The jig is up, the monkey’s dead, and the show is over. My loyal readership, I have been lying to you all these months. In over 400 posts published here and at The Spearhead, I have portrayed myself as a cynical guy with opinions on sexuality, politics, culture, race, and life that would make prim, proper and upright citizens vomit in shock. I’ve made it plainly obvious, in paragraphs upon paragraphs of clumsily edited, metaphor- and alliteration-heavy prose that I’m not a role model, a guru, an activist, or someone to follow in any way. I even went so far as to hang the literate man’s equivalent of a “Here Be Dragons” sign on my front door. Anyone with an IQ over 100 and a cultural knowledge that goes beyond My Pet Goat should be able to tell that a blog called In Mala Fide written by a guy using the literary surrogate of a Judeophobic French fascist as his pseudonym is not one you’d want to admit reading in public – at least not until the revolution comes, anyway.
But the truth is out. I am not who you thought I was. Occidental Dissent contributor Matt Parrott has pulled away the curtain to reveal the man pulling the levers. Look on his works, ye Mighty, and despair:
Bardamu’s critiques of White Advocacy fall along a predictable pattern, “circle-strafingâ€Â easy targets within the very broad movement without actually challenging our core message. He’s criticized our rabid anti-Semites. He’s criticized our nerds. He’s criticized our prudes. He’s planning on writing a piece which does not claim we’re wrong, but merely claims we’re doomed.
He’s taking a long time to write it (procrastinating) because his soul is tortured. As a deeply contemplative man who’s a student of human nature, he knows that proximity + diversity = war. He knows that unchecked immigration and forced integration are rapidly transforming this fine country into a third world bazaar. He knows that Muslims pose an existential threat to the West. He rejects the neocon bullshit about Islam being a religion of peace and Arabs being a dash of democracy and burger franchises away from being peaceful and assimilated Westerners.
I think he knows that the best future for ourselves and our future generations is one in which we band together in defense of our birthright, our genetic endowment, and our way of life. But it may take him a while to admit the implications of this to himself. He may also need to mature a bit before he mans up and takes a genuine sense of ownership and accountability for the fate of his community and his ethnonational tribe.
The clever bastard has also procured a less-than-flattering picture of moi. I’m wondering who he had to bribe to get it:
note for the slow - this isn't really me
Please don’t think less of me for dressing like a hipster pimp.
Parrott’s post was in response to my post about nerds, a post that save for the opening paragraph and a remark on the kielbasa fest nature of WN blog comment threads, didn’t focus on white nationalists at all. That post was one I’d been intending to write for months but couldn’t get into comprehensible form without the right foil to bounce off of. I thought I was going to end up bashing libertarians again, but reading the comments to Kievsky’s post almost made me facepalm. It was the perfect opportunity.
Not only that, this is the second time in as many days that Matt has posted about yours truly. On Tuesday night, he responded to my plan to lower non-white birthrates with cheap porn and free abortion with this:
FB uses a bunch of words in this post, taking care to refrain from grammatical errors and arrange them in paragraph form. But this is yet another example of apparent fanciness barely disguising naked vulgarity. The core concept he offers is that prudery is my race’s problem and that sexual debauchery is the cure. To hear him tell it, “…the white race will be outbred into extinction because of the stubbornness and ignorance of the people who claim to want to save it.†Unfortunately, he’s not alone in thinking this. Many otherwise thoughtful and sensible people in our movement harbor this thoughtless and senseless belief.
I see the game here. Matt is wondering why, despite accepting many of the ideological premises of white nationalism, I don’t support it and am critical of it. “Damn that Bardamu, he knows the score! Why won’t he leap into the fray?” I’m the fornicating heathen smoking pot in a grimy flat in the bad part of town and Parrott is the door-to-door evangelist who has come to save my soul from eternal damnation. Well, Jesus DID say to go where the sinners are…
Well, he can put away his Bible, because I ain’t biting. I HAVE thought about the implications of white nationalism and they aren’t good. My objections to white nationalism are primarily pragmatic – I don’t support it because it doesn’t work. It’s an ideological heresy born out of opposition to the insane, also-heretical doctrine of multiculturalism. If multiculturalism is feminism, white nationalism is the left-wing masculism of Glenn Sacks and Warren Farrell – a competing heresy that purports to be the answer to the ills caused by the former, but cannot solve them because it springs from the same flawed premises. Note that white nationalism is not to be confused with white advocacy. The two are separate concepts and I support the latter because I’m not an idiot. I realize that the racial group I belong to is increasingly marginalized and has a dim future unless we push back.
