Remember folks, this contest relies on YOUR participation, and I’d really like to have a Stupid Girl of the Year Award this time in twelve months, Â so don’t forget to submit stories and items to me. If you’re looking for stories of female stupidity, I recommend checking out British newspapers. In particular, the Daily Mail is to dumb women what the New York Times is to beta males.
On with the show!
Our first candidate for January 2010’s SGOTM Award was submitted by DC Handgun Info. It’s the epic, stomach-churning tale of a prison psychologist who had an affair with one of her inmates, a felon gangbanger, and the lengths she went to protect him. Also known as the story that will inspire a thousand misogynists:
The mystery inmate who had a jailhouse affair with a stunning prison shrink is a violent, abusive, twice-convicted felon who is a member of the Bloods gang, The Post has learned.
And psychologist Magdalena Sanchez kept her lover, Demetrius Hill, on suicide watch so they could have sex in private whenever she wanted, a source close to the case said yesterday.
“She kept him on suicide watch so she could have exclusive access to him,” the source said.
Sanchez, 35, was indicted last week for allegedly having cellblock romps with Hill, 28, between September 2005 and February 2006 and lying about it.
This story is a big huge slap in the face to all the naysayers who claim that only low-class, mentally ill, trashy women get wet for thugs and scumbags. Unless of course they can engage in sufficient semantic gymnastics to redefine a licensed psychologist as “low-class.”
She is out on bail and living on the Upper West Side with her hubby, finance whiz Josh Spitz.
And she’s MARRIED too? Seriously, can you imagine how her poor husband feels? I’ll bet he’s a real geek, a innocuous fella who played by the rules, excelled at his job, pulled down a huge paycheck. And his blushing, beautiful bride spent her nights getting her snatch pumped by the cock of a man who’s only achievement in life is getting nabbed for shaking down Long Island drug dealers. Lesson reaffirmed: if you’re a guy, its game uber alles. Your career doesn’t matter to chicks beyond paying the bills.
Court records reveal that just weeks before authorities discovered the illicit affair between Sanchez and Hill, she wrote a Brooklyn federal judge pleading that Hill be sprung from prison.
She was trying to convince Judge Denis Hurley – who was about to sentence Hill for robbery and gun possession – that the four years Hill served before his conviction were “punishment enough for his acts.”
“It would be a shame for someone like Demetrius to [be] robbed of the opportunity to have a ‘normal’ life,” Sanchez said in the March 20, 2006, letter.
He was arrested in February 2002 and charged with robbing Nassau County drug dealers with a BB gun and a .25-caliber pistol.
Convicted in February 2005, Hill – who had previously done time for attempted robbery – was awaiting sentencing at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn when he allegedly began his fling with Sanchez.
Oh, the things girls will do for the men they love. Rob people? Kill innocents? Who cares, he makes her gina tingle! Oh, what a fickle thing for one half of the human race to base their moral compass on!
The pair could hook up easily because Hill was in a special “suicide cell,” sources said.
“I saw her come in late at night. I know they were alone for many, many hours at a time, sometimes the whole night,” recalled a retired officer, who said he was on duty when Sanchez made her house calls.
“She wore very tight, enticing clothes – like a tight, low-cut, short, red dress and very high heels that would click up and down the empty halls,” he said. “She also wore pants so tight you can see what’s in her pockets.”
Not only that, I’ll bet that she performed all sorts of kinky stuff with her bad boy-toy while restricting the man she said “I do” too to five minutes of missionary sex a month. And don’t even think about blowjobs. The pussy juice must flow!
Several areas of the federal pen are camera-free, including the suicide cells, where Hill was sent after swallowing a razor blade in a purported attempt to kill himself, the ex-guard said.
While Hill was on suicide watch, he was put in a padded cell and stripped naked, with only a cover-up apron for clothing.
“They are watched 24 hours a day by a guard. But if a psychologist comes in – like Sanchez did – and says, ‘I’d like to meet with my patient,’ the guard has to go,” the former guard said.
