Soccer and multicultural imperialism

by Ferdinand Bardamu on June 21, 2010

in Politics

I know there’s a World Cup in soccer going on. I don’t know what the fuss is all about. I don’t know who’s winning or losing. I don’t know what a vuvuzela is or why it’s such a big deal. All I know is this:

Fuck soccer.

That’s right, fuck soccer. Fuck its everlasting monotony of movement. Fuck its stalemate-encouraging design. Fuck the fact that the only way to win at it is to wait for the opposing team to make a major fuck-up. Fuck it in its faggy too-long gym socks. Fuck it so hard it will never be able to fuck again.

And while I’m at it, fuck the whiny wankers who kvetch about Americans calling it soccer and not football. If you’re one of those wankers and you’re from England, fuck you even harder, you bloody stupid cunt. You’re probably the same jack-offs who bitch about we Yanks dropping the superfluous “u” from “color” like it’s still 1775 and you can still fucking tell us what to do. Here’s a visual reminder as to why you should shut your fucking mouths on this issue:

That’s right. You lost the right to dictate to anyone how to do anything when you ceased being an ass-kicking empire and commenced being an American satrapy. I’ll have no problem listening to you talk about what to call soccer all day long when you pull Uncle Sam’s throbbing, meaty dick out of your arse.

And finally, fuck the phony, snooty, ignorant upper middle class white American cocksuckers who lie about liking a sport only sub-90 IQ turd worlders and alcoholic Limey lumpenproles on welfare could enjoy. Fuck you most of all, you prickish posers, you prancing pansies, you assassins of good taste. You nouveau riche asswipes crowd into shrines of misappropriated culture, indulging in the cuisine and pastimes of the foreign equivalent of the people you turn your noses up at at home. You revel in the symbols of other societies while taking special care to insulate yourself from the aftereffects of your maniac ideology, all the while denouncing the people who are affected most by it as intolerant evil racists. Fuck you SWPLs. Fuck you like a skinny white pothead tossed cheeks-first into the Black Guerrilla Family-dominated prison block. Fuck you like a wasted barfly cornered in a dark alley by three horny rapists. Fuck you like Barack Obama’s approval numbers. Fuck you all very much, and God bless the United Fucking States of America!

Ah…that felt good.

For the record, I don’t hate soccer – I just don’t care about it, like I don’t care about baseball, football, or any team sport except college basketball and maybe hockey. I don’t hate Brits, despite loving to poke fun at the foibles of their women. I don’t hate SWPLs – I laugh at them like everyone else with a clue. And if aural pollution was punishable by the Hague, Toby Keith would be one of the world’s biggest war criminals. I’m not even that much of a nationalist anymore.

But whenever I read opinion pieces from liberals lamenting why oh why don’t Americans care about soccer, I have the gut urge to wrap myself in the Stars and Stripes and waltz on down to the local indie coffeeshop blasting Rush Limbaugh on my boombox and singing “God Bless America” like some sort of patriotic wigger – or pound out chest-beating rants like the one above. Like clockwork, every four years during the World Cup, the same morons write the same editorials asking the same questions. “Why don’t Americans love soccer? Why won’t they join the rest of the world in a celebration of love, peace, harmony and understanding? Are they parochial xenophobes or what?” Of course, they forget that there is another major Western country that is aligned with the Red, White, and Blue in not caring about a bunch of prissy girly men kicking a ball around a field and treating every little scrape like a life-threatening injury. Wanna know what that country is? Here’s a hint:

(No, I have not photoshopped this in any way. I was reformatting one of my computers last week and got this error message while reinstalling some motherboard apps. And I realize that the typo is supposed to be “aborted”, but you get my meaning.)

Yep, Canada. The nation that liberals love, that magical northern wonderland of tolerance, diversity, and socialized medicine is as indifferent to the beautiful game as the evil racist rednecks to the south. In Canada like in America, “football” refers to a homegrown sport involving ‘roided up freaks in padded suits manhandling a pigskin. And like the Americans, the Canadians stick to sports that originated on their continent, like baseball and hockey. The Quebecois are the only French-speaking people in the world who use “le soccer” instead of “le football”. Yet, none of those whinging internationalist liberals ever take the piss out of the Canucks for behaving exactly like we ugly Americans. You’ll never read an idiot like Dave Zirin of The Nation accusing the Canadians of being nefarious nativists:

Every World Cup, it arrives like clockwork. As sure as the ultimate soccer spectacle brings guaranteed adrenaline and agony to fans across the United States, it also drives the right-wing noise machine utterly insane.

Among adults, the sport is also growing because people from Latin America, Africa, and the West Indies have brought their love of the beautiful game to an increasingly multicultural United States. As sports journalist Simon Kuper wrote very adroitly in his book Soccer Against the Enemy, “When we say Americans don’t play soccer we are thinking of the big white people who live in the suburbs. Tens of millions of Hispanic Americans [and other nationalities] do play, and watch and read about soccer.” In other words, Beck rejects soccer because his idealized “real America” – in all its monochromatic glory – rejects it as well. To be clear, I know a lot of folks who can’t stand soccer. It’s simply a matter of taste. But for Beck it’s a lot more than, “Gee. It’s kind of boring.” Instead it’s, “Look out whitey! Felipe Melo’s gonna get your mama!”

Yes, yes Zirin, Americans aren’t happy that their culture is being transformed by foreign invaders. And they ESPECIALLY aren’t happy that people like you are accusing them of being evil for not yelling, “Thank you sir, may I have another!” every time the multiculti canoe paddle lands on their rear-ends.

Zirin’s piece (which, I should add, was featured on NPR’s website – nice use of government dollars there) made the rounds on the right-wing sites last week. It’s quite amusing to watch mainstream bloggers like Allahpundit and Ace of Spades HQ squirm and wriggle out of the obvious reason why Americans don’t take to soccer – it’s a foreign sport being forced on us from the top-down by people who have an obvious antipathy for our way of life. It’s not like they’re even bothering to hide their internationalist agenda anymore (hat tip for the video to Cameron of M4 Monologue):

Never mind that soccer’s popularity is in part due to European imperialism – something tells me that a European sport wouldn’t be nearly as beloved in Africa and Latin America if those places hadn’t spent part of their history under the white man’s boot. Never mind that, as Cameron mentions in his post, people are watching the World Cup not out of some spirit of brotherly love but because they want their country to whip everyone else’s asses. It’s the world’s sport, and those Mexican-hating Yanks (and, um, Canucks) are standing in the way of the dawning of the Age of Aquarius!

