Regular visitors to the Chateau are probably familiar with Great Books for Men, a frequent commenter who buries his disturbingly salient points underneath a mountain of mutilated Internet slang. Eumaios and Hawaiian Libertarian recently turned me on to GBFM’s blog, and I just finished reading his latest post on fiat currency, feminism, and game. Aside from the deliberate spelling errors and nonstop repetition of certain phrases (surely there’s another way to write “secretive taper of butthex”), it’s a beautiful work of crackpot genius:
many of youse have been rwsiased on ritalin with no dads to tell you to fucking work hard and fucking shut up and fucking pay attention, and thus you act like little ritalain addicts which is the way the fed wants tit mashing buttons in your menaingless videogames in your single mom’s basmemnt turning up the playsattion volume to drown out the sounds of your mom upstairs banging biker cock which teh fed funds anmd encourages to put it in her butt and which your real dad is forced to pay for and asubsidize after he cuaght her cheating with the pool boy lzozlzlzlzllz and never nmanning up and going forth and finidg your true ftahers and the reading the constitution for yourself nor homers odyssey in which telemanchus must also rid his mhome of teh false suitors and teh us constitution which states that only congeress shall eb able to coin money and that it must be gold or silver but not fiat butthexing paper lzozlzlzozlzlzlzlz.
If you have no idea what GBFM is saying, Eumaios also wrote a handy guide to the slang he uses. Go read the rest, and remember to lzozlzlz!



{ 74 comments… read them below or add one }
Hmm, interesting, will have to set aside a special time for that. Like reading Thomas Pynchon or studying Cubist art, there’s much more involved here than the mere act of absorbing the “art” at a visual level.
I secretly think GBfM is Roissy’s alter-ego.
The problem with GBFM is that large swaths of Austrian macro are batshit crazy. When it comes to economics, there really are worse things in heaven and earth than Ben Bernanke. Money is the hardest subject in all of economics and while Ben Bernanke and the mainstream macroeconomists are not the fountains of wisdom they think they are, there are no easy, mechanistic solutions to problems in human behaviour, such as how to best run the currency system. Keynes may have inspired all sorts of silly ideas among his followers, but his essential insight that a demand for money can reduce the demand for everything else is completely true.
I always read “butthex” as butt-hex, until others somewhat convinced me it’s really butt-thex, like Barney Frank would pronounce it.
I still like “butt-hex.” Hex. It sounds like somethign witches would be mixed up in. And witches represent all that is unnatural. Or rather all-too-natural, though in disturbing and wrong ways.
The problem is that Barney Frank would pronounce it not butt-thex, but butt-thekth.
He does come off as a bit…over-caffeinated. I get a headache trying to read is stream-of-thought writing, but commenters over at chateau Roissy swear by him.
GBFM is kinda funny for a while, but his schtick gets old rather quickly. The comparison to Mencius is apt. GBFM has much the same combination of derangement and insight.
Think that I made sense of it.
The “feds” train women with the MSM to be souless leeches of a man’s hard work via the marriage 2.0. They do that because if the native population becomes thin, is easier to justify exporting the jobs to people from foreign shitholes who are all too happy to be basically slaves.
Whithout a father in the house to teach a son about virtues, hard work and honesty, the son just retreats to a videogame-hermit existence to not having to face his mother from slutting it up. Girls, of course, are trained to be the next generaton of sluts.
That’s it, until hormones start acting in the boy. Since he has no foundation of virtues and he sees with his own eyes that the only guys that get laid are douchebags, he sets to become the biggest douchebag. Or biggest thug, in poor homes.
That way, with men being so focused on Game and putting all their self-esteem on the unholy number of parters counter, they aren’t in position to face the overlords of this oppresive regime. Instead of reaching their potential of virtue and honor, they just become Peacocks, too entranced in hedonistic pleasures to actually DO something about the status quo.
That’s why, besides the Roissysphere and the Manosphere, you don’t see any PUAs talking out-loud to the regime that allows them to rachet said number of partners. Why would they? They are the “winners”.
All of the above contains paraphrasing of myself, but the point stands.
Ahh the crazies that frequent the Roissysphere.
I’ve got one: she goes by a different name every time (I think her main one was DADT) and can’t stop talking about being Indian. Its hard to tell someone is crazy online, but sometimes it’s just damn obvious.
She’s “infested” my blog as well. And I believe Ferd ended up banning her awhile back.
[I never banned her - after I "exposed" her she disappeared of her own accord. - ed.]
Of course, that argument has a hole.
Game isn’t a product of the “feds”. Is a natural reaction to the enviroment that feds created. “Feds” just want most men to be little betas with empy brains and empty wallet. Feds are too happy to contain the number of men who do get laid to a minority (famous and/or thugs) instead of spreading the knowledge to the masses. That’s why the MSM tries to train people to dislike Game.
DADT isn’t the famous “Bag Lady” that Obsidian attacked?
[Yes, she is. - ed.]
thanks yu’lalala!sss!!
