There’s not going to be an LIGFY next week, so you better make this one last.
New blood first:
Chic Noir gives surprising accurate dating rules for men.
Michael Wears a Hat states the benefits men get from cradle robbing.
Thras critiques Half Sigma’s opinion on abortion.
Also check out J R’s and DaveinHackensack’s blogs.
And the rest of you grinders:
Prime analyzes It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia from the viewpoint of game.
Chuck reports on a beta supreme who’s wife is obsessed with Twilight.
Dave from Hawaii analyzes the wretched wrongness of the American diet.
Roissy takes on a story about cuckolded men.
Obsidian reveals why most women are incapable of addressing the realities of the sexual marketplace.
Zdeno writes at 2 Blowhards on the nature of nightclubs.
Bhanu Prasad writes on the women who have lost out in the sexual revolution.
Al Fin states that Obama is bringing slavery back to the world and reports on a new aphrodisiac for women.
11minutes gives the reason why women believe in the myth of inner beauty.
Master Dogen mocks the androgyny of today’s youngsters.
Alex Birch remarks on the paradox of liberalism.
Martin Regnen reminds us why nerds and smart people deserve to be picked on.
Max critiques hard determinism.
From Girl Game: LILGRL has two great potato recipes, and Aoefe debunks the “soulmate” myth.
Hunter is annoyed by his beta friends.
The Kap’n explains why he hates the homeless.
Kamal S writes a two-part essay on truth, privilege, and oppression.
MarkyMark notes that Western women have difficulty dating overseas.
691 writes on the value of mentors for a young man.
OneSTDV states that the Internet has ended the concept of the sweetheart.
Professor Hale outlines a plan to reform how graves work.
Roosh goes on a dune buggy adventure.
Talleyrand demolishes the notion that women select the “best” men.
Sofia thinks people over 30 are BO-RING.
Sparks123 takes a balanced look at evolutionary psychology.
Mark Baachman offers a New Deal for women.
Ben Leonard reports on the addictiveness of junk food.
Genius says why it’s not easy being hung like a horse.
J reports on the reasons for CUNY’s decline.
Robert Stacy McCain has fun with a troll.
Gerard O’Neill blames feminism for the debt epidemic among the Irish.
T. aka Ricky Raw posts Part 2 of his review of Precious.
Guy White develops a method for distinguishing race.
Jeff Riggenbach claims there never was an Old Right.
Agnostic writes on when it’s a good idea to fight for a good-looking older woman.
William Lind states that political correctness is cultural Marxism.
Daniel Larison explains how, despite the fantasies of conservatives, Sarah Palin is almost identical to John McCain.
Srdja Trifkovic analyzes the self-destruction of Catholicism and Protestantism.
John Robb writes on how to smash an insurgency.
Joe Bageant states that there’s no difference between the Democrats and Republicans.
Mike Payne reports on the fall of Playboy.
Mencius Moldbug lays out his plan to conquer America.
Razib Khan writes on the silent secularization of the U.S.
{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }
You forgot me!!!
I don’t have much sympathy for the women Bhanu Prasad describes. For the most part, church girls can’t get married for one of two reasons:
1. They don’t put themselves out there, i.e. they go to tiny churches and work in female centred professions.
2. They are too picky.
There are lots of single men in churches who want to get married, but they are often all but invisible to the all too choosy females beside them.
The real female losers in the sexual revolution are the sexular, and include the following two types:
1. The most attractive women. They may still be able extract some degree of commitment from their alpha husbands/boyfriends, but may have to share him with less attractive women. Their bargaining power with the top men is reduced.
2. Less attractive females who are not well adapted for short term mating. If they aren’t careful, they can end up being pumped and dumped a lot by men above them in attractiveness.
You didn’t link to this guy, but I did want to comment on his post anyway:
http://gameforomegas.wordpress.com/2009/11/21/the-treatise-on-love-as-understood-by-an-awful-bore/
It’s ironic that Roissy linked to the Treatise, whose crucial insight is about how women differ in their resemblance to pure animals, as all too often he and others at his site have tended to label all women as purely amoral and arational, completely beholden to their lowest impulses. In fact, there really are differences, often large differences, in, for example, how women respond to asshole game.
Thursday:
In fact, there really are differences, often large differences, in, for example, how women respond to asshole game.
Good linkage.
In my experiences there are differences in female “primitiveness”, but the dominant/ submissive dynamic always remains. The are lots of professionally educated women who are still quite primitive, and some of their less educated sisters who are more refined. The trick is to identify the type you like and then home in on them.
