Women are stupid and amoral: a double feature

by Ferdinand Bardamu on September 29, 2009

in Sex

Out of Virginia, we have another case of a girl dead, along with her father, because she thought with her little head instead of her big one:

Before her death, Emma Niederbrock called Syko Sam the love of her life. His real name is Richard Samuel Alden McCroskey, the third. Online, he’s known as Syko Sam. In Prince Edward County, he’s being called a murderer.

Right now, he’s charged with the murder of Reverend Mark Niederbrock of Walkers Church in Pamplin, but more charges may follow. Police found a total of four bodies inside the Farmville home he was visiting.

We’re told one of the victims was Emma Niederbrock. She is the daughter of Pastor Mark Niederbrock and Longwood Associate professor Debra Kelley.

Several social networking sites and friends have posted online and told us in person they believe Emma was one of the four killed.  They say she had some sort of romantic relationship with McCroskey.

Emma’s friend Brandon Macreachan says she met McCroskey online. His MySpace page is filled with messages from her. One on posted on August 16 reads “only 19 days until I’m with the love of my life.” Then on August 19th a posting from Emma reads “I love you more than anything in this world.”

The amusing twist in this story is that Niederbrock KNEW that McCroskey was murderously fucked in the head (hat tip: Lawrence Auster) but wanted him anyway:

People who know McCroskey described him as him as a fan and promoter of the horrorcore, which is hip-hop music adapted to violent lyrics, but they said they did not believe he was violent.

One song attributed to McCroskey on one of his MySpace pages discusses committing murder in a rage, trying to get rid of the remains and driving a stolen vehicle.

Another story from View from the Right elaborates on the vagina-lubricating nature of McCroskey’s sociopathy:

McCroskey recorded songs that spoke of death, murder and mutilation under the name Syko Sam. His MySpace Web page said he has only been rapping for a few months but has been a fan for years of the horrorcore genre.

“You’re not the first, just to let you know. I’ve killed many people and I kill them real slow. It’s the best feeling, watching their last breath. Stabbing and stabbing till there’s nothing left,” McCroskey sings in “My Dark Side.”

Here’s a picture of the man himself:

And here’s one of Niederbrock (she’s the faux-redhead on the left):

Somewhere in America, a law-abiding teenage nerdling is flicking his man-switch and wondering why none of his female peers will touch him.

As I wrote in my piece on the slaying of Jasmine Fiore:

With economic emanicipation, women are free to chase men who make their pussies wet. The problem is that a disproportionate number of these men are inclined to violent and sociopathic behavior. For men like Ryan Jenkins, killing a woman and stuffing her mutilated corpse into a garbage bin is as second-nature as inhaling and exhaling. Because their thought processes are dominated by their crotches, women wander into relationships with these men without consideration of the consequences. The exact same qualities that make these men attractive to women is what makes them capable of abusing and murdering them. An additional part of women’s attraction to these brutes is the delusional belief that they can change them, that their vaginas have the magic power to turn a sociopath into a normal human being. When you tangle with a rattlesnake, you risk getting bit. Jasmine Fiore wandered into the rattlesnake’s lair, and it cost her her life.

Much like there will be more Sodinis in the future, there will be more Fiores. Akin to how the Aztecs demanded daily human sacrifices to appease their cruel gods, women like Jasmine Fiore are sacrifices to the false idol of sexual egalitarianism. And when the next girl dies, the chattering classes will wring their hands about how horrible it is, not stopping to consider the social structures that result in these women being fed to the meat grinder.

The only difference here is that Emma Niederbrock specifically sought out Richard McCloskey because he rapped about killing people. Unlike Fiore, she doesn’t have even the tiniest shred of an excuse. Her pussy lead her to knowingly embrace death. Oh, gina tingle, how many more females will thou kill?

On my Russia post two weeks ago, this exchange took place:

Thursday: I disagree entirely with any claim that women civilize men in any way.

Women are, on the whole, not impressed by wanton cruelty and bad manners, and prefer not to be promiscuous. As such, they function as a curb on male excesses necessary for civilization and thus they are indeed a civilizing influence on men, i.e. they help make men fit for engagement with the wider world, not just fit to be good fathers within the home.