“The Blanque says:
June 5, 2010 at 3:42 pm
He does come off as a bit…over-caffeinated. I get a headache trying to read is stream-of-thought writing, but commenters over at chateau Roissy swear by him.”
lozlzlozzlzllz fuck teh fcaffeiniated shit i am on ritalin and adderoll lzozlzlzlzlz my nice shcool nurse preseibed it 2 me after i was frowning one day in shcool and asking th tea teacher if they knew that the federal reserve wasn’t really federal biut a private bank lzozllzlzlz omg zlzozllzlzlzlzlz omg and so she told me to not worry but she had medeicne to heplp with the questions and now it all makes ense but i am jittery and go lzozlzozlzlzllzlzlzlzlz and it is not important to spell right she told me the nioce lady,. just don;t ask stoioop id quetsions about the fed and i will get very good grades lzozlzlzlz
It’s like combining a WoW player with a political blogger. Intriguing.
yah mostly i am a good boy and i sit in my basement playing worlkd of warcraft leveling up up up an dmashing menaingless buttoms linke z ritalin adderol zombie as the fiat vampires cuk my life awya lzozlzll as ben bernanke does not want me to ever leave my single mom’s basement and go forth and find my true fatehr as aenseis iddid in virgil’s aeneid and as hamlet was called by teh ghost of his father lzozlzozlzlzozlz omg zlzolzozlzlzozl to great aventures and to set his kingdom right no i am a good zitizen i stay down here and never rea dteh us constitution nor mises nor hayek lzozlzlzozl and say nothing about my mom fornicating with all my different biker stoedasds as my real father pays for her fornictaions.z zlzlzlzl
hey i was thinking that pimps are more honests than minsiters because a minsiter will marry you to the kind of whore where you have tgo go on paying for past use of her pussy which other men are now banging and you are funding lzozlzozlzlzl whereas no pimp would ever do that the w ould not come back and make you pay for a pussy that is banging other men so let me know when churches get pimps as monisters and i swear 2 jesus i wills startt going lzozlzlzlzlz
Ugh…this is how postmodern leftists review art and literature. That being confusing and impossible to understand means it’s brilliant. It’s like reading a killer’s manifesto.
[I don't normally let duplicate comments through, but that last line made me laugh. - ed.]
The person writing these posts might be a perfectly cogent individual who’s writing them in jest, but either way, it’s fucking annoying. I wouldn’t be surprised if GBFM is Fifth Column like you suggested MikeeUSA is.
[Not so sure about MikeeUSA anymore since one of the MRA old-timers at The Spearhead (think it was zed) mentioned that he's been doing this for years. Guy's even got his own entry at Encyclopedia Dramatica. My theory is that GBFM is "perfectly cogent" but writes the way he does to get attention. What can I say, it works.]
Roissy’s comments section has been getting progressively dumber over the last couple months. Roissy claimed to be a free speech absolutists but would harass and degrade any dissenters of his world view while allowing the most racist and offensive (and stupid) comments go by without a peep. Now, comments are stuck in moderation hell, all the intelligent commentators have moved on to other blogs and crappy commentators make the comments section no longer worth reading.
Yes I believe it’s Bag lady. She is fucking psychotic. As in seriously mentally unstable and not just in an Internet troll kind of way.
His stuff is unreadable dreck. He might be a cogent, intelligent individual but I’m not going to take the time to decipher his stuff when his posts on the surface look like something of a tinfoil wearing wacko. Can somebody give me a sophisticated, postmodern interpretation of how saying that the Federal Reserve is actively encouraging the PUAs of the world is a sign of brilliance? LOLZ, I’m such a philistine.
[Well, I qualified "genius" with "crackpot" for a reason. Always read with a critical eye. - ed.]
But seriously, Roissy’s comment section is getting dumber and gbfm’s redundant bullshit plays a large part. All the intelligent commentators have been driven off to other blogs while the rest remains to spew their hate. Roissy regularly harassed female commentators who dissented from his worldview but completely ignored the most racist and offensive material you can think of.
Bag Lady or whatever her name is now made herself at home at Lady Raine’s blog, where she goes by DESI and comments around the clock.
The golden age of Roissy’s comments section was mid 2008 through fall 2009.
Best parts of that ‘golden age’ were the Great Obsidian Race Threads, abundance of smart commenters, a solid number of ‘regulars’ with cool personalities, and a collection of first-rate female commenters.
I think the alleged LR outing of Roissy last winter took some wind out of that blog’s sails; the Chateau thing with hints of multiple writers had an effect as well.
On a positive note, there had been new quality posts and I have no doubt that Roissy can crank out an awesome spirited “philosophical” post given the right topic in current events. But yeah, the comments section kinda sucks now.
The great contribution of that blog, other than teaching guys Game (no small thing in itself), is in Roissy creating a template for coolness in paleo/right politics.
All the intelligent commentators have been driven off to other blogs
Yeah, it used to be a pretty good place to have a conversation: Ferdinand,
[Moi? You honor me. But seriously, I'm not sure I count since even when I commented over there, I didn't really comment over there. The only time I remember having an actual conversation with anyone was arguing with someone (think it was Seeking Alpha) over the Afghan war. Most of the time, I just dropped drive-by comments and links to my blog posts. - ed.]
PA, T. (Ricky Raw), Vladimir, Clio, Hope, omw, Michael Blowhard, Doug, Slumlord. I’m sure I’m missing a few.
[Off the top of my head: Tupac Chopra, Dave from Hawaii, Tarl, agnostic, Spike Gomes, Chuck Ross, Obsidian, Gannon, DaveinHackensack, Bhetti, Welmer, Advocatus Diaboli, Gunslingergregi.]
Hell, even some borderline crazy people like Whiskey and TFH occasionally had really interesting stuff to contribute. Most comments sections, even on very good blogs, like Steve Sailer’s, tend to suck. Roissy’s didn’t. I think it was because the combination of pick up and broader social commentary was so new.
They called it crazy in 2005 to think that Sub-prime was junk. Or to short it.
Sadly I think LR siccing her lawyers on Roissy had a big effect. He’s had to watch what he posts.
As for fiat currency — its great as long as it has faith. Its when faith that the fiat will be maintained that things get dicey. So far the US has skated by on everyone else being worse, with a butt-hex of problems. China, for example, has had (since the 1990′s) tremendous amounts of bad loans and bankrupt State Owned Enterprises. A gold or silver or bi-metallic currency has its own problems, but prevents governments from monetizing debt by printing money (there has to be gold/silver to back it).
That has nothing to do with Marriage/Sexuality 2.0, that’s driven by female choice and collapse of close-knit society with suburbanization and atomic levels of mobility and anonymity. There’s also an element of women being able to play the global level of men available due to mass migrations. There being guys more sexy than the natives around.