Primitiveness is not something that gets discussed much in the game community which I think is a shame since its relative lack in a woman is a sign of emotional refinement. i.e “quality”.
From personal experience, primitiveness can be positively correlated with all types of behaviour, sluttishness , abusive boyfriends, immodesty, etc.
Primitiveness is not something that gets discussed much in the game community which I think is a shame since its relative lack in a woman is a sign of emotional refinement. i.e “qualityâ€.
It’s discussed all the time at fastseduction.com, particularly the relationship board.
Bottom line: the closer a women trends to “primitaveness”, the stronger libido she has.
Conversely, women who act perfectly rational are often lacking strong sexual desire (although they often relace that with a strong *romantic* desire).
LSD (“low-sex-drive”) women are often expert manipulators and are able to cooly comport themselves and resist a seducer’s attempts. She is not given over to irrational desire.
Basically:
High Sex Drive = High Fertility = greater unconscious need to “test” males for their masculine/alpha cred
Low Sex Drive = less hindbrain/more forebrain = greater *conscious* desire for resources and status (and also personal compatability, intelligence, etc.)
As in all other things in life, there is always a tradeoff.
Thursday:
Damn, now you’re giving ME links? Maybe I ought to turn LIGFY over to you.
Are we talking about actual asshole game or Roissy’s fast and loose definition of asshole game?
Chic Noir gives surprising accurate dating rules for men
I did, really. I did. Oh thanks Ferdinand for the link and confirming that I’ve finally seen the light.
Chic,
5.don’t give off the creepy weird guy vibe. Avoid jerky hand movements, weird facial expressions, intense staring with a woman you haven’t vibed with and bad posture.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!! Aaah, I call them Rat-Weasels. They look weird.
Are we talking about actual asshole game or Roissy’s fast and loose definition of asshole game?
Actual asshole game.
Thursday:
Then I agree with you.
Tupac:
It’s discussed all the time at fastseduction.com, particularly the relationship board.
Thanks Tupac, I’ll drift over there and have a look.
I’d broadly agree that primitiveness and sexuality are correlated in the current permissive Anglosphere. But I think you have to be careful about this link, especially with regard to the more religious communities.
In a society where there are no constraints on behaviour, people are going to behave as they please. Primitive girls will behave in a primitive manner, however in women who come from societies and cultures were there are strong social expectations with regard to personal behaviour people behave as their expected to behave, not like how they want to behave.
These girls they have learned to control their sexual behaviour, and in the appropriate context, unleash it, if you get what I mean. The ability of a these girls to control their libido should not be mistaken for an absence of it.
people behave as their expected to behave
Should be
” people behave as they’re expected to behave”
The ability of a these girls to control their libido should not be mistaken for an absence of it.
I’ll probably end up offering some tortured excuse for logic, but I’m inclined to view control of libido as absence since one would presume that one would want to have (enjoyable) sex as often as possible…
For someone who got laid last night (and this morning) that Kelly Brook picture is turning me on way too much.
On the radio a few days ago, some woman called into to some station and bragged about how she was dragging her (obviously herb) husband to see the new Twilight movie about a week after the movie came out on their WEDDING ANNIVERSARY. The woman on the radio had to be at least 40.
Thanks for the link.
God, the woman in the picture is just gorgeous. Luminously pretty.
http://www.equalities.gov.uk/media_zone/press_releases/women_in_prison.aspx
Harriet Harperson, the evil lord of UK misandry, has started a drive to stop sending criminal women to prison. This report just reeks of “criminals are victims, if they’re female”.
It’s all about rehabilitation and tending their needs, rather than punishment for their evil behaviour.
These girls they have learned to control their sexual behaviour, and in the appropriate context, unleash it, if you get what I mean. The ability of a these girls to control their libido should not be mistaken for an absence of it.
This *can* be true in many cases, but I was speaking in broad generalities.
“Those who restrain desire do so because theirs is weak enough to be restrained” – William Blake
“Those who restrain desire do so because theirs is weak enough to be restrained†– William Blake
I don’t mean to challenge the great Mr. Blake, but I call bullshit on this. Restraint is a sign of core strength and it is much easier to indulge in attention seeking slutty behavior than it is to not. It takes a higher form of character to not taste all that is being offered one’s way. A gal who is open, explorative and highly sexual with just a few select men vs. one who allows lousy two minute pokes from many, many guys is the better score and should not be mistaken for having low desire drive.