A question to the men in the audience – would you cheat on this:
…with this?
Michelle is somewhat attractive, I’ll admit, but the hideous tattoos are a deal-breaker. I’m retching a little just looking at her. And yet Jesse James was able to bang this slag on the sly for nearly a year straight. I know Sandra’s getting old, but a man like Jesse has options, and THIS is what he picks?
I’ll leave any speculations on James’ alphaness or lack thereof to the commentariat, because I’m too lazy to research this right now. But alpha or beta, the guy still has awful taste in women. Between this and Tiger Woods’ seraglio of low-grade skanks, the march of prole drift continues apace. What becomes of a culture whose overlords are as philistine as the peasants who worship them?
Pictures taken from Bob Belvedere’s, who has named our friend Jesse the Loser of the Week. I concur. Oh God, I concur.
…
Unrelated, but I’ve decided to give a shoutout to Schopenbecq’s new Men’s Rights Reddit, created in response to the old Reddit being taken over by feminist trolls. I smelled something fishy about that place when they declared my piece on the Jasmine Fiore murder as an example of “misogyny” a few months back. I have no ungodly clue how to use Reddit, but for those of you who do, bookmark that link and keep it handy.
…
Also unrelated, but I forgot to do this earlier. Health-blogger and sometimes-manosphere blogger Ben Leonard has moved his blog to a new address:
http://www.benjaminleonard.com/thoughts/
In Mala Fide – no blogger left behind.
{ 56 comments… read them below or add one }
To answer your question, I wouldn’t bang either of them.
The forehead tattoo ruins it for me. Otherwise, I’d fuck her. I don’t understand most mens’ aversion to tattoo’d women. At least her work looks professional.
No, I wouldn’t, but looking at Jame’s past taste in women it’s no surprise.
The real question is why Bullock picked him in the first place. She had choices: she chose badly. Just another stupid woman. Move on, nothing to see here.
That may be true, slumlord, but Jesse **traded up**. That’s like a guy who has a Ferrari and can afford Ferraris keeping his Ferrari in the garage while he cruises town in a Pinto.
To answer your question: Hell. No.
Could care less what this trailer trash Jesse sticks his dingus into.
The real shocker here is that Bullock, who seemed like one of the saner chicks of the Germanic tribes, managed to delude herself into falling so hard for this looser.
To the point of even adopting his whore spawn.
Bad Boy Gina tingles, gentlemen. They´re really all the same. Even the “cool chicks”.
I’m not attracted to Bullock but can at least accept that many men would be, and I would certainly sport fuck her. That tatooed monstrosity makes me queesy. I wouldn’t want her in my range of vision, much less in my bed. Aside from the aesthetic factors, everything about her screams “fucked in the head”
I might actually fuck em both.
It’s obvious Tattoo girl probably provides all sorts of goodies Miss Congeniality cannot. I think that as men, we are not nearly as driven by beauty as we’d like to believe.
Maybe you aren’t pal, but I am
I should have mentioned in my post a thought I had while creating it and that Greg Gutfeld voiced last night: ‘Bombshell’ McGee looks an awful lot like Marilyn Manson. I wonder if Jesse James has a secret homosexual urge thing going on.
girl with the tats does ATM. easy enough to figure why JJames went lookin elsewhere
I think the reason why these guys (Woods, James, Clinton, etc.) screw women way below their status is because they are slumming and it is the sleaziness of low-class women that turn them on. Low class women can be sexy in a perverse way and many men are susceptible to this.
Max:
I’m not fond of tattoos, but I wouldn’t turn down easy sex with a chick because she had one or two. The operative word here is “hideous.” That much ink and you look like a freak, no way around it.
Phoenixism:
If the services are coming from THAT, I’ll gladly take my right hand, thank you very much.
Bob:
I don’t think so. There are plenty of men who are attracted to masculine women. Thing is, they’re usually nerds or David Alexander-types, submissive men hoping for a woman who will take the lead in the relationship.
Jesse James is a guy with an extensive criminal record, who got a TV show about his business fabricating motorcycles for affluent people who want to pretend to be like him. The porn star and the tatooed freak are just his normal environment. Sandra Bullock and his customers are all of a piece- rich people who find the world of scumbags exciting to dabble in.