I would agree that the influence of women alone is not enough to civilize young men, and that older men are required as well, but female standards for acceptable behaviour are part of what makes for civilization as well.

What we are witnessing in the colleges and in Moscow is the devloution of civilization back to a hunter-gatherer model.

No, hunter gatherers had much more egalitarian sexual behaviour. Remember, in hunter gatherer societies, everyone knows what everyone else is doing and women had to be concerned about who they became pregnant by. Our current society has some characteristics of hunter gatherer societies, but just as many of polygamous early agricultural societies.

Tarl: Women are, on the whole, not impressed by wanton cruelty and bad manners,

That must be why women in so many primitive societies (Native American, Central Asian) were put in charge of torturing the tribe’s prisoners…

Thursday: Who randomly kills/tortures small animals (vastly) more often? Rhetorical.

Whiskey: Men are far more sadistic. However, women are deeply and innately attracted to power, and often find sadistic men “hot.” Michael Vick, for example, does not want for female companionship. The same holds true for Johan Van Der Sloot, did hold true for the Petersons, Scott and Drew, and OJ.

There are a few examples of outright sadism in women like Elizabeth Bathory, but sadistic behavior by men has been no impediment to their sex lives. Indeed, by showing they have no controls over their behavior they exhibit “ultra-dominance” and women fall for that deeply. Example: Dracula in the Stoker Novel is shown abducting a peasant woman’s baby for his “brides” to devour, and later killing the woman when she comes to his castle to protest. This cruelty (a deliberate choice by Stoker) makes him in fact VERY sexy to the female audience (and characters).

Much of Stoker’s novel is about how men like the average solicitor hero can compete with a guy like Dracula, absolute and cruel ruler of a foreign land, for his own fiancee. The answer is the “beta revolution” of AJ Travis and such — other men so victimized band together to destroy Dracula. In reality, that approach fails for obvious reasons.

Nevertheless cruelty does at the very least not turn women off, and mostly arouses them if done in a way that projects power and dominance.

Men and women are equally beautiful, but in different ways, and equally as ugly, but in different ways. Men DO the sadistic things, and women find it arousing. The bad is balanced by the good, but it IS there, in both sexes, in equal but different measure.

Whiskey, as usual, is right on the money. Thursday is correct in saying that “kill[ing]/tortur[ing] small animals” and such crimes turn women off, but as the McCloskey case shows us, “wanton cruelty,” if pulled off in an domineering fashion, can and does make women hot. For further evidence of this, here’s Paul’s brilliant satire of the George Sodini case:

The lesson here is that if you’re going to be a sick, murderous bastard AND you want to bask in the company of women, it’s best to be alpha about your crimes. I anticipate that McCloskey will have more offers from women in the first week of his imprisonment than the average beta schmuck gets during his entire life.

And on the other side of the pond (hat tip: The Fifth Horseman), fugitive molester Roman Polanski has a(n) (un)likely ally – feminists:

I’ve had it with the Swiss.

I used to admire them — their clean, orderly, decorous way of life. Their stubborn independence and self-reliance. I forgave them for the years they never joined the United Nations, and even now, not joining the European Union.

But now, not only are the Swiss bankers caving in to America’s bullying, so are the Swiss police and Swiss jurisprudence.

Arresting Roman Polanski the other day in Zurich, where he was to receive an honorary award at a film festival, was disgraceful and unjustifiable. Polanski, now 76, has been living in France for over thirty years, and has been traveling and working in Europe unhindered, but the Swiss acted on an old extradition treaty with the U.S. and seized him! The Swiss Justice Ministry will decide whether to extradite him to the United States.

“Disgraceful and unjustifiable?” I’ll reiterate what Kate Harding wrote in her Slate article: Polanski raped a thirteen-year old girl. She didn’t seduce him or entice him into a lustful frenzy – he approached her, pumped her full of alcohol and Quaaludes, and proceeded to savage her barely pubescent orifices with his Polack cock until he came. Allah knows there are plenty of false rape cases, but this isn’t one of them. As TFH pointed out in his comment, the fact that feminists cheer on women who ruin men’s lives with bullshit rape claims while DEFENDING AN ACTUAL RAPIST is beyond comprehension – unless you understand how women think.