That, and even if I was philosophically onboard with white nationalism, I still wouldn’t be joining the activist ranks. Political protest isn’t in my nature. The first and last time I ever did anything “activist-y” was in college, and I was doing it solely to get laid. I was born burnt out about these sorts of things, and I realized a while ago that we are ultimately doomed. The only logical option now is to go do your own thing, whatever that may be. I’m out for myself, my friends and my family, and fuck the rest. You can rag on me all day for being selfish and apathetic, but I really don’t care – I’m not interested in throwing my life away on projects that have little to no chance of success. The serpent that tempted Eve may be saved, but not Ferdinand.
Some of you may be wondering why, despite not supporting white nationalism, I link to and promote WN blogs like Occidental Dissent. My interest in white nationalism is similar to Ray Sawhill’s interest in game – it’s something I may not fully agree with, but I think it’s interesting and worth keeping an eye on. I believe we are on the precipice of great change in the West. In particular, racialism and tribalism are coming back in a big way, as middle- and working-class whites disabuse themselves of the liberal, multicultural lies forced on them by their ruling elites. We are cursed to live in interesting times, and if smart, committed leaders like Parrott and Hunter Wallace have their way, white nationalists may very well end up as one of the major players. If they weren’t important, no one would pay any attention to them, just like if I wasn’t important in the right-o-sphere, Matt wouldn’t have devoted two posts in a row to me. Even those who are far less comfortable with racialism than I am can see the wisdom of keeping abreast of social developments.
So Matt, I appreciate the concern and the linkage. I’ll be watching you guys from the balcony and taking notes, but I won’t be joining in the action on stage. In this twisted tragicomedy, it is my role to be the quiet, thoughtful observer and occasional heckler. I wish you luck, ’cause you’re really gonna need it.
As for the essay on why white nationalists are doomed, Matt’s provided the inspiration for me to knock it out sometime next week. Thanks, dude.
{ 43 comments… read them below or add one }
I’ll always have a seat saved for you on the Failure Train of Imminent Doom, my dear friend.
Hehehehe
I was hoping that that really was a picture of you. That would have made for some interesting conversations about how easily psychology can control a woman’s sex drive ;)
[That picture's gotten around. Here's the original. - ed.]
When you noted how WN is spawned from multiculturalism I was worried you were going to pull a David Horowitz, but fortunately that turned out not to be the case.
I don’t consider myself WN and think the concept of abandoning huge swathes of North America to colored people, Jews, and SWPLers to be obscene, but it’s not that important. Surface ideologies are merely a cipher, and I’m sure most WNs will be more than happy to support good old white supremacy in the future.
I don’t believe in multiculturalism either, strangely enough. I saw how that worked out in Germany, and it pissed me off then. It’s like German guys just collectively bent over and waited for it, thanks to the Greens. Pathetic. Multi-culti goes against patriarchy (which is why feminists espouse it), and men without patriarchy are just a bunch of unattractive wimps.
I’m out for myself, my friends and my family, and fuck the rest. You can rag on me all day for being selfish and apathetic, but I really don’t care – I’m not interested in throwing my life away on projects that have little to no chance of success.
That’s not selfish and apathetic, that is shrewd. I used to feel that way, too, before I married. I feel differently now though, as I have children who are going to have to live in the world we leave behind. Of course, it is possible to protect the ones you love with your political decisions and activities.
Note that white nationalism is not to be confused with white advocacy. The two are separate concepts and I support the latter because I’m not an idiot. I realize that the racial group I belong to is increasingly marginalized and has a dim future unless we push back.
Yeah, that’s how I feel, as well. It’s odd though. Women are total sell-outs that way, and will sometimes align themselves with their husband’s interests to the point of it being self-destructive.
