Hat tip: Robert Stacy McCain.
Lucidity is skin deep, but senility goes straight to the bone
Previous post: Linkage is Good for You: Not Safe for Work Edition
Next post: Intactivism?
by Ferdinand Bardamu on June 7, 2010
in Politics
I run this joint. Follow me on Twitter here, on Google+ here, and friend me on Facebook here. Find out more about my upcoming book, The Eternal Solipsism of the Female Mind and Other Essays, by clicking here.
Previous post: Linkage is Good for You: Not Safe for Work Edition
Next post: Intactivism?

"That’s the central point of The 4-Hour Workweek – screw conventional wisdom and ethics to get rich. Leverage go-fuck-yourself Calvinist capitalism for your own benefit. Plagiarize other peoples’ work and pass it off as your own. Outsource your work to India like a good little free marketeer. Then spend all your newfound free time on vacation instead of raising a family, creating a useful invention, or otherwise contributing to society in any way..."
Copyright © 2009-2012 In Mala Fide. All rights reserved.
All other copyrights remain the property of their respective owners.
Home | Subscribe | Privacy Policy | Scroll to Top
{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
Good god that is one ugly biatch.
Her facts are wrong, but her sentiment is correct.
1,
She was born in 1920.
Youtube clips of Nancy Pelosi are showing perseveration, impersistant speech , and glazed over eyes . I expressed my concern for her dementia with my congressmen, but he brushed me off.
Lest anyone wonder who’s really in charge, let a crazed lefty express a thought in public that is probably widely held in US universities and she is promptly sacked.
She is not crazy, she is honest- at last.
If she’s right, then shouldn’t all White people go “back” to Europe? Where they will be minorities as Muslims take over? Shouldn’t all Black people go “back” to Africa? Heck, Europeans would argue (and have) that Jews belong in Israel because that’s where they are from, not Europe.
Shouldn’t White Australians (and Asians) all go “back” to Europe or Asia, “give it back” as that tall, bald lump of idiocy Peter Whatshisname from Midnight Oil argues?
Shouldn’t all Turks “go back” to Turkey and leave Cyprus?
Shouldn’t all Russians “go back” to Russia and leave Chechnya?
Shouldn’t all Serbs “Get the hell out of Serbia” since Muslims are taking over?
Shouldn’t all Chinese “get the hell out of Tibet” since it “belongs to Tibet?”
Shouldn’t all Lebanese “get the hell out” of Lebanon since it belongs to the Phoenicians? Shouldn’t all Muslims “get the hell out” of Egypt since it belongs to the Pharoahs?
Hell, La Raza tells White people like me to “get the hell out of America” it belongs to them not me. Indians tell me the same. Both say “go back to Europe.”
Thomas told Jews to “go to Auschwitz” one step removed, she mentions Poland the notorious site of concentration camps and the notorious sites of killing Jews AFTER Liberation, in 1946, 1947, and 1948. If anything, this ought to be a wake-up call that Jews have only their own strength of arms, and nothing else, to save them, since nearly all Muslims (99.99999%) want them dead.
As for Thomas’s defenestration, it proves that Hearst was responsive to the American people, who by large majorities approve of Israel’s handling of the blockade, hate Muslims, and like Israel.
Mostly because Evangelicals consider themselves “New Jews” and part of a new Covenant that simply extends the old. Not replaces it. This is why Palin had an Israeli flag on her desk. It speaks to Evangelicals (she’s one of them) and is about them (more than Jews, though philo-semitism mostly characterizes Evangelicals and America).
Its proof that America has not yet succumbed to SWPL latte swilling PC, there’s enough older people to maintain some sanity. [According to Peter Beinart's story and poll by Frank Luntz, most American young Jews would be unperturbed by Israelis all being wiped out -- it would simply save them PC embarrassment.]
This is off topic, but your contact form doesn’t work – keeps saying I entered the code wrong.
Anyway, alpha:
http://schlockmercenary.com/d/20100608.html
[If it's broken and you need to contact me, email at fbardamu [AT] inmalafide [DOT] com. Thanks for the heads-up. – ed.]
In this story I’ve noticed three, not really related, interesting things:
1. Helen Thomas is of Lebanese descent, and thus presumably has an axe to grand with Zionism
2. The incredible extent of Jewish power in the United States that leads a 90 year old woman to be publicly rebuked from multiple quarters for expressing a negative opinion about a foreign country
3. The ignorance of Helen Thomas in particular but people in general of the origins of Israelis
Regarding point one, when this story broke I had no idea who Helen Thomas was. I was born in 1985, so by the time I was an adolescent her career was mostly over. Like all good members of gen Y, my immediate reaction was to look her up on Wikipedia. She strikes me as one of those people the journalism profession likes to celebrate as important, chiefly because journalists have a grossly overinflated sense of importance. Walter Cronkite and Edward Murrow come to mind.
