For those of you who don’t live in the not-so-great Empire State, Hiram Monserrate is a Democratic State Senator from Queens who was brought up on felony and misdemeanor charges for rearranging his girlfriend’s face with a wine glass last year. Last week, he was acquitted of the felony charges and will assuredly get a slap on the wrist for the misdemeanor charges. Feminists are naturally pissed off that another Evil Patriarchal Oppressor has escaped justice. But what does Hiram’s girl, the one who had to have twenty stitches to close her wounds, feel about all this? The answer will surprise no one with a brain:
Karla Giraldo wants her man back.
Just days after her boyfriend, state Sen. Hiram Monserrate, was convicted of assaulting her, Giraldo told the Daily News she will ask a judge to lift the order of protection that has kept them apart for 10 months.
“I love him. We love each other and we want to be together again,” the 30-year-old Giraldo said in an exclusive interview.
A picture of the sweet thing:
Say it with me now: GI-NA TING-LE! GI-NA TING-LE! GI-NA TING-LE! GI-NA TING-LE!
{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }
Let natural selection work.
The dirty little truth.
Dedicated to all my friends who accuse me of being a misogynist, and tell me that the right way to flirt with a woman is to be nice to her.
Serious-fucking-ly, this dude came up to me and said:
“Man you are flirting too heavy. Why don’t you try to say nice things to women?”
Another one was listening to a woman talking about her ex, while he was resting his chin on his hand, his elbow on the table, a look of puppiness in his face.
If I say “nice” (gentle, kind, respectful, insert almost any positive trait) does not work: I am a misogynist.
If they see “nice” not working for them it is: “Why?”
When I tell, it is : “You are too pessimistic. I wont talk to you about these topics” (happened)
When they see “bad” working, it is: “Why?”
When they see arrogant working for me: “try to be nice”…
5th Horseman is so right.
99% of women and 80% (even more) men will not ever understand game.
I at this point am at my fourth level of understanding modern female sexuality:
1. Denial
2. Anger
3. Acceptance
4. Disgust
Important distinction: What we see is not “female sexuality”, it is “modernized female sexuality”. We will never know what it was like when women risked pregnancies with every sex act. This is also the reason I say a female is more inclined to casual sex, once she has found a provider, rather than when she is single. The pill, abortion, antibiotics, child support laws destroyed the only control mechanisms provided by nature.
Now I am trying to figure out what this disgust means for me, and what I should do about it, or with it.
Whenever I say I am wrong for feeling disgust, whenever I decide to open a blank page, never once have they failed to recreate the feeling of disgust.
And I am saying this as a man who had his share of the village.
Many women out there (considering 50% are not even worth looking at due to their donut induced inflation) are not worth getting up from my arse and talking with them.
Maybe, maybe this disgust has a function for me as it will act as a very picky filter for the women who manage to induce no disgust in me, which I estimate at about one in ten of what I find attractive (which is 1 in 10 also, so am looking at a measly 1%….)
After the stiches healed. Aww thats love though through the bad times and the good times.
the acceptance put into practice quickly leads to disgust. sometimes they mistake your disgust for being an asshole….then girls really flirt with you….even when you’re just not interested in the slightest bit
gunslingergregi:
“After the stiches healed. Aww thats love though through the bad times and the good times.”
Dude, you rock.
Yea till death do you part right. Can’t set all kinds of conditions on that if you want it to come true. Partner should be in it to win it walking through the valley of the shadow of death.
Monserrate was convicted of misdemeanor assault for dragging the injured Giraldo through the apartment lobby. This was caught on surveillance video, so her testimony wasn’t relevant. My guess is that the judge (Monserrate declined a jury) convicted him of this charge so there’d at least be something, as it was impossible to convict him of actually cutting Giraldo’s face. Giraldo was so stinking drunk at the time it would have been difficult to get a conviction on felony assault even if she testified freely against Monserrate.
Peter
Female sexuality is weird when I examine it from male perspective. Or just a modern standpoint. But I never completely grasped what men in the Roissysphere want us to do about it: overcome the fact that what makes us wet are displays of dominance, or embrace it and play the docile, feminine counterpart? The former would lead to an almost inhumane gender-neutral “paradise”, and the latter back to traditional modes of thought.