Other worthwhile past commenters from the Roissy’s comment section: PatrickH, Shouting Thomas, Willard Libby, Gig, Firepower, Esquire, Dana, GirlGame girls (Aeofe et al). Ryder commented rarely, but was good in some back-n-forths with Obsidian. Obsidian was good under his earlier name Mumin. David Alexander was fun to go back-n-forth with. GNP/Peter was good for an occasional wry comment. Chick Noir had flashes of sweetness from time to time. The G Manifesto transcended mere commenting, incarnating a certain state of mind.
Some of these characters still comment, notably Canon’s Cannon. There are some decent new commetners, like Polymath. And Gorbachev is worth reading if you have the patience for long comments with too many paragraph braks.
A really brief history of the Federal Reserve Bank, and why GBFM’s schtick is cool by me.
Once upon a time, “Dollar” meant fixed weight in gold. Then the Fed came along and issued greenbacks which read, “pay to the bearer, one Dollar.” Hence, the Federal Reserve note was a promise, an IOU, to deliver a certain weight of gold. Somewhere along the way, the Federal Reserve said to the bearer of that IOU, “On second thought, instead of me giving you a fixed weight of gold for that IOU, why don’t you just keep the IOU and we’ll call it even.”
(that’s a little bit like to taking your valet stub back to the parking attendent and being told that the piece of paper in your hand is now a Honda)
Anyhoo….my point is that to even admit knowledge of these remedial facts about the Federal Reserve is to tip-toe to the precipice of being a full-on kook regardless of how calm, cogent, and detached a person is when discussing the subject. If you’re gonna be a kook regardless, you may as well go all the way over the top and make it a bne bneranke butthexing thing lozlzlloo.
I just dropped drive-by comments
I notice quality. Your commenting there was what lead me here.
Tupac Chopra, Dave from Hawaii, Tarl, agnostic, Spike Gomes, Chuck Ross, Obsidian, Gannon, DaveinHackensack, Bhetti, Welmer, Advocatus Diaboli, Gunslingergregi.
Dave from Hawaii was a major omission. The master of LTR game. Novaseeker too.
Tupac is engaging and has lots of experiences to share. Obsidian is off the deep end on the race thing. (Granted, he was baited pretty bad, but he’s returned the favour too many times now for me to have a lot of sympathy anymore.) Chuck is amiable, but frequently a very confused thinker. I lost a lot of respect for Agnostic when Vladimir showed how incredibly sloppy some of his research is. Among those PA mentions, Patrick H was excellent before he drank the Roissy haterade.
You’re being too kind for most of the others, a lot of whom I can’t even remember.
[In my case, I remembered them because I either read their blogs, they comment on mine, or they frequently pop up at other blogs I read. - ed.]
Welmer, I will note in particular though, is a 10th rate mind, which is why I don’t read the Spearhead anymore. Some of the women seem like they would be charming in person, but aside from Clio, Hope and omw none of them had much of substance to say. (And if I want female charm I prefer to interact with, you know, actual girls, not people on the internet.)
Well, it’s been fun. I’m done my prep and I’m off to interact with some actual humans now.
I think this quote tells us quite a bit about GBFM:
>>>>i was gonna be an eocnomics professor but none of my professorss understoodd this bvasic difference between austrian eocnomics and keynsian bernaknomics* when i wnet to them in office houirs and they called campus securiyy when i tried to expalin it with star wars figures–you know the important butthexing parts without whcih it’s hard to grasp i’ll admit–<<<<<
a) I'd guess something fewer than 1% of students enrolled in college Keynesian Indoctrination Courses (commonly called, *Economics*) have even heard of the Austrian school much less know anything about the subject. Ergo, he's an extreme autodidact;
b) He tried to explain the difference between Keynesianism and Austrianism by showing Darth Vader butthexing Princess Leia, or maybe it was Han Solo. Ergo, he's either one sick puppy or he's trying to communicate complex ideas and concepts to a generation of boys who are one generation further removed from a culture which valued masculinity.
lozlzozlzlzlzlz
yah im the crackpot
the fiat media makes secretive tapers of buthex are new york times bestsleeller
the man who created more debt than any man ever ben bernanke is time magaizne man of the year lzozlzlzll
so,mtimes i lose hope for teh future of humanity when the only people who purport to be men run a bunch of blogs where they call truth insanity and then take to talking about the nest kind of furry hat to wear out to gect chcix to touch their dicks lzozlzllz
aginst the army of the burgeoning governmnet and all the fiat media and warmongers wnd welfare statits tstands two dozenbloggers in furry hats.
lzlzlzl
[I don't agree with all of what you say, but keep preaching dude! - ed.]
>>>>>>>>i lose hope for teh future of humanity when the only people who purport to be men run a bunch of blogs where they call truth insanity and then take to talking about the nest kind of furry hat to wear out to gect chcix to touch their dicks lzozlzllz<<<<<<<<<<<
PUA Community = butthexing while Rome burns?
[LOL. - ed.]
greatbooksformen is a total crackpot like Dave from Hawaii. The primary problem is women not a bunch of bankers. Let’s tell the truth. Bankers is used to mean Jews without the obvious antisemitism.
lozlzlzlzll yes i was at a metting of highe rups on martha’s vinyard and the quyeen said “let them eat butthex!!”"”
lzozlzlzllzlzlzlzlzl
in rome they gave them bread and circuses and here they give us bread butthex stories and circuthes zlzllzozlzlzlzlz
hey 2 all of you asstards who think the bankers dind’t fund feminism and teh deosuling of womenz via secrteiv tapiongs of butthex lzozllzl as a means for converting womenz into soulless wealth transfer vehicles read teh following lzozlzozlzlzlzl lzozlzlzlzl :
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/18889
“The feminist movement was crafted by the one-world political initiative and invented to create and sustain global depopulation goals. That is and remains the primary mission of the feminist movement.