I was talking to this Mexican woman whose son goes to my son’s preschool. Her (white) husband was laid off recently and she was getting all worked up telling me about how “Good men are getting tossed aside in order to make room for a bunch of illiterate immigrants.” It was a bit strange hearing someone say that with such passion, and such a thick accent. But of course, if you’re married to a white man and he loses his job to a Mexican, then it’s your children who are going to suffer. For homemakers: Husband First. The kids have to eat, after all.
My husband has accused me of being a libertarian for the same reason. An abolition of the welfare state would benefit me (and strengthen my Church), as my husband would clean up in a more meritocratic environment. His potential is being severely sapped by quotas, regulations, and taxes. I used to be more socialist in my thinking, and I found it difficult to speak out against the size of the government, because both of my parents are federal bureaucrats. But now I think Husband First and figure they can move into our guest bedroom, if they get laid off.
I guess that means I’m selfish, too, and am only concerned about what’s good for me and mine. Ask me if I care.
From Occidental:
I live in an Amish/Mennonite area, as well. I interact with them regularly, so I can tell you that he’s completely missing the point.
Those men have tight Game. Same with a lot of Mormon guys, Orthodox Jews, devout Muslims, and traditional Catholics. They’re hard. Game isn’t all about “negging”. That’s useful for picking up chicks, but it’s not the basis for handling a woman on a long-term basis.
In my view, a man will only feel truly confident in handling a woman if he has a strong ideology, which he has internalised, to support him. An atheist might do it, if he was a strong “believer” in evolutionary psychology; but the most durable approach is if the man has some strong religious reason for believing that he should rule his wife. The groups Alte has listed are all possibilities. I moved from mainstream Catholicism to a more Traditional Catholicism partly because I could see that mainstream Catholicism was becoming (somewhat) feminised, with females creeping into the sanctuary, and so on. That was not the only reason, but it was part of it.
Years ago, there was a pop cultural humorous series of books, the “Real men …” books. One of them, the sequel to “Real Men Don’t Eat Quiche”, contained a short list of “real man’s religions”. Catholicism and Presbyterianism were mentioned. This was just humorous, of course, but there is an element of truth in it. For example, the only “real man” in America who is an Episcopalian is Lawrence Auster, and he is a special case. As a general rule of thumb, any church with Lesbian bishops is not a real man’s religion …
I might add that I recently heard a homily, from a rather young Traditional Catholic priest, in which the ladies in the (small) congregation were enjoined to show a spirit of obedience to their husbands.
NOT something you will hear in most Catholic churches these days.
I don’t believe in multiculturalism either, strangely enough.
It’s ironic given that multiculturalism is the only real way for you and your family to exist safely. A world where tribalism and racialism comes back means a world that’s far more difficult for you and your children. I can’t defend any real dismantling of multiculturalism because it’s a threat to my safety and my way of life. If I was a black nationalist, I would have little care about it, but as one of those black people with white friends, I’d prefer to keep a environment where I can safely go to a Catholic church or date a white woman (or Asian woman) and walk the streets of a major urban city whether in North America or Europe.
In other words, I need multiculturalism to feel safe as a non-white person in a white society.
No, you are mistaken. Both my husband and my children are unmistakably white, and will never benefit from any pro-minority policies. Since my husband provides for and protects me, and my children are my genetic legacy, I’m best off espousing views that benefit them.
Most women in interracial/international marriages have made such mental calculations themselves. That’s why my cousin (who is black as night), who is also married to a white man, votes reliably Republican and is tending toward Libertarianism. You should see her rant about the evils of affirmative action. She’s basically throwing her own personal priorities under the bus, in deference to him and her children.
Also, I come from a long line of free concubines whose children did astonishingly well, considering the general poverty of the time. If the choice is eating or not eating, keeping your property or not, then I’m with the white guys. I know that that’s not very PC to say, but it’s the truth.
In other words, I need multiculturalism to feel safe as a non-white person in a white society.
Yeah, because if it weren’t for multiculturism, your “white friends” would go all crazy and start lopping off heads, wouldn’t they? :rolleyes:
Seriously, David–just go back to watching porn, and let the grownups talk.
White Nationalism is doomed because the vast majority of white people that are under forty have multiple non-white friends.
