Ted Kennedy, 1932-2009.
Burn in hell, you leftist traitor.
It couldn't have happened to a nicer guy
About Ferdinand Bardamu
I run this joint. Follow me on Twitter here, on Google+ here, and friend me on Facebook here. Find out more about my current and upcoming books by clicking here.
Previous post: Swan song of the West: an analysis of "Walk, Don't Run"
Next post: College chick foolishness
{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }
This is the second post I’ve seen with this message. Was he really THAT bad?
He got away with negligent homicide, so I think so.
The 1965 immigration act was when the fatal leftist cancer metastasized in the United States. He was pushing for another one two years ago. He was that bad.
This guy was the sworn enemy of all white men. Still, I feel like I did when Dworkin died — yeah, yeah, ding-dong the witch is dead and all that, but the damage has already been well done.
I’ll paraphrase Pete Rose’s comments about Ty Cobb to state what I think about Ted’s death, “From what I know about Ted Kennedy, he isn’t looking down at us right now.”
@ FB:
Off topic, but you might interested in this:
Glamour has a picture of a big girl in their Sept issue (180 lbs, some serious stomach fat):
http://allday.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/08/23/2043473.aspx
The media: “It’s about time they show a REAL girl!”
Yes. He was that bad.
It never fails to amaze me how women think they can program men to find certain things attractive.
The woman in the photo is attractive, of course, but not gushingly so as portrayed in the comments. Certainly women who are thinner are “hotter” than she is. I know full well that this frustrates women, but it also frustrates men that women have a very narrow sense of what an attractive alpha is. We both face the same narrowness of definition, just in a different sense.
So we have Game, and they have makeup and dieting. *shrug*
OneSTDV: They probably shouldn’t be glorifying her little pooch (not like the readers of glamour need another excuse to gorge on bonbons), but come on, she’s gorgeous!
http://www.glamour.com/images/health-fitness/2009/03/0303-lizzie-miller_at.jpg
So, girl with a pooch and thick thighs = “real” girl?
What a bunch of BS. Women keep trying to shift the standard AWAY from young, fit, nubile girls.
Towards:
Fatter
Older cougars
MILFs with baggage
Etc, etc.
Yup, Ted Kennedy was a traitor to his own people, his country and his civilization. Living in Hyannisport, one never has to deal with the consequenses of opening up the door to the U.S. to the disfunctional cultures of the world.
Attractive, not gorgeous. If you saw her at the swimming pool (fresh in my mind because I just came back from the water park with my son), you would certainly think she was attractive, but there would be more attractive women there, too — in the real world, that is, not even in the modeling world. In the modeling world, she doesn’t really rate.
One hundred eighty five? That’s more than I weigh, ugh. She looks like a thirty year old that had a dozen kids. Why would any twenty year old have a built in fleshy loincloth unless she started cranking out the kids at twelve? American women have truly gone to the dogs.
I guess everyone has a type. I will amend my rating to super cute. She has an attractive “good girl” face, if that makes any sense, and I have a thing for thick legs. The gut picture was in poor taste, I can agree.
Ugh. I just watched a video clip of her on the today show or something talking about size norms and how she embraces being bigger. That’s the end of my internet crush.
She weighs 185? Yea, more than me too. F that. Cut back on the cheezburgers and lose the pooch, honey.
These poor figures on MODELS is not tolerated in more male-empowered areas like Eastern Europe. The fact it is becoming more tolerated here shows how low mens’ status here has fallen…
Yea, now she excuses her flaws as a political statement. *eyeroll*
I would agree she looks good from the neck up, poor from the gut down. Let’s just leave it at that and not take pride in our flaws, people.
The mass open-air celebrations of Ted Kennedy’s death in the begins in 5, 4, 3 . . .
Nah this kind of thing is a feminist “trial balloon”. Float a ‘larger but cute’ model out there, and see what the reaction is. If it is positive, then the fembots want more of this in the media, to try to shape our attraction (so they hope). If it’s negative, then no harm no foul, it was a small pic.