But there is more to this story. The 13-year old model “seduced” by Polanski had been thrust onto him by her mother, who wanted her in the movies. The girl was just a few weeks short of her 14th birthday, which was the age of consent in California. (It’s probably 13 by now!) Polanski was demonized by the press, convicted, and managed to flee, fearing a heavy sentence.

If the girl’s mother offered her up as a virgin sacrifice to Polanski’s penis, she deserves to be in jail as much as he does. The fact that no one thought to prosecute her is evidence of the anti-male nature of the legal system. And even so, that still doesn’t change the fact that our buddy Roman molested a girl who was not of age. Oh, and the age of consent in California is eighteen, which a 10-second Google search would have told you.

I met Polanski shortly after he fled America and was filming Tess in Normandy. I was working in the CBS News bureau in Paris, and I accompanied Mike Wallace for a Sixty Minutes interview with Polanski on the set. Mike thought he would be meeting the devil incarnate, but was utterly charmed by Roman’s sobriety and intelligence.

Allow me to translate: “Polanski made my pussy wet, therefore he deserves to walk free.”

I suggest, in the finest American tradition, we protest this absurd and deplorable act by smashing our cuckoo clocks, pawning our Swiss watches, and banning Swiss cheese and chocolate.

And let them yodel all they like.

I say we celebrate the Swiss’ righteous act by opening Swiss bank accounts (which is the lynchpin of their economy, anyway – not that a feminist would know that).

Joan Z. Shore’s open apology for evil is proof positive that men who can make the ladies’ ginas tingle can get away with anything in their eyes – rape, murder, woman-beating. Guys, take your pedestals and shove them where the wind breaks.

{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }

1 rf.interference September 29, 2009 at 7:15 am

s TFH pointed out in his comment, the fact that feminists cheer on women who ruin men’s lives with bullshit rape claims while DEFENDING AN ACTUAL RAPIST is beyond comprehension – unless you understand how women think.

How many feminist sites have you read commentary from? We rightly bust on the feminists all the time for taking one example and making a generalization (one man equals all men) and here you match them and cherry pick Joan Z. Shore. The commentors at Jezebel are almost all glad he’s been caught. Have you yet looked at this entry on Feministing linking to other feminist blogs? Not a defender of Polanski to be found.

2 Mike T September 29, 2009 at 7:21 am

You know, I could be wrong, but the **rape** charge against Polanski might have to do with the fact that he drugged her and deflowered her without her consent, not her age. Feminists demand the balls of college age men who screw drunk, grown women who are plenty old enough to know what might happen and deal with it, but I guess European artistes who deflower the underage daughters of psychotic female fans are the new protected class.

3 Grim September 29, 2009 at 9:12 am

You spoke too soon, tons of defenders now. All making bullshit reasons for defending him, but clearly aroused women who want to get it on with him.

4 dagezhu September 29, 2009 at 10:02 am

‘his Polack cock’

Polanski is not a Polack, he’s a Jew.

There’s a big difference, one that would have gotten your face beaten in if you said that to the wrong people.

He raped with his Jew cock, not with his Polack cock. Get it right.

5 Obsidian September 29, 2009 at 10:26 am

What is so interesting to me isn’t Whiskey’s analysis above, but his “low level misogyny” analysis that he occasionally gives, and that when putting the Syko Sam and Roman Polanski issues, among a great many others, together, is indeed something powerful to contemplate:

In a world where you pretty much have to be living in the Sherwood Forrest in a hollow log in order not to know what’s going on, more and more Men and Boys can’t help but get a clue as to the real Dark Side of Women and Girls…and act accordingly.

As Ferdi said in his recent review of Tucker Max’s new film, many young guys will eagerly ape him, with varying degrees of results.
But then there’s another cohort of guys, who will see how Women can and will operate, and will simply decide they aren’t worth it-and will not get involved with them in ANY way. Not opening doors for them. Not offering seats on the train or bus for them. Not deferring in anyway for Women, regardless of age or physical condition. Not caring if a Woman is robbed or raped, even in broad daylight and at a time when just about everyone has a cellie.