I think I would actually bang Michelle for the novelty of it. She looks like she’d be pretty freaky in the bed and I’m generally turned on my tattooed chicks, though not so much on the forehead, but hey, it’s not like I’m marrying her or anything. Though Sandra is by far the superior women of the two and probably wouldn’t risk the cheating if there was a chance of being caught.
It’s the “theory of compensatory sluttiness” at play, again. the tatted chick is a slut and probably a freak in bed. she probably allows Jesse James to do whatever he wants to her – making his sex on the side as easy and as enjoyable as possible for him.
I’d bet that if a study were done on the subject, we’d find that the mistress is always less attractive and sluttier and freakier than the wife. This isn’t a novel idea by any means, but the mistress has to compensate somehow.
As for fucking them? Bullock’s walk in that tight skirt in “Miss Congeniality” is enough for me. She’s got a nice ratio on her. As for the slag; if that’s a snake tat on her belly, I’d have to make sure I hit it from behind. Snakes freak me out man.
Jesse James is 5 years younger than Sandra Bullock. Why would a cocky, self-confident, alpha-male bad boy marry an older woman? Maybe I’m unusual among men in that I’ve never been attracted to women older than I–even in high school, I shrugged as the other guys drooled over the latest twentysomething teacher, preferring to ogle our own cheerleaders instead–but I thought the male attraction to youth was near universal. Isn’t anyone else surprised by all these rich, famous guys who take up with 35-year-olds when they could have their pick of nubile 22-year-olds?
Because Bullock makes a ton of money, that’s probably why.
My guess is that Sandra is a boring bitch in real life — an overprivileged princess from Arlington Virginia. She wanted to scratch her bad boy itch with James, and got the embarassment of him cheating in her with a tatooed skank. Sounds about right to me.
That’s only a question of time.
You can’t like a woman so much that you don’t want to have a new one after maybe 1 week to a few years.
Michelle McGee. Hmmm, another MM – which seems appropriate since she so closely resembles Marilyn Manson. Cree-pee.
What Novaseeker said. Bullock like all women was attracted to the bad boy. Like many, but not all, she thought with her genitals instead of her head. Figuring she’s Sandra Bullock, of course she can “tame him.”
James is a low-class semi-thug without much going on when he’s not fabricating motorcycles (his only real talent). THAT is a huge turn on for women, including Bullock, and ought to show people who even a beta-omega loser can turn it around:
THUG IT UP!
But his taste and Tiger Woods taste and Clinton’s taste and Edwards taste DO point to something awful: icky porn-star ification in powerful men. Probably they ARE lazy and just take whatever falls into their lap. All of these guys were pursued not the pursuer.
Heck if I were a Hollywood mogul or big shot or what have you, I’d be cheating with attractive chicks. Who are younger. Not used up skanks and icky porn stars. All those tats are disgusting.
James, Tiger Woods, Clinton, Edwards, Spitzer, and so on could have actually had bimbos who were attractive had they put any effort into it instead of taking what fell into their laps. Even Mayor Tony and Mayor Gavin took the lazy way out (screwing a subordinates wife) instead of hooking up with hot chicks. Though it has been rumored that both have 16 year old girls as liasons. Which might be false. Who knows.
A woman’s sexual value is based on her beauty, youth, wholesomeness (i.e. not had a bunch of guys), and intelligence/personality. A few of these chicks had/have youth, but that’s it. What is Monica Lewinsky now? A used up bimbo.
I think its basically laziness. I don’t like George Clooney, but at least the man puts effort into finding women who are half-way attractive, don’t scream trash, and are discreet. He has some self-respect.
Is the “laziness” of these upper Alpha-power guys an indication of a woman shortage as women share the few uber-Alphas (Clooney, etc.) and rapidly skankify? Or is it something else?
Is pure lazyness. Period.
Besides, thugs and/or paper alphas are simply bottomfeeders (but unlike beta males, they are good at it). All the fame in the world isn’t going to change that.
We all knew guys like this. They would seduce a beautiful women one week and the next they would have sex with some piece of trash. There are a group of guys that can’t discriminate.
“the march of prole drift continues apace”
That sentence made me think of Megan Fox. She is the perfect example of a trashy bitch that is considered beautiful by the masses and yet I cannot see anything more than a pump and dump in her.