Because the mainstream right can’t admit that there’s nothing wrong with rejecting foreign traditions for no other reason then that they are foreign, they can’t point out the big irony of left-wing multiculturalism – it purports to celebrate other cultures but in practice works to meld them together into one. Yesterday, I linked a post by Coldequation in which he unironically quoted the Unabomber Manifesto on this issue:

Here is an illustration of the way in which the oversocialized leftist shows his real attachment to the conventional attitudes of our society while pretending to be in rebellion against it. Many leftists push for affirmative action, for moving black people into high-prestige jobs, for improved education in black schools and more money for such schools; the way of life of the black “underclass” they regard as a social disgrace. They want to integrate the black man into the system, make him a business executive, a lawyer, a scientist just like upper-middle-class white people. The leftists will reply that the last thing they want is to make the black man into a copy of the white man; instead, they want to preserve African American culture. But in what does this preservation of African American culture consist? It can hardly consist in anything more than eating black-style food, listening to black-style music, wearing black-style clothing and going to a black-style church or mosque. In other words, it can express itself only in superficial matters. In all ESSENTIAL respects more leftists of the oversocialized type want to make the black man conform to white, middle-class ideals. They want to make him study technical subjects, become an executive or a scientist, spend his life climbing the status ladder to prove that black people are as good as white. They want to make black fathers “responsible.” they want black gangs to become nonviolent, etc. But these are exactly the values of the industrial-technological system. The system couldn’t care less what kind of music a man listens to, what kind of clothes he wears or what religion he believes in as long as he studies in school, holds a respectable job, climbs the status ladder, is a “responsible” parent, is nonviolent and so forth. In effect, however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the system and make him adopt its values.

This is the end goal of multiculturalism – all of the cultures of the world dumped in a blender and mashed into a pulpy juice. The diversity-loving liberals want everyone to be a carbon copy of everyone else, from the food they eat to the sports they watch on TV to the way they think and the color of their skin (I once had an earnest leftist college classmate tell me in an argument that the end goal of diversity was “to get everyone to interbreed and have lovely brown kids so that the world would be at peace”). They encourage multiculturalism to destroy diversity.

In this sense, the Glenn Becks and G. Gordon Liddys (seriously, who listens to G. Gordon Liddy anymore aside from bored lefties looking for quotes to cherry-pick?) of the world have far more respect for its diverse cultures than the Dave Zirins. They and other Americans are saying that they don’t want their national and ethnic identity subsumed in a global multicultural soup. They are saying that this is as far as the barbarian hordes can come and no further, where their proud waves must stop. If you truly believe in diversity and not multicultural anarchy, you will join them.

In the meantime, I’ll continue being a closed-minded nativist by limiting my sports time to watching Jim Boeheim and the Orange kick ass during the winter months. Go SU!

{ 69 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Athol Kay: Married Man Sex Life June 21, 2010 at 6:54 am

No soccer = no soccer moms.

As you were solider. As you were.

2 Breeze June 21, 2010 at 7:05 am

“This is the end goal of multiculturalism – all of the cultures of the world dumped in a blender and mashed into a pulpy juice. The diversity-loving liberals want everyone to be a carbon copy of everyone else, from the food they eat to the sports they watch on TV to the way they think and the color of their skin (I once had an earnest leftist college classmate tell me in an argument that the end goal of diversity was “to get everyone to interbreed and have lovely brown kids so that the world would be at peace”). They encourage multiculturalism to destroy diversity.”

Well said

3 Genius June 21, 2010 at 7:36 am

Soccer is so boring, even reading about how boring it is manages to bore me.

4 Brendan June 21, 2010 at 8:29 am

The other thing about soccer is that it is amazingly un-diverse. World Cup? Sure, many teams get to participate and play “foil”, but this is a contest that is controlled by a small handful of countries: Germany, Italy, Brazil and Argentina. And keep in mind that there is plenty of ethnic overflow historically between Germany and Italy, on the one hand, and Brazil and Argentina on the other. And every now and then another Euro-country will win, like England or France. That’s pretty much it. It’s really the German-Italian-South-American cup, with everyone else just kind of along for the ride.

5 Xamuel June 21, 2010 at 8:41 am

Wait, they’re still playing? I thought that shit was like last week…

6 Snark June 21, 2010 at 9:52 am

Hey Ferdinand – it’s called football, not soccer.

- Tom from the UK

[No punchline? - ed.]

7 Alte June 21, 2010 at 10:10 am

multiculti

Eh, you like that, don’t you? It sort of rolls right off the tongue. Thank Ueber-Green Joshka Fischer for that one.

Of course they’re still playing! I’m a Fußball Widow until it’s finally over. When Germany lost on Friday, my husband came home with steam blowing out of his ears. It’s best to just sort of hide behind the couch until the whole things blows over.

From my vantage point, the best thing about Fußball (I’m not allowed to call it “soccer”, on penalty of death), is that Germany’s good at it and the guys aren’t wearing very many clothes. I used to be a cheerleader in Texas, and it was always such a disappointment when the guys would take off their uniforms and there was so little left of them. Those shoulder pads lie. Fußball players have better bodies, too. Those legs!

American football just doesn’t have anything to offer in that caliber. It’s like an International Festival of Man Meat. And they all take their shirts off in the end.

Fußball FTW.

8 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 10:11 am

It’s true, we Canadians don’t care for soccer (excluding those who either were born outside of Canada or the States, or whose parents came from outside of Canada or the States, and who typically self-identify as “hyphenated-Canadians”, e.g. Italian-Canadian, Portuguese-Canadian, etc., and typically cheer for their homeland’s team rather than Canada; thanks a lot, multiculturalism!). I mean, I played it as a kid and it was alright, but watching it on TV? Even more boring than watching golf! Puts me to sleep.

9 Vincent Ignatius June 21, 2010 at 10:17 am

Soccer fans are fucking barbarians. When was the last time an American got jumped (or worse) because of his favorite baseball team. Even in Boston, I can go into a pub and admit that I’m a Yankees fan without worrying about violence.