In many ways, this is as close to a fulfillment of the Lover/Provider complex as any girl is going to get. A sexy, violent dude locked in a rubber room with no sharp objects and barely any clothes? She gets all the hot lovin’ and none of the bloody dismemberment.
Court records describe Hill as a violent, uncontrollable inmate who throws feces and urine at guards.
“He was very violent – she tamed him,” the ex-worker said.
Despite his proclivity for violence, Hill was regarded – even by prosecutors and his jailers – as extremely intelligent, court papers show. He represented himself during much of his robbery case, quoting Cicero and the Old Testament in his legal briefs.
It’s impossible for educated women to be attracted to murderous, monkey-like thugs, right. And I’m a French legionnaire.
Hill, described by a source as “charming enough to figure out how to seduce half the world,” seems to have a thing for women who hold powerful prison positions, court records show.
Before Sanchez and between prison stints, he allegedly had an affair with a Nassau County correction officer, Cynthia Plummer, who allegedly provided the car for his robbery spree.
Two women. Two prison employees who should have known better fell for this dashing, Bible-quoting sociopath. Shouldn’t this have suggested to anyone with authority that this guy should probably be kept AWAY from women? Of course not – these two dears are anomalies, outliers. They don’t represent the female of the species in ANY way whatsoever.
Hill’s mother, Ruth Crumpton, said yesterday she was “not surprised” to hear her son had a relationship with Sanchez.
“He is a Romeo,” she told The Post as she made dinner in her Elmont, L.I., home. “He’s “a very manipulative young man.”
Mothers know their sons. Society knows not their daughters.
…
January 2010 candidate number two was submitted by Get Real. She’s an English bar manager who spends her time on the Internet seeking out men to fuck her hard and fast. The kicker? She’s slept with two hundred blokes. Strap on your gas masks and fishing boots, because we’re taking a trip to Slutsville:
MOST women surf the internet for clothes, shoes and bargains. Not Louise Grant. She scours the web for sex with total STRANGERS.
The 25-year-old bar manager is hooked on net sex and has slept with 200 online date mates.
On average, she beds a different man every FIVE DAYS. She’s even had sex with THREE of them in ONE DAY.
You’ve just met the woman with the most repulsive vagina in the British Isles. It’s probably the size of an aircraft hangar and smells like cheese and jizz. On the plus side, if she gets pregnant (Yahweh forbid), she won’t have to worry about labor pains – the little sprog will just fall out of her crevasse while she’s out and about.
Louise claims to be driven by the “thrill” of no-strings sex with guys she’s just met.
She admits: “I can’t explain the buzz I get from meeting someone for the first time and knowing that in a couple of hours we’ll be ripping each other’s clothes off. It’s addictive.
Ah, that constant craving for excitement and drama that all ladies have. Too bad you’ve had to destroy your sexual market value in order to fulfill your fantasies.
“A lot of women may call me a slag, but I’m not. The sex is on my terms – I call the shots.”
All sex, save for rape, is on the woman’s terms. Owning your sluttiness doesn’t make you less of a slut – it makes you more of a moron.
And despite not knowing what creep may lurk behind a profile picture, Louise reckons her cyber bed-hopping is SAFER than conventional dating.
“My friends will meet guys in clubs and take them home,” she argues. “That’s more risky than what I do because I can check mine out before we meet.
Skanks of a feather fuck together.
“I’ll always insist on safe sex and carry condoms. If the guy complains, I won’t meet him.”
I love people who justify their bed-hopping by insisting that their paramours wear jimmies for two reasons. One, condoms aren’t one hundred percent effective. Two, the Law of Large Numbers ensures that the more you engage in an activity, the greater the likelihood of something going wrong. Getting your crotch-pocket filled with over 200 crotch-rockets isn’t just playing with fire, it’s running into a burning building and daring the flames to cook you alive. If this broad’s STD profile doesn’t look like this girl Hermes wrote about, she is damned lucky.
Louise, from Manchester, first started using the internet for sex after splitting with her fiancé three years ago.
Feeling lonely, she looked up an ex on Facebook. The next day they went out for drinks followed by sex.