Is it possible that women could desire to look good for reasons other than attention from men? Glamour is marketed to women , not men. Does it always matter what men think is attractive? It’s not all about men.
Imagine the world populated by hetero women only. We’d still make ourselves attractive to each other. We’d still express our inner artists through clothing and makeup. The only difference I can imagine is little to no value for large breasts.
Is it possible that women could desire to look good for reasons other than attention from men? Glamour is marketed to women , not men. Does it always matter what men think is attractive? It’s not all about men.
Imagine the world populated by hetero women only. We’d still make ourselves attractive to each other. We’d still express our inner artists through clothing and makeup. The only difference I can imagine is little to no value for large breasts.
Sure, go ahead and knock yourselves out with your inner artists and pretend it doesn’t matter what men think. I don’t buy that, but some may. Sure Glamour is a women’s magazine, but so is Cosmo, and that one caters to how women interact with men. Glamour does, too. The protestation to the contrary is feminist claptrap.
Sure, in a planet populated by hetero women with no mates, women would still compete with each other for looks just for shits and giggles. Just like lesbians do, right?
Some of us are well beyond the claptrap, anony. Go and peddle your bullshit somewhere else.
OneSTDV,
This may not surprise you, given your HBD-informed interests, but I find Lizzie Miller quite attractive, and I’m usually not a big fan of White gals, *precisely* they tend to be a bit too thin and fragile for my tastes. But I don’t knock your or any other White guy’s tastes in this regard-many of you like em thin. More power to ya.
I just don’t the point in some of you going on and on about this thing; it reminds me of the SocialCons hatin’ on Game and just about everything else they can think of, lol. The bottomline is that the American Woman is heavier today, with no indication of turning back. 12-14 IS the average dress size for the American Woman now. That’s just a fact of life, and for my money, if it was that big a deal for me, I’d be on the first thing smokin’ to East Europe, where supposedly thin and pretty young White things exist (though, I’ve personally seen at least as many thick Helga looking chicks coming of EE as well; for some reason you White guys never get around to mentioning this).
Anyway, would love to get your HBD thoughts on why it seems that Black male sexual attractiveness tastes tend to run toward the Lizzie Millers of the world bodywise, and why White males, tend to go for really thin gals.
Holla back
The Obsidian
In regards to Lizzie Miller:
Other than the pouch which I find somewhat disgusting, I find her extremely attractive (especially her face).
I brought her up not because she’s unattractive, but because of the response of feminists. It’s interesting how they constantly try to shift the definition of beauty. And they keep trying to tell us that she is “real” and a bunch of other crap.
Almost no 180 lb with a pouch like that would be anywhere near her.
OneSTDV,
Let me just ask you outright: if you had the chance to tap Lizzie Miller, you mean to tell me that you wouldn’t?
Again, I really don’t get what all the fuss is about. Miller’s a good looking White gal, and the deal is, that her size is indeed the norm now for American Women. You can rail against that all you want (just like you rail against other stuff that you can’t do anything about) but it won’t change anything. Seems to me that those among us really have a hard time w/the size of American Women these days, really need to consider relocating, which, as a Brotha, I find fascinating-when it comes to getting away from Black folks, many of y’all don’t need much in the way of handwringing and convincing-yet, when it comes to this issue, all of the White boys complain, piss, bitch and moan, instead of merely deciding to get a passport and leaving for greener pastures.
Game, and Conservatism/Libertarianism, is about personal agency. Complaining about what feminists think you should be attracted to, or bemoaning American White Women getting a bit heavier, runs counter to this. If the gals aren’t to your liking here, there is nothing stopping any of us from going to where they indeed are.
Holla back
The Obsidian
If not for “lions of the left” like Kennedy and others, you would all be beholden to monotonous, monogamous marriages to women who age, without any recourse or access to other women. Something I’m sure some of you would consider “slavery”.
The left has provided you with sexual liberation and you can now vent your wanton ways on more than just one woman.
{ 3 trackbacks }