Women’s “rights†are disallowed definition by culture, religion, personal opinion, or any other social definition minus the feminist movement. In today’s world, we have no choices as women, whatsoever, but to agree to the think tank morality written and coded by this global movement. The feminist movement is no different than the global environmental movement, the global healthcare movement, the global education movement, or the global economy movement. All are social re-engineering tactics used to forward the take over of all world governments, economies, and cultures, and to force all commoners into the custom-made livelihoods and service of corporate-based governors. According to this government, we have no choices but to accept them all.
”
lzolzlllzlzlzlz many of u will never get married and if you do yoru wife will divorce you and transfer your assets to the butthexing fiat matsers lzozllzlz who butthexed her in college and will wmake you pay via alimony as they butthex her after encouraging and trianing her 2 divroce you lzozlzlzlzlzlz
i love how they conquered a country and instead of killing the men like the barabarian raids of antiquity they instead left the men living as slaves lzozlzlzol working away their days to pay off the debt created bu the fiat divorce butthex neocon cultruere lzozlzllzlzlzlzlzl
and the funny thing is that i don’t see any of you ever changing it as you are content to stay in your isngle mom’s basements mashing buttons in playstaion god of war lzozlzlozlzlzlz and never asecending teh stairs out of plato’s cave into the sunlight and seeing the fiat butthex matrix for what it is lzozlzolzlzlz the h8er of fatherhood and your fatehr which is why your dad had to fund your mom bankging butthexers and bikers lzozlzlzlzlz
hey i was thinking that pimps are more honests than minsiters in churches because a minister will marry you to the kind of whore where you have tgo go on paying for past use of her pussy which other men are now banging and you are funding lzozlzozlzlzl whereas no pimp would ever do that the w ould not come back and make you pay for a pussy that is banging other men so let me know when churches get pimps as monisters and i swear 2 jesus i wills startt going to churchez lzozlzlzlzlz
hey wat d u losers have against star wars figures and using them to demonstrate the basic principles of eocnomics so as 2 ediucate faculty jmembers as 2 the differences beteween keynisain and aystrian eocnomcicici?
lozlzlzlzl how else is one supposed to demo the fdifference between butthex and holding hands?
^^^^ i menat the difference btween secrteive tpaings of butthex without the girths conthent which the neocns profit off of publisha and promote in the pages of their pagazinaes and at their fiat publishing homes lzozlzlz which must serve the massive debt that is our godd and invert the worlkd via butthex and sodomize everything sacred lzozllzzlolzlzlzlzlzlzlz so as to convert mere fiat into physical property and welath zlozlzlz
@white and nerdy
You know, awareness of the Corporation-Goverment cadre isn’t an attack on Jews.
Jews aren’t that important.
The primary problem is women not a bunch of bankers. Let’s tell the truth. Bankers is used to mean Jews without the obvious antisemitism.<<<<<<<<<<<<
I don't think this is strictly an either / or question. I think feminism and the Federal Reserve each deserve their respective share of the blame for our current social/economic ills. Whether there is a direct link between the two is, to say the least, something not easily demonstrable to a moral certainty.
As for the idea that *bankers* is code for *Jews*, that's the sort of tired ole anti-anti-semitic ad-hominem that one encounters early and often in any discussion regarding the role of the federal reserve in our economy.
hey wat d u losers have against star wars figures and using them to demonstrate the basic principles of eocnomics so as 2 ediucate faculty jmembers as 2 the differences beteween keynisain and aystrian eocnomcicici?
lozlzlzlzl how else is one supposed to demo the fdifference between butthex and holding hands?<<<<<<<<<<<<
I suppose a Ken doll alternatively butthexing a Barbie and a GI Joe seems more graphically illustrative to me, but there's no accounting for aesthetic tastes, is there?
I know Jews aren’t that important. I’m not the one making that claim. There’s a difference between talking about the links between corporations and governments and making wild claims about the Illuminati, Jews, Zionists, Neoconservatives, Freemasons, the $1 bill, Obama’s birth certificate, 9/11, the New World Order, income tax avoidance, common law, depopulation schemes and a billion other things that I don’t have time to name. None of that has to do with actual facts about the links between corporations and governments.
When it comes to the Federal Reserve, I have no idea what is going on there. I don’t care because until feminism is gone it doesn’t matter. Worrying about the Federal Reserve is like arguing about whether the refrigerator door is open or not in a kitchen in a house that’s on fire. Feminism has set our house on fire and we must deal with that first before worrying about the refrigerator.
I am skeptical of the Federal Reserve commentary because of one reason. The commentary puts the Federal Reserve as the primary problem not feminism/women. It seems like a way to claim that women are helpless victims instead of the problem that they actually are.
greatbooksformen (more like completegibbershfortheroissysphere) posts a link about how feminism is all part of some “depopulation scheme”. This man explains it better than I could but putting the lack of proof aside it does nothing but avoid the fact that women are the primary problem. Let’s deal with the primary problem, women, not fall on our swords for them with conspiracy theories.
The reason why I say that banker is being used as a euphemism for Jew is because of the inability to recognize that women are the primary problem. Often you hear about “Jewish feminists”. There are lots of non-Jewish feminists and talking about “Jewish feminists” is another canard to avoid admitting that women are the primary problem.
Women are the problem not Jews.
Women are the problem not Fox News.
Women are the problem not bankers (even if bankers are causing their own problems).
Women are the problem not the Federal Reserve (even if its causing its own problems).
Women are the problem not shit pulled out of someone’s ass like depopulation schemes, the Illuminati, the NWO, etc.
Didn’t GBFM say he was Jewish? It’s somehow quite appropriate.
