost.”
I am sure you will take umbrage with that quote, because it doesn’t fit your worldview, but truly intelligent people don’t close their minds off to anything. So no, you did not change my mind on anything with regards to women, but like I said some of your posts are spot on, and I am one of those people who choose to take what I want of things- including: people, ideas, books, politics, and so forth. There is good and bad in everything, there is a balance of good and evil, it isn’t just “isâ€.
Not sure if you will read this. If you do, I suspect it will open me up to dissection and ridicule. I don’t really care, I have long abandoned the idea that anything I ever say will be popular, unless it is cloaked in satire.
“Giving exposure to random losers with neither readerships nor writing skills only inflates their egos and hit counts.”
“his blog is read by so few people he doesn’t even rank. Also tell him that he’s just a liberal masquerading as a conservative, like most of the Reagan right.”
Is this really the work of the “master of ridicule” you build yourself up to be? This is your oober blognerd version of a penis measuring contest, ‘my hit count is higher than yours’
I can always respect a blogger/commenter who disagrees with my opinion on issues, and backs their disagreement up with facts of some sort, but it is pretty elementary school playgroundish to, for the most part call me a poopoo head.
I will say that there is actually a lot that I agree with on your site, as I consider myself a traditional male figure, but you regularly take it over the top by denigrating the entire female population merely for being female. Maybe you do it purposely to cause friction and build your readership and hit counts. I don’t pretend to know.
I write my blog because I enjoy it as a hobby. I do not do it to have a million hits. I do not even pretend to know all the little tricks you “exponentially more popular and well-known” bloggers use to build your hit counts.
You may now slam my comments with your name-calling and cyber chest-thumping if you wish. You may even summarize it all with the ever-witty, “You got served!” exclamation. You are obviously a cyber-giant that an inferior, tech-challenged peasant such as myself should never have messed with.
just because all women dont want babies doesnt mean they are feminists, it means they find the lifestyle boring. you have a few good points, but women outearn men so to keep saying they are useless is fucking stupid. how old are you in the first place, to say women are “wrinkled” by the 30′s-since women are useless whores i suppose that is what your mother is. Perhaps if you are dying in the hospital a woman should piss in your mouth rather than giving you oxygen to breathe. God knows you dont want one of those women to step out of their place and SAVE your worthless life, especially if there are no male doctors around. Its not about being feminist, its about common sense. Many males lack intelligence to lead and are fucking stupid. Men cannot give life, all they can do is dump sperm. I can tie you up and extract your sperm and kill you and still be able to survive. You are the useless one. If you kill a woman life would not continue. Give birth, bitch since you are so wonderful. Gender relations have nothing to do with intelligence. It is stupid to submit to anyone or anything that is stupid. Men think with their dicks, they cannot formulate a complete thought without being clouded by sex, so they cannot be trusted to make responsible decisions. You only confirm your level of useless flesh by preaching about hatred towards women and other races. Wow, what a waste of cartilage and your mother’s uterus. Perhaps many women have met son of a bitches like you so marriage and reproducing with a fuckface like you was too disgusting so they opted to sit at a desk and make the money you couldnt make that kept you hiding behind a computer like a worthless pussy writing your nasty hateful thoughts. Youre a demonic spirit that spreads worse than your mother’s legs. Perhaps she should have swallowed your father’s cum that night. Perhaps abortion looks like a good idea when a wasted ignorant hate preaching male like you walks the face of the earth..after reading this trash, im taking a birth control pill. Hopefully you dont impregnate anyone because your ignorance has been spread enough. Since “30′s” is such an OLD AGE for a person (whether male or female) since you claim women in their thirties are damn near disgusting, hopefully you dont live a day past 36, or you decide to do the world a favor and kill yourself. Im not a “hater” i just think you should die a slow death because i find you disgusting and useless. Hater would imply jealousy, and you are nothing to be jealous of. You are a useless hateful demonic son of a bitch, calling every woman a feminist that doesnt like your stupid racist fucked up ideas of life. The only thing i agree with is that marriage is outdated for both genders. Not that you ever picked up a Bible (clearly), but it does state that A MAN THAT FINDETH A WIFE FINDETH A GOOD THING..to tolerate a small dick white man that cant fuck just to squeeze out a newborn so a bitch like you will talk trash about “how the woman’s body looks” afterwards since you need to base things off looks is a contradiction in itself. While women have to live up to these standards, how big is your dick? How much money do you make? How does your body look? Do you have a fountain of youth to make sure you dont age past 36, or do you think a woman wants to look at you when YOUR dick shrivels and your skin is loose, your hair is gray-no, we will go back to the alpha male thats 23 just like your aging pussy ass
here is a website that is full of creative haters
http://biggesthater.com/index.php/about/
> “[kayla] Gender relations have nothing to do with intelligence. It is stupid to submit to anyone or anything that is stupid.”
