By a country mile, January’s Stupid Girl of the Month is inmate-loving prison shrink Magdalena Sanchez. With 233 votes in, she blew away super-slag Louise Grant with 59 percent of the vote. Keep those submissions comin’ in, folks! This monthly exercise in didactic savagery must continue!
This edition of the SGOTM awards is shuper-shpecial because it’s our very first three-way contest. A veritable ménage à trois of female retardation assembled for your reading pleasure.
February 2010 SGOTM Award candidate number one was submitted by Alkibiades. She’s a New Zealander who, after getting smashed in the right proper Kiwi way, flashed her ta-tas at a passing motorist and got plowed (pun intended):
Cherelle May Dudfield, my new favorite extrovert, is in a little less trouble today than she was in September, when shortly following her drunken stroll into traffic, she was struck by a car. The driver apparently found Cherelle standing in the middle of a traffic island, flashing him, a little distracting. The car did slow down, but it still ran right into her. “She rolled up onto the hood and cracked the windscreen before she came down with some minor injuries and was taken to hospital,†said the police.
After her release from the hospital, Cherelle faced charges for disorderly behavior. She pleaded guilty and paid a fine of $198. I’m not sure she learned her lesson though. A video snapshot of Cherelle reenacting her, um, experience can be found on the Internet now.
And here’s the Sky News report on our exhibitionist friend:
Mostra il seno agli automobilisti
Uploaded by penelope71. – News videos from around the world.
Seriously, what am I supposed to write here? What can be said about a drunken white trash skank so stupid that she thought she could stand in the middle of traffic and show off her tits to passing male drivers without consequences? It’s like the episode of Seinfeld where Kramer crashes his car after spotting a woman wearing nothing but a bra. My only regret is that the car didn’t finish her off and earn her a Darwin Award.
…
February 2010 candidate number two was also submitted by Alkibiades. It’s another case of a lady prison worker becoming infatuated with a dangerous criminal. This story merits special consideration, however, because of WHY this criminal is dangerous:
A prison officer who had an affair with the cage fighter locked up for a horrific acid attack on an aspiring TV presenter is facing jail today.
Lisa Harris, 28, sneaked kisses, cuddles and steamy text messages with Daniel Lynch, 33, at Pentonville Prison while he was awaiting trial for raping 25-year-old Katie Piper.
The steroid-addicted thug had been jailed for life for getting a friend to hurl sulphuric acid in the model’s face and was awaiting trial for rape at the time.
A total of 210 texts and calls lasting some 23 hours went backwards and forwards between the illicit couple over four weeks in February last year.
Lynch called Harris his ‘princess’ and the prison officer ended her messages with kisses, Blackfriars Crown Court heard.
Does the name “Daniel Lynch” sounds familiar? Here’s a little refresher for you:
[Lynch] had stalked Miss Piper on Facebook before subjecting her to an eight-hour rape ordeal in a hotel room. He then arranged for his friend Stefan Sylvestre, 21, to throw acid in the TV presenter’s face on Golders Green High Road, north London, on March 31, 2008.
The attack blinded her in one eye and left her permanently scarred.
…when 33-year-old Daniel Lynch, a martial arts enthusiast, emailed Katie to say he’d been following her career, she admits she was instantly attracted.
‘He was wearing a martial arts suit in his picture and I’d been doing some promotional work for martial arts in the UK,’ she explains.
‘We seemed to have a lot in common and, to be honest, looking at his picture, I fancied him.’
A few days later Lynch turned up at a promotional event in Reading where Katie was working.
‘He seemed quite shy and nervous when we first met,’ she says. ‘We just had a nice, normal chat. He was 6ft 4in, quite macho-looking and handsome. I liked what I saw.’
Katie sent him her phone number and when they went on their first date, he met her with flowers and a teddy bear.
‘We liked each other and we had fun,’ she says. ‘He told me on our second date that he loved me. His arm was always around me and even when we were in the car and stopped at traffic lights, he would turn and kiss me.
Lynch, who lived in Shepherd’s Bush, West London, with his mother and brother, had convictions for violence and had served a jail sentence for throwing boiling water into the face of another man. But Katie knew none of this.
You can also click on those links to see pictures of Katie’s mutilated face, though I wouldn’t recommend it if you have a sensitive stomach.
There’s not much to say about Lisa Harris that I didn’t already say about Magdalena Sanchez last month, other than to make a few notes on this specific case:
When he was bantering with other officers, Miss Harris assumed that he was a man who had an offence of grievous bodily harm recorded against him and she was aware that he was awaiting trial for a matter of rape.