Louise says: “I missed sex so much. We shared some wine and got a bit flirty – we knew we’d end up in bed together.
Sex addiction – it’s not just for men with stiff rods and fame any more.
Buzzing from her night of passion, Louise went straight online to sign up to an adult dating site, passion.com, where she could meet other guys for no-strings sex.
Her first ad read: “Hi. I’m outgoing with a naughty side I want to explore. If you’d like to know more, drop me a line.”
I really don’t understand why self-admitted sluts feel the need to be subtle. Suggestion: rewrite your ads to read, “Hi. I’m a skank with poor impulse control. If you want to dump a load between my thighs, drop me a line.” Since you’re just looking to rent a penis for the night, it’s not like you NEED any of this bullshit.
And it wasn’t long before ahe was bombarded with messages – and gross pictures-from fellas who were desperate to “meet” her.
“I’m not model material,” admits Louise. “But I couldn’t believe how good-looking the blokes were. It’s such a thrill knowing all these guys want me.
This is a tactic I’ve noticed among certain types of women (not just sluts, but chaste girls too) – constant downplaying of their looks in order to either solicit sympathy from men or justify their behavior. Louise isn’t bad looking – she’s not the apex of female beauty, but she’s hot in that skanky, fake way that Limeys and guidettes specialize in. David Alexander is no doubt saving her pics to his hard drive to fap to later as you read this. And there’s an mental image you didn’t need. Unless she’s an Aspergeress or really, really stupid, there’s no reason why this chick shouldn’t be able to gauge her attractiveness by just walking down the street and watching how the menfolk react.
Louise quickly joined two other sex sites – be naughty.com and plentyoffish. com – and now rushes home from work every day to check her emails.
She recalls: “In the first month I met four guys and now meet around two a week. I’ve not counted but I must have slept with nearly 200 men.
When you’re a woman and you lose count of the number of man-scrapers that have fallen into your chick-crevice, you’re doing something wrong. Something horribly wrong.
“I remember meeting three guys in one day. The first was Paul at the Hilton Hotel in Manchester. We had an amazing night of sex and again in the morning. By lunch I’d met up with Chris, who was into swinging.”
And for dinner? Maneater Louise still wasn’t satisfied.
“He was in his mid-40s,” she says. “A George Clooney lookalike. He was handsome, rich and knew how to treat a woman.”
But she claims her most exciting encounter was when she indulged in kinky role play.
Louise says: “I acted out a sexy boss fantasy for a guy called Adam. I was wearing lingerie and high heels. I interviewed him before he grabbed me and told me to strip – it drove us both wild!
You DO realize you’re revealing this to a nationally read tabloid right? When cock-addicts can proclaim their status to the world without repercussion, you know society has crossed the Rubicon. No going back now.
“Another guy I see loves giving women oral sex. He’ll come round to my flat just for that.”
Unlike some men, I have no problems with eating out girls. However, I usually wait a certain amount of time with a girl before I’m willing to plunge my face into her loins, and I NEVER do it with one-night stands or flings. Beyond the fact that making a girl earn your tongue is good game, there’s another very good reason why I do this. I really, really hope this sucker comes down with mouth cancer and has to talk with a voice synthesizer for the rest of his life. And when people ask him why a third of his jaw is gone, he can tell them, Stephen Hawking-style, “I went down on a hosebag.” Maybe he can give speeches to schoolkids about the dangers of unsolicited cunnilingus.
Louise reveals: “I’ve met married men, IT geeks and a few plumbers.
“I hear pals moan about their partners and thank my lucky stars I don’t have to put up with snoring, pants lying around or getting dinner ready.
“When I have a date, I put on sexy undies, drink wine with a gorgeous guy who takes me home and ravishes me.
“I’ll settle down one day but it’s too much fun at the moment.”
To any “man” considering slapping a ring on this jism-hooked dickeater, send me your identity so I can hunt you down and repeatedly kick you in the nads while wearing soccer football cleats. You’re an embarrassment to our gender and for the sake of the species, you shouldn’t be allowed to reproduce.