There’s also no non-arbitrary way of delineating who is “white” and who is not, especially upon considering the number of people with mixed white and visible non-white ancestry who “pass” as white in younger social circles. The category of “white” has expanded over time to encompass an increasing broader number of groups that were previously regarded as “caucasian but not white.” Study of haplogroups muddles things up even further, as it makes it really obvious how how much overlap there is between neighboring populations and how difficult it is to divide people up into neat categories. Most white nationalists aren’t genetically literate though, and still use outdated terms like “caucasoid”, “negroid” and “mongoloid”. You also run into countries like Brazil where the “whites”, “blacks” and “browns” are pretty much all of mixed ancestry — the exception being more recent immigrants from Poland, Germany, etc. — but happened to be recreated as racial categories by way of a color preference within their class structure.
Ethnic conflict will be a problem in the future, and multiculturalism in all but the most affluent environments is going to create a lot of strife within the western world. Whites will push back, but white nationalism is not even a coherent philosophy, much less a practical program. If anything, I expect people to become more unapologetically clannish and cliquish. They’ll no longer pretend to be altruistic as they do today, and they’ll doggedly defend the interests of themselves and whatever groups they perceive to be their “in-groups”. Such in-groups might have a partially based upon race, but also upon social class, profession, hobbies, religion, lifestyle, etc. I don’t foresee liberal and conservative whites ever joining forces.
I think the most likely scenario is that America will be a richer, English speaking Brazil with fewer blacks and more browns. Lots of groups will be clannish and keep to themselves, but will continue to do business with outsider groups when there is money to be made. Tension between underclass groups of different ethnic backgrounds will periodically flare up into riots, brawls and shootings, but such will be regarded as the norm of everyday life. It won’t lead to political breakup or expulsions of certain groups from the country (although plenty of people will relocate to different neighborhoods and attempt to maintain a de facto segregation). Hmm…I guess we aren’t too far away from what I describe right now.
“Bardamu’s critiques of White Advocacy fall along a predictable pattern, ‘circle-strafing’ easy targets within the very broad movement without actually challenging our core message.”
It’s called Sun-Tzu’s Art of War.
“FB uses a bunch of words in this post, taking care to refrain from grammatical errors and arrange them in paragraph form.”
And that’s called “writing.” Don’t be afraid.
thank you good sir for the kind words and direction.
i don’t know why so many PUA blogs devolve into racist screeds.
Even though the over the top sexism is understandable (not always excusable though) the racism comes out with a vengeance.
Oh, that’s easy to explain.
Frequent sex raises testosterone levels, which results in men acting more territorial. That makes sense, because if a man is having sex, then he’s likely to have a woman to protect. What is racism if not male territorialism? It’s all about splitting the women up into “herds”, and protecting them from interlopers.
FB: Hey, where did you and Matt Parrott find my picture, anyway?!
@Alte
I was going to say that it was because the idea of becoming a Gangsta Thug Nigger is extremely fucking disgusting to every non-black guy.
LOL.
You all are being so unfair to thugs!
Thugs get a bad name, and white guys can do Gangsta Thug pretty well themselves. (Nigger is harder and often degenerates into Whigger, which is less appealing.) Saw some rich, sexy Russian Gangsta Thugs in Madrid. Yum. Bet they have their own soccer franchise, and shoulders like that. Not to mention they all seem to have an expensive, black girlfriend wearing very uncomfortable shoes and a very short skirt. Gives me the competition fever every time.
You just have to stay on best-behavior, or they’ll break your face. Shame about that. I don’t do “best behavior” well, so I avoid such men. As I like my face the way it is, and don’t wish to have it so expertly rearranged.
One anti-FB commenter over at Occidental Descent writes:
“I think this guy threatened to beat me up or some such nonsense on the old forum.”
Is this true, Ferdinand?
[Of course not. I've never posted on the OD forum. - ed.]
Alte, that last post was purely idiotic.
White Nationalism is doomed, not the least of which is most Whites are middle class (and middle aged) and unlikely to be in for a bout of street fighting. Or protesting much, either. That’s a young man’s game. Also, women detest it.
However, White interest group sectioning (whatever you call it) is gaining adherents. The Tea Party is basically that, led by middle aged women, who have small businesses or are middling professionals, and face catastrophe in the transfer system to support multiculturalism and multi-racial societies. Punitive taxation, no opportunity for their White kids, and so on.
White interest group stuff looks like Sarah Palin. That’s who is leading it (or maybe Jan Brewer). Neither look threatening or are credible boogey man (though SWPL women loathe them with a fiery hatred of a million suns).
Mormonism and Amish require a separate, and segregated society keeping the Sex and the City mores at bay. When TV offers “Hung” and “Hard Times of RJ Berger” (about a teacher, and teen nerd with big penises respectively) as entertainment, Game is mandatory to have sex. WN folks and Auster both neglect, that to create a family you actually have to have a guy having sex with a woman.
In fact, White women have basically begun to reject the nuclear family and beta provider, Roissy has a great post on that. The Illegitimacy rate among White working class women is 40%, among White middle class women 20%. Only among the upper classes are women still finding husbands before kids.
Our future looks like Mexico or Brazil or what have you. Poor, mostly Mexican/Mestizo, Whites being overtly discriminated against in every way, and pushing back voting-wise in blocs, most women having kids with sexy bad boys, every guy trying to thug it up, crumbling infrastructure and weakness characterizing the West everywhere which will be rapidly colonized from Scandinavia to Spain to Russia to Germany to England to the US and Canada, by various folks who are poor but numerous and aggressive.
What repels me from WN sites is the level of pussy ass crying little girl pessimism bordering on hysteria among the commenters. I visited at Stomrfont only once in my entire life, but read AmRen for about a year. Eventually pulled a plug on that and never revisited because reading the articles and commetners made me want to put a gun in my mouth.
To the WNs: challenging times lie ahead. Welcome to human history. A littel ballsy optimism and a lot of sense of humor are indicated.
On Nordicism: the Italy, Uruguay and Serbia teams all look white to me.
And Whiskey, don’t fancy yourself a Cassandra. You are a Jane Fonda.
So basically, White Nationalism is doomed because neither any non-white men or any fuckable women support it.
@Alte
Those are guys that want and can kill middle class guys for our stuff or just because. So I’m realistic and consider them an enemy.
I know that that’s not very PC to say, but it’s the truth.
I must admit, it’s hard for me to come up with a rational response to you as you invoke a visceral* and angry reaction from me. I don’t want to hurl insults, claims of selling out, or curse at you because it doesn’t advance the debate, and I like you as a person so I’d feel guilty afterward.
*Yeah, I started crying.
Most women in interracial/international marriages have made such mental calculations themselves.
But I wouldn’t want my wife to make that type calculation. If a woman is going to have make such mental calculations to marry me, then I’m afraid that there’s no way that I could live with myself knowing that I forced her to choose between her race and my race. I want an interracial relationship that will spite the Stormfronters and other white nationalist types, not prove their pet theories correct about stealing women and children. I don’t want to have to steal from others to avoid starvation. I’d much rather commit suicide and die honourably than live dishourably against my principles.
Also, I come from a long line of free concubines whose children did astonishingly well, considering the general poverty of the time.
In contrast, I come from a line of high prole, yet not bourgeois types with elitist tendencies who have secretly longed to be in the mulatto classes.
Yeah, because if it weren’t for multiculturism, your “white friends†would go all crazy and start lopping off heads, wouldn’t they?
It is unlikely that white people will engage in a mass pogrom of non-whites. It is more likely that white people may resort to more racist behaviour in regards to non-whites, and that’s what concerns me. I assure you that my friendship with Athena or any of my white friends wouldn’t exist sixty years ago because there would have been social prohibitions against that.
The problem that I have is that with the multiculturalism, we end with a highly segregated racial sphere with no safe spaces for those of us who “cross” races. I want to live in a world where I can have white friends, marry a white woman and have children with her, live in a white neighbourhood, worship with white people (hint: David is Catholic), travel with white people, and work with white people with no consequences at all. Racialism and tribalism are a threat to that world, and thus, they’re a threat to me.
Frequent sex raises testosterone levels, which results in men acting more territorial.
So my low testosterone which is induced by my lack of sex results in my anti-racist stances?
Alte, that last post was purely idiotic.
Sorry, that was just me attention-whoring to see if Snark will respond. Look at me! Look at me! Look at me! ;-) Glad you liked it.
But seriously, those guys are all over Madrid. I’m thinking construction cartel, or something. Russian mafia, gays, and models. That’s Madrid, for you.
Those are guys that want and can kill middle class guys for our stuff or just because. So I’m realistic and consider them an enemy.
Yeah, I know. Although I’m usually only exposed to the wealthier thugs, not the ghetto ones. Those kind of guys are the only ones that make my husband nervous. But I’m not sure if it’s because they’re so hot, or because they’re so violent. Perhaps both.
White Nationalism is doomed because neither any non-white men or any fuckable women support it
True dat. It sounds like a bunch of whining to me.
It’s like: if you want white supremacy, go out and shag a white chick. If you can’t even knock one up, you don’t deserve to reign. It’s not like it’s hard to impregnate a white woman. Black guys do it all the time, without a problem.
(ducks and runs)
want an interracial relationship that will spite the Stormfronters and other white nationalist types, not prove their pet theories correct about stealing women and children.
No, it’s definitely stealing. Their reaction is logical and natural. Multiculturalism hides that, but in a patriarchy the woman (and children) takes on the ethnic identity of her husband. That’s only natural.
Sorry to upset you, but you know I just call it like I see it. At any rate, I would have had to sell out one side or the other (or both), regardless of whom I married.
So my low testosterone which is induced by my lack of sex results in my anti-racist stances?
In general, yes. In particular, it just leads to territorialism. What form that takes, depends on the guy. Simple possessiveness, xenophobia, racism, religious fundamentalism, etc.
Black guys do it all the time, without a problem.
(ducks and runs)
I haven’t! :-)
No, it’s definitely stealing.
I must admit, I feel distraught and rather sad reading that because as I said earlier, I don’t want to steal women. This certainly leaves one reinforced with the idea that fighting the patriarchy is key to making the world safer for me. Otherwise, I’m left with a context where if I find a nice white girl to marry, I can’t marry her because it will basically eat away at my morals and prove the racists right, something that I don’t want to do. I want the racist scum to die and rot and hell knowing that they’re wrong, not live with the pleasure of knowing that they’re right.
Regardless, what would you do if one of your children married a black (or other non-white Christian) person, or would you discourage them from doing so?
In general, yes.
Humans are slowly coming across as an immensely repulsive and broken group of creatures. The least perfect of God’s creation. I mean, it’s almost as if we have to ban sex and testosterone to make the world a better and more peaceful place.
Alte, as soon as I saw your reference to Russian mobsters, I felt sorry for your husband.
One of the reasons patriarchy tends to lead to the woman taking on the ethnic identity of the husband may simply be naming, such as the use of surnames. I have a very Irish surname, and people just assume (not correctly) that I am 100% Irish. My wife, who is less Irish than me, ethnically, now has the same very Irish surname, and everybody now assumes she is of Irish extraction. So much so, that she plays along with it a bit at times.
This may be of interest:
http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=110840
It may be a nice example of men taking wives from another ethnic group, and the female ethnic group being subsumed into the male group identity (Icelandic and Celtic, in this case).
DA is getting plenty of sex, just not with a real woman. How would that affect his testosterone levels according to your theory? How would his endocrine system “know” that this is not real sex? It would seem to me that DA should be pretty macho by now, if your theory is correct.
[I recall a study years ago that showed that testosterone levels - as well as the amount of semen ejaculated - are higher during actual sex then masturbation. Maybe it has to do with the sensory experience (sight, sound, smell, feel) of having a real, living woman in your hands as opposed to an image on a computer screen? I imagine there's a reason why most world religions consider jerking off to be taboo. - ed.]
In any case, most men will tell you that they are calmer and nicer when they are getting regular sex.
I suspect that some men are just high-testosterone inherently, and they therefore have territorial tendencies. Certainly real-life success can raise testosterone levels, and maybe sexual success can too, but I think this is likely to be less important than the inherent level itself.
In terms of the form territorialism takes, I have often been called “sexist” but almost never “racist”. That is, I am “possessive” and a “religious fundamentalist” (although I would argue that is just a negative descriptor of a man who is serious about his religion); but I am not “xenophobic” or “racist”. The latter tendencies seem more likely in high-testosterone men who are less intelligent and unmarried.
FB, the next thing that will happen is that you will be exposed as a reptile alien like me.
[Hush, fool! You'll expose our plot! - ed.]
So much so, that she plays along with it a bit at times.
Why? If she’s not Irish, why would she want to adopt your identity, isn’t it a bit insulting to her to do so? I wouldn’t expect Athena to adopt my Haitian identity.
DA, I suppose partly because she is a Catholic like me. Many Catholics in Australia are of Irish extraction. Also, she does have some Irish blood. And she looks very Irish. Besides, the Irish in Australia are rather a dominant and well-liked ethnic group. She has a first name that sounds vaguely Irish, so that helps as well. People often call her Carmel by mistake, because they think it goes with our surname. Carmel is a common Irish-Australian Catholic girl’s name.
I have thought hard about whether Alte is correct about women taking on their husband’s culture, in my specific case. I certainly think my wife has adopted a lot of my opinions, and she is probably more religious because of me than she would have been otherwise. But in terms of things like food, because my wife does all the grocery shopping and cooking, I tend to eat what she wants to cook. We are going out tonight for a curry, for my 55th birthday, and that is partly because she doesn’t cook Indian-type curries. A lot of the house furnishings and so on are also her preferences.
Really, we are so similar in our ethnic and cultural backgrounds that many of the potential “cross-cultural” issues hardly arise.
if no one is hating/talking about you…..you’re not doing anything worthy of note.
With the black hat and black coat, the pictured man looks like some sort of twisted, nightmarish Hasidic Jew.
Alte, as soon as I saw your reference to Russian mobsters, I felt sorry for your husband.
Yes, I’m sorry, David. That was quite horrid of me. I’m suffering from a spate of rebellious disobedience lately. I suppose because he made me give up my blog, and I’m resentful. It was such a satisfying intellectual release for me. But that’s my problem, and I just need to get over it and beat my impotent hypergamous instincts unconscious with a very large bat.
I feel sorry for my husband, as well. I’m a terrible and ungrateful wife, with the self-control of a toddler, a volatile temperament, the sexual attention span of a gnat, the libido of a rabid 17 year-old boy, and a chronic inability to STFU.
So I’ll practice that now. This is me, finally STFU.
Alte, I wasn’t admonishing you. That is not my place. I was just grateful that I don’t have to protect a woman from Russian mobsters. No doubt your husband could do it; but it would terrify me. I am grateful I live in a backwater like Australia some times.
Your husband is the man that God has given to you. That should put him ahead of all other men in your mind and heart.
He is. I was just joking about the mobsters. I’m not completely stupid and self-destructive, you know.
But I shouldn’t joke like that. That was the transgression.
“Is this true, Ferdinand?
[Of course not. I've never posted on the OD forum. - ed.]”
You disappoint me. Nothing could be funnier or add more to your persona than if you went around threatening to kick white nationalists’ asses. Not for what they believe, but for being pansies and nerds. That would be the absolute peak of Ferdinand Bardamu and it would be difficult to match.
[There's no way to threaten people with physical violence on the interwebs and not look like a tool. Though a number of those guys do deserve a few punches to the face... - ed.]
I meant I was joking about finding the mobsters sexy. I don’t, and I’m not attracted to real thugs. I prefer geeky guys. I wasn’t joking about their presence, of course. There really do seem to be an awful lot of them there, and they were quite forward. They seem quite used to taking things that don’t belong to them. No surprise there.
Dated a Ukrainian engineer for a while. He seemed really great, until he opened a bottle of vodka with his buddies. Thanks, but no thanks. That’s the problem with those Eastern guys, in general. It’s no wonder that Russian women are hunting Western men. At least most of them are usually sober and don’t use Beat-Down Game.
I’m not really that bad. Just silly and irreverent, and sort of flaky. That was over the top, though (as Snark pointed out). I’m trying to cool it now, and quit the hysterics. I’m going to go for a walk, and chill.
No trolling today, FB. I’m on best behavior. Otherwise David won’t like me anymore, and will pity my husband all the more.
FB’s right about testosterone levels and masturbation. The body can tell the difference somehow, and responds accordingly.
In any case, most men will tell you that they are calmer and nicer when they are getting regular sex.
To a point, although it seems that they are merely happier, not necessarily calmer.
Or perhaps it is preselection, as you say. Men with lower libidos are generally more docile, right?
The latter tendencies seem more likely in high-testosterone men who are less intelligent and unmarried.