A related slag would be Sasha Grey that idiotic porn actress who read one intro to philosophy textbook and hipsters are making her out to be a goddess.
You could just as easily ask: “what motivated Hugh Grant to slum it with Foxxy Brown, when he had the inestimable Elizabeth Hurley waiting for him at home?”
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind.
It is obvious to those with the eyes to see.
Is it really too much of a strech to imagine Hurley as a woman following the social script laid out for her to find a “suitable” mate, and in so doing, become a frigid bitch who doesn’t slob the knob? Or who only does “it” in the missionary position? And only twice a week, if that? Sure, she’s a goddess lookswise, but any man with a functioning sex drive is going to reach out for warmer waters.
Speaking of which — are you out there Poetry of Flesh? Litle girl, I’ve got some candy.
Not Safe For Work: http://www.puahate.com/showthread.php?t=3407
Krauser: Maybe you aren’t pal, but I am
Understood, Krauser.
Presented with the choice, I’d be all over Sandra. I’d still do both, however.
This Jesse James flap is hardly unique. Men have proven illustriously blind to aesthetics when banging broads.
Sandra has a look-but-don’t-touch quality about her. Michelle’s quality is more touch-with-latex-gloves-and-a-bucket-of-Purell.
I am repulsed by the tattoo girl and I have always liked Sandra Bullock.
But the answer is obvious. As Bill Maher said once referring to the Hugh Grant prostitute incident,
“[For men]it’s never about big or little, tall or short, blond or brunette. It’s only about old and new”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgWg2em8sOA (about the 5:00 mark)
That Bill Maher bit was fucking CLASSIC.
I replay it every once in a while when I need to snap my head out of it :)
Ok, there’s seems to be a confusion here:
It isn’t the fact that he cheated, that was predictable and all of you know it.
Is the fact that he cheated with THAT. He could have done better, but he went to the first that fell into his lap. Hence, he’s a bottomfeeder. Lazyass.
OK. Got it. The guy’s got no taste.
While I’m inclined to like girls with tattoos, I think the woman in question is a bit too extreme. Once you’ve gone to the face, you’ve destroyed whatever arousal was forming. There’s a difference between the porn star emulating girls with a tramp stamp and maybe one or two marks on an arm or leg, but it’s certainly another to reach the level of this girl. So in my case, it’s Sandra, but with some decent make up and long hair.
FWIW, most of Tiger’s harem is of far better quality.
David Alexander-types, submissive men hoping for a woman who will take the lead in the relationship
The theory is that she knows better than the inexperienced male, and thus would be far better at “leading”.
Also, I’ll note that skanky girls scream fuck me. They have a certain look and have a vibe that indicates her desire for sex and that she’ll be good at it. In contrast, the cute girls as desired by other men are just sources for hugs brownies.
As a joke, I’ve noted that nature creates the skank loving (and sexually attracted) betas in order to ensure that the skank’s alpha bred children will have a beta paternal influence…
Assanova:
Heh, in that photo she actually looks hot. Must be because the facial tattoos are hidden behind the bangs. And the boobs.
Gx1080:
THANK YOU.
Pretty much. Knowing that I’m doing better than I probably should be in this area has me saying WTF about this guy’s choice in women to cheat with.
Most women haven’t “lead” before, so they have no clue. You as a man, even inexperienced, know better on how to “lead”. I didn’t really need experience the first time I “led” a woman so it isn’t a problem that you think it is.
Most women haven’t “lead†before, so they have no clue.
The awful clunky theory is that she’s had more sexual experience, and thus has far better knowledge of sex and the related acts. Mind you, I think for a many in this pool, lead really means “she asks me out, she begs for sex, and then she just has sex with me, while my lazy fat ass does nothing”, not a dominatrix that whips a man for behaving badly.
You as a man, even inexperienced, know better on how to “leadâ€.
You are an alpha, not an idiotic anti-social dysfunctional sub-human male that’s clumsy and bumbling and incapable of making a basic decision. From my perspective, it’s far easier to let her lead and pick everything because there’s a sizable chance that I have no idea of what to do, where to go, or how to do it properly. Why risk the embarrassment?
FWIW, discovering that women like to be lead is another reason as to why I opted out of dealing with women on any sexual level.