Reading this made me think of all those manifestos written by foolish feminists that blame normal men for rape. Here we have a normal woman freely giving a rapist her love and kisses and these jejune idiots are saying with a straight face, “Only Men Can Prevent Rape – By Not Raping Women”? How ’bout this – “Only Women Can Prevent Rape – By Not Rewarding Rapists!”
Lynch began to ‘dictate’ Harris’ hours of work and would tell her ‘I don’t want to see your face around here’, the court was told.
He then convinced her to bring her mobile phone to him so he could use the internet.
Mr Epstein added: ‘She was involved with a man who was far more experienced in the ways of the world and far more capable of behaving in extreme fashions that she was.
‘She, in her naive and immature approach to this situation, stupidly believed that she could bring resolution to it of her own making.’Â But Harris was arrested trying to smuggle in the phone after Lynch allegedly tipped off prison guards to what she was doing.
His lover was of ‘no use’ to him inside anymore, the defence claim.
Mr Epstein told the court: ‘It was a malicious act on the part of a particularly malicious and manipulative individual for whom she had foolishly fallen some weeks earlier.’
Talk about textbook sociopathic behavior. Again, we have another lady who thinks her pussy is magic and can cure even the most heartless of men. Does anyone out there honestly think that a warm, wet hole could change a man like this:
Thought so.
…
And finally, February 2010 SGOTM candidate number three was submitted by slumlord. She’s a 14-year old high schooler who embroiled her Olympia, Washington-area school in a kiddie porn bust because she couldn’t keep her clothes on:
LACEY, Wash. – They are too young to drive, but some teens at Lacey’s Chinook Middle School apparently aren’t thinking twice about taking some very adult pictures of themselves.
It’s called sexting and now, those who took part have been arrested and could be slapped with child porn charges.
So far, authorities have confiscated nine cell phones with the “sexted” picture on it. No one can say for sure how many more are out there.
North Thurston Schools said administrators acted quickly when they learned of the sexting gone wild among students.
So now it is a matter for Lacey Police who believe this started when a 14-year-old girl took a picture of herself so graphic, it could be classified kiddie porn, and sent it to her 14-year-old boyfriend.
When the relationship ended badly, that’s when police say the now ex-boyfriend started to forward the picture to others.
When parents found out, they went to the school and administrators called police. The boyfriend and another girl who was apparently spreading the picture were arrested and could face charges of child pornography.
I’m of the opinion that prosecuting teenagers for child porn because they passed around dirty pictures of themselves is beyond ludicrous, but even still, this offends me on so many levels. Why the hell is a kid in junior high taking naked shots of herself? Where the hell are her parents while this is going on? And most importantly, why the hell is she not being charged with anything? She’s the fucking SOURCE of the problem, you misandrist morons!
Sexting is a growing problem nationwide and the school district hopes that by alerting parents and having a frank discussion with students, it will be the last sexting case they have to deal with.
“Before you press ‘send,’ think about what you are doing and how it may affect other people,” said Courtney Schrieve, North Thurston Schools.
You know the best way to impart that lesson? Arrest the girl who MADE the nude photo to begin with!
Police say anyone who has been sent the picture should delete it, but if someone is found to forward it again, they could be implicated in the case and face charges.
Yeah, they’re going to delete it alright. Ten bucks says it’s already circulating on The Pirate Bay.
{ 35 comments… read them below or add one }
My vote is number #2 by a country mile. It’s honestly quite unsettling to read about the whole female into violent offender in prision thing. I have on the whole a fairly positive view of women and that sort of crap makes me want to step back and wonder about the whole lot of them.
Speaking as a New Zealander…. #1 is apparently becoming a sad example for the whole country. Though I’ve been to Invercargill and it’s honestly a very very boring town. So… hmmm.
Ferdinand,
The award has to go for the prison officer. She falls for a violent that has RAPED and DISFIGURED another woman. Yet an another insight into the dark female sexuality, that rewards rapists and thugs.
No wonder, the most attractive men of the subcontinent are Muslim Khan’s, (Salman Khan, Shah Rukh Khan etc.,.). Their ancestors were the same people who slaughtered about 4 crores (40 million) hindus.
Thanks for bringing these out. I will surely show this to few of my friends, who are nothing more than married manginas.
What happens to Daniel Lynch’s alpha-male status if he gets punked out in prison? Of course, he’s more likely to be the one doing the punking out, but there’s no way even a 6’3″ “martial arts enthusiast” can fend off five or six “beta” prisoners.
I think #2 is the most idiotic.
#3 is stupid but is only 14 so certainly her parents and teachers bear some responsibility for letting her be such an idiot.
It was harder to decide between #1 and #2, but in the case of #1 it was more of a drunken spur of the moment kind of deal. Whereas #2 had to put A LOT of effort into her idiocy.
The second woman is by far the stupidiest. The crime committed by the man is beyond atrocious.
Depriving a woman, particularly a model, of her number one asset, the beauty of her face is far worst than raping her. She’ll be disfigured for life. She may hate herself, at least her appearance, forever. How can someone feel attraction for a being capable of such an awful crime? That’s bloody beyond me. The man and the woman in that second story are both despicable.
And indeed, those accusations of some feminists that all men are capable of doing that are ludicrous. Those are the actions of a minority of men, who are and have always been in every patriarchal society, punished extremely harshly for that kind of behaviour. In fact, thanks to the feminists and the whole progressive click, the punishment for such crimes today is much softer than it should be. I wouldn’t be against the reintroduction of the death sentence in every european country for that kind of crimes, even torture would be too kind a punishment for those men.
“Those are the actions of a minority of men, who are and have always been in every patriarchal society, punished extremely harshly for that kind of behaviour.”
Punished by other men, rewarded by women.
So feminists can STFU! It’s women who want to reward the acid-chucking, raping men. It’s other men who always have delivered justice.
There is no comparison here. Prison worker by a mile.
“I wouldn’t be against the reintroduction of the death sentence in every european country for that kind of crimes, even torture would be too kind a punishment for those men.”
Just remember that most ‘rape’ charges are by women filled with buyers remorse. In your white knighting anger you would end up torturing and killing a lot of innocent men.
Men like you are nothing but pawns used by feminist to wage war against men. You need to learn to direct your anger more resourcefully.
I voted for #2 as well. What a Darwin award candidate. When Daniel Lynch splashes acid on HER face too, no man will want to mate with her.
This passage from the story on the acid attack stood out to me:
He was wearing a martial arts suit in his picture and I’d been doing some promotional work for martial arts in the UK,’ she explains.
‘We seemed to have a lot in common and, to be honest, looking at his picture, I fancied him.’
“Having a lot in common” is a supreme example of women’s tendency to backwards-rationalize their attraction. I’ve met girls whom I had a heck of a lot more in common with on paper, who wouldn’t give me the time of day. But, he’s wearing a martial arts suit and I’ve been doing some promotional work for martial arts–oh, we have SOOOOOOOOOO much in common! Yeah, right, a pretty white girl from a good upper-middle-class British family and an Afro-Carribean thug have a ton in common. “We have a lot in common” is just girlspeak for “he’s cool and socially dominant and gets me hot and bothered.”
Then there’s the latest comment on the Daily Mail story, which reads:
What an inspirational/amazing/courageous girl with such mature wisdom on young and beautiful shoulders.
Yeah, she’s so inspirational, amazing, courageous, and wise girl for becoming smitten with a dangerous criminal and throwing herself at him. What a courageous and wise act that was.
Actually, if you re-instated the death penalty for rape, the load of proof would probably go up again as well. It’s only gotten so easy to accuse someone of rape since the punishments became milder. And women would be more careful of their behavior, their dress, and who they spend time with, if rape was harder to prosecute. Their flamboyant behavior stems in part from the assurance they receive that they will always be protected by the law, regardless of circumstances.
Anyway, you guys aren’t thinking tactically enough. Feminists didn’t latch onto rape because it so horrified women. They did it because it so horrified men, specifically voting men who are predominantly married and/or fathers. It was a way to seek allies. Most women I know actually feel less strongly about rape than the men I know do. They think it’s a bad thing, but fear of it doesn’t affect their behavior and decisions, for the most part. They only worry about the extreme get-pulled-behind-a-bush type.
“Just remember that most ‘rape’ charges are by women filled with buyers remorse. In your white knighting anger you would end up torturing and killing a lot of innocent men.
Men like you are nothing but pawns used by feminist to wage war against men. You need to learn to direct your anger more resourcefully.”
Where have I said anything about killing rapers? I am talking about the crime of acid throwing which, arguably, is much harder to fake than rape accusations. I’m the first to say that men accused of rape must benefit from fairer hearings. I find the women falsely accusing men of rape disgusting, but that doesn’t make real rapers any less disgusting. And when I say that, I am perfectly in agreement with the position of the Fasle rape Society. In the present case, it is absolutely not about brainless beta pussy white knighting that I am talking but simply about justice. And the only person I am a pawn of is myself, and the ideology I defend.
With regard to #3, she absolutely should be charged with production if those others are being charged. At least one of the two who are being charged is, in fact, a girl so the misandrist charge is not entirely justified. Still, if she created something that lewd and lascivious with the clear intent to distribute, she should be slapped with the fully monty (production, distribution and possession).
Hate to break it to you hoss, but the really, really serious crime there is the acid-in-the-face. I think I speak for the other guys here when I say that male or female, if you douse someone’s face with acid you deserve to get hanged.
The acid-in-the-face is definitely worse. It’s like wearing the horror of your experience on the outside.
Girl #2 might actually look hotter after an acid-flinging attack. She couldn’t look worse.
One was drunk, one was 14, and one has no excuse.
B&G said:
“Actually, if you re-instated the death penalty for rape, the load of proof would probably go up again as well. It’s only gotten so easy to accuse someone of rape since the punishments became milder. And women would be more careful of their behavior, their dress, and who they spend time with, if rape was harder to prosecute. Their flamboyant behavior stems in part from the assurance they receive that they will always be protected by the law, regardless of circumstances”.
Totally not true, you’d just have more innocent men getting the death penalty.
Rape is already life in prison.
The standard of proof is the same for all crimes.
And the “innocenc project that has already freed over a hundred men on death row shows that the death penalty is no way to insure people are “careful” convicting people.
Making the penalties worse will not change female behavior. Making the consequences worse for women’s bad behavior will.
That is the only rational solution, upping the penalty risk for men to somehow change the behavior of women is complete Orwelllian double think,
#2 definitely: stupid and a gender traitor.
Thanks for the link to #3. I used in in an argument elsewhere to refute the argument that young women aren’t more promiscuous these days. 14. Sweet baby Jesus in the manger. It would never even have occurred to me to take a naked picture of myself when I was 14 (with my Kodak disc camera).
I don’t think the 14 year old should even be up for stupid girl of the month, I think the authorities charging her and her boyfriend should be up for whatever award goes to them. Tons of 14 year olds do far more than snap pics of themselves.
When I was 14 there was sure a fair amount of sexual things being done in my peergroup, we just didn’t have cell phones. But we surely would have been doing “sexting” had we been able to. Anyone with any common sense knows the laws they are using to charge the 14 year olds with were directed at creepy old men in basements, NOT everyday kids who got busted doing something dumb.
Totally not true, you’d just have more innocent men getting the death penalty.
Hmm… That’s true. I didn’t consider the murder-corollary.
The standard of proof is the same for all crimes.
But I don’t think that this is true. She doesn’t have to prove that he raped her, he has to prove that he didn’t rape her. He has to defend himself against a crime for which there is often no immediate proof that it even took place. If there’s theft, the goods are missing. If there’s murder, the person is missing, or there’s a corpse to examine. How do you prove that there’s been a rape? Even being married to the victim isn’t proof of innocence anymore. If you have sex with her on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, she could later say that on Tuesday she was raped. How do you defend against that?
As long as the laws say that rape is “whatever she says it is”, there will be little incentive for her to behave herself. And as long as the burden of proof is that low, how can you prevent men from being convicted, or prove perjury? He said/she said will leave the women in the position of power, as they seem more sympathetic and helpless.
Anyway my larger point was: society will have to make a decision. We can either raise the burden of proof, or deal with false accusations. It is not possible to keep rape laws as they are, and simply punish perjury more harshly. If false accusations are even possible, that points directly to the point that the burden of proof is too low to prevent perjury.
In most of the cases I’ve read where the charges are withdrawn, it’s because the woman recanted. Not because she was proven to be lying.
In this case, for example, she didn’t recant until he produced DNA evidence:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/bronx/justice_happened_things_system_solomon_JyyLFVitMM4bx63gpD1ouI
“she didn’t recant until he produced DNA evidence:”
Well, if he produced evidence exonerating himself, it’s not really a recantation on her part, is it?
Yeah. She was just trying to make herself look good after keeping mum for 4 years.
Does anyone out there honestly think that a warm, wet hole could change a man like this
By ghetto, thug black male standards, he’s rather soft looking, and the woman in question is a prison guard which tends to attract the prole women that don’t meet the requirements to be a police officer so it makes a lot of sense if one thinks about it.