At the end of the story, there’s a panel of sorts with two relationship experts taking opposing views on Louise’s sperm-swallowing habits. From Catherine Townsend:
Louise is having fun meeting guys on the net . . . and good for her. This is the future of relationships – whether it’s for no-strings sex or to meet someone for the long term.
Gee, you clueless cunt, I wonder why THAT is?
Lots of my friends meet men this way and they use the pics of guys like trading cards. There’s no harm in what Louise is doing as long as she’s very careful. Meet the guy in a public place and tell friends where you are.
Aside from the insurmountable damage she’s doing to her sexual market value, or the diseases she’s unavoidably picking up, nope, no harm at all.
And from Jane Butterworth:
One day, says Louise, she wants to settle down, but how will her future partner view her sexual history?
If he’s smart, he’ll stick around long enough to bust his nut on her face and bail before she has time to wipe the cum off of her chin.
{ 44 comments… read them below or add one }
“A lot of women may call me a slag, but I’m not.”
Oh, the eternal solipsism of the female mind. IT REALLY KNOWS NO BOUNDS. “I fit the very definition of a slag, but I’m not a slag … really.”
“I’ll settle down one day but it’s too much fun at the moment.â€
Uh …
Right. Because men are lining up to settle down with 30 year old women who have had more than 200 cocks inside them.
Eternal solipsism …
I’m voting for the first one, if only because slut pride only hurts the slut. The first one is a commercial for ghettos.
“All sex, save for rape, is on the woman’s terms. Owning your sluttiness doesn’t make you less of a slut – it makes you more of a moron.”
The funniest thing I read in a week.
I had to go with the online slut. At least girl number one is just following her slutty instincts. Girl number 2 is just a moron and a slut. Sucking 200 dicks, FTW!
two things:
-you were on fire with this post, I laughed my ass off several times.
-thank you for going down on women, you are a good man.
The finance guy married to the first lady should have married an East Asian (Japanese, Chinese, Korea) instead. East Asian women tend to be more respectful of men of accomplishment and less attracted to the “bad boys”. It is true that East Asian women can be as materialistic as any other women (if not more). However, they are usually more “rational” about it than the women of other races. Besides, East Asia is in its ascendancy, which is relevant to anyone working in technology or finance. No man of means should ever even consider marrying an non East Asian lady.
BTW, I have nothing against the second lady (the bar manager). We have no problem with a guy who picks up 200 women in a bar or on-line. I see no reason why we should have a double standard with women doing the same.
Ferdinand,
First one..hands down.
In the movie departed, Matt Damon’s girl friend has an affair with Leonardo DIcaprio, who eventually is a con ordered to take psychological counseling from her. Both the stories look so similiar.
“We have no problem with a guy who picks up 200 women in a bar or on-line. I see no reason why we should have a double standard with women doing the same.”
That’s because you’re a brainwashed postmodern idiot.
The second is a slut, the first one is truly screwed in her head.
“In the movie departed, Matt Damon’s girl friend has an affair with Leonardo DIcaprio, who eventually is a con ordered to take psychological counseling from her. Both the stories look so similiar.”
The stories might “look similar”, but in the film Matt Damon is a scummy corrupt cop and DiCaprio is a good-guy undercover cop. Besides, comparing fiction with reality is an exercise in silliness.
Number two, by far.
Number one is not “stupid”. In fact, she did what she did rather intelligently — she had her bad boy on the side in a safe place — locked up so they could have that rough, passionate, bad-boy sex she doesn’t get, and probably didn’t want, from finance-geek hubby. She planned her escapades reasonably well and protected herself. What she did was treacherous to her husband and her career, of course, but it wasn’t “stupid” per se — not any more than any other affair is stupid.
Number two, however, is stupid if she thinks she will really ever be able to “settle down” after having two different men a week on the regular. Either she will have a lasting appetite for that and she won’t be satisfied with one man for sex, or she will have had her fill of sex and go into a de-sexualized mode at some stage. The likelihood of her settling into a stable long term sexual relationship with one guy is pretty much nil at this point.