Its not the kind of over the top misogyny Hip Hop is often accused of, but a more sedate kind that is in a way, a kind of legit reaction to the world around these guys. Whiskey posits that this is the greatest danger, not the Ryan Jenkins, George Sodinis, Syko Sams and Tucker Max’s of the world.

Its kind of the difference between a Charlie Horse and a Stroke.

And I agree. The latter is much, much worse.

Oh, God.

The Obsidian

6 sideways September 29, 2009 at 2:39 pm

Of course feminists defend Polanski – he’s a Jew. As are most leading feminists. Feminism was never really about helping women, but disempowering Goy men so that Jews could take over.

BTW, I agree that if you wanna see real balls-to-the-wall GAME, study Tucker Max. Of course, most guys still can’t even come close to pulling off his extreme C&F, and would fail miserably in the attempt – but he obviously can. The key being that he can balance his extreme cocky a-holeness with extreme funny humor.

But lacking the latter, you cannot pull off the former.

7 sideways September 29, 2009 at 5:27 pm

More BS excuses from liberal Jews in Hollywood:

Whoopi Goldberg used her spot on ABC’s “The View” to try to clear up the record regarding the crime to which Polanski pleaded guilty in 1978.

“I know it wasn’t ‘rape’ rape. I think it was something else, but I don’t believe it was ‘rape’ rape,” said Goldberg, dismissing the possibility that Polanski had forced himself on anyone.

It’s not “rape” rape when you ply an underage girl with booze & qualuudes???

Here’s exactly what Whoopi is talking about: In March 1977, the 44-year-old Polanski fed a 13-year-old girl champagne and a sedative, forced himself on her and anally raped her, according to the girl’s grand jury testimony. He was convicted of a lesser charge — statutory rape — because he agreed to plead guilty.

8 The Fifth Horseman September 29, 2009 at 6:14 pm

I am seeing that a man learning Game can result in TWO different paths for a man.

1) The path to being a prolific cad.

2) Avoidance of women altogether.

Let me explain the second. A man with Game will have a lot of sex with a lot of women. Since feminists hate Game, what is the best way to counter it? Create a false-rape infrastructure, where more and more men get their lives ruined despite having done nothing wrong. Bingo. Game is countered, as a student of Game does not want to go to jail on false grounds. That would be a life even worse than David Alexander’s, who at least will never be in prison.

Thus, since Game gives men an accurate understanding of women, AND the false rape industry will introduce a lot of fear in men….. quite a few men will get sufficiently turned off and appalled, and will disengage from women altogether, and involuntarily drift into a David Alexander-type existence. This includes men who COULD otherwise be Alphas, but are too afraid of getting mixed up with the wrong woman.

These men would not be there by choice, but out of self-preservation in a false-rape society. Few ideas have more society-destroying potential as a false-rape economy with no due process. Famous men who were falsely accused of rape include Kobey Bryant, Ben Roethlisberger, and Tucker Carlson. That shows that this is not so rare of a phenomenon.

So don’t anyone tell me that sex technologies (3-D/VR and sexbots) have no market. In fact, they might have a role to play in saving society.

9 anon September 29, 2009 at 6:55 pm

“Bingo. Game is countered, as a student of Game does not want to go to jail on false grounds. ”

Sounds like a lot of fun for the women involved. When Game is outlawed, only outlaws will have Game.

10 Obsidian September 29, 2009 at 6:59 pm

Hmm. Interesting point, TFH. Very, very interesting point.

Hmm…

O

11 The Fifth Horseman September 29, 2009 at 7:02 pm

Perversely, that is the idea their hindbrains are driving towards.

Society would lash back long before this got too extreme (see my Four Horsemen of Male Vengeance). But between now and then, many, many men will see their lives ruined with great evil and cruelty.

12 Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Tech September 29, 2009 at 9:49 pm

Thus, since Game gives men an accurate understanding of women, AND the false rape industry will introduce a lot of fear in men….. quite a few men will get sufficiently turned off and appalled, and will disengage from women altogether, and involuntarily drift into a David Alexander-type existence.