A brilliant example of feminist, er, brilliance.
> “Men think with their dicks”
Whereas women don’t think at all.
Funny, though, how women “think with their slits.” I mean, we forever hear about women falling (again and again and again!) for “jerks.” So much for “female intuition”!
Also, thanks for explaining fellatio: Men think with their penis…and women suck penises. Ergo, wimmin think they can ingest “thoughts” fluidly.
> “[Men] cannot formulate a complete thought without being clouded by sex, so they cannot be trusted to make responsible decisions.”
Hmmm. So that’s why societies never trust men to fly planes, build cities, form governments? Instead, they trust PMS-driven, irrational, illogical, moody females to create civilizations.
> “marriage and reproducing with a fuckface like you was too disgusting”
I’m sure a wonderful wide-load, saggy-boobed lady like yourself has tons of options.
Similar female “catches”, in their entire lives, never once took a risk to meet males…something a 14 year-old-boy in Nebraska does 20 times in one day trying to get a date for the prom.
Yes, yes. Today’s womyn are sooooo brave and feisty. Just go to any club. See grrrrrrls boldly ask their GIRL friends to dance with them. And at every bar, wimmin bravely sit and wait for men to make first-moves.
> “they opted to sit at a desk and make the money you couldnt make”
You mean those cubicle-farm gals turned down jobs as oil-rig roustabouts, underwater demolition experts, test pilots?
> “a worthless pussy writing…nasty hateful thoughts.”
Germaine Greer? Too true.
> ” Perhaps she should have swallowed your father’s cum that night.”
Momser would have gained some IQ points, that’s for sure.
> “..after reading this trash, im taking a birth control pill.”
Good. Then take OUT the actual trash. And wear a cowbell so sane men can hear you approaching.
> ” you claim women in their thirties are damn near disgusting”
Ask teen and twentysomething female hotties how THEY feel about turning 35.
> “Im not a ‘hater’ ”
And Nixon wasn’t a “crook.”
> ” i just think you should die a slow death because i find you disgusting and useless.”
And I’m sure someone somewhere hopes YOU slip on a wet rock while hunting, then fall on your dropped knife, which then razors off your clit…which is then eaten by a nearby jackal.
All because, you know, you’re such a wonderful, kind, caring feminist and all.
> “Not that you ever picked up a Bible (clearly)…
Whereas your misandric jeremiad shows what a Jesus-like generous soul YOU are.
> “A MAN THAT FINDETH A WIFE FINDETH A GOOD THING..”
Sure. Because he can sell her to sex traffickers. Or screw her before her husband comes home.
> “a small dick white man”
You are certainly free to seek what your soul craves.
> “While women have to live up to these standards, how big is your dick? How much money do you make?”
So, er, where do the “standards” women have come from?
Seems like Kayla’s pissed that men are finally fighting back. And that, her having slid further down the Time Tunnel (and so no longer so attractive), she’s turned into a bitchosaurus.
When she was younger she had ZERO complaints that men didn’t judge her by income, job, character, accomplishments, etc. She just liked the attention she got for doing nothing but owning T&A.
Now that she’s older, and moved down the converyor belt, she she’s them men looking at the new crop of hotties coming by. So Kayla shrieks, “Hey, what about me? I’m still here. So what if I have cellulite, and saggy tits, and a flattening ass, and no personality? I still have a vagina. Sure it’s loose and dry, but c’mon! ”
> “do you think a woman wants to look at you when YOUR dick shrivels and your skin is loose, your hair is gray”
Sure. Happens all the time, depending on how much money, status, GAME a man has.
Ms. Kaylamidia doesn’t get it: Female attractiveness is based on looks, male’s on lucre. Ergo, women lose sexiness as they age, men gain it (with financial and other success).
Deal with that, Kayla. It’s the same social contract you LIKED when younger. Now that you’re older, read the second page of what you signed. It’s what’s happening to you. It’s no evil male conspiracy. Just “life.”
Besides, you can join the Senile Sisterhood… living with cats and ice cream and Oprah re-runs. Just don’t expect men to care. You spent 5 decades mocking them. So call Gloria Steinem when hairballs clog your toilet.
{ 4 trackbacks }