In her Wikipedia article I noticed this interesting tidbit, “Her parents, Mary (née Rowady) and George Thomas, were Lebanese immigrants from Tripoli, Lebanon;[5][6][7] her father’s surname had originally been “Antonious” before being anglicized to Thomas at Ellis Island”
Lebanon, as we know, was invaded by Israel in 1982 in an attempt to root out the PLO there. The South was occupied until 1985, and had an on-and-off Israeli presence until it ended in 2000. In 2006, Israel invaded again as well as bombing most of the country.
While Helen Thomas grew up in an era where America was still America and thus she never in her education would’ve been encouraged to nurture ethnic grievances, not even the mighty melting pot of that era eradicated ethnicity overnight. Odds are very good that Helen Thomas isn’t anti-Zionist for liberal reasons (though she might think so), but for the quite sensible reason that her urheimat has been repeatedly reduced to smithereens by the IDF.
Unsurprisingly, this has not been reported on at all in the media. Diversity!
The second point doesn’t need much elaboration. This ninety year old woman has been dropped from her speaking engagements, her collaboration with Craig Crawford, Hearst Newspapers, and likely other things.
Not only that, but she was officially rebuked by the White House. That is to say, the extent of Jewish power in America is so strong that the White House felt the need to rebuke the extreme anti-Zionist remarks of a journalist.
Predictably, Helen Thomas has apologized. Why? What does this ninety year old woman have to lose? Why doesn’t anyone (besides James Crowley) caught in a public spate over violating the dominant structure of taboos stand his ground?
The third point concerns Helen Thomas’ own ignorance. She tells the Jews to go “home”, as if before 1948 world Jewry were concentrated in Germany, Poland, and the United States. I am not sure what structure the Israeli population had at that time, but as far as I know most Israelis there had either been continuously present in Palestine for centuries or had immigrated before the war after the development of modern Zionism. Recently the largest source of immigrants has been the former Soviet Union.
The video, perhaps deliberately, makes an error about the German Jews. While it is a fact that most of Polish Jewry was exterminated, by 1941 540,000 Jews from Germany and Austria had emigrated. Very few German Jews suffered the fate of the millions of Central European and Eastern European Jews in the death camps.
Surprise, surprise you have to be a colonist, Zionist who brings up the Holocaust every other sentence if you want to maintain your seat in the White House briefing room.
I think Helen might have fared better if she’d just said Jews should get the hell out of Palestine.
Telling them to “Go back to Germany and Poland” was what really did her in. It doesn’t sound good.
Israeli Hi-Tech Guy,
I’m not so sure that’s true. While stating that Israeli Jews should relocated to where the Third Reich once ruled was pigheaded, I doubt that being reticent on that “point” would’ve spared her.
The sine qua non of American political life is that you DO NOT question Zionism. The most one can do is state that Israel should cease constructing settlements and express support for the two-state solution. The moment you express anti-Zionist sentiments you become persona non grata.
This may change in the future if Peter Beinhart is correct, but for now it is an iron law of American politics.
Actually I don’t know why people don’t get this. She thinks that jews have a right to call germany and poland home, and this is ridiculously insulting to german and polish people because the jews did in fact financially take over those countries. They owned the businesses and real estate. One known phrase, and source of antisemitism in eastern europe was jews saying “our buildings, your streets” to the people in who’s countries they lived in and profited off of. This is also the reason why hitler was so angry at them.
Anonymous,
This is known as “success” and should not necessarily count as an indictment of the Jews. Perhaps if you focused on the ethnic nepotism and financial fraud Jews disproportionately engage in, you’d have a point. In this combination they are not unique however, and the overseas Chinese are fairly similar as are most market dominant minorities. They further receive similar treatment from their host populations in Southeast Asia. But yes, in 1938, despite five years of state-sponsored antisemitism and considerable emigration, German Jewry still owned one-third of the real property in Germany.
If you want to make a case against the Jews, and believe me, there is one, you’ll need to do better than to to criticize them for…success.
And really, do you not know why people don’t get it?
“The third point concerns Helen Thomas’ own ignorance. She tells the Jews to go “homeâ€, as if before 1948 world Jewry were concentrated in Germany, Poland, and the United States. I am not sure what structure the Israeli population had at that time, but as far as I know most Israelis there had either been continuously present in Palestine for centuries or had immigrated before the war after the development of modern Zionism.”
Relative to the Jewish population beforehand, there was a lot of Jewish immigration to Palestine between the two wars, especially (and unsurprisingly) as the Nazis came to power. That’s a very small window compared to “centuries.” I haven’t been able to find precise figures, but it looks like the Jewish population of what’s now modern Israel/Palestine was something like half a million around 1930. Poland’s was over 3 million. Even today, the number of Jews in Israel is less than the commonly accepted 6 million Jewish Holocaust victims–and about a third of today’s Israeli Jews are foreign born.
Why is it ignorant to think of Central Europe as a much greater hub of world Jewry, pre-WW2, than the comparative backwater of Palestine?
By far the largest source of Ashkenazi Jews in Israel is Russia. After that, Romania and Poland. The Polish Jews, however, enjoy a particularly elite social status and thus seem much more numerous than they actually are.
Ashkenazi Jews from Germany and the former Austro-Hungarian Empire are a relatively minor group in Israel.