Absolutely right. Other than the “David Alexander type existence” that partially describes me. (Please, don’t insult me by saying I have a “David Alexander type existence”.) I have my issues with Game mainly because too many of the proponents of game don’t deal with realities like the false rape industry. It’s not just the false rape industry either. It’s women who take your cum out of used condoms to impregnate themselves and get child support from you, etc.

It’s not that I don’t understand Game either. I understand it all too well, which is why I have chosen the path of being a ghost instead of practicing Game.

A David Alexander type existence is better than jail. It’s also better than 22 or more years of child support. And my existence is better than a David Alexander type existence.

So don’t anyone tell me that sex technologies (3-D/VR and sexbots) have no market. In fact, they might have a role to play in saving society.

I have been saying this for a long time.

13 The Fifth Horseman September 29, 2009 at 10:30 pm

Well Game absolutely does have valid uses within long-term relationships. Too many critics of Game deny that, even after proof is provided.

The false-rape industry makes LTR Game more important than PUA Game.

But yes, I can see many men choosing to be unavailable to women, due to there being too many bad apples. These are men who COULD be alphas, but are scared off by the predatory tactics that feminists are encouraging.

This is the 4th Horseman of the Four Horsemen of Male Vengeace.

I have been saying this for a long time.

YES. Too few people get this. If World of Warcraft is already addictive, and Internet porn already binds with the male brain in a way that makes him less intereted in real women, 3-D/VR sex will be 10X more addictive. This is bad for society, but more so for women than men.

At a minimum, when 8s are treated like 5s and 7s are treated like 4s, women will learn the meaning of ‘every action has an equal and opposite reaction’.

This is the 2nd Horseman of Male Vengeance.

So we have discussed the 2nd and the 4th here.

14 David Alexander September 30, 2009 at 12:01 am

Please, don’t insult me by saying I have a “David Alexander type existence”

As a quick disclaimer, while I am a quiet sub-human who spends most of his days at home, I’d suspect that had my dad not passed away, and my wages were a bit higher, I suspect that I’d probably do some more traveling and exploring. It’s always possible that I’d meet a few more people and make more friends*, but a real relationship is the bridge that will never be built.

*Alpha pump and dumps will ensure steady business…

15 HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS YO September 30, 2009 at 1:57 am

I’ll have to defend the young girl on this one. Just because he raps about violent stuff people doesn’t automatically make him a sociopathic killer, she likely had no way of knowing, at least based solely off his music, that he was a murderer. I have some personal perspective on this one, I am a death metal musician and fan. It’s very violent music in general, but most of the death metal fans I know, as well as my bandmates and I, are beta schnerdlingers using extreme music with violent themes as an outlet for aggression and bitterness. It’s not something that produces a “gina tingle” either, probably she was attracted to him because he was e-famous, not because he rapped about throwing hoes’ bodies in dumpsters or whatever.

16 Taras September 30, 2009 at 1:58 pm

All these slutty and amoral western women and girls think it’s cool and fun to shag anything that makes their vagina tingle. But what they don’t get is their fun does not come for free, it comes with consequences. One of them is that men will look at them as nothing but an easy roll in the hay. Two, men will also regard them with contempt, whether or not they sleep with said slutty skanks. Third, these women have relinquished their right to be treated as ladies, so when they get physical with men, they shouldn’t whine if they get the tar beat out of them. A woman who tries to take on a man should expect to be put in her place as a man. The likes of this shank whore and Jasmine Fiore I am utterly indifferent to, they are not women. They are walking cum dumpsters for every thug and criminal that crosses paths with them.

17 RF Interference October 4, 2009 at 4:59 am

I don’t think I did. The response is divided at best and many feminists are taking the correct stance on this. Sure, FMF founder Peg Yorkin came out in defence of Polanski but shortly afterwards the FMF itself has come out again.

The majority of writers and commentors at places at sites like Jezebel and Feministing are very much against Polanski and I don’t think it is accurate to claim the majority of feminists support the man.

18 nousername1 November 13, 2009 at 8:42 pm

The only reason any feminists support him is because he is a Jew and feminism is a Jewish intellectual movement designed to weaken society.
the Jews are parasites and parasites cannnot live inside of a healthy body.

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: