Coldequation alerted me to this discussion going on at View from the Right. Yours truly was quoted by one commenter:
Ian B. is really getting to the core of the value of game to the traditionalist movement. As Ferdinand Bandamu [sic] puts it:
“The goal of game is to make it possible for a man to attract women, and what he chooses to do with this ability is up to him.”
That’s it. Game is just the theory of what makes a man attractive to women, and it’s a theory that requires rejection of that basic tenet of liberalism, feminism. Generally speaking, rejecting other tenets of liberalism, while beneficial to society, has no obvious benefits to the individual who chooses to reject them, other than what satisfaction can be gleaned from knowing that you are right and everyone else is wrong. Game, on the other hand, provides distinct, individualized benefits to those who decide to reject feminism, and with it, liberalism. And that is why it could lead to the restoration of the social order that conservatives desire. Incentives matter.
Go check it out. Here are two other related VFR entries that are also worth reading.
{ 1 trackback }