Worrying about the Federal Reserve is like arguing about whether the refrigerator door is open or not in a kitchen in a house that’s on fire. <<<<
No it isn't.
The Federal Reserve enables a host of undesirable things — a socialist welfare / warfare State, an economy built on the sand of borrowing and consuming rather than the solid ground of saving and investing — not to mention the inevitable ruin of the currency.
It's going to be painful when the Federal Reserve Note goes the way of every other fiat currency in human history and my guess is feminism won't last a generation after the fact (such is the case when an ideology rooted in fantasy runs headon into hard reality). The demise of feminism will be small consolation though if my savings from a life's work are barely adequate to keep me in a diet of crackers and catfood.
White & Nerdy – I’ve read a whole lot of credible, cogent books that go into in depth detail regarding the issues of “conspiracy theory.” As I’ve reiterated over and over and over again, I believe their exists a deliberate campaign of disinformation so as to confuse and conflate the truth with fantastic lies, so the average useful idiot sheeple simply ignores ALL evidence as “crackpot.”
This way, people like you simply ignore the truth of our fiat reality, as molded by the Government/Corporation/Trust complex…and write it all off as crackpot reptilian alien illuminati bullshit.
While GBFM has been hammering the same point over and over and over again with the annoying txt lingo, the basic premise is correct: without the Federal Reserve system, the feminist problems we are all familiar with would not have gained the traction that it did.
It is at the very heart of the matter. It is precisely how they set up the system for which the Corporations and Trusts where able to gain influence in the Government to effect their control of our media, our food production, our economy and our educational systems.
If recognizing these truths makes me a crackpot, than I accept that label without shame.
lolzlolzolzolzozl!
@white and nerdy
Women aren’t that important. This goes beyond women, it’s Bankers, the media, entertainment industry, it’s the very structure of our economy. NONE OF THEM COULD BE SO SUCCESSFUL WITHOUT FIAT MONEY. When you can print money you can make people rich who have never done a PRODUCTIVE days work in their life. From politicians to civil cervants to the media to the film industry to bankers. Printing money is basically stealing from the productive and hard working. If there is 2 billion in an economy and the government prints another billion and hands it to me and my family/friends in a brief case, THEY HAVE MADE US RICH OFF EVERYONE ELSES BACKS, whilst simultaneously devalueing everyone elses money. The money they handed me only has value because of the productivity of that economy and everyone elses hard work actually making and doing important things. They took it from your pockets and put it in mine. I can then go about using my money to collect all the other money in the economy through investment, oppression and crooked dealings like i don’t know BUYING LOADS OF GOLD AND COMMODITIES WITH THAT MONEY OR LOANING THAT MONEY AT INTEREST TO BACK TO THEM. Iv’e then transferred my fiat wealth into real wealth while all the other guys who didn’t own a 3rd of the GDP and were doing actual work like building, distributing, inventing real wealth are left with nothing but the worthless fiat money they have in their pockets + the money i just dumped into the market. Without fiat money many “industries”, branches of the government, welfare state etc simply could not exist. Printing money is an evil form of wealth re-distribution many times more subtle and evil than taxation. People complain when their taxes go up, but many of them don’t realise what printing money does to the economy and the purchasing power of their own wages.
Sorry. The Da Vinci code was fiction. Anti-male fiction.
“Fiat reality” is a gibberish term.
Answer this. GBFM claims the Federal Reserve created PUAs. Do you agree? Give us a yes or no answer. If yes why should I take you seriously. If not why aren’t you rebuking GBFM?
Only a mangina would think such a thing.
FACT: Women are the primary problem.
Women have more power than the Federal Reserve by several orders of magnitude. The divorce laws, sexual harassment laws, the DV system, false rape system, etc. have no economic constraint so the Federal Reserve doesn’t matter. Women are the primary problem.
Dave you sound like one of these guys:
Dave from Hawaii: The Federal Reserve is out to get us. They put fluoride in the water.
Dave from Hawaii’s wife: Im taking the kids and the house. If you challenge me, then I’ll say you are a rapist and you touched the kids.
Dave from Hawaii: That’s okay. I completely support you because I’m too stupid to see that you aren’t acting of your own free will. I know that the Federal Reserve poisoned your food to make you do this.
White and Nerdy: think. The women in your scenarios threaten to take away a man’s house and kids and have him imprisoned for nothing. It’s MEN in power who made these laws, preside over courts, and sic police on him.
Yes. The men are doing the bidding of the women. That makes them manginas but the women are choosing to do what they do. They aren’t under mind control receiving orders from the Federal Reserve.
Only a mangina would say that.
You men should know better. The average chump on the street has the excuse of ignorance. You men don’t have that excuse. Stop kissing women’s collective ass.
From the Biblical Manhood blog:
I don’t really see the point in bitching about womens’ essential nature (if that’s what you’re doing). Yo don’t bitch about the weather — yo get an umbrella. Same thing with women.
I’m not conspiracy-minded if you’re suggesting a centralized, coordinated, conscious effort by a small number of people. Instead, I see the wolrd n temrs of market forces and how they interplay in class-struggles, capital/labor basically. In my view, feminism was originally a fringe, lesbian-heavy 19th century movement (the 19th century was full of crackpot movements), co-opted by industrialists/corporations to decouple women from their husbands in order to depress the value of labor.
Politicians (again, mostly men), found feminism and other Marxist offshoots we call “progressive/left politics” today useful as vote-fodder.
So no, there is no central cabal running thnigs. It’s powerful men butthexing all other men, sometimes using womens’ nature, sometimes blacks’ restlessness, or thrid-worlders’ desire to work at slave wages, as their weapons.
This is essentially the Mencius Moldbug view. I think he (rightly) focuses on intellectuals and politicians in a democracy as the informal power-network, though I think large corporations are also a huge player in his “Cathedral.” But what Moldbug stresses is that there is no central point that issues directives; there is no head in this beast.
So no, it’s not the women.
Sorry. The Da Vinci code was fiction. Anti-male fiction.
Yeah. And your point is? The Da Vinci code is precisely the sort of misinformation designed to make anyone that attempts to discuss anything related to “conspiracy” labeled a “crackpot” marginalized and dismissed without a second thought. Just like you’re doing, slandering me here on FB’s blog.
“Fiat reality†is a gibberish term.
Answer this. GBFM claims the Federal Reserve created PUAs. Do you agree? Give us a yes or no answer. If yes why should I take you seriously. If not why aren’t you rebuking GBFM?
You’re interpreting GBFM’s spiel literally, and missing the main point…but than, that’s because your understanding of the main point is “The Da Vinci Code.”
The “Federal Reserve” is simply GBFM’s reference to the power elite…the social engineers of society. By “creating” feminism, they inadirectly contributed to the creation of the natural response to the feminist paradigm – the PUA movement.
Take out the lingo, and consider the thesis of Dr. Amneus (The Garbage Generation and The Case For Father Custody), you would understand that the PUA phenomena is simply precisely what happens when you destroy Patriarchy and institute Matriarchy. When women have the power to control their own sexuality and reject Male “oppression” men no longer have the motivation to do what built civilization: become dependable, providers for their families. Instead, they worry themselves with becoming short term fling lovers for the women to choose.
So yes…by financing the feminist movement through educational curriculum and mass media cultural values, the social engineers that have promoted this stuff have in a roundabout way created the PUA movement.
Only a mangina would think such a thing.
I concede in the face of your macho shaming language. Pretty interesting for a guy who’s so concerned with shaming language on your own blog.
Apparently it’s only bad if women use that tactic.
Dave from Hawaii: The Federal Reserve is out to get us. They put fluoride in the water.
lol. You’re right. I’m a whack job for pointing out the fact that most of the nation’s water supplies are fluoridated with sodium fluoride, a waste product from the aluminum manufacturing process. Whatever, dude.
Dave from Hawaii’s wife: Im taking the kids and the house. If you challenge me, then I’ll say you are a rapist and you touched the kids.
Not gonna happen.
Dave from Hawaii: That’s okay. I completely support you because I’m too stupid to see that you aren’t acting of your own free will. I know that the Federal Reserve poisoned your food to make you do this.
“Omega Virgin Revolt?”
Now I understand perfectly where you’re coming from.
Anyone that dares to get married or have a relationship with a woman is a “Mangina!”
You have trouble telling fiction from reality. Let me put it this way. If there’s so much “misinformation” out there then aren’t you a conduit for “misinformation”? Why do you take something as silly as GBFM at his word? Rather what you assume to be his word since from what you said you don’t know what he really means.
Yes I am because I want some testable ideas to see if they’re facts. I really don’t have an opinion on a lot of this but I know if you’re letting women off the hook like you and GBFM are doing it’s bullshit.
If he means power elite then he can say power elite. Maybe GBFM means invisible pink elephants. First graders can write better than this.
Why are you taking this guy seriously?
That’s not what GBFM said. I know you will disagree but unless GBFM can communicate clearly he could mean any old thing.
Plus I asked for a yes or no answer. You couldn’t give me one.
That’s not why you’re a crackpot. You’re a crackpot for refusing to see what’s in front of you, that women are the primary problem.
Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech has relationships with women but he’s no mangina. He doesn’t cower before women like you do. Women use you like a tool. PM/AFT takes charge when he’s with a woman. You could learn something from him if you would just stop being afraid of your own shadow.
“The “Federal Reserve†is simply GBFM’s reference to the power elite…the social engineers of society.”
I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand by any longer and watch people get played like fools. GBFM doesn’t have some grand theory of the world. He’s a satire of the more outrageous comments over at Roissy’s blog.
That’s why he uses ridiculous internet slang and vague, ambiguous references to various concepts that have nothing to do with one another, i.e. Tucker Max and Ben Bernanke. He wants to intentionally sound stupid in order to discredit the people who agree with his comments.
Mencius Moldbug is the wrong analogy. The correct analogy is Tina Fey and Sarah Palin. GBFM is to Roissy’s commenters as Tina Fey’s impersonation is to Palin.
A few further thoughts on “interpreting” GBFM:
GBFM’s comments are a loose amalgamation of all the politics in the Roissysphere. I don’t think he even agrees with most of the stuff he says. He’s merely regurgitating the opinions of others, shrouded in the language of a 16-year-old, text crazy girl. It’s so ambiguous and nonsensical that you can read into it whatever meaning you want. And apparently a bunch of you are reading SERIOUS meaning into it. Shocking, really.
Cauthon…read GBFM’s blog. Interspersed with the spastic txt lingo, he links to actual articles that clearly articulate what he’s referring to.
While he rights like a retard on ritalin, he is referencing plenty of real, solid concepts and ideas.
He’s not as clueless as he deliberately presents himself to be.
W&N – as for you…I offer you the same response I gave to PMAFT when we had our own respectful debate – without resorting to using stupid names like “mangina.”
http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/2010/04/misinformed-disinformation.html
Yo[u] don’t bitch about the weather
Uh, we do in Canada.
Anyway, I have to respectfully disagree with this line of thought. You would feel animosity towards, say, a bear or other wild animal that was going around your town attacking people. Even if it was just hungry and acting according to its nature.
If that’s the case, then GBFM is doing a bang up job.
PM/AFT said in that link:
PM/AFT agrees with me. Women are the primary problem. Why can’t you deal with this fact?
Yes. We live in a society that women are in the process of destroying. Call if female nature but it women aren’t stopped they will be the end of the human race. Men are able to rise above their nature so women are either able to or we forcibly prevent them from acting on their nature.