10 Alte June 21, 2010 at 10:42 am

Puts me to sleep.

Yes, yes. But then they take off their shirts, and it’s all worth it. Every minute of viewing is rewarded handsomely. Can hockey claim the same?

*sigh* You guys just don’t understand why it’s called The Beautiful Game.

(Trolling, trolling…)

11 Alte June 21, 2010 at 10:48 am

So basically, Yankees fans are wimps. Hey, sport is pretend-war. Sounds like baseball fans can’t even be bothered to pretend. How lame. Where is the passion, where is the strife, where is the testosterone?

That clarifies it for me.
Fußball, Fußball über alles, über alles in der Welt.

12 Genius June 21, 2010 at 11:32 am

Even in Boston, I can go into a pub and admit that I’m a Yankees fan without worrying about violence.

I don’t know, I saw plenty of violence in the bleacher section of the old Yankee Stadium, back when they were still selling beers.

13 chris June 21, 2010 at 11:58 am

Rugby is where it’s at.

14 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 12:11 pm

All of the Canadian cities care about world cup. in my city there are a sea of car antenna flags and world cup is big business in pubs. The only Canadians who don’t care about world cup are backwoods hicks from rural white bred townships.

[In other words, the only "Canadians" who care about soccer are immigrants and foreigners, and real Canadians couldn't give jack. Thanks, homie! - ed.]

15 Alte June 21, 2010 at 12:15 pm

Hmm… yes. Rugby has some serious babes. I love the images of them tackling each other in the mud. Blood, sweat, tears, and testosterone. It’s like football without the protection.

Oh, wait… were you discussing the relative merits of the actual sport? Right… I got confused for a minute. I’m so easily distracted that way.

16 Jabberwocky June 21, 2010 at 12:15 pm

Why isn’t dodgeball a serious sport yet? Seriously. Its primal. Its violent but has finese. It has throwing, dodging, and the occasional catch. What the fuck else do you need. Like soccer, it requires very little equipment. Play with three balls, maybe more, to keep it aggro, and lets fucking do this shit.

Jabberwocky for the Olympic inclusion of dodgeball.

17 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 12:21 pm

Well, Alte, I can appreciate why you would prefer soccer over hockey, for those reasons. But for some reason, players removing their shirts doesn’t do anything for me. Now, hockey players partially removing another player’s jersey, and pulling it over his head, during a hockey fight, that’s good comic fun.

One thing I forgot to mention above was that alas, things appear to be slowly changing, insofar as immigrants and their offspring are numerous enough here in Ontario, that bar owners managed to get the province to allow them to open up their bars an hour earlier (10am instead of 11am), for the duration of the World Cup, this year. While I’m all in favour of earlier drinking hours, I hate the reason, and I hope that all those who take advantage of the opportunity to grab a beer an hour earlier will not pay any attention to the snoozefest on the bars’ big screen TVs. Fortunately, I think that those of use predisposed to find it boring will still do so, even with beer.

18 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 12:48 pm

Rodrigo: thank you for making my case against multiculturalism and wide-open immigration for me, you anti-WASP bigot. Backwoods Real Canadian, and proud of it, guido!

19 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 1:12 pm

@Will S
nah you got it all wrong amigo. i got white friends in the city. i am anti- racist backwoods hick i am not anti- wasp. you fit into the latter category too bad so sad. my white friends in the city are not as ignorant as you and they all love world cup and root for their team.

20 Alte June 21, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Oh, Rodrigo! Does this mean that you and Will are going to start sparring? This is what I come here for.

(Pulls up same chair as last week. Prepares popcorn. Pours a glass of lemonade.)

Will, Rodrigo can’t be racist. He has white friends, and everything. He probably even lets white people use his toilet!

At any rate, the backwoods hicks tend to have broader shoulders and more angular jawlines. So, I’m rooting for them, as I believe in the survival of the hottest. If only they had a sport that involved getting undressed and running around all sweaty in the dirt.

Well, a woman can’t have everything, I suppose. Unless Will would be interested in teaching his buddies to play rugby? Just a suggestion. No pressure, or anything.

But for some reason, players removing their shirts doesn’t do anything for me.

Well see, that’s because you’re an unenlightened, backwoods, hetero. That’s so “out” now. All the best men are either gay or metrosexual (with a significant overlap between the two, of course).

Now, hockey players partially removing another player’s jersey, and pulling it over his head, during a hockey fight, that’s good comic fun.

I went to a fight and a hockey match broke out. You’re right, there is something to it.

(How am I doing FB? Is the trolling good for you?)

[He, he, he. - ed.]

21 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 1:42 pm

All the racists i have come across are old farts from townships in some backwoods part of ontario. they are miserable middle aged cranks or cows like will or Alte who are being screwed by feminism, but misdirect this anger towards the new people in the cities. again, i am not anti-white, i am anti-bigot and most of those come from either the black ghetto or the white ghetto of rural ontario.

22 Alte June 21, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Look, FB, Rodrigo knows how to troll, too! I shall learn from the Meister.

Rule #1: Be a bigot.
Rule #2: Claim to not be a bigot, because you are only bigoted about people you consider inferior to yourself.
Rule #3: Claim to be open-minded and then accuse all of those who don’t like soccer of being ignorant.
Rule #4: Insult white men en masse. Nobody likes white guys, as they’re a bunch of racist rednecks.
Rule #5: If insulting white men isn’t enough, throw in some ghetto black chicks or middle-aged cows. Nobody likes them either.
Rule #6: Assume that people who live in the country have never lived in a city, or traveled more than 50 miles away from their father’s pig farm. Make sure to edumacate them, and learn them real good.

Any more tips, Drigo-Darling?

23 Alte June 21, 2010 at 2:43 pm

i got white friends in the city.

And my nieces are Puerto Rican, my father is black, my husband is white, and my best friends are both from Eastern Europe.
I let them all use my toilet, as I’m open-minded that way.

You were saying?

24 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 2:51 pm

Soccer is a world religion, especially the Latin world. Catholicism is only a branch of Soccer. If you despise soccer and world cup, you are not a practicing Catholic.

25 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 3:12 pm

Ooh, Alte and I against Rodrigo! Talk about strange bedfellows.