I thought with interest about the two men lurking in the background in each case, though. The cuckold in the first case, pathetically sticking by his inmate-fucking wife. He should be a candidate for Roissy’s BOTM. And, in the second case, the former fiance who dodged a bullet big-time — that guy should be on his knees day and night thanking God for deliverance from being married to a sex addict.
We have no problem with a guy who picks up 200 women in a bar or on-line. I see no reason why we should have a double standard with women doing the same.
The double standard exists because for a man to do that it takes *effort* — it’s no man feat for a man to scratch up that many notches — it’s quite rare and quite hard. For a halfway-decent woman to do so takes no effort at all, other than making herself sexually available. It isn’t an “achievement” for a woman in any sense, it’s simply a statement that she is the rare woman who gives it away. For men, it’s a statement that he is one of the rare men who can convince women to give it away. That’s a huge difference, and well justifies the double standard.
Why does the one from England look so Gooky?
In a recent discussion paper written by Columbia University Economists Lena Edlund, Joseph Engelberg and Christopher Parsons titled “The Wages of Sin” it was proposed that prostitutes at the high end of the spectrum are well paid and that wage premium reflects foregone marriage market opportunties. Since woman #2 bedded 200 men without charging a premium and exposed herself to greater risk of STD infection, she’s definately the dumber girl.
The first woman is married and in so doing has hedged her bets so even if the husband calls for divorce which is within his rights he will likely have to pay alimony given the state of family courts in the ethically bankrupt US.
“That’s because you’re a brainwashed postmodern idiot.”
“The double standard exists because for a man to do that it takes *effort*, yada, yada”
“Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea.”
“Sex without love is merely healthy exercise.”
“Political tags – such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth – are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
Robert A. Heinlein
More Robert Heinlein quotes for you.
“A competent and self-confident person is incapable of jealousy in anything. Jealousy is invariably a symptom of neurotic insecurity.”
“Don’t ever become a pessimist… a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events.”
“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”
Quotes make for bad counter-arguments.
Quotes make for bad counter-arguments.
You are right.
However, I make an exception for Robert Heinlein because his comments are just so right on and the ones I used here are totally relevant to the discussion, especially the one about women and cats.
Check them out:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/robert_a_heinlein.html
Can you honestly say that any of them are wrong?
More stupidity from our resident libtard Lindsey.
And, no, I’m not going to engage in a dialogue with quotes from a science fiction author. Nice try, though, jackass.
From the description there, I thought the prison tramp was some sort of hottie. What a disappointment:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2008/09/08/2008-09-08_hubby_of_cheating_prisoner_psychologist_.html
I agree with Novaseeker that her husband would make an ideal BOTM candidate over at Roissy’s. From the above link:
Funny, I can think of a thousand ways I might grieve over the loss of a family member but none of them involves banging a prison inmate.
Novaseeker,
You need to watch yourself. Your insecurities are becoming quite apparent. That’s very beta-like behavior, you know.
I’m actually not too sure about Mr. Demetrius “Prison Badass” Hill. From the NY Daily News:
Hill is serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison on gun-related charges. He has sued the Bureau of Prisons, claiming he was sexually harassed by a male guard who demanded to be called “Peaches.”
BWAHAHAHAH! What kind of “Alpha” takes male-on-male sexual harrassment to court?
Girl #2 was my pick. At least #1 managed to pull a marriage off and had hubby boo-hoo how wonderful she was to the judge so she walked with 2 years probation. Girl #2 has got to be infected with something by now and is basically a free hooker.
You’ve just met the woman with the most repulsive vagina in the British Isles. It’s probably the size of an aircraft hangar and smells like cheese and jizz. On the plus side, if she gets pregnant (Yahweh forbid), she won’t have to worry about labor pains – the little sprog will just fall out of her crevasse while she’s out and about.
I really don’t understand why self-admitted sluts feel the need to be subtle. Suggestion: rewrite your ads to read, “Hi. I’m a skank with poor impulse control. If you want to dump a load between my thighs, drop me a line.†Since you’re just looking to rent a penis for the night, it’s not like you NEED any of this bullshit.
To any “man†considering slapping a ring on this jism-hooked dickeater, send me your identity so I can hunt you down and repeatedly kick you in the nads while wearing soccer football cleats. You’re an embarrassment to our gender and for the sake of the species, you shouldn’t be allowed to reproduce.
Dude, that was fucking great! You were in rare form, FB. You had me cracking up, man! Oh, I chose Louise, the British slag. BTW, I did a post on her some time ago…
Girl number one reminds me of Harlequin, the prison psychiatrist that falls for the Joker.
See, cartoons do have educational value!
Girl number two is pretty, but makes my skin crawl.
Both are perfect paragons of female virtue.
Girl number 2 is stupider, though the first is plenty stupid. Eventually, the husband will ditch her. She’s a total bad boy chaser, and thus damaged goods (getting older too) so her ability to catch a new husband is pretty close to zero. She also has no real career left.
Girl #2 is plenty stupid, though. Women cannot command anything from men. The corrolary to women and cats doing as they please is dis-investment in women and children by men. And Ghetto Black behavior, or if you like, White British Chav and West African behavior.
In all three cases, men react to women with a lot of partners and promiscuous behavior by first, amping up the thug treatment to bang as many women as possible on their own account, and second investing nothing in women and children. Who are on their own. This reliably breeds poverty and violence. But hey, women get to satisfy their desires and that is what counts.
Too bad you’ve had to destroy your sexual market value in order to fulfill your fantasies.
Even in the long run, I think she’s still doing better than the girl who married the loser beta while young. The former at least knows about what real orgasms are like…
but she’s hot in that skanky, fake way that Limeys and guidettes specialize in. David Alexander is no doubt saving her pics to his hard drive to fap to later as you read this.
You know me too well. And I’ll keep pining over the skanky girls.
But hey, women get to satisfy their desires and that is what counts.
And yet, you seem to think having sex with an average looking woman is worth working hard and handing over 95% of my income for forty years? Fuck you.
It is absurd that someone would seek to pathologize legimate Jealously, while seeking to defend blatant and unhealthy sex addiction.
This had me laughing for several minutes.
Seriously, what’s it like to have sex with a vagina the size of an aircraft carrier? I think her not being able to feel your dick is the least of your problems. I would be more worried about falling into her vagina. I would be serious money several of the guys she banged are lost in her vagina. Someone should check the missing persons list in her country. I bet a few of the guys she banged are on it.
Unlike some men, I have no problems with eating out girls. However, I usually wait a certain amount of time with a girl before I’m willing to plunge my face into her loins, and I NEVER do it with one-night stands or flings. Beyond the fact that making a girl earn your tongue is good game, there’s another very good reason why I do this. I really, really hope this sucker comes down with mouth cancer and has to talk with a voice synthesizer for the rest of his life. And when people ask him why a third of his jaw is gone, he can tell them, Stephen Hawking-style, “I went down on a hosebag.†Maybe he can give speeches to schoolkids about the dangers of unsolicited cunnilingus.
Dude, never mind the mouth cancer. Even if there were no risk of that whatsoever, eating out a hosebag like this is reeeeevolting. Put my tongue where hundreds of strange cocks have been? Ewwwww! I’d rather eat lunch off the toilet seat at the airport.
Girl #2 was my pick. At least #1 managed to pull a marriage off and had hubby boo-hoo how wonderful she was to the judge so she walked with 2 years probation. Girl #2 has got to be infected with something by now and is basically a free hooker. @Athol Kay: Married Man Sex Life
—
My sentiments EXACTLY!
This is why I submitted her for this month’s candidacy. (Thanks Ferdi!) :)
We have no problem with a guy who picks up 200 women in a bar or on-line. I see no reason why we should have a double standard with women doing the same.
The double standard exists because for a man to do that it takes *effort* — it’s no man feat for a man to scratch up that many notches — it’s quite rare and quite hard. For a halfway-decent woman to do so takes no effort at all, other than making herself sexually available. It isn’t an “achievement†for a woman in any sense, it’s simply a statement that she is the rare woman who gives it away. For men, it’s a statement that he is one of the rare men who can convince women to give it away. That’s a huge difference, and well justifies the double standard.
—
This was the essence of my argument/debate/point with ‘Lady raine’ (over on the ‘Game and Gender Hierarchy’ thread) — not that these women are necessarily ‘bad’ or ‘wrong’ — it is just that it takes next-to-nothing for a woman…nearly any woman (‘halfway-decent’ or otherwise) to merely engage in the physical act of intercourse. It proves very, very little in regards to her beauty, feminine desirability or socio-sexual ‘market value’.
Remember Steve Philips of ESPN and his, um, ‘mistress’, the ‘Tubby Temptress’??
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/item_tevaoeTPhWS3WDDEW3xkaJ
(Not only did this delusional idiot Philips lose his job and career over this AND have his wife divorce him over it — of whom he will now owe 50% of his ASSetts to for the rest of his days — he did it with a fat ‘women’ who looks like Michael Dukakis with long hair and in drag! Good going, Steve — you f-cking jackass.)
And men who ‘hook-up’ and cavort with these types of women really are nearly just as bad and hypocritical as the women are themselves, especially if they know of the woman’s ‘past’. In other words, guys shouldn’t really be ‘proud’ to ‘score’ with a skank. It just betrays what their level of desirability is on the ‘social market’ by the types of, em, ‘partners’ they can attract. (As with Philips.)
*BTW, why does this stuff happen with such amazing frequency in the British Isles???
I go with whore #2. She is truly oblivious to the harm she has done herself both to the fragile self-esteem and her STD-infections. Even if she was able to land a decent man she’d be incapable of pair-bonding with him. She is ruined for life.
Skank #1 is awful but she wasn’t especially stupid – just evil. Now I’ve seen a picture of her I can see she never would land a quality guy, so she was just living out a fantasy.
Even if she was able to land a decent man she’d be incapable of pair-bonding with him.
Funny joke. I guess you also still believe in Santa Claus and the Toothfairy? Women do not bond with beta males. They simply tolerate living with them existence until a better option appears.
whore #2 is not stupid. She is quite hot. She has nice boobs, cute face. I would fuck her. She won’t have trouble getting a decent husband even though she is a slut. There are plenty of liberal nice guy betas who will not only marry her but will even tolerate cheating. You severely underestimate the stupidity and desperation of men if you think they won’t want her.
Her dumbest move was not fucking 200 guys, it was advertising it. She will lose out on conservative males because of that. But I bet money that some liberal, leftist twat would be willing to marry her.
Another ttrouble with #2 is her comment…
Cheating on hubby is not stupid, but a part of the female mating strategy.
Number two is a complete moron destroying her reputation. Nobody wants to marry a whore. She will regret bitterly once she gets to “settling age”.
I voted for one, but then I realized my wrong ways.
she already had a man who would be paying for her sexual freedom, he is paying now, and he would be paying if they divorced. she fucks the con, and he pays…
she is just another dumb bitch lost in the total freedom of choice and follows the gina tingle which has been let loose from the natural confinement it would’ve been in.
Number two.
she is stupid. but, I have me so many women like that.
Due to my respect for a different culture, was even close to marrying one, when I had enough and followed my gut instinct.
What I disagree with tho is the cries of her having an aircraft carrier’s pussy. 200 intercourses in two years really is not much compared to a girl in a relationship.
The size would be same, she could even be more tighter… and if she has no std at the moment, even the smell and the color would be normal.
Having said that,
Looking at the pussy with glasses that do not focus on the possibly non-std-now,
That pussy is green, oozing, with hundreds of different semen swimming inside it, with hundreds of men’s pubic hair intertwined with her’s. hundreds of men’s sweat left their marks on her skin, that pussy is even more worhtless than a dead donkey’s.