I can’t overcome my biology. I wouldn’t consider my boyfriend a super Alpha by any means, but at the same time, he does demonstrate his dominance and that turns me on. If he was simpering, spineless, unchallenging, and basically weak, the sex wouldn’t be anything beyond perfunctory.
But I never completely grasped what men in the Roissysphere want us to do about it:
The latter would be better, which is to take no action. We don’t want you to DO anything, other than :
1) Stay as pretty as possible for as long as possible.
2) Be sweet/feminine/pleasant/loving/non-nagging.
former would lead to an almost inhumane gender-neutral “paradiseâ€
i.e. 1950-2000 India
and the latter back to traditional modes of thought.
i.e. pre-1950s India.
he does demonstrate his dominance and that turns me on. If he was simpering, spineless,
And that is Game. That is precisely what Game is.
Sophia:
Displays of dominance are not same as acting like an asshole, acting with extreme arrogance, putting you down, being a thug, criminal etc.
Women of today seem to have forgotten that.
Today a dominant man may really have not much going for him sex wise, if he has no fame, evil trait, proof of preselection etc.
Would have been great if it simply was dominance.
It is not. so please do not simplify.
today’s woman has taken that also to the extreme. Docile and feminine does not mean “I do what I want, with no price paid, deal with it”. Feminine does not mean enjoying a different man now and then, and more often, and then claiming men are pigs, while she chose those men.
Feminine and docile does not mean having no responsibility, empathy, sympathy.
My 75 year old aunt is hell of a feminine and docile woman. Yet, I would still get on my knees out of my respect for her strength. And yes, she is a woman who can be feared. And you know what? She looks more beautiful than many 20 year old females walking around. It’s in her eyes.. In her walk. In her face.
Today’s female takes feminine and docile as: fuck like bunnies upon entering adolescence, after ten years find a guy, sucker him in, make kids, cash out (50%), act like a child, whine, complain, make bad choices, make other people pay, feel entitled, be princesses without the royal behavior.
No. but is your biology your biology?
Pills, hormones, brainwashing, incentives?
Sophia:
But I never completely grasped what men in the Roissysphere want us to do about it: overcome the fact that what makes us wet are displays of dominance, or embrace it and play the docile, feminine counterpart?
We want you to think with your head, not just your pussy.
Well, there’s a distinction between stuffing a wine glass in someone’s face and displays of dominance. I would argue the former rings of insecurity. But, I was just pondering aloud a more general phenomenon: the idea that women should give even the most hopeless of “betas” a chance. That’s like men giving equal opportunity to ugly women.
the idea that women should give even the most hopeless of “betas†a chance.
No one’s saying you should go out with men you don’t find desirable, I’m saying it’s stupid to go out with men who radiated the obvious signs of psychopathology. Remember brain should rule the pussy, not the other way around.
Look what happened to poor Katie Piper. Very bad choice. If you had half a brain you could see that this guy was bad. Why such a pretty girl would “fancy” a thug like that is beyond me.
Sofia woman need to be able to do it all. Be feminine and be able to cut the head off a grissly attacking their man. Get it now?
Men are not expecting enough from woman that is the problem and yea they are not being held accountable for there descisions by life when they can just get a check from a man. Take away the free checks and let them struggle side by side with there men. Instead of having this see through fake equality.
Are woman so weak they can’t take a beating of course not. They are stronger than what is being made of them. Woman should be pissed that men are interfereing with the way they carry out there lives and relationships with men.
I mean they can take a good fuck right and passionate fucking can get pretty physical.
Sofia:
But, I was just pondering aloud a more general phenomenon: the idea that women should give even the most hopeless of “betas†a chance. That’s like men giving equal opportunity to ugly women.
Not exactly. The big difference is that the “betas” that lack confidence right now will gain experience and will become dominant once they’ve gotten enough positive feedback. Right now they’re stuck in a seemingly endless negative feedback loop. You have the power to take them out of that loop. Stop lying to them, give them a chance, and they’ll grow.
Ugliness on the other hand can’t be grown out of.
former would lead to an almost inhumane gender-neutral “paradiseâ€
i.e. 1950-2000 India
and the latter back to traditional modes of thought.
i.e. pre-1950s India.
EXPLAIN!!!
{ 3 trackbacks }