Ah, yes, Rodrigo, the urban sophisticate putting down less enlightened, non-urban types as ‘ignorant’. This will surprise you, no doubt – I’m not an old fart, I’m a young fart; and a further surprise to your urban, liberal stereotyping, I’m half-brown, and my mom hails from a tropical, Third-World soccer-loving country. And she used to be Papist, though she isn’t any more. But anyway, I am half-white, my people on my dad’s side have been here since the 1820s. Real Canadians don’t like soccer. Your white urban friends are self-loathing sell-outs, SWPL types; I couldn’t care less what they or you think. I only lament that my country is falling more and more into your hands.

26 Alte June 21, 2010 at 3:24 pm

If you despise soccer and world cup, you are not a practicing Catholic.

LOL. Okay, that was a good one. I actually like Fußball a lot. Especially if Ballack or Cacau are playing. Especially if Ballack and Cacau are playing.

Did you see the game before last, where Cacau ripped off his shirt at the end? I nearly fainted dead away at those pecs. I made such a scene, my husband threw me out of the room in disgust at my blatant sexual objectification of true and worthy athletes.

Anyway, I’m against multiculturalism, on principle. Everyone should be Catholic, although I’d tolerate other Christians, and atheists who keep a low profile. Everyone else should leave, so that we have more room to spread out. Go forth and multiply, and all that. After all, America is so crowded already… isn’t it?

That is all. I’m not asking for much. Let’s all be reasonable here.

BTW, do I really sound middle-aged? I’m not even 30 yet!

Talk about strange bedfellows.

If you described what you look like in more detail, I’d be able to picture that more accurately.

27 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 3:39 pm

So neither will or alte are white yet both are pro-hick white supremacist individuals. this is very interesting to me because i am latin and proud, but i do not judge others based on race. i am friends with chinese, white, arab, latin, indian people and i am exposed to everybody’s culture in the city. i can only guess the water you are drinking in your little backwoods hick towns is causing you to have a self-loating inferiority complex for your non-white heritage. what shame, but that is to be expected in the milton or georgetown’s of ontario where all the village idiots demand conformity to white culture.

28 Alte June 21, 2010 at 3:41 pm

At any rate, you guys take your sports so seriously. But they’re really just the male equivalent of beauty-pageants. And just like the women of Estonia think they’re “all that” when Estonia wins the swimsuit competition, the men of Germany think they’re “all that” when Germany wins the first round. They’re trying to bask in the reflective glory of their team.

That’s why they get into big fights about it. Sex is on the line, and if there’s one thing that men like to fight over…

So this whole thread boils down to:
My Man Meat Festival is cooler than your Man Meat Festival.

29 Alte June 21, 2010 at 3:42 pm

Rodrigo, please translate that last bit into English for me. Thanks, amigo.
– Chica

30 Alte June 21, 2010 at 3:46 pm

Damn, I’m all out of popcorn again. Well, it’s been fun folks, but I’ve had about all of self-righteous, hypocritical, moralizing I can stand for today.

Till tomorrow, amigos! Don’t do anything I would do.

31 Donatien Alphonse François June 21, 2010 at 3:58 pm

You’re a moron:

(1) Soccer has been the number one participation team sport in the USA for more than a generation, supplanting bowling in the early 1980s. Most American fans of the game played it as a kid (and see (3)).

(2) The previous premier soccer league, the NASL, was actually quite well attended even though the venues were horrible for soccer. The league failed because the media giants couldn’t figure out how to sell ads during telecasts. With HD television and digital sideline boards, this problem is solved.

(3) People who like to watch soccer tend to *play* soccer, and it’s impossible to be an out-of-shape lardass if you play it regularly. I notice the hotties gravitate to fit guys wearing the laughably silly lime-green Sounders FC gear like flies to shit. That’s because they know a soccer player will have stamina in the sack for that all-night they crave so dearly.

(4) Soccer is actually more fan-friendly than either football or baseball, because it’s over in 2 hours, including a gigantic intermission that actually gives you enough time to grab a beer and empty your bladder. Because a period lasts only 45 minutes of real time (a half in American football lasts *90* minutes of real time), you have the energy to spend the entire time on your feet yelling. This is why soccer games are way more fun to attend than any other sport, and this is why soccer brawls are way more intense. (Compare hockey fights to baseball fights, and you’ll understand.)

[I'm so honored to meet you, Mr. Zirin. - ed.]

32 Jabberwocky June 21, 2010 at 4:13 pm

Dodgeball.

33 Alte June 21, 2010 at 4:15 pm

That’s because they know a soccer player will have stamina in the sack for that all-night they crave so dearly.

I’m supposed to be doing laundry right now, but I couldn’t help but pop-in and substantiate this claim. Like machines, they are. All of that running and kicking. My husband played for 23 years, and it shows.

This is, Monsieur François, an easily verifiable and completely accurate claim for Fußball’s innate superiority.

34 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 4:53 pm

A-ha! I can tell, Rodrigo, from your narrow geographical references that you’re a Torontonian or at least a GTAer; figures; you’re not even close to guessing what part of Ontario I’m from. But yes, we are as real Ontarian here as Georgetowners and Miltonians.

Typical. There’s a reason the rest of us Canadians hate Toronto, you know. So, you’re not a racist, you claim, but you certainly are an urban supremacist, looking down your nose at ordinary non-Torontonian / non-GTAers. Toronto uber alles. Toronto, the New York City wannabe.

It’s people like you, with your haughty urban attitudes, who feel superior to real Canadians and don’t want to assimilate in the least to the culture of the country you’re living in, who make me identify with my Scotch-Irish half and not my brown side.

Alte, racially, I’m half-East-Indian, and half-white. But thankfully I’m not a real ‘desi’ the way urban ones are, as I can’t stand them; and the charge that Rodrigo or others might level at me that I’m therefore a ‘coconut’ or something such (brown on the outside, white on the inside), or an “Uncle Tom”, is real enough, except I actually come by it honestly, since I am half-white, fortunately.

35 Rodrigo June 21, 2010 at 5:30 pm

will was no doubt raised by a selfish inbred single mother which is why he has a self-loathing for his east Indian heritage.

36 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 5:39 pm

Fail. My folks are happily married, with an old-fashioned, Marriage 1.0, for almost four decades now. Nice try, though. It isn’t my East Indian heritage I loathe, it’s the bigoted attitudes of Canadian desis towards ordinary Canadians, esp. the ones who live in the sticks like me – in other words, bigots just like you, though you’re a Hispanic bigot rather than a desi bigot.