@Dave from Hawaii
I don’t think GBFM is clueless. In fact, I think he’s a very clever troll. My question to you: if he has a truly cogent point to make, why is he using the ridiculous slang and obtuse references? Why not just talk like a normal human being?
W&N – Your right. The problem is women. Men are above blame. The entire gender of WOMEN have fucked everything up. Anyone who doesn’t see it this way, is just a nutjob mangina.
Cauthon – I don’t speak for GBFM. I have no idea why he writes in that style. The thing is, when you do your share of real in-depth research into The Federal Reserve Banking System and Austrian Economics, and you learn about the social engineering behind feminism and all the ills of our current society…well, you quickly realize what the hell GBFM is trying to say in his own way.
Sometimes, he comes up with some very clever sayings that reflect profound truths…for instance:
The fed has determined that cats free up the woman to work fifteen hour days marketing subprime loans in short skirts as her gina dries up, and it is cheaper to import pre-grown labor from Mexico than it is to let women out of the work force to raise kids instead of abort them.
I’m bitching about women’s choices. Whether that means their essential nature or not is up to you.
Dave and GBFM are saying that it is a centralized, coordinated, conscious effort by a small number of people and that women have been hoodwinked into supporting them. In reality women made choices with no coercion.
That’s fine to a point but a lot of the legal system has no effective constraint of market forces. And a lot of this problem is women using the legal system for their own ends.
Women are the primary problem.
Most men are above blame. They had nothing to do with it. Why are you so afraid of women taking the blame they deserve?
Even men at the top don’t deserve that much blame. I have had to deal with numerous false sexual harassment claims (even from women I had no contact with) and I have seen executives of major corporations running scared of women. If men at the top have so much power why are these men so afraid of women? Women have the power and are the primary problem.
PM/AFT gets this. I bet Welmer does too. Why can’t you?
@Dave from Hawaii
I want to avoid an extended debate with you. I’ve seen the thousands of words you’ve written on your blog. I doubt I’ll change the mind of someone so invested.
Here’s my two cents:
The Fed is a bunch of stat nerds from academia. It’s not a conspiracy. (I work in finance and actually know a couple guys who work at the NY Fed. I’m not talking out my ass.) You can have the last word on this if you want.
But as for GBFM, he’s parodying the ideas of guys like you. Please read him with more skepticism.
The Fed is a bunch of stat nerds from academia. It’s not a conspiracy.
That’s right. The more contact you have with elite institutions, the more you find the idea of them executing any large scale conspiracies completely laughable. Lots of incompetence and groupthink of course, but no conspiracies.
Lots of incompetence and groupthink of course, but no conspiracies.
Agreed. Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity.
That’s right. The more contact you have with elite institutions, the more you find the idea of them executing any large scale conspiracies completely laughable. Lots of incompetence and groupthink of course, but no conspiracies.<<<<
I agree essentially, I think what conspiracy theorists see as planned conspiracy is something which comes about quite organically.
But the harm the Fed causes is in their actions regardless of why they do what they do — when you give a group of bankers license to print their own money they inevitably print themselves into oblivion. I know this the same way I know what'll happen if you give a 15 year old boy an empty house, a bottle of lotion and a box of porn.
lozlzlzlzlzlzl you fucktards
it’s not a fucking conspiracy theory you fucks
it’s happeing right out in fornt of your fucking faces you ass fucks
jesus chcist sometime i lose all hope in men as all you beta mastabetas are playing vidoe games in your single mom’s baesment as she’s banging fed dufnded druggie cock up above and your reall dad has to fund her banging random coks lkzozllzllzllzl omg lzozlzl
and then you crucify people who spit truth 2 power and go “whahaha whahah whahah poeple at elite institutions are very nithe and they would never bankrupt a country nor would women kill 50,000,000 unborn.”
wake. the. fuck. up. you fuckityfuckmastabetas.
women just murderd 50,000,000 unborn by their chocie alone lzozlzlzlz after the fed deosuled them in asscocking sessions in college it was easy to get them to turn on their iunborn lzozlzllzlzl that’s why the bankers fund assocking and fmeinisms lzozlzlz
and 2 our coutry is fucking bankrup you stupid fucks.
50,000,000 unborn murdered and we’re trillions of dollars in the hole (lzozlz the gina).
it didn’t just happen you FUCKS.
the poeple who count every penny abd whose life revolves around obtaining welath certainly did not place us 14 trillion in debt by mistake you ass cocks. no–they got to spend that 14 trillion created form thin air, which your chidlren and you must now pay off lzozlzlzlzllzlz
not all of you are stupid fucks, but too many of you are.
for teh stupid fucks go hang out at maxim and cosmo.
leave realiuty and truth to the men and the great books 4 men. lzozlzlzlzl
all you stupid fucks have juyst been passed by womenz who have been trained to tempt and take all that men make–lzozlzllzlz
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/05/the-end-of-men/8135
lozlzlzllzlz
relax men
women may have more jobs and get paid more but remember it’s all in debt-based dollars that ben bernanke prints at will
see the fiat masters conquered our country and when conquering a country it was custumary to kill the menz and let the womenz live on to pump ‘em zlozzllzl
but the fiat masterz said “hey why not keep the men aorund lzozllzlzlzlz, and what would be even funnier would be to have the men who create and produce everything be managed by soulless whores who we butthexed at harvard and yale thusly deosulling them. lzozlzllzlzzl! and now the osulles harpies are transferring the man’s assetts to us–the money masters who create money out of thin air; whether the soulles harpies are doing it throuigh marraige and divorce or as MBA managers lzozlzlzllzlzlozzlzlo.†omg lozlzllz
it’s not a fucking conspiracy theory you fucks
it’s happeing right out in fornt of your fucking faces you ass fucks<<<<<<
definitely…the Federal Reserves' open, obvious, indisputable actions are reason enough to grab pitchforks and torches.
yah it’s pretty funny
i’ve never seen so many betaboys
mashing buttons in tehir single mom’s basements lzolzlzlzl as bikers and loser step boyfirnds bang their moms upstairs funded by their real dad’s dollars who she criminalized so as to enslave and transfer welth to the state from lzozlzlzlzl and the beta fanboyz here just turn up the volume on the world of warcraft and go “lal al ala al ala lla la la la i can’t hear my mom getting asscocked! lzozllzzl lal al ala al al al al ala al i can’t see my real dad funding this la la la ala al ala i can’t see all teh 50,000,000 abortions and the debt growing and state growing and fatherhood being killed lla al al la la la la” sing the little deosuled decocked fanboyz lzozlzllzlzzll.
