Comments on: The one form of socialism that is verboten

By: You now have the right to get laid

You now have the right to get laid — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:37:15 +0000

[...] a redistribution of pussy to the sexually malnourished because of the gigantic overlap between socialism and feminism in the West: Now, guaranteeing free nookie for romantically underperforming men is consistent with the [...]

By: The sunny side of civilizational decline

The sunny side of civilizational decline — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:22:05 +0000

[...] Or to put it another way, my brain may loathe feminism, but my dick loves it. [...]

By: Game and gender hierarchy | In Mala Fide

Game and gender hierarchy | In Mala Fide — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:40:10 +0000

[...] It’s like I said before – men who can’t get laid, or have difficulty doing so, are little more than vermin to these scum. As Snark said, game is the nuclear bomb that is vaporizing the old order of supplicating [...]

By: Desi FPUA

Desi FPUA — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:05:29 +0000

”And, as most men would agree, they would rather be poor with lots of quality pussy than rich and celibate. ”

Poor men with lots of quality pussy? IMPOSSIBLE.

The rich, celibate? Another impossibility.

By: sestamibi

sestamibi — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:06:46 +0000

This is a real problem, as pointed out on many of the blogs in the Manosphere, but you are not the first to address the issue from the perspective of “sexual socialism”.

In the January, 1983 issue of Harper’s, Arthur S. Levine offered “Sex and the Democrats” Liberalism’s New Frontier”, lamenting the unequal distribution of sexual resources. Of course, he sidestepped the issue of such resources being unequally distributed to MEN only, since women can get laid anytime, anywhere, and his treatment was openly tongue-in-cheek.

It’s not so funny in 2009.

By: Charlotte hatte ich schon bestäubt « Sophisticus

Charlotte hatte ich schon bestäubt « Sophisticus — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:08:02 +0000

[...] wird steigen. Die FanatikerInnen in Berlin haben die Ursache dafür geschaffen. Mann kann vom Feminismus profitieren: “However, my dick loves feminism. I am a loner and could not stand being married or having [...]

By: MTG721

MTG721 — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:25:21 +0000

There is no contradiction in left-wing opposition to sexual socialism (male sharing of female evolutionary resources more equally via patriarchal monogamy, prostitution, etc).

Western leftism is inherently gynocentric, and essentially a large-scale form of revenge and gold-digging fueled by jealousy and self-hatred. What matriarchal socialists (women, feminists, liberals) have in common is a lust/hatred/envy towards male evolutionary resources (wealth, status, power), the system (patriarchal capitalism) that distributes most of it to a top few individuals, and the people (men) who create/support such a system. Women/feminists lust for elite male resources and hate those who have it (elite men and the elite women who can attract them), while liberal men secretly wish to be those elite men (not for sex, but for the wealth/power).

This is why matriarchal socialists are so opposed to affordable pussy (prostitution) and patriarchal monogamy (sexual socialism). Because matriarchal polygyny (sexual capitalism) is a powerful tool for attracting alpha male resources, for punishing and controlling beta males, for beating up on and destabilizing the patriarchal capitalist system they lust/hate/envy, and for holding the fate of civilization in their hands.

And this is why for MRA’s the issue of pussy price should be of top importance. Once you reduce the price of pussy and reduce the sexual wealth gap (sexual liberalism) among men via Game, marriage/relationship strike, prostitution, virtual porn, foreign women, men’s rights in all sex/relationship/marriage matters (note: returning to patriarchal monogamy/sexual socialism is NOT an effective way in a modern world with birth control, femiskanks and manginas) then you greatly reduce the hold matriarchal socialists have over men, capitalism and civilization.

By: j r

j r — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:25:07 +0000

feminism is about securing total, uncompromising autonomy for women in every sphere of life.

there is a problem with this definition. autonomy implies the freedom to do what you want and the responsibilty of living with your decisions. while most contemporary feminism is seeking the first, it is going to great pains to avoid the latter.

a better definition of the sort of leftist feminsm i abhor is: an attempt to have your cake and eat it too.

By: Black&German

Black&German — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:38:41 +0000

You guys are missing the whole point. There is such a thing as sexual socialism: marriage. It’s only now, that marriage is such a weak institution, that there are so many men living in celibacy. What we have now is a form of soft polygamy but it’s self-correcting.

By: z.g.

z.g. — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:36:33 +0000

Just talked to one of the socialist dudes.

Nope.

Once again I got to hear how good the sexual revolution was, and how good is it to have women free. from a guy who is living a sexless existence, but a guy who would have had an attractive wife, had it not been for that freedom.

so I asked, why am I not free not to pay taxes?

The dimwits answer: “Choose not to work, so you wont pay taxes. so yes, you have freedom to not pay taxes”

Does that mean, women should choose not to have any sex, in order to exercise their right to choose?

“No. That is different. ”

But of course it got into human rights all all other divergences without giving me any answer…

I told him all civilizations fell once the wife-husband relationship was broken.

what do these guys think?

That communist Russia was some free for all orgy on a dinner table with flowing chocolate?

Oh, and without words he accepted that “Socialism is good in theory but in life we can only make it work close to theory”

“Because you have the human factor”

“Yes. We need to educate everybody”

“you mean indoctrinate”

“No, educate”

“So socialism only works if everybody participates”

“-blank-”

“What if millions of people do not want socialism”

“-blank-”

“what’ll you do with guys like me”

“We need to educate…”

I’ll let these idiots’ brains cherish the sexual revolution, while their dicks are starving (they’re no MGOTW’ers), will let my brain go against the revolution&co, while my dick is enjoying young and nubile ladies.

Let the socialists try to explain me that wild capitalism in the sexual arena is fair…

My dick will be sipping single malt scotch, getting massaged by lips in the meantime. Viva la revolution!