37 Vodka and Ground Beef June 21, 2010 at 7:23 pm

I’m totally devoted to you and your love of cursing.

Here was my personal fucking favorite batch of lines: “If you’re one of those wankers and you’re from England, fuck you even harder, you bloody stupid cunt. You’re probably the same jack-offs who bitch about we Yanks dropping the superfluous “u” from “color” like it’s still 1775 and you can still fucking tell us what to do.”

Hi-larious. Fuck.

38 finsalscollons June 21, 2010 at 8:20 pm

“They encourage multiculturalism to destroy diversity.”

I see you get it. Multiculturalism is only a tool to destroy the native culture (by making it only one of the cultures of the land and, therefore, making it not entitled to a special respect in its own country) and impose a liberal lowest common denominator

It happens in America, it happens in Europe.

I love soccer, because I am European, but I understand American don’t like it.

39 The Blanque June 21, 2010 at 8:35 pm

Soccer is a world religion, especially the Latin world. Catholicism is only a branch of Soccer. If you despise soccer and world cup, you are not a practicing Catholic.

James Carroll–is that you?

40 Alte June 21, 2010 at 9:08 pm

Alte, racially, I’m half-East-Indian, and half-white.

Sounds promising. ;-)

and the charge that Rodrigo or others might level at me that I’m therefore a ‘coconut’ or something such (brown on the outside, white on the inside), or an “Uncle Tom”, is real enough, except I actually come by it honestly, since I am half-white, fortunately

Same here. Coconut, meet Oreo.

It’s funny, because both white and minority people accuse me of being a racist. Which I assume means that I am not one. If nobody is happy, then it means I’m not taking sides. I’m a bit of an opportunist when it comes to race.

41 Will S. June 21, 2010 at 9:22 pm

I agree, Alte; I’ve long figured that if one manages to piss off everybody, at one time or another, one must be doing something right.

42 Donatien Alphonse François June 21, 2010 at 10:34 pm

Is misidentifying me as Dave Zirin your idea of a homoerotic neg, Monsieur Bardamu?

[No, it's my way of mocking you for trying to argue the merits of soccer to a guy who's said he doesn't care about it, champ. - ed.]

43 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 12:09 am

Oh, wait… were you discussing the relative merits of the actual sport? Right… I got confused for a minute. I’m so easily distracted that way.

I remember when Alte was cool, then she became Chic Noir with better grammar and spelling. I’d never thought I’d say this, but she actually makes me long for the cold, heartless, and sexless rule of my Wellesley Queen.

In effect, however much he may deny it, the oversocialized leftist wants to integrate the black man into the system and make him adopt its values.

He’s right, and damn it, that should be the leftist aim. To turn all of us non-whites into darker (or yellow) skinned clones of white people. Into inoffensive, non-threatening faux-whites. We could have saved the world, but no, they weren’t willing to put their full effort into the plan, and the non-whites elites didn’t follow through and do their job by shaming their people into being white too.

[Except that black people can't be turned into white people or vice versa, save for a few individuals. Admittedly, I can see why someone like you would support this plan, but ramming the whole of humanity into one mold is disastrous for reasons that should be obvious. - ed.]

They encourage multiculturalism to destroy diversity.

What’s wrong with that? Everybody would have been happy. Non-whites would have been equal, and whites would have secured their place as human deities able to command the masses.

[Man, I don't want to be a human deity, and I don't want to command any masses. I just want my paycheck, my beer, and my girl.]

You would have neutralized all those awful threats that non-whites pose to whites.

[Which would be like destroying the village to save it.]

Same here. Coconut, meet Oreo.

I’m an oreo too except I don’t have the luxury of being a pretty female with light skin. Regardless, I like being called an oreo since it effectively proves some degree of superiority, and means that I’m somewhat safe for white consumption. Safe enough to be unattractive to white girls, but safe enough to be their friend and get hugs.

If nobody is happy, then it means I’m not taking sides.

I find it hard to make everybody happy because making anti-white statements feels wrong and racist and against my principles while making anti-black statements leads me to feeling guilty since for all intents and purposes, I’m a spoiled suburban snot who gets to live in a safe all-white suburb living off daddy’s inheritance. In most cases, I’ll just keep my mouth shut and not reveal my opinions to people in the real world lest I make them angry with my viewpoints.

Oh yeah, I like soccer. It’s far more interesting and faster paced than say football or baseball. It has a nice continuous flow of action of hockey or basketball.

44 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 1:15 am

Except that black people can’t be turned into white people or vice versa, save for a few individuals.

If you try hard enough, anything is possible!

[LOL. Good one. ed.]

I can see why someone like you would support this plan, but ramming the whole of humanity into one mold is disastrous for reasons that should be obvious.

How is that disastrous? One gets to pacify the savages, and the savages become civilized and rewarded with trinkets for being loyal.

[Because people are different. Race, gender, genetics, and a dozen other factors divide us. What works for one group may not work for others, and in fact doesn't.]

Which would be like destroying the village to save it.

Either their village is destroyed while saving yours, or both villages get destroyed. Take your pick.

[Not true. We can save both villages without compromising either. See my upcoming series on white nationalism to see how.]

45 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 3:05 am

Cacau

Remember kids, Alte complains about the white Turkish lady being the border guard, but not about the black Brazilian playing soccer for the German national team.

46 Rodrigo June 22, 2010 at 3:09 am

william wallace you aint

woohoo im an inbred hick too. kumbaya me lorrrrrd

47 MikkoAP June 22, 2010 at 5:14 am

I’m enjoying the World Cup. Not for the soccer, which i hate, but all the fun drama surrounding big teams filled with international stars who are about fail at the start. France, England… i love it.

One thing i’m a bit dissappointed with is the lack of fun news stories about wonderful cultural exchanges between soccer tourists with the natives of that soon-to-be a third world country.

But they, there’s still time

48 Breeze June 22, 2010 at 5:22 am

All the SWPL and liberal media made a big fuss over the soccer down under. So Sydney put a giant screen to watch the games on at night…and when the Aussie team isn’t play no one turns up except English backpackers. I think that shows just how much yuppies claim to like soccer just to be trendy. If they gave a shit they’d be freezing their arses off watching the games the Aussie ain’t in.