And women would be more careful of their behavior, their dress,
Why do you want to cut down on the number of women in appealing clothing? Might at well make everybody dress in baggy jeans at that point.
FB,
Is it not ironic that the same men who berate white women for being bitches turn around and consider white women to be the most beautiful.
Have you ever seen a white woman (or any woman for that matter) over 30 without makeup? Scary, isn’t it?
>>Have you ever seen a white woman (or any woman for that matter) over 30 without makeup? Scary, isn’t it?
My 37 y/o wife still gets carded once in a while. Beauty lasts a fair bit better out of the bars and cigarette clique.
Have you ever seen a white woman (or any woman for that matter) over 30 without makeup? Scary, isn’t it?
For the purposes of sex, their useful decreases, but otherwise, it’s not as if they’re ugly. I’d probably argue that’s why marriage is stupid, and tales from bitter losers (read: Whiskey) proclaiming the glory of beta marriages to women makes little sense.
Marriage is only stupid if kids are stupid.
It’s the nonsense about making marriage about soul-mates and other such romantic stupidity that has led us into the mess we’re in. Marriage is about keeping Mom and Dad together in one house. If people would finally admit the truth of that, divorce laws would change overnight, to protect children.
#2 – the uk leads the world!
Also in the uk the govt has started an advertising campaign directed at school boys warning them how they could be potential domestic violence abusers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYF3u6rb_ZU
The nice boys will be labeled potential abusers. The bad boys won’t care. The stupid girls will go after the bad boys. And – surprise, surprise – the bad boys will abuse the stupid girls. How about a ad focusing on stupid girls stupid choices!
The explain how in a “rape case” you can have…
1) No physical evidence of the crime.
2) No circumstantial evidence of the crime.
3) No witnesses to the crime.
and people still get sent to prison.
Proving that sex occurred is not even real circumstantial evidence. To use murder as a comparison, saying that sexual intercourse is proof of rape is akin to saying that the presence of a small amount of the “victim’s” blood is proof that the defendant murdered them.
I said it before, number #2 (the prison officer) just followed her instincts. That doesn’t make her stupid. In fact, she could be a very intelligent woman (low and high IQ girls follow their gina tingles alike). This case just demonstrates the inherent irrationality and danger that comes with female sexuality.
Number #1 (the flasher) really seems stupid (as in “of below average IQ”). She’s my pick.
“Those are the actions of a minority of men, who are and have always been in every patriarchal society, punished extremely harshly for that kind of behaviour.â€
Punished by other men, rewarded by women.
So feminists can STFU! It’s women who want to reward the acid-chucking, raping men. It’s other men who always have delivered justice.”
It is also MEN who punk out rapists in prison!
Many women are attracted to thugs. They think they’re “exciting”. I know women like that, and all women have that sort of urge. For instance, Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights is a quasi-rapist but no woman who reads that cares. Our hearts still skip a beat when he moans on about Catherine. For that matter, the character of Isabella is a classic thug-lover.
Like I said before, I think it’s men who are more upset about rape than women. Rape is sort of a man-defined crime anyway; territorial, or something. It sort of hints at “defiling property”.
Dude, I had this totally perfectly preserved woman and you came and messed it all up. Now I’m gonna beat your ass!
That’s why modern marital rape laws sort of baffle me. What exactly is the crime there? It breaks his promise to “love and cherish” her, but since when is that illegal? If she doesn’t like it, she can get a divorce. How can marital rape be a felony when adultery (which is a clear breach of contract) isn’t even a misdemeanor?
I find many women see this the way that I do, but most men just see red and want to bang guys heads together when rape is being discussed. That’s probably why feminists picked this particular issue as their flagship; they know how strongly most men feel about it. It’s a good way to shut them up.
#3 Needs to be charged and disciplined for production, solicitation, distribution. Letting other kids be punished while she gets a free pass is evil on all sides. Including her.
#2 Will one day pay for her idiocy and thinking with her clit when she decides to leave the psycho. It’s the dark side of female sexuality. The evil clit.
#1 I was laughing my ass off. Show your boobs, and get overrun. Now that is stupid.
“Look at da boobies, drive your car to the boobies. The drive thru boobshow”
For me “stupid” needs to make me laugh. #1
Ok, #1 was just too funny to pass up. #2 is stupid, but only if she objects to being raped. #3 isn’t the girl being stupid, it’s the legal system over-reacting.
[Submission moved to the main thread - ed.]
[Submission moved to the main thread - ed.]
{ 2 trackbacks }