I’m with you on the unmarried, but not the intelligence aspect of it. Married men are more possessive of their own woman, and less concerned with the group-allegiance of other women. (Although I have seen them get angry about hearing about someone else’s wife leaving for an “outsider”.) That’s more for single or polygamous men, as they are concerned about the future availability of “their” women for sex. Intelligent men are just better at pretending to toe the party line. But that doesn’t mean they aren’t festering.
One of the reasons patriarchy tends to lead to the woman taking on the ethnic identity of the husband may simply be naming, such as the use of surnames.
That’s true. I have an undeniably Germanic name, and it effects the way people interact with me.
Hey Ferdi,
I’m having gtrtouble with the following passage by you:
“Note that white nationalism is not to be confused with white advocacy. The two are separate concepts and I support the latter because I’m not an idiot. I realize that the racial group I belong to is increasingly marginalized and has a dim future unless we push back.”
O: Could you please explain exactly what you mean by that, with some concrete examples? Exactly in what way are White folk becoming increasingly marginalized? I need clarification. Thanks!
O.
[Check in next week. The answer may surprise you. - ed.]
Yes, good point, FB and Alte, about real sex vs virtual sex.
And also about regular sex making a man happier rather than less aggressive. I am always more assertive when I am happier.
Regular sex also keeps a man’s sexuality more “healthy”. My wife was having her period lately, and I was becoming really horny, and found myself exploring all sorts of strange Internet material. I didn’t go over the deep end, morally, but it was touch and go. Fortunately, things have resolved themselves in a natural way since, and all that weird stuff (naked Russian girls in snow, etc) no longer seems so interesting.
I thought you might be serious about the Russian mobsters. You are a much tougher person than me, Alte. I live in a small Australian city. We rarely come in contact with the more florid types of people here. I remember seeing an amazing looking blonde a couple of years ago, in a hardware shop of all places. She just seemed almost alien in her stunning appearance. Tall, voluptuous, and I got the impression, really dim. Most people in this town are middle class intellectual types. This woman looked quite out of place. After she had left, there was excited discussion among the men left in the shop – “mafia girlfriend” seemed to be the consensus.
I have found myself being a bit possessive of women who work for me. But I don’t have that ethnocentric tendency to keep “our women”. I do feel more of a desire to keep Catholic women “in the fold”. I always like people better if they are Catholics (my daughter was watching the soccer last night, and I caught myself commending the Slovenian team for likely being Catholics). This crosses racial lines too. I “like” Goanese and Vietnamese and so on because they are Catholics.
DA, I also like Haitians because they are Catholics.
“There’s no way to threaten people with physical violence on the interwebs and not look like a tool.”
I disagree. There are ways it can be done. Obviously you’re not being serious, but they think you are, and that is where the prize lulz lie.
David Alexander, yes, but that’s because you get benefits from living and hanging out with white people. I don’t have any benefits from living among black people, going to school with them or… Well, I could list the benefits of doing that, but I’d need a few days to think about it to come up with one. And a newsflash for you, every choice we make is a trade off. When a white woman dates you, she does choose your race over hers. Sure, she might ignore that on a conscious level, but that is irrelevant. You can continue living deluded and believe that the world runs on fairy dust and magic, but it’s simply not true. Another thing – not even sharing my space with nonwhite people brings me a benefit. So your real problem is making nonwhite people being among white people benefit white people. Then yes, when the multicultural stupidity will collapse, you will be in a fairly crappy position.
Oh, and by the way, wanting to spite Stormfronters proves their theory. And another thing, out of curiosity, I analyzed quite a lot the sexual instincts influencing things and the reasons why black men like to boink us confirm what Stormfronters think too. And before you bring up your lack of knowledge of statistics and say that you don’t want to boink white women because it’s cool to have sex with the women of another group, individual decisions don’t matter when you analyze groups.
Yet another thing, racism is an empty world. Nobody cares about it. And self-reservation of your group and race isn’t racism. But again, as I said, you live in a world that runs on pixie dust. Racism had a meaning when it implied hatred induced by prejudice. But not wanting to be around black people as a group doesn’t come out of prejudice. Oh, and another thing, what you want is irrelevant to me and should be irrelevant to white people. I never understood this pathology of caring about what outsiders think your group should do.
{ 4 trackbacks }