49 Alte June 22, 2010 at 7:12 am

I remember when Alte was cool, then she became Chic Noir with better grammar and spelling.

LOL. Sex deprivation is addling my brain.

Besides, it’s fun to just troll sometimes. I get a bit worn out being serious. If you want to see me being serious and moralizing, try Oz Conservative.

Remember kids, Alte complains about the white Turkish lady being the border guard, but not about the black Brazilian playing soccer for the German national team.

Remember kids, all of these guys complaining about foreigners wouldn’t want to be rid of Adriana Lima.
That sword cuts both ways, you know.

50 Alte June 22, 2010 at 8:16 am

DA, you just don’t seem to get it. Patriarchy and segregation go together, just like matriarchy/feminism and multiculturalism go together.

You can’t have one without the other, and the stricter you combine them, the better. Since I’m all for Christian dominance, I’m all for patriarchy, thereby increasing the Christian marriage and reproductive rates. I couldn’t care less about all of this racial-stuff, which is why I find it all a bit entertaining.

That’s because men use race, ethnicity, nationalism, and religion to herd women and limit their sexual access to other men. This increases the men’s reproductive success. You notice the guys on here are usually complaining about non-white men. They’re not suggesting we throw out nubile Mexican girls, just their male competition.

Women don’t really care about all of that, for obvious biological reasons. They just want the most alpha guy they can find. If you do find a woman who is passionate on the subject, she’s probably happily married (and therefore a brainless follower), having difficulty finding a husband, or worrying about her own son’s marriage prospects. Single women love multiculturalism because it increases the number of hot guys they can hook up with.

That’s why men feel more passionately about WN than women do. For white women, all it means is that they don’t get to sleep with Seal, Rinaldo, Denzel, or Cacau. In other words, it’s a net loss for them. The white guys will still be hanging around them regardless. They only complain if white men marry non-white women (and then they howl indignantly and make pleas for racial allegiance).

White men only complain about the reverse. Even at a site like Stormfront, the discussion of Halle and Gabrielle revolved around, “Well, of course she did. She’s pretty enough to be blessed with one of us.” So much so that some WN women butted into the conversation and began complaining about blatant double-standards. And beautiful black women will often be described as “practically white”. That’s patriarchy for you. They’re men. They just want as many women as possible for themselves.

51 Alte June 22, 2010 at 8:42 am

Let’s take our beloved David as an example of this. Null shows up, and it’s obvious that she’s young and female, from the way she writes. She’s also Muslim, which (if you discount patriarchy) should make her one of David’s natural enemies. Just as I am black, which (if you discount patriarchy) should make me also one of David’s natural enemies.

Except that patriarchy doesn’t work that way. This is is how it works:

David chit-chats with Null and I for a bit, and when he decides he likes us, he says to me “It’s so nice that you’re Catholic. Good girl.” and to her “It’s a shame you aren’t Catholic. Ever thought about converting?”

This is the same reason that my husband insists on my Bavaria-cation. I’m not originally from Bavaria (I’m from a different region), but he insists that I speak German with a Bavarian accent, cook Bavarian foods, wear Bavarian clothes, read Bavarian books, drink Bavarian beer, etc.

It’s herding, according to whatever criteria that particular man has defined. David cares most about his religion, so he wants all the women he likes to be Catholic. Once they are Catholic, he is free to add them to his personal harem (whether as wives — for his own use, or daughters — for his son). So, in his viewpoint, the more pretty, fertile, intelligent women convert to Catholicism, the better.

My husband cares most about his ethnicity, so he wants all the women he likes to be Bavarian. WN guys care most about race, so they want all women they like to be white. But since race (a pseudo-physiological construct) is harder to transfer than religion or ethnicity*, they’re stuck hand-wringing and mumbling about “Well… she’s not really black.”, and if the One Drop Rule applies. The consensus is: it applies if she’s ugly.

* Which, some argue, is why concepts of ethnicity and organized religion came to be, in the first place. Race-allegiance is easier to define, but it severely limits the number of potential female mates, and is therefore an inefficient form of patriarchy. What happens if there is a sharp reduction in the availability of your “own” women? For example, when in a foreign country? Do you just go without sex?

If you are using religion for herding, you can just say, “Woman it’s time for your baptism.” If you are using ethnicity for herding, you can just say, “Woman, put on this dress, wear your hair like that, and learn to cook dumplings.” If you are using race, do you just go without? No, they usually create a work-around called “concubines”.

(Do I still sound like “Chic Noir with better grammar and spelling”? BTW, I think Chic Noir is actually kind of cute.)

52 Vincent Ignatius June 22, 2010 at 8:55 am

@Genius

What you were seeing was just drunk idiots getting into a fight. Considering you were sitting in the bleachers at the old Yankee Stadium, I’m willing to bet that the men fighting each other were all Yankees fans.

53 Gx1080 June 22, 2010 at 10:12 am

First, any discussion about which sport is superior is retarded, full stop.

Second, those countries are superior on soccer because: They like it. Many, many men in those countries like that sport, that creates the high testosterone, ultra-competitive enviroment neccesary to polish talent in world champions.

Easy as that.

To any contry that whines about losing in a sport, I ask: Where are your high school teams? Your college teams? Your STATE teams?

Liberals deny human nature to extend their power, what else is new? Call them on it.

But Ferd, you can’t tell a sport to fuck itself and then claim to not hate it. It doesn’t make sense, unless you are so numb to curses that is all the same. Is dumb to throw hate to a sport.

[I can if it was all in jest. - ed.]

54 the friendly grizzly June 22, 2010 at 12:17 pm

Anyone for 43-Man Squamish?

/anyone even get the reference?

55 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 12:44 pm

Because people are different.

But you can’t have different people occupying the same space. Not just on a local level, but quite frankly at the global level. I don’t think we can sustain a planet where there’s a mass of poor brown people and rich light skinned people. Just handing the brown people some money to pacify them may not work any more as they’ll just simply become resentful. I’m left wondering if the only solution is to get rid of the brown people.

56 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 1:03 pm

DA, you just don’t seem to get it. Patriarchy and segregation go together, just like matriarchy/feminism and multiculturalism go together.