We know why he went to Tatoo skank (remember: she was easy), but is mind boggling. Just as all David Alexander’s posts are mindboggling.
Speaking of DA, do the guy lets a dominatrix fuck him in the ass with a dildo or something?
Didn’t read the above post.
Ok, so just went mad from celibacy.
Ok, so just went mad from celibacy.
I went mad from discovering HBD, female hyperogamy, not finishing college and getting a respectable white collar career, and the loss of my father.
“You are an alpha, not an idiotic anti-social dysfunctional sub-human male that’s clumsy and bumbling and incapable of making a basic decision. From my perspective, it’s far easier to let her lead and pick everything because there’s a sizable chance that I have no idea of what to do, where to go, or how to do it properly. Why risk the embarrassment?”
The way to deal with this is to believe that you are always completely correct, and if it comes to it, everybody else is wrong.
Stick fast to this and other people will start admitting that you’re right. See? You always were.
Without the tattoos, her man face would be the only turn off.
Stick fast to this and other people will start admitting that you’re right. See? You always were.
That crap only works for alphas. It’s painfully obvious when you’re eating at the same place for the fifth time in two months, doing the same crap activity, or he’s fucking you with the same crappy moves that don’t induce orgasm.
Considering that the woman in the top photo is 45… yeah, I would. I’d prefer a woman without tattoos but hell, anything beats 45.
–A question to the men in the audience – would you cheat on this–
99% of the men would not have such a women to cheat :)
Desi, you cut through the bullshit. Beautiful.
As i see from jesse james profile on Wikipedia, he IS a bad boy biker , and he was aptly attracted to a similar woman.
“Heh, in that photo she actually looks hot. Must be because the facial tattoos are hidden behind the bangs. And the boobs.”
Except her tits are cover with plastic surgery scars which make them freaky Frankenstein tits.
Yes
I am VERY turned on by chicks with tattoos, including tattoos on the face. I’m just a freak I guess. I probably couldn’t bring a girl like that to an event though; she doesn’t fit my public image.
“That crap only works for alphas.”
Forget about that whole dichotomy and just do as I said.
“It’s painfully obvious when you’re eating at the same place for the fifth time in two months, doing the same crap activity, or he’s fucking you with the same crappy moves that don’t induce orgasm.”
You give way too much thought to what women think or feel. Stop it. You’re right, if she complains then she’s wrong.
Yes, it’s awful and clunky because often it isn’t true. A lot of the time mire sexual experience doesn’t mean better knowledge of sex. It seems logical that it would, but a lot of the time it isn’t the case.
I’m not so sure about that, but what I saying you should do isn’t that hard. The “problem” is mostly in your head, DA
Forget about that whole dichotomy and just do as I said.
No, because I am wrong very often. There’s no need to live in some illusionary dream world in order to screw up things further.
You give way too much thought to what women think or feel.
It fuels that egotistical need to feel better than other people. Plus, it secures hugs and brownies.
Yes, it’s awful and clunky because often it isn’t true.
Which admittedly is rather depressing. I’d like to know why there’s such a disconnect in terms of experience and ability, and I can’t think of any plausible reason. She may know what she wants (read: alpha jackhammering), but it’s hard to translate that into providing a proper sexual experience for the male, especially when he’s a clueless beta.
The “problem†is mostly in your head, DA
Leading requires the skill and experience to warrant that position, and I simply lack both. My attempts to lead in a long forgotten sexual relationship were uninspiring at best and silly and comedic at worst.
Regarding the Reddit bit: Don’t you think it’s a little unfair to call people trolls just because they disagree with you?
What’s so depressing about it? The reason why there’s such a disconnect between experience and ability is that doing it wrong or not as well as could be over and over again doesn’t automatically make you better at it. This should not be a revelation to anyone.
Then give her the “alpha jackhammering” you think she wants.
DA, you’re a heterosexual man. You have everything you need.
Then give her the “alpha jackhammering†you think she wants.
She could get that from a real alpha. There’s no way that I could duplicate that since I’m far too weak and frail.
DA, you’re a heterosexual man. You have everything you need.
I assure you, I don’t.
Amanda:
They’re not trolls because they disagree with me, they’re trolls because they’re trying to disrupt the Reddit’s mission.
{ 2 trackbacks }