The pussy of the woman in a relationship has been also pounded 200 times in the past two years, but that pussy has been primed for that man’s sweat, tha man’s sperm, that man’s scent, that man’s dna. It recognizes that dna as an unforeign substance. That pussy has paid its dues to receive that sperm.
This pussy, has no fucking clue how to identify healthy sperm, has no fucking clue about anything. That pussy has no idea of the relationship between sex and love, and possibly due to being fucked so many times without any given love or commitment, it now has disconnected sex and love.
Now, if there is love there cannot be sex.
she has been the town whore working for free.
Yes, it was her choice.
The fact that it was her choice does not make her a strong and independent, empowered woman who can make choices,
It makes her a dumb slut.
A free prostitute.
Yea, she chose the men she slept with. Look around, and look at which men women choose to sleep with (including me), you’ll see that she choosing the men is actually worse than her banging randomly.
Green, oozing, but tight… that’s how I see it.
I have a hard time taking “News of the World” as a credible news source (it IS a tabloid). So I’m not sold on the legitimacy of the story.
First one. I mean the second one is totally standard, I wouldn’t feel any urge to punch her in the face if I saw her walking down the street. She’s really not doing anything wrong; she can fuck as many guys as she wants I don’t really give a damn. If reaches age 32 and proceeds to bitch about how there are “no good men out there” for marriage, then we’ll have a problem. I think she probably understands she’s destroyed all of her ltr credibility by doing this though.
At least she’s not breaking the law or hurting anyone like the prison psychologist. That’s in an entirely different league of fucking stupid and amoral. I hope the family courts are kind to hubby when those two inevitably split. I really think they’ll make an exception this time, I mean she fucking cheated with a murderous felon; even the most stone-cold judges can’t possibly let her economically benefit from the split resulting from her doing so. I hope she gets some jail time, her psychology license permanently revoked, and her husband keeps way more than 50% of the assets. She should also probably be sterilized just for good measured, I’m sure some thugspawn will be poppin out pretty soon otherwise and the prisons will have one more inmate in 14-20 years.
This month the Stupid Girl contest is misnamed. These women are something other than stupid. Slutty, certainly. #2 breaks the sluttiness meter. Depraved, at least #1. But there are far stupider girls out there.
About girl #1, first, it’s amazing that the govt basically kept a guy as a naked sex slave for her enjoyment. Yeah, he’s a convicted robber so I don’t care, but still, take a step back and think about it.
Second, to me what she did constituted attempted murder of her hubby.
She created a rivalry situation between him and a convicted felon. She tried to get the felon out of jail. Even if she hadn’t, he might have been paroled. Then even if a murderous confrontation doesn’t ensue naturally, it would be a risk any time wifey got annoyed or bored and badmouthed hubby to her badboy lover.
Does she say she wouldn’t have done that? I don’t care. Women have used the “I don’t have to keep my promise because of how I *feel*” line so often, I say it applies pre-emptively too. If women need not keep their word, their word is worthless.
Number one is a shrink: this means she is the lowest form of female life. Her actions prove it. I’ve “dated” quite a number of shrinky dinks -most of them are the type of woman who enjoy it when you spit on them while porking them in a public restroom. Such antics used to be darkly amusing to the younger me: these days I just stay away from such festering cesspits of rationalization.
Number two is merely a slut. 200 is not a crazy number for an attractive woman to rack up. Who cares if she did it via the interbutts or “hooking up” in bars or at college? I’ve known many women who admit to 100+ dongs. I’ve fucked some of them, and one of ‘em I consider a high quality person who I remain friends with to this day (no I didn’t give any of them head either: duh). There was something in the NYT about modern urban New Yorker women racking up an average of 50 or so. That means there are going to be lots whose average is a lot higher. Of course, she’s an idiot for talking about it to a newspaper, but again, nothing real out of the ordinary.
“She also wore pants so tight you can see what’s in her pockets.â€
those are just bizarre sextoys. nevermind.
CMPitts is a pathetic douchebag. Don’t listen to a word he says! :) ;)
If you cover up everything below her neck, she looks like a guy in drag.
{ 4 trackbacks }