It’s not that I don’t get it, but as a rabid anti-segregationist, I’d much rather have an ineffectual patriarchy to protect me and keep me safe and provide opportunities to meet new people than depending on the kindness of strangers in a patriarchy. Judging by how human nature has played out in history, I’d much rather nuke the planet if multiculturalism doesn’t work than live in a planet filled with racists.

But we’re focusing back to the arguments that we had back at your place. The problem is that your patriarchy is a threat to my freedom and liberty, and it’s basically prop up for women like yourself. So while in your little ideal world, Athena is off limits to me even as a friend, you get to play with your German husband with no consequences to yourself. I may be the stereotypical sub-human male around here, but I’m not going to let people like you steal from me.

They just want as many women as possible for themselves.

I want as many men and women as possible for everybody. I don’t believe in this concept of women belonging to me or my race, and I’m downright happy when a black woman marries a person of another race as it will remove our isolation from the rest of the world and bring greater acceptance. Maybe I’m just simply biased as the product of white ancestry on both sides with varying friends and family members of both sexes in relationships with people of another race.

This is the same reason that my husband insists on my Bavaria-cation.

Weird side-question: Isn’t Texas basically a Southern state settled by Bavarians, who seem to be the most conservative of the Germans?

Admittedly, your husband’s attitudes seems to be a bit controlling from my perspective, and I’d never want to do that to girl that I meet, even if she came from a different part of Haiti. If I wanted somebody with those traits, I would have stayed within a narrow cliche of girls from the Grande Anse.

Except that patriarchy doesn’t work that way.

Somebody’s relying on the kindness of strangers again. Oh wait, you’re a girl, you’ll just be a pliable sex toy that likes it while I’ll get killed. Ooops.

57 Alte June 22, 2010 at 1:17 pm

I’m left wondering if the only solution is to get rid of the brown people.

No, the opposite is more likely. Get rid of the light-skinned people and take their stuff. After all, light-skinned people are just a bunch of aging wimps, and the brown people are just… so… freaking… many. Their lives are so shit that they have nothing to lose.

Large numbers of young men with nothing to lose… sounds like trouble to me. Sounds like Al-Qaeda, Crips and Bloods, Socialist Revolutionaries, Drug Wars. And the light-skinned white men wouldn’t fight back, because their relative wealth and comfort, combined with the lack of all responsibility enforced by feminism, has made them apathetic and complacent. They can’t mount a counter-attack because then they’d have to stop chasing women or playing video games for a bit. Who has time for that, when you could be masturbating, or playing WoW?

The European coast guards are completely overwhelmed by the sheer numbers sneaking in, as is the American border guard. They’re getting a bit of a break right now, because of the declining economy. But if they get hungry enough, they’ll be back.

Maginot on the Rio Grande.

58 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 1:35 pm

They can’t mount a counter-attack because then they’d have to stop chasing women or playing video games for a bit.

Yes, white people have created a luxurious society for its citizenry. It’s the reason for existing. But white people don’t need to resort to massive human powered conflict. White people have the technology to wipe away the brown people with very little effort. Hell, one B-52 can carpet bomb some pissant third world city back into the stone ages.

59 Alte June 22, 2010 at 1:53 pm

Weird side-question: Isn’t Texas basically a Southern state settled by Bavarians, who seem to be the most conservative of the Germans?

Yes, that’s why my mother wanted to move there and misses it so much. Bavarians are also religious-cowboy types. Fiercely independent, as well. The Bavarian motto is “The Free State”, which mimics the Texas “Lone Star State”. There are strong separatist movements in both states, as well, and strong ethnic ties. The traditional clothes are also quite similar.

Somebody’s relying on the kindness of strangers again. Oh wait, you’re a girl, you’ll just be a pliable sex toy that likes it while I’ll get killed. Ooops.

Ah, ha! I knew that you would think that. I left it open to see if you would bite. Let’s keep using David as an example, as he’s not here to defend himself right now.

You are forgetting that patriarchy is most effective when men build teams. Why do you think David takes such a keen interest in you? Why do you think he keeps probing your thoughts, questioning your assumptions, attempting to change your mind? No one else on here does that. They all just roll their eyes and write you off.

Because you’re Catholic, of course! The moment you said, “Hey, David. I’m Catholic, too.”, he thought, “Oh, he’s one of us.” After all, it’s not enough to be a patriarch all on your own. Your reproductive success depends upon your children finding suitable mates. It’s in every patriarch’s interest to build teams of patriarchs so that his children have as wide and as high-quality of a pool of mates to choose from.

That’s why WN are so keen to convince other white men to join their ranks, and denigrated multiculturalism. There’s no point in producing “pure white children”, if there are no other “pure white children” for yours to mate with. You’d just be delaying the mix for another generation.

Patriarchies thrive on population growth, whereas matriarchies do best with slow decline. That’s why the Catholic Church speaks out for monogamous marriage and chastity, and against masturbation. The first is good for reproductive success, the latter is bad for it. Any religion that does not take that stance is shooting itself in the foot.

You may say that it’s wrong to choose friends because of religion (all of my closest friends and relatives are Catholic, despite the ethnic diversity), or race, or ethnicity, or whatever, but everyone chooses their friends based upon similarities of some sort. You must admit that it’s fun to hang out with your fellow Catholics and chit-chat a bit. There is a basis of common understanding that you simply will not have with other people.

Even multiculti types choose their friends based upon their shared multiculti beliefs. They’ve just basically come up with their own ad-hoc ethnicity or religion, and everyone who wishes to join may do so, and everyone else will be written off as “backward”. They don’t discount race because they aren’t prejudiced. They do so because they’ve substituted race with their belief system, and judge people according to that instead. I also discount race because I’ve replaced it with religion.

We can disagree on whether race, religion, ethnicity, or political beliefs are the “best” method for sorting people into friend-or-foe. But sorting will happen either way. Birds of a feather flock together.

60 Alte June 22, 2010 at 2:01 pm

Hell, one B-52 can carpet bomb some pissant third world city back into the stone ages.

Then why don’t they do so? They’ve had that ability for quite some time. Why don’t they just bomb the heck out of every brown or black population on the planet?

Do you not see that there are theological reasons for them not doing that? Their liberal belief system is founded upon multiculturalism, so cultural imperialism would completely erode that belief system (religion, almost) and replace it with… what? Christian patriarchy?