Roissy’s comments section has been getting progressively dumber over the last couple months. Roissy claimed to be a free speech absolutists but would harass and degrade any dissenters of his world view while allowing the most racist and offensive (and stupid) comments go by without a peep. Now, comments are stuck in moderation hell, all the intelligent commentators have moved on to other blogs and crappy commentators make the comments section no longer worth reading.
agree heartily. Renegade Roissy, where some lies perish, others are born, and half truths linger.
^^^^^
total bs
name one blog that gets more traffic/comments than roissy’s
roissy’s got staying power 2 go all night long and then the next whole day and night too nonstop into ten years and a hundred years on down the road like homer virgil shakespeare lzozlzl as rtruth is immortal and does not care what betaboyz think lzozlzlzl
u guys can’t even compete with a truckload of viagragra lzozlzlzlzl
That’s right. The more contact you have with elite institutions, the more you find the idea of them executing any large scale conspiracies completely laughable.
You’re right Thursday…this idea that their is a large conspiracy with thousands of willing participants all adhering to some master game plan is laughable.
That has never been the case.
The thing about the “conspiracy” I am pointing out is accomplished by setting up a system in which the overall goals are achieved by getting people to have a self interest in making it happen.
Like the Federal Reserve arbitrarily holding the interest rates at historically low levels for the whole first half of the decade…which causes a whole lot of people to jump into the housing market on the easy credit this created, which inflated the bubble that eventually lead to our current economic situation.
It only takes a few high level elite bankers to make those kind of arbitrary decisions that affect an entire nation of people.
It doesn’t take a conspiracy of thousands or millions to convince women to divorce their husbands and create single mother households.
Just enough conspirators to lobby the government, pay off the politicians and get the laws changed to give women incentives to do so.
That is how “conspiracy” to socially engineer society is effected. Not by getting “everyone” to play along…but to get everyone to think they are doing things in their own self-interest.
lozlzlzlzlz
just because something is a conspiracy does not mean that it isn’t lozlzlzlzlzlzlzlzl
lozlzlzlzl
you guys are still refusing to read:
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/06/08/contrast-is-king-identity-inversion/#comments
“ERASING GENDER IDENTITY
FEMINISM & HOMOSEXUALITY; HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS
Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women’s rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are “socially constructed†to oppress them.
Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity by making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don’t marry and have children. Courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God. (WHERE WOMENZ COME IN IS THEY NEED SOMEONE TO TRANSFER THE PHYSICLA ASSETTS AND WELATH FROM MEN TO THE BANKERS LOZZLLZLZZL VIA DIVORCE DEBAUCHERY FALSE SEXUAL HARRASSMENT SUITS FEMINST? STUDIES CLASSES MBA’S FEMBOTYS MANAGAING TEH MENS WORKS CREATORS LZOZLLZZLLZZL TAKING THEIR PRODUCTS AND GIBVING THEM TO THE CREATORS OF DEBT LZOZLZL)
“Cruel Hoax†shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.
†–http://www.cruelhoax.ca/#top
what are u waiting 4?
both of your balls and weiner to be cut off?
lozzllzlz
GBFM is right. Here is Ezra Pound on goodbooks favorite hobby horse:
with usura is no clear demarcation
and no man can find site for his dwelling
Stone cutter is kept from his stone
weaver is kept from his loom
WITH USURA
wool comes not to market
sheep bringeth no gain with usura
Usura is a murrain, usura
blunteth the needle in the the maid’s hand
and stoppeth the spinner’s cunning.
Pietro Lombardo came not by usura
Duccio came not by usura
nor Pier della Francesca; Zuan Bellin’ not by usura
nor was “La Callunia” painted.
Came not by usura Angelico; came not Ambrogio Praedis,
No church of cut stone signed: Adamo me fecit.
Not by usura St. Trophime
Not by usura St. Hilaire,
Usura rusteth the chisel
It rusteth the craft and the craftsman
It gnaweth the thread in the loom
None learneth to weave gold in her pattern;
Azure hath a canker by usura; cramoisi is unbroidered
Emerald findeth no Memling
Usura slayeth the child in the womb
It stayeth the young man’s courting
It hath brought palsey to bed, lyeth
between the young bride and her bridegroom
CONTRA NATURAM
They have brought whores for Eleusis
Corpses are set to banquet
at behest of usura.
Wait, when did that insane piece of garbage, Single Mom– better known as LR– sic her lawyers on Roissy? When he posted pics of the run-down shit hovel she calls her house? And what was the outcome?
I’m not sure LR sic’d lawyers on Roissy. I’m pretty sure the negative publicity of his real exposure was enough to get him in trouble at work. He probably dodged a bullet, but since put on the whole “multiple personality” thing of the “château”.
And yes, GBFM is right. As the nation marches along its doomed path of insolvency, everyone will come back to him and think “WOW so prescient!!!!11″
Retard.
Nobody thinks the janitors, HR managers, paper-pushers, pretzel-vendors and other nobodies who work for the Federal Reserve are the conspirators. Are the people who direct the Fed stats nerds?
{ 2 trackbacks }