Aren’t they trying to fight against the reinstatement of Christian patriarchy? People are inherently religious, and they need some belief system to adhere to, otherwise they sink into nihilism. So there would have to be some viable secular replacement. Totalitarianism or Fascism, perhaps. White nationalism would be the obvious replacement, but you don’t want that either.

You are hard to please, DA. You want something for nothing, which goes against Natural Law.

61 David Alexander June 22, 2010 at 2:53 pm

The Bavarian motto is “The Free State”, which mimics the Texas “Lone Star State”.

Fun, I’ll remember to avoid Texas AND Bavaria. I’ll stick with NRW, Hesse, and Berlin just like how I stick to the Northeast and Pacific Coast. Liberal places are safe spaces for brown people…

Why do you think David takes such a keen interest in you?

I’ve suspected he was just merely curious. I mean how many mentally ill social phobic Catholic black men living in the United States of Haitian ancestry do you meet on the Internet. You’re unique, hence why I like talking to you, so I imagine the same applies here with me.

The moment you said, “Hey, David. I’m Catholic, too.”, he thought, “Oh, he’s one of us.”

Yes, I may share the same faith, but if I decided to date some girl in my parish, it’s highly likely that won’t count for much because of the racial factor. Religious patriarchy is no match for racial patriarchy. One can trap me into all sorts of crazy patriarchal concepts, but it’s ultimately useless if I say “I love your daughter” and they freak out about it, or if I get dirty looks for merely driving into their neighbourhood.

That’s why the Catholic Church speaks out for monogamous marriage and chastity, and against masturbation

Yeah, once you masturbate, you slowly realize that you can hold out on women for longer especially once you realize that women need more maintenance than a high speed rail system. Smart men thinking independently and realizing women are just too much to deal with in a sexual capacity are bad for reproductive success, and spreading that information only exacerbates the problem.

but everyone chooses their friends based upon similarities of some sort.

Of course we do, but I don’t use religion or race as some tool to cut people off. I’ve had Jewish, Anglican, Protestant friends, and my brother has Hindu, Muslim, and Buddhist friends, so I’d argue that we’d miss out on a lot if we chose to restrict ourselves based on such demographics. I just choose based on who will be a good friend.

Then why don’t they do so?

Whites have superior morals. They have guilt, something that the brown and black people don’t have.

You are hard to please, DA. You want something for nothing, which goes against Natural Law.

You’re right, I do want something for nothing, but what else could one want? To achieve the maximum with doing the minimum amount possible is the goal of man since the dawn of time. It’s why we go out and invent things. Otherwise, we’d live like we did at the dawn of early humanity living harsh, brutal lives. So yes, I want a functional society with equality as its foundation with no need for patriarchy or matriarchy and with no racism or anti-ethnic bias, and I want it all for just 4 payments of $29.99. If not, then I’m left wondering if we as humans deserve to exist, and whether or not we should kill ourselves and let some other species take over or let God start over with a new project with superior beings.

62 Alte June 22, 2010 at 3:03 pm

I want it all for just 4 payments of $29.99.

LOL.

63 Gx1080 June 22, 2010 at 6:35 pm

Insults to commenters on this blog:

Rodrigo: You are a Canadian version of SWPL-ers, a prole with money who believes that said money and whatever bogus of the week makes you better than the other proles. Hint: You aren’t. How you people don’t get cramps of having your noses high and your heads full in your asses?

DA is….DA. Nothing to see here.

Besides being funny, I find that the fact that a married woman can act like a rank-and-file Roissy’s Attention Whore (when not in a hate crusade, of course) should tell the readers enough about the true nature of women.

64 Bhanu Prasad June 22, 2010 at 9:37 pm

–Never mind that soccer’s popularity is in part due to European imperialism–

Interestingly, here in India, Soccer is followed by the christianized pockets of Kerala, Goa and some part of Kolkata. The vast majority of the nation is pretty much indifferent to this rough game, and I am proud of that.

And french football team, dominated by negroes, draws an apt picture of europe and it’s mounting immigration problem.

65 Alte June 23, 2010 at 9:24 am

Besides being funny, I find that the fact that a married woman can act like a rank-and-file Roissy’s Attention Whore (when not in a hate crusade, of course) should tell the readers enough about the true nature of women.

:-) I’ve never said that Roissy was wrong about women, I just don’t agree with his nihilistic political goals.

And I also find it funny.

66 Alte June 23, 2010 at 9:29 am

At any rate, I’m a bit bored with all of the blogging. Taking down my site and going ghost. Caio!

67 bobtail August 16, 2011 at 8:31 am

this soccer rant is funniest thing i’ve read in ages
am australian and think ‘world game’ is bullshit too
it’s blatantly corrupt, it’s about handful of rich european teams
ie, if some poor little shmuck team from nowhere gets to far up the world cup ladder, hey presto, just wait for a foul call opportunity and give them a penalty, that’ll ensure their well sponsored european opponent gets into final rounds, it’s not sport, it’s theatre, it’s bulllshit!
plus, like you, we have own football codes, and fuck it, they are better!
classic rant, loved it

68 Anonymous October 11, 2011 at 5:13 pm

jajajajajaaj I feel sorry for ur stupid ass. ur probably one of those dumb fucks that sits aroun and watch tv all day eating ur momas cereal and junk food. computer nerd that has nothing eslese to write. feel sorry for ur life and ur momma. couln’t raise a well spoken kid. well emough saud. Soccer players make more than u can even think in ur FUCKING li yeah FUCK FUCK FUCKING life. Soccer is life and is beautifull. Get a life dumb ass. or look for God he will defeniatly help u. peace

69 Will S. October 11, 2011 at 7:51 pm

Hey Anonymous, speak white. Seriously, jajajaja does not = hahahaha, except for illiterate wetbacks. And you clearly can’t type in English – tons of spelling mistakes there, not just your cutesy textspeak abbreviations, so don’t fucking bother. You can’t even make misspell ‘definitely’ the way most misspellers do (‘definately’ ; at least that’s better than your sorry-ass ‘defeniatly’, loser), so go back to Me-hee-co or Pwer-Toe-Ree-Co or whatever the hell land you come from – or stay there and stop typing on English-language blogs till you can actually speak our language, amigo.

Oh, and if you’re not Spic, that’s even more pathetic. Seriously.

Leave a